User Panel
|
Lol, the underscores thought they had it nailed again.
So cocky and pompous every time for something that turns into a giant nothing burger. Trying the old "fling enough shit at the wall and something will stick" bullshit. |
|
Quoted:
The bold part is how I know you're stirring shit up. The vape thread, the Kavanaugh shit (apparently the Ruby Ridge shit...) you've built up quite the reputation for saying ridiculous things. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Top_Secret is banned, Hugh, well I find he doesn't really reply to what I said just uses it as a springboard to type his own opinions. I don't really know who else debates this thing from the other side. I get 95% of my news from this site. IRL I am surrounded by liberals that I can't even talk guns or any politics about. This place is the only place I can debate people. I start talking politics to my friends and they immediately want to change the subject. BS was smart, smarter than a lot of the folks I debate here. That's why so many of you hate him and want him banned, because he whooped your ass in debates. You don't want the other people banned because you like to smack them around, amirite? i.e. manipulative rather than fact and logic based. Which is all they CAN do, because they have chosen the losing side. |
|
Quoted:
"BS was smart, smarter than a lot of the folks I debate here. That's why so many of you hate him and want him banned, because he whooped your ass in debates. You don't want the other people banned because you like to smack them around, amirite?" That is a CoC 6 material right there, by the letter. However, not by the spirit of it's typical application in GD. It would have to be a particularly bad day for a mod to issue a warning. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The bold part is how I know you're stirring shit up. The vape thread, the Kavanaugh shit (apparently the Ruby Ridge shit...) you've built up quite the reputation for saying ridiculous things. Coc 6 Attacking or insulting a member in an effort to elicit a negative response. Harassing another member over past threads or posts
Continually following another member around the site to attack another member over posts they have made is considered harassment and will result in sanctions. The only exception to this rule is when the original referenced posts are related to the current thread's topic. That is a CoC 6 material right there, by the letter. However, not by the spirit of it's typical application in GD. It would have to be a particularly bad day for a mod to issue a warning. |
|
Quoted:
Lol, the underscores thought they had it nailed again. So cocky and pompous every time for something that turns into a giant nothing burger. Trying the old "fling enough shit at the wall and something will stick" bullshit. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It's more than a nothingburger though, it's T$ playing the dem media like a goddamn fiddle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol, the underscores thought they had it nailed again. So cocky and pompous every time for something that turns into a giant nothing burger. Trying the old "fling enough shit at the wall and something will stick" bullshit. The thing that gets me is why do they keep falling for it? Every Single Time!!! You would think they would have learned when they realized they bought into the Russian disinformation (dossier) --> because they wanted to believe it. Maybe they are just used to being in charge and making reality what they want it to be. Now that they can't, they are flailing their arms, hoping to land a punch. Who the hell knows. |
|
|
View Quote SAD! |
|
|
|
IC IG should subpoena all communications of the whistleblower for the past six months.
Not to target her (I have my suspicions), but rather, who she colluded with. Wait. It has already been monitored. Probably... And the cast of characters is drawn out... ETA: Replying to myself here, but seriously!!! People say DJT is a bumbling fool. How 'bout them apples!!! |
|
Quoted:
It's gonna be very interesting watching you guys squirm when something bad goes down and it is revealed that POTUS ignored his IC. I remember some of us being very pissed when it was revealed Obongo didn't take all of his PDB's and Clinton fucking up the IC so bad it resulted in 9/11. View Quote Gee I wonder why he wouldn't trust them. |
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
View Quote Well at least no child goat porn was involved this time. Just regular old fashioned bribery and nepotism. |
|
Quoted: That is how it smells, yeah. The thing that gets me is why do they keep falling for it? Every Single Time!!! You would think they would have learned when they realized they bought into the Russian disinformation (dossier) --> because they wanted to believe it. Maybe they are just used to being in charge and making reality what they want it to be. Now that they can't, they are flailing their arms, hoping to land a punch. Who the hell knows. View Quote I'm enjoying it. |
|
I'll bet Crazy Uncle Joe is one person that is not so happy about
|
|
Has it been mentioned the whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the conversation
|
|
Quoted:
Has it been mentioned the whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the conversation
View Quote It's kinda funny, but someone should be held accountable for this shit... |
|
Quoted:
Has it been mentioned the whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the conversation
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Damn, once more N_T's get egg on the face..just has to suck always being wrong.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Has it been mentioned the whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the conversation
|
|
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived
But Ukrainian officials tell me there was one crucial piece of information that Biden must have known but didn’t mention to his audience: The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Has it been mentioned the whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the conversation
View Quote "The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said." And there you have it. There is literally nothing to this other than a 100% unverified and more to the point unverifiable story. For those in the audience that want to keep believing "this is the one". Think for one minute. Those that want Trump gone, whether Democrats, Deep State, Never Trumpers or all three would start with THEIR BEST SHOT AT THIS and then start moving down the change of shit they can accuse him of. They wouldn't save 'the best for last'. So we are into...what....accusation number 5 of some impeachable wrong doings. Each and every time these nothing burgers are more ridiculous and more unsubstantiated. They are causing two things to happen. 1. TDS people are expecting a 'payoff'. They want their happy ending. This continual blue ball of Trumps gone this time is going to eventually have them turning on the Dems. They are going to eat their young. 2. ALL and I mean ALL the moderate voters are seeing this as a gang pile on week in and week out. Because the claims are becoming more and more ridiculous each time, they are tuning this out. Since the Dems are running a group of communist with the added feature of 'trying to out do each others commie free shit', they are effectively giving Trump a landslide win. The ONLY WAY TRUMP LOOSES the next election is if Trump fucks up himself. Hold out hope you never Trumpers you..... This is comical to watch in a sad sort of uncomfortable way. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived But Ukrainian officials tell me there was one crucial piece of information that Biden must have known but didn’t mention to his audience: The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/17/exclusive-2016-arizona-police-report-cocaine-pipe-found-in-car-rented-by-joe-bidens-son-hunter-biden-authorities-declined-to-prosecute/ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/01/empty-seat-hunter-biden-missed-fathers-campaign-launch-after-breitbart-news-investigation-into-crack-pipe-found-in-his-rental-car/ |
|
|
What the fuck ever happened to the news vetting their stories instead of just throwing shit out there?
|
|
Some Liberal heard a nothing that he shouldn't have heard and will be Arkancided when it doesn't pan out.
|
|
Omfg. I thought this would end up the standard nothingburger with the run of the mill retraction that no one will see.
But it looks like this may really blow up in creepy Joe's face. Good times! |
|
Quoted:
Omfg. I thought this would end up the standard nothingburger with the run of the mill retraction that no one will see. But it looks like this may really blow up in creepy Joe's face. Good times! View Quote I honestly think the "whistleblower" thought they had something or was desperate to get ahead of it and cover for ole Joe. Too bad so sad. |
|
View Quote |
|
So this "whistleblower" says they got the info second hand and not through anything relating to their work - which is convenient if you don't want to run afoul of certain classification related laws, but... means they're not entitled to whistleblower status in the first place.
And it's related to a topic where Biden has already admitted wrongdoing on camera - on an issue that the Ukrainian government previously tried to send someone over to hand-deliver information, but who couldn't come after the Obama admin yanked their visa. Yeah this totally wasn't setting up a leaker to tee up something damaging to the dems. lolgetfucked. |
|
|
|
Wait, did bullet_sponge get banned or a time out? link to violation?
|
|
Back in January 2016 all the Obama White House was interested in was Manafort even though the Ukrainians had Biden info and more on other Democrat corruption too...hmmm...
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/440730-how-the-obama-white-house-engaged-ukraine-to-give-russia-collusion |
|
Quoted:
Wait, did bullet_sponge get banned or a time out? link to violation? View Quote |
|
Quoted: I guess it depends on what you mean by "this". The whistleblower exists, independent of whatever media reporting is out there. It's the nature of the complaint that's still up in the air. View Quote I mean, a reasonable person might notice a _pattern_ to these allegations and after having observed how many of them turn out to be complete bullshit might be inclined to await the extraordinary proof that should accompany such an extraordinary claim. But it doesn't seem to be in _some_ people's nature to do that. And one is forced to wonder why, exactly, that is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: B_S (and some others) are VERY smart, but use that intelligence to debate subjects unfairly or even... dishonestly. Not saying "lies", but tactics which are not legitimate debate tactics. i.e. manipulative rather than fact and logic based. Which is all they CAN do, because they have chosen the losing side. View Quote BS and TS never seemed to engage in real debate. It was always calculated trolling. They wouldn't engage any arguments they couldn't spin. They were a waist of time to engage. |
|
Quoted: BS and TS are smart, the others not so much. BS and TS never seemed to engage in real debate. It was always calculated trolling. They wouldn't engage any arguments they couldn't spin. They were a waist of time to engage. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Works for me... But even with regards to 702... impugning the IC and the workers in is like slapping someone you don't know then wondering why they aren't on your side in an argument. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
But now they are gone. Peace and tranquility will return to GD. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: BS and TS are smart, the others not so much. BS and TS never seemed to engage in real debate. It was always calculated trolling. They wouldn't engage any arguments they couldn't spin. They were a waist of time to engage. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Sure would be nice if he'd lock em up for a change, instead of cursing their crookedness while doing little to nothing about it. Trump has the authority. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Works for me... But even with regards to 702... impugning the IC and the workers in is like slapping someone you don't know then wondering why they aren't on your side in an argument. View Quote Anyways, 702 should be gutted. We can only guess at what goes on, since its all classified. But from what I've seen, its a violation of the 4th amendment. I don't buy the argument a search hasn't taken place if a LEO hasn't typed it into the computer (IE vacuuming up all data isn't a search). |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.