User Panel
Quoted: Didn't I say in the beginning it was a scenario (=hypothesis)? Of course the Russians will deny. The same way Ukrainians will keep saying it's all Russia's fault. And we know both lie. Only way to find out the truth is having an unbiased and reputable organization investigating it. Problem is, who is left out there that can be trusted? And if that organization is really unbiased and reputable, will either side allow them in the area to investigate? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Read my post again: civilians wearing plain clothes, some of them with armed bands, mixed up and coming towards you. What do you do? Also, arm bands and clothes are easily removed for photo ops. Dead do not talk (but vote democrat). Do you have any evidence that this occurred? The Russians denied it as did all other parties. Didn't I say in the beginning it was a scenario (=hypothesis)? Of course the Russians will deny. The same way Ukrainians will keep saying it's all Russia's fault. And we know both lie. Only way to find out the truth is having an unbiased and reputable organization investigating it. Problem is, who is left out there that can be trusted? And if that organization is really unbiased and reputable, will either side allow them in the area to investigate? Look at the raw information coming out for yourself dude. |
|
Quoted: I cannot fathom why you guys are so willfully blind on this subject. GD believes the election was stolen with 100% sincerity with significantly less proof than we have that Russia committed these atrocities. Hell, even the most argumentative guy on your side finally admitted that "obviously Russia did it". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Sigh. You keep leaving out the important bits. When you look at the aggregate information, which includes: Sat pics of piles of bodies from the time of Russian occupation pics on the ground of people shot, hands tied, raped, tortures eye witness accounts intercepted comms when you take ALL THAT INFORMATION TOGETHER and THEN you apply common sense, there's really only one realistic conclusion. Everything else is a ridiculous stretch. If it was ONE piece of evidence from the above, then it should be held in question. I appreciate your willingness to be civil, something that is not common here (especially on topics like this). But we aren't going to agree. I've made my point, you've made yours. GD believes the election was stolen with 100% sincerity with significantly less proof than we have that Russia committed these atrocities. Hell, even the most argumentative guy on your side finally admitted that "obviously Russia did it". |
|
Quoted: You mean Ukraine wanting their soil and oil back? Yeah, you’d do the same. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So we have the most corrupt invading the third most corrupt. The third most corrupt backed by the US, which shows how bad we are in the corruption scale. And if the oil bribe was in soil taken by Russia, it helps explaining how desperate some are to take that area back. You mean Ukraine wanting their soil and oil back? Yeah, you’d do the same. I meant the politicians and their sons getting the payout here in the US. Not only the oil but also the money laundering operations to take the bribes out of there. Quoted: Quoted: Of course Putin wants Ukraine back under his fold. Besides a buffer state it's a big natural resources and industrialized nation that will help with the crumbling Russian's GDP (and Putin's future as well). "Illegal genocides post 1945" isn't much of a thing, isn't it? After all, commies alone murdered more than 100 million in that period, which makes what's going on in Ukraine to pale in comparison. Not that the crowd backing Ukraine cares much about that also. Just look at the "covid pandemic", "my-body-my-choice abortions", legalized drugs deaths and so on. So, neither side cares about the thousands dying there. It's small change for them and both will use it for their own benefits. Morality has been thrown out of the window by those people a very long time ago. Don’t get confused on domestic politics. This issue stands on its own. It's not possible to not get domestic politics involved when the top elements of the US government are involved in blatant corruption over there. And at the same time sinking the American nation into a similar shithole. So, both are tied together. The problem are the priorities. Americans should be protesting and crying to get America restored, not looking mesmerized at the other side of the pond while their country sinks (fast). |
|
Quoted: We could get into a whole thing about this but the south attacked the north. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I remember in school about that happening in 1861. Some on the same people going bat shit over Russia in the Ukraine were in the Civil War threads all in favor of the North and especially in favor of what Sherman did, We could get into a whole thing about this but the south attacked the north. |
|
|
Quoted: I meant the politicians and their sons getting the payout here in the US. Not only the oil but also the money laundering operations to take the bribes out of there. It's not possible to not get domestic politics involved when the top elements of the US government are involved in blatant corruption over there. And at the same time sinking the American nation into a similar shithole. So, both are tied together. The problem are the priorities. Americans should be protesting and crying to get America restored, not looking mesmerized at the other side of the pond while their country sinks (fast). View Quote That was Russian money. The Russians were working with the democrats. |
|
Quoted: Most of these people are unable to see the hypocrisy of establishing an impossible burden of proof and standard of objectivity when the source is telling them something they don't want to hear, and then applying a much less stringent (or entirely nonexistent) burden of proof and standard of objectivity when the source is telling them something that they want to hear. It's utterly and completely ridiculous. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Sigh. You keep leaving out the important bits. When you look at the aggregate information, which includes: Sat pics of piles of bodies from the time of Russian occupation pics on the ground of people shot, hands tied, raped, tortures eye witness accounts intercepted comms when you take ALL THAT INFORMATION TOGETHER and THEN you apply common sense, there's really only one realistic conclusion. Everything else is a ridiculous stretch. If it was ONE piece of evidence from the above, then it should be held in question. I appreciate your willingness to be civil, something that is not common here (especially on topics like this). But we aren't going to agree. I've made my point, you've made yours. GD believes the election was stolen with 100% sincerity with significantly less proof than we have that Russia committed these atrocities. Hell, even the most argumentative guy on your side finally admitted that "obviously Russia did it". That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: Attached File |
|
Quoted: That was Russian money. The Russians were working with the democrats. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I meant the politicians and their sons getting the payout here in the US. Not only the oil but also the money laundering operations to take the bribes out of there. It's not possible to not get domestic politics involved when the top elements of the US government are involved in blatant corruption over there. And at the same time sinking the American nation into a similar shithole. So, both are tied together. The problem are the priorities. Americans should be protesting and crying to get America restored, not looking mesmerized at the other side of the pond while their country sinks (fast). That was Russian money. The Russians were working with the democrats. So they were getting double-dips? No wonder Putin wants a part of that pie. |
|
Quoted: So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. |
|
|
Quoted: That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/36058/B10D4C1D-9F1A-4BA0-89EA-036730D31BAE-230-2340960.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Sigh. You keep leaving out the important bits. When you look at the aggregate information, which includes: Sat pics of piles of bodies from the time of Russian occupation pics on the ground of people shot, hands tied, raped, tortures eye witness accounts intercepted comms when you take ALL THAT INFORMATION TOGETHER and THEN you apply common sense, there's really only one realistic conclusion. Everything else is a ridiculous stretch. If it was ONE piece of evidence from the above, then it should be held in question. I appreciate your willingness to be civil, something that is not common here (especially on topics like this). But we aren't going to agree. I've made my point, you've made yours. GD believes the election was stolen with 100% sincerity with significantly less proof than we have that Russia committed these atrocities. Hell, even the most argumentative guy on your side finally admitted that "obviously Russia did it". That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/36058/B10D4C1D-9F1A-4BA0-89EA-036730D31BAE-230-2340960.JPG Only a fool would discount all the evidence staring them in the face just because even idiots like in that meme are smart enough to see the very obvious truth. You're not smart for ignoring the truth, just because a stopped clock is right twice a day. |
|
Quoted: That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/36058/B10D4C1D-9F1A-4BA0-89EA-036730D31BAE-230-2340960.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted: This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. |
|
Quoted: That is a slice of Putins pie. He took Donbass and gave the democrats a cut of the action in order to block weapons sales to Ukraine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So they were getting double-dips? No wonder Putin wants a part of that pie. That is a slice of Putins pie. He took Donbass and gave the democrats a cut of the action in order to block weapons sales to Ukraine. Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. |
|
Quoted: You aren't trying to figure out the truth. You are looking for things that support your worldview. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/36058/B10D4C1D-9F1A-4BA0-89EA-036730D31BAE-230-2340960.JPG You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. |
|
|
Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That's what happens when once-reputable sources lose all their credibility. Trust isn't something that is found in supermarkets. It gets worse when one side is backed by groups and people widely known for having no ethics and morals and being corrupt to their core, and what they want is widely known. It gets much worse when the folks trying to figure out the truth are slandered and the folks accusing them have nothing to show but to say that it's "Russian propaganda". So, once more: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/36058/B10D4C1D-9F1A-4BA0-89EA-036730D31BAE-230-2340960.JPG You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. You are not reading what we are posting. The raw info is there for you to see for yourself. You don't have to trust the media. |
|
Quoted: Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. Only because you are ignoring all the facts. |
|
Quoted: Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. View Quote I made an error that’s significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you’re talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. |
|
|
Quoted: I made an error that's significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you're talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. I made an error that's significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you're talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. |
|
Quoted: No, we're not ascribing causality and motivation to a specific party where the evidence is unclear. We are not the party defending our (intellectually honest) position with religious fervor. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Only because you are ignoring all the facts. No, we're not ascribing causality and motivation to a specific party where the evidence is unclear. We are not the party defending our (intellectually honest) position with religious fervor. If the evidence was unclear I would agree, and with many other situations in the war I DO agree. In this particular scenario there is VERY little doubt as to what happened. You keep denying it, it's been spelled out for you multiple times. I suspect you haven't even SEEN the evidence have you? It's not religious at all, again, I'd be more prone to be sympathetic to the Russians for obvious reasons but I'm not...also for obvious reasons that you guys have blinded yourselves to. |
|
Quoted: Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. Extreme times, extreme measures. Both sides lie. Therefore, the truth is hidden in between. It will not come out by itself since both want to hide it. |
|
Quoted: Extreme times, extreme measures. Both sides lie. Therefore, the truth is hidden in between. It will not come out by itself since both want to hide it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. |
|
Quoted: I made an error that’s significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you’re talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. I made an error that’s significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you’re talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. If I recall correctly, you are not totally wrong. For I what I recall that Burisma thing has been going for many years, including when the Putin puppet was there. When the west puppet was installed it continued. That's what I understood you meant and joked about Putin also wanting part of that pie. So, you mean that the Burisma thing is entirely Russian? What was the part that Trump wanted Ukraine's help to investigate that was immediately turned into that "Russian collusion" by the democrats? That one was Ukraine's corruption. |
|
Quoted: If I recall correctly, you are not totally wrong. For I what I recall that Burisma thing has been going for many years, including when the Putin puppet was there. When the west puppet was installed it continued. That's what I understood you meant and joked about Putin also wanting part of that pie. So, you mean that the Burisma thing is entirely Russian? What was the part that Trump wanted Ukraine's help to investigate that was immediately turned into that "Russian collusion" by the democrats? That one was Ukraine's corruption. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. I made an error that's significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you're talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. If I recall correctly, you are not totally wrong. For I what I recall that Burisma thing has been going for many years, including when the Putin puppet was there. When the west puppet was installed it continued. That's what I understood you meant and joked about Putin also wanting part of that pie. So, you mean that the Burisma thing is entirely Russian? What was the part that Trump wanted Ukraine's help to investigate that was immediately turned into that "Russian collusion" by the democrats? That one was Ukraine's corruption. |
|
Quoted: What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. I suspect you may be overthinking the problem if you are struggling with a definition of Russian propaganda. |
|
Quoted: Here's the problem. You can't do any of your own research in any meaningful way. You have no access to classified information and I doubt that you have the skill set of the combined thousands of people that are doing analysis on the open source data and aggregating and cross-checking their findings. If you only rely on what you can figure out as an individual, your lack of access to information and lack of skills and time is going to prevent you from making valid decisions about anything. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. Yes, and I never claimed it. What I have been saying is that I doubt anything that comes from either side. If had at least part of the capability you described we wouldn't be having this discussion (or maybe would if our opinions diverged). |
|
Quoted: No, it was asking Zelensky to investigate Hunter's connection with Russia-centric businesses and oligarchs and withholding military aid to Ukraine as leverage. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ukraine also pays the democrats and even employs their kids. Putin wants his "fair share. I made an error that's significant. Burismas operations were in Crimea, not Donbass. Russia considers Crimea to be a part of the Russian Federation itself. Burisma was founded by an ally of Yanukovytch, Russias man in Kiev. After Russia invaded Crimea they paid the Bidens a cut of their new oil wealth to block transfers of weapons to Ukraine. While Ukraine is corrupt, the specific corruption you're talking about is Russian corruption. Foreign source. If I recall correctly, you are not totally wrong. For I what I recall that Burisma thing has been going for many years, including when the Putin puppet was there. When the west puppet was installed it continued. That's what I understood you meant and joked about Putin also wanting part of that pie. So, you mean that the Burisma thing is entirely Russian? What was the part that Trump wanted Ukraine's help to investigate that was immediately turned into that "Russian collusion" by the democrats? That one was Ukraine's corruption. Got it. So, if Trump was asking for an investigation of Russian corruption and Zelensky was against Russia: 1) why didn't he help? 2) how could the "Russia collusion" story get any substance, since it was investigating Russian corruption? |
|
Quoted: Yes, and I never claimed it. What I have been saying is that I doubt anything that comes from either side. If had at least part of the capability you described we wouldn't be having this discussion (or maybe would if our opinions diverged). View Quote |
|
Quoted: Extreme times, extreme measures. Both sides lie. Therefore, the truth is hidden in between. It will not come out by itself since both want to hide it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You are not reading what I am posting. Besides my view in this case is that both sides blatantly lie. Therefore, I'll do my own research before trusting anything coming from either side. Somehow, this view is extreme. I don't get this at all. Extreme times, extreme measures. Both sides lie. Therefore, the truth is hidden in between. It will not come out by itself since both want to hide it. Once again, this is why you look at the whole picture of ALL the info available. Not the media, though there can be useful info there too, but the actual raw data coming out that has also been analyzed by others. It's not THAT hard. You keep ignoring this, and I know you keep ignoring me because I've proven you wrong so thoroughly, and so many times. You shouldn't have to be told the same thing so many times. |
|
Quoted: I suspect you may be overthinking the problem if you are struggling with a definition of Russian propaganda. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. I suspect you may be overthinking the problem if you are struggling with a definition of Russian propaganda. Just want to set expectations and terms & definitions since it appears that anything that goes against the "free Ukraine!" narrative is labeled as "Russian propaganda". |
|
Quoted: Got it. So, if Trump was asking for an investigation of Russian corruption and Zelensky was against Russia: 1) why didn't he help? 2) how could the "Russia collusion" story get any substance, since it was investigating Russian corruption? View Quote |
|
Quoted: Got it. So, if Trump was asking for an investigation of Russian corruption and Zelensky was against Russia: 1) why didn't he help? 2) how could the "Russia collusion" story get any substance, since it was investigating Russian corruption? View Quote Trump wanted an investigation reopened after it was concluded. Zelenskyy apparently isn’t a puppet and said it was closed. |
|
Quoted: Just want to set expectations and terms & definitions since it appears that anything that goes against the "free Ukraine!" narrative is labeled as "Russian propaganda". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. I suspect you may be overthinking the problem if you are struggling with a definition of Russian propaganda. Just want to set expectations and terms & definitions since it appears that anything that goes against the "free Ukraine!" narrative is labeled as "Russian propaganda". "free Ukraine narrative" it's pretty pathetic that a so called freedom loving American would phrase it like that. God forbid people root for an underdog country that was unjustifiably invaded. As far as definitions, lets say anything Russian state sponsored to start with...you know, like RT. |
|
Quoted: Just want to set expectations and terms & definitions since it appears that anything that goes against the "free Ukraine!" narrative is labeled as "Russian propaganda". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I thought about who touches the information. In RT's case, since it belongs to the Russian state, any information will pass by a censor's desk at some point, if not multiple times, between someone writing it and it being published. In the satellite imagery case, who touched that data between the photos/videos were taken and then they reached the intended audience? So, I think we are all talking about chain of custody. And, because of that, "regular dudes on the street" have to swallow any bs that's spit on them? Gee, wouldn't it be nice if there were mechanisms by which to validate information without relying on official sources? Definitely. And that's what we are discussing here. And just because sometimes there's no agreement about the information credibility, it does not mean that is it "Russian talking points" as some try to imply. If it's RT, it's literally Russian talking points. Dancing around it or glossing over that fact doesn't make it go away. You have been told a 100% truth that this is the most well documented conflict in history and you are making an active choice to ignore a wealth of high confidence OSINT work in favor of headlines that line up with what you choose to believe. If you go back, no one is questioning that RT is the Russian side, or propaganda. What is being questioned is the information presented to the American public, which also comes from very questionable sources. Therefore, as OP suggested, using RT to help figuring out where the truth really is might not be a bad idea. I haven't gone to that website yet but might take a look. The truth will be hidden somewhere between what the MSM and its cohorts have been vomiting and what Russia and China have been spitting. The difficult part is filtering the useful stuff from the trash. You are crafting a strawman from a false dichotomy that the only sources of information available are MSM and whatever its positional antithesis might be. You should not do that. I used "MSM and cohorts" as a general descriptive. I agree there are many more sources in between the two extremes. The big problem is how to find them. Even in this very website it is not easy to figure out what is real and what is not, mostly when there's a group hellbent on painting anyone and anything that do not flow with "free Ukraine!" narrative as "Russian propaganda". I read a couple posts talking about threads that try to impartially discuss what's going on using intelligence and military expertise. Where are they? Some that were started to discuss the backstage of that war were quickly trashed by that nonsensical discussion. Those threads aren't anywhere you can get at them because the torrent of idiocy in GD drove them elsewhere where there are better noise filters and better contributors. GD should probably take a break to ponder that dynamic. So, that leaves only GD, which will keep doing its "GD thing" to discuss this, since the filtered threads aren't accessible to everyone. And, for the obvious reasons, the discussions will keep going all over template. What makes me curious is why some members, usually the same ones, tend to show up in the threads that try to discuss the whys and other issues that do not go with the official "free Ukraine!" narrative and trash them with "Russian propaganda", "Putin lovers", etc. and nothing useful to contribute. That males those members no different than those fanatical leftists and just show a desperation to hide the actual truth. Let alone that their credibility is already trashed. However, for me, the worst part is that all this only diverts the attention from much worse things happening at home and if they are not fixed ASAP the US will go the same way of Ukraine, if not worse. This may come as something of a shock, but people might actually get trashed with "Russian propaganda" when they are echoing actual Russian talking points. What is "Russian propaganda"? Suddenly, the media, politicians, and even some once-reputable government agencies that lie through their teeth are telling the truth (i.e. "free Ukraine!" narrative). I once even got a member telling me that "soros was doing a good thing now by going against Putin". So, can I say that "Putin is doing a good thing for going against soros"? The latter is currently a much bigger problem for the US than the first, as well as several of the US politicians backing Ukraine. Furthermore, a many people once criticizing and censoring others because of "Russian collusion" ended-up exposed as the ones doing it. I suspect you may be overthinking the problem if you are struggling with a definition of Russian propaganda. Just want to set expectations and terms & definitions since it appears that anything that goes against the "free Ukraine!" narrative is labeled as "Russian propaganda". Roland's response notwithstanding, your continued use of "free Ukraine! narrative" is pointedly dismissive. We're using the term "Russian propaganda" in a literal sense in that people are, deliberately or otherwise, taking stances and repeating talking points that directly align with Russian statements or interests. |
|
Quoted: Trump wanted an investigation reopened after it was concluded. Zelenskyy apparently isn’t a puppet and said it was closed. View Quote Zelenksy didn't reopen the investigation because it would have revealed the Kolomoisky, Zelensky and Biden ties. Biden got the original investigator, Shokin, fired. Zelensky is a puppet for Kolomoisky, US is now sanctioning Kolomoisky to put pressure on Zelensky to cover up sleepy joe's connection. Kolomoisky is behind Azov battalion that fought Russian separatists..... |
|
Quoted: Roland's response notwithstanding, your continued use of "free Ukraine! narrative" is pointedly dismissive. We're using the term "Russian propaganda" in a literal sense in that people are, deliberately or otherwise, taking stances and repeating talking points that directly align with Russian statements or interests. View Quote https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-cant-independently-confirm-atrocities-ukraines-bucha-official-says-2022-04-04/ I don't want to accuse you or anybody else of saying things that you're not. But is the link above representative of Russian propaganda? |
|
Quoted: https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-cant-independently-confirm-atrocities-ukraines-bucha-official-says-2022-04-04/ I don't want to accuse you or anybody else of saying things that you're not. But is the link above representative of Russian propaganda? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Roland's response notwithstanding, your continued use of "free Ukraine! narrative" is pointedly dismissive. We're using the term "Russian propaganda" in a literal sense in that people are, deliberately or otherwise, taking stances and repeating talking points that directly align with Russian statements or interests. https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-cant-independently-confirm-atrocities-ukraines-bucha-official-says-2022-04-04/ I don't want to accuse you or anybody else of saying things that you're not. But is the link above representative of Russian propaganda? I'm assuming that is a leading question, but this statement doesn't seem to line up with "We didn't do it, must have been the Ukrainians." ""We're seeing the same imagery that you are. We have no reason whatsoever to refute the Ukrainian claims about these atrocities -- clearly, deeply, deeply troubling," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "The Pentagon can't independently and single handedly confirm that, but we're also not in any position to refute those claims." |
|
Quoted: https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-cant-independently-confirm-atrocities-ukraines-bucha-official-says-2022-04-04/ I don't want to accuse you or anybody else of saying things that you're not. But is the link above representative of Russian propaganda? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Roland's response notwithstanding, your continued use of "free Ukraine! narrative" is pointedly dismissive. We're using the term "Russian propaganda" in a literal sense in that people are, deliberately or otherwise, taking stances and repeating talking points that directly align with Russian statements or interests. https://www.reuters.com/world/pentagon-cant-independently-confirm-atrocities-ukraines-bucha-official-says-2022-04-04/ I don't want to accuse you or anybody else of saying things that you're not. But is the link above representative of Russian propaganda? Didn't even read it did you |
|
Quoted: Zelenksy didn't reopen the investigation because it would have revealed the Kolomoisky, Zelensky and Biden ties. Biden got the original investigator, Shokin, fired. Zelensky is a puppet for Kolomoisky, US is now sanctioning Kolomoisky to put pressure on Zelensky to cover up sleepy joe's connection. Kolomoisky is behind Azov battalion that fought Russian separatists..... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Trump wanted an investigation reopened after it was concluded. Zelenskyy apparently isn’t a puppet and said it was closed. Zelenksy didn't reopen the investigation because it would have revealed the Kolomoisky, Zelensky and Biden ties. Biden got the original investigator, Shokin, fired. Zelensky is a puppet for Kolomoisky, US is now sanctioning Kolomoisky to put pressure on Zelensky to cover up sleepy joe's connection. Kolomoisky is behind Azov battalion that fought Russian separatists..... You'll believe this 100% but not all the other evidence in Bucha. Classic. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Of course I did. I know exactly what it says. They're basically saying they can neither confirm nor deny. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Didn't even read it did you Of course I did. I know exactly what it says. They're basically saying they can neither confirm nor deny. That's a pretty significant rewording of it. |
|
|
Quoted: Of course I did. I know exactly what it says. They're basically saying they can neither confirm nor deny. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Didn't even read it did you Of course I did. I know exactly what it says. They're basically saying they can neither confirm nor deny. What it says is that DoD won't be the one to confirm or deny. Not their lane. |
|
|
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. What's pathetic is all the big brains who keep saying "if xxx says it's true then it must be false" You need a grade school level class in logic and rhetoric. |
|
|
Quoted: Trump wanted an investigation reopened after it was concluded. Zelenskyy apparently isn’t a puppet and said it was closed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Got it. So, if Trump was asking for an investigation of Russian corruption and Zelensky was against Russia: 1) why didn't he help? 2) how could the "Russia collusion" story get any substance, since it was investigating Russian corruption? Trump wanted an investigation reopened after it was concluded. Zelenskyy apparently isn’t a puppet and said it was closed. Attached File |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.