User Panel
|
|
|
|
Quoted: https://www.bizzbuzz.news/economy/stage-set-for-reincarnation-of-ins-vikrant-aircraft-carrier-1163049 India's first indigenous aircraft carrier INS Vikrant has a displacement of 43,000 tonnes, while China's Fujian has a displacement of more than 80,000 tonnes. The USS Gerald R Ford, the largest warship in the world, has a displacement of 112,000 tonnes https://thefederal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ins-vikrant.jpg View Quote Good for them. |
|
|
Quoted: Imagine the smell. View Quote Having just survived a 15 hour flight with countless Indian asses in my face, bumping into me and waking me, and having the longest toilet lines I've EVER seen on an airplane, and being told by a pretty Asian flight attendant not to use a particular toilet with a horrified look on her face... ...I don't have to imagine |
|
How far is India able to project their aircraft carrier? Is it blue water capable?
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Could not agree more. India has made it known to us that they don't appreciate being treated like fly-over country. Joke about call centers and river shitting all you want, but they would be a hell of an ally if things got "real". View Quote We've fucked over India for decades. They don't trust us, they generally do whatever is best for themselves. There's a reason they still purchase Russian oil and Russian weapons, it's because when the chips were really down (and they needed us) we decided to cozy up with Pakistan for some retarded reason |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Serious question. Besides the different looks, what’s the difference between ours and ski jumps? What’s the reason other countries use them instead of our style? View Quote A ski jump has no moving parts, so it's simpler, cheaper and easier to both build and maintain. The drawback is that it doesn't allow for the same large loadouts as a cat carrier, just like a VTOL fighter/attack bird can't carry as much as one that uses a cat or nice, long runway. If the planes are too heavy, and there's no cat, they can't get up sufficient speed in such a short launch to stay in the air, so they have to launch lighter than their full potential payload, and that weight has to come out of the ordnance or fuel they can carry. You can launch fully loaded birds with nothing in the gas tank, if you can refuel them immediately once they're in the air, or you can launch fully fueled birds with barely anything on the hardpoints. A ski jump carrier can't do both. |
|
Every one making jokes about the poop decks. Relax its really hot and sunny out so it will dry out fast and not gonna smell bad.
|
|
Quoted: Having just survived a 15 hour flight with countless Indian asses in my face, bumping into me and waking me, and having the longest toilet lines I've EVER seen on an airplane, and being told by a pretty Asian flight attendant not to use a particular toilet with a horrified look on her face... ...I don't have to imagine View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Imagine the smell. Having just survived a 15 hour flight with countless Indian asses in my face, bumping into me and waking me, and having the longest toilet lines I've EVER seen on an airplane, and being told by a pretty Asian flight attendant not to use a particular toilet with a horrified look on her face... ...I don't have to imagine No surprise there, in some of these third world countries, they don’t have toilets, so they don’t know how to use them. That leads to messes on the toilet, not inside it. |
|
Quoted: india will be the Italy of ww3. Incompetent and utterly humiliated lol View Quote Of all the Asian navies they have a blue water one and have the ability to project power beyond their shores. I really wouldn’t look down on them to much since they have a long history as a sea faring power that had a shit load of British influence in how they operate. This kind of comment is akin to how some in America look at the French military, like the Indian navy the French military is probably the best equipt and powerful maybe outside of the poles right now in Europe. |
|
Quoted: A ski jump has no moving parts, so it's simpler, cheaper and easier to both build and maintain. The drawback is that it doesn't allow for the same large loadouts as a cat carrier, just like a VTOL fighter/attack bird can't carry as much as one that uses a cat or nice, long runway. If the planes are too heavy, and there's no cat, they can't get up sufficient speed in such a short launch to stay in the air, so they have to launch lighter than their full potential payload, and that weight has to come out of the ordnance or fuel they can carry. You can launch fully loaded birds with nothing in the gas tank, if you can refuel them immediately once they're in the air, or you can launch fully fueled birds with barely anything on the hardpoints. A ski jump carrier can't do both. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Serious question. Besides the different looks, what’s the difference between ours and ski jumps? What’s the reason other countries use them instead of our style? A ski jump has no moving parts, so it's simpler, cheaper and easier to both build and maintain. The drawback is that it doesn't allow for the same large loadouts as a cat carrier, just like a VTOL fighter/attack bird can't carry as much as one that uses a cat or nice, long runway. If the planes are too heavy, and there's no cat, they can't get up sufficient speed in such a short launch to stay in the air, so they have to launch lighter than their full potential payload, and that weight has to come out of the ordnance or fuel they can carry. You can launch fully loaded birds with nothing in the gas tank, if you can refuel them immediately once they're in the air, or you can launch fully fueled birds with barely anything on the hardpoints. A ski jump carrier can't do both. Thanks for the explanation, it led me to even further reading. Didn’t realize they didn’t use a cat to launch. |
|
Quoted: We've fucked over India for decades. They don't trust us, they generally do whatever is best for themselves. There's a reason they still purchase Russian oil and Russian weapons, it's because when the chips were really down (and they needed us) we decided to cozy up with Pakistan for some retarded reason View Quote Yeah every country looks out for their own best interest. Most of the time that doesn't dovetail with US interests and vice versa. Of course, under obama we threw the british and israelis under the bus in favor of iran and pakistan mainly because someone in the DNC is getting paid. I wouldn't trust the US either. |
|
Good!
The Indians freaking can't stand the Chinese right now after that brush they had a few years back. We need our allies in Asia to step up and should be encouraging all of them to do so. |
|
Quoted: Look at the trajectories India and the USA are on. Which country is actually trying to improve? Which country is imploding from the inside? View Quote India is still operating rail systems installed by the British. Building a shitty carrier doesnt is mean they've made it. The country has huge problems. |
|
Good for them. It's in our (those of us in the world that ain't China) best interests for this thing to be successful and combat capable.
|
|
|
And they're basically drifting it in the OP pic. Where's my Bender saying "neat" jpeg?
|
|
Quoted: Of all the Asian navies they have a blue water one and have the ability to project power beyond their shores. I really wouldn’t look down on them to much since they have a long history as a sea faring power that had a shit load of British influence in how they operate. This kind of comment is akin to how some in America look at the French military, like the Indian navy the French military is probably the best equipt and powerful maybe outside of the poles right now in Europe. View Quote The French domestic is generally fine but India has had numerous domestic production scandals. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: F18s need cats for useful loadouts. It'll be STOVL or STOBAR models of something. View Quote Fail. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/boeing-hard-sells-f-a-18-super-hornet-to-indian-navy-for-ins-vikrant-122082401031_1.html The Indian Navy is looking at the F/A-18 Super Hornet and Rafale M. Boeing / The Navy sent a couple of F-18's to India for them to check out. Two U.S. Navy F/A-18E Super Hornets completed multiple takeoffs from the runway at Hansa Naval Base (in the state of Goa, India) that is equipped with a Ski-Jump type inclined ramp, which emulates the flight deck of the Indian aircraft carrier INS Vikrant. Testing included roll-in and fly-in arrestments, as well as performance flights, in a variety of weights in the air-to-air, air-to-ground, and air-to-surface configurations, meeting the Indian Navy test requirements. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Fail. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/boeing-hard-sells-f-a-18-super-hornet-to-indian-navy-for-ins-vikrant-122082401031_1.html The Indian Navy is looking at the F/A-18 Super Hornet and Rafale M. View Quote Super Hornet launching from a ski jump carrier is either low on fuel or low on ordnance, compared to off a cat carrier. I don't even know if the super bug can launch from a ski jump with a full combat load, regardless of the gas onboard. Does India have sufficient aerial refueling capability to launch fully-armed (as fully as they can launch?) super bugs and top them up before they make their way to the op area? Can the Vikrant arrest and recover fully-armed CAP super bugs if they don't expend any ordnance during their mission? If the super bug can actually operate fully off a ski jump carrier, why are we (USA) even bothering with EMALS? |
|
Quoted: Super Hornet launching from a ski jump carrier is either low on fuel or low on ordnance, compared to off a cat carrier. I don't even know if the super bug can launch from a ski jump with a full combat load, regardless of the gas onboard. Does India have sufficient aerial refueling capability to launch fully-armed (as fully as they can launch?) super bugs and top them up before they make their way to the op area? Can the Vikrant arrest and recover fully-armed CAP super bugs if they don't expend any ordnance during their mission? If the super bug can actually operate fully off a ski jump carrier, why are we (USA) even bothering with EMALS? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Fail. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/boeing-hard-sells-f-a-18-super-hornet-to-indian-navy-for-ins-vikrant-122082401031_1.html The Indian Navy is looking at the F/A-18 Super Hornet and Rafale M. Super Hornet launching from a ski jump carrier is either low on fuel or low on ordnance, compared to off a cat carrier. I don't even know if the super bug can launch from a ski jump with a full combat load, regardless of the gas onboard. Does India have sufficient aerial refueling capability to launch fully-armed (as fully as they can launch?) super bugs and top them up before they make their way to the op area? Can the Vikrant arrest and recover fully-armed CAP super bugs if they don't expend any ordnance during their mission? If the super bug can actually operate fully off a ski jump carrier, why are we (USA) even bothering with EMALS? This is a temporary solution. The MIG-29Ks they have are proving to be unreliable, at least according to India. They built another knock off of their Russian carrier and the F/A-18 or Rafale will fill an as an intern solution for the time being. The future is a carrier with a catapult and an Indian stealth fighter. I assume there will be some big delays but they want this stuff ready buy 2028. Will probably be the mid 30s though. How good will their own stuff be? Probably better than Russian. India has essentially banned importing of most military equipment. They're buying small amounts of foreign designs for the time being but they are working towards in country designs for everything going forward. |
|
View Quote Cool video at link. |
|
Will there be so many people loaded on the flight deck that a plane wont be able to take off or land?
|
|
So I can assume it's hull number will be CV-711? It will be able to handle refueling and re armament as well as a large slurpie with a roller jerkie to go. Thank you, come again.
|
|
|
|
Interesting is the wake behind the ship. That appears to be a really tight turn for a carrier.
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Good for them. More allies with more capabilities surrounding China can't be a bad thing. Why do you think India is an ally? When did they become our friend? They've been an ally. We've been trading and negotiating with enemies (Pakistan, Iran, etc) so they do the same. We've made some extremely stupid geopolitical decisions, that maybe if we were privy to specifics, we'd understand. As it is, we look two-faced. |
|
|
Quoted: Interesting is the wake behind the ship. That appears to be a really tight turn for a carrier. View Quote Tiny ship. Probably set like that from the factory. They are on the phone with customer support right now trying to straighten it out. They probably left a styrofoam cube on the rudder when they took the ship out of the box. |
|
Quoted: Yep, and they have actually fought the Chinese in recent years. View Quote https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/09/01/russia-stages-scaled-down-war-games-with-china-india-a78694 Russia launched large-scale joint military exercises with China, India and several other countries in the Far East on Thursday, although they involved far fewer troops and hardware than in previous years amid Moscow’s six-month invasion of Ukraine. A total of 50,000 troops will take Vostok-2022 (East-2022) war games — compared to 300,000 who participated in the same drills four years ago. Vostok-2022 will also involve 140 warplanes and 5,000 pieces of military equipment, a fraction of the 1,000 military aircraft and 36,000 equipment seen in 2018. “This is going to be the smallest strategic-level exercise in years because the entire ground forces potential is engaged in operations in Ukraine,” Konrad Muzyka, director of the Poland-based Rochan military consultancy, told Reuters. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.