User Panel
Quoted:
How many post 86 machine guns do you see being shot by average people? Can you even talk about owning a post 86 illegal machine gun on this site? Nope. How about bump stocks, are people still using them left and right or are they destroyed/buried in someone's backyard? You don't think moving the drinking age from 18 to 21 had any effect? I heard it used to be mayhem around my town back in the 80s. IE people passed out drunk on the sidewalks. Not anymore, moving it to 21 had a huge effect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Unless you're willing to put a gun to someone's head (and some countries do just that) you can't regulate people into behaving a certain way. The only way is through education and information and people wanting to make better/healthier choices. And even then there will be a group that just doesn't care. And that's on them. You don't think moving the drinking age from 18 to 21 had any effect? I heard it used to be mayhem around my town back in the 80s. IE people passed out drunk on the sidewalks. Not anymore, moving it to 21 had a huge effect. |
|
Quoted:
11 people have probably died this year from simply eating. View Quote |
|
So in 20 years there were no cases of any side effects, illness or deaths from nicotine vaping.
Then recently in the last few months a handful of cases, with matching side effects pop up, many of them saying that they use THC liquids and now people blame vaping with or without nicotine for the problems?? When did these problems arise and what patterns are seen? Why weren't there any cases before aside from one case where a male used THC and developed similar symptoms? You cannot blame Nicotine vaping if all arrows point in one direction, especially with the amount of time there were no issues with millions of users. The numbers of deaths that arent related to THC - if they are truthful, could be caused by a long list of variables, not vaping in general. I find this ridiculous that people so easily cast aside data for emotions. Those that are freaking out about vaping and are watering at the mouth to blame vaping, I hope that your not in any position of power over anyone else or make any calls/regulations/reports that effect people other than yourselves. |
|
Quoted:
Nope. No evidence. Just thinking outloud and considering all the possibilities. But am I right in that all the "THC vs no THC" information has come from simply surveying the sick people? If so, do you not believe, or are you unwilling to accept, that there are many situations where someone might lie when asked "Have you used any THC vape products?"? I won't rule out the possibility that some of these people have truly only used nicotine products. But I also won't rule out the possibility that people lied. Why would you, or anyone, rule out the possibility that people lied, when in this specific situation, there could be many reasons why someone would lie. A teen's parent is in the room when the doctor asks about THC, an adult is worried about work related or legal repercussions, etc. These are valid possibilities. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If I've read correctly so far, all the info on whether or not people have used THC products or only nicotine, have come from surveying the sick people? If so, that leaves the possibility that they simply lied. Not wanting to admit you've used THC products, wouldn't be unrealistic, for various reasons. But am I right in that all the "THC vs no THC" information has come from simply surveying the sick people? If so, do you not believe, or are you unwilling to accept, that there are many situations where someone might lie when asked "Have you used any THC vape products?"? I won't rule out the possibility that some of these people have truly only used nicotine products. But I also won't rule out the possibility that people lied. Why would you, or anyone, rule out the possibility that people lied, when in this specific situation, there could be many reasons why someone would lie. A teen's parent is in the room when the doctor asks about THC, an adult is worried about work related or legal repercussions, etc. These are valid possibilities. 90% of the problem has been tied to use of an illicit product. Not too much of a stretch to suspect that the other people with the problem are falsely denying use of said illicit product. IIRC, this was an issue with AIDS in the early days of diagnosing it when it wasn't totally understood. Other then statistical anomalies, the vast majority of cases were in some way tied back to IV drug use or homosexual activity. Things that a lot of people denied participating in when being diagnosed, causing a shitload of fear and wild goose chases. I remember the widespread fears of being able to catch AIDS from mosquito bites, toilet seats and the like that partially came from this. |
|
Quoted: Nope. No evidence. Just thinking outloud and considering all the possibilities. But am I right in that all the "THC vs no THC" information has come from simply surveying the sick people? If so, do you not believe, or are you unwilling to accept, that there are many situations where someone might lie when asked "Have you used any THC vape products?"? I won't rule out the possibility that some of these people have truly only used nicotine products. But I also won't rule out the possibility that people lied. Why would you, or anyone, rule out the possibility that people lied, when in this specific situation, there could be many reasons why someone would lie. A teen's parent is in the room when the doctor asks about THC, an adult is worried about work related or legal repercussions, etc. These are valid possibilities. View Quote The youngest, a 19 yr old male and 21 yr old female both admitted to THC use. The other people are older. Here's the people who didn't admit to THC 67 year old male 35 year old male 42 year old female 44 year old male You think they're scared of admitting THC use in front of their parents? Neat theory though. |
|
|
Quoted:
So in 20 years there were no cases of any side effects, illness or deaths from nicotine vaping. Then recently in the last few months a handful of cases, with matching side effects pop up, many of them saying that they use THC liquids and now people blame vaping with or without nicotine for the problems?? When did these problems arise and what patterns are seen? Why weren't there any cases before aside from one case where a male used THC and developed similar symptoms? You cannot blame Nicotine vaping if all arrows point in one direction, especially with the amount of time there were no issues with millions of users. The numbers of deaths that arent related to THC - if they are truthful, could be caused by a long list of variables, not vaping in general. I find this ridiculous that people so easily cast aside data for emotions. Those that are freaking out about vaping and are watering at the mouth to blame vaping, I hope that your not in any position of power over anyone else or make any calls/regulations/reports that effect people other than yourselves. View Quote I will say that on the surface it does look like a mostly THC vaping problem. The majority of the cases involve THC vaping. Going through the case files though, there are people claiming to not have used THC and only nicotine vape and have the same looking lung problems. Looks like chemical burns with foaming macrophages, says the latest study I linked to earlier. I'll go on Google Scholar later and try and learn more about the difference between full and partial tobacco smoke. I did a quick search earlier and didn't find much with comparing vape to smoke, but I did see some things on full vs filtered smoke. I still think this theory is the most plausible. Its the only one I've heard that doesn't rely on respondants lying, and explains all the cases. Also the soybean carrier oil theory (lipid pneumonia) that vitamin E liquids are made of, can't explain all the cases according to the latest study. They didn't notice lipid laden macrophages and called into question that as a marker of this disease. |
|
Quoted:
Sure its possible, but low probability. Did you look at page 22, 23 and 24? Doesn't seem like people are being dishonest. Lots of people admitting to THC use. These aren't the cops, after all. The youngest, a 19 yr old male and 21 yr old female both admitted to THC use. The other people are older. Here's the people who didn't admit to THC 67 year old male 35 year old male 42 year old female 44 year old male You think they're scared of admitting THC use in front of their parents? Neat theory though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Nope. No evidence. Just thinking outloud and considering all the possibilities. But am I right in that all the "THC vs no THC" information has come from simply surveying the sick people? If so, do you not believe, or are you unwilling to accept, that there are many situations where someone might lie when asked "Have you used any THC vape products?"? I won't rule out the possibility that some of these people have truly only used nicotine products. But I also won't rule out the possibility that people lied. Why would you, or anyone, rule out the possibility that people lied, when in this specific situation, there could be many reasons why someone would lie. A teen's parent is in the room when the doctor asks about THC, an adult is worried about work related or legal repercussions, etc. These are valid possibilities. The youngest, a 19 yr old male and 21 yr old female both admitted to THC use. The other people are older. Here's the people who didn't admit to THC 67 year old male 35 year old male 42 year old female 44 year old male You think they're scared of admitting THC use in front of their parents? Neat theory though. I think this is going to end up some weird mix of contamination, vaping habit, prior/current combustion smoking habits, etc. |
|
Quoted: They are more likely to have professional careers that probably don't tolerate THC use though. I think this is going to end up some weird mix of contamination, vaping habit, prior/current combustion smoking habits, etc. View Quote |
|
|
Good to know that after vaping for almost 9 years with zero problems that it's super bad for you...
|
|
Quoted:
Sure its possible, but low probability. Did you look at page 22, 23 and 24? Doesn't seem like people are being dishonest. Lots of people admitting to THC use. These aren't the cops, after all. The youngest, a 19 yr old male and 21 yr old female both admitted to THC use. The other people are older. Here's the people who didn't admit to THC 67 year old male 35 year old male 42 year old female 44 year old male You think they're scared of admitting THC use in front of their parents? Neat theory though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Nope. No evidence. Just thinking outloud and considering all the possibilities. But am I right in that all the "THC vs no THC" information has come from simply surveying the sick people? If so, do you not believe, or are you unwilling to accept, that there are many situations where someone might lie when asked "Have you used any THC vape products?"? I won't rule out the possibility that some of these people have truly only used nicotine products. But I also won't rule out the possibility that people lied. Why would you, or anyone, rule out the possibility that people lied, when in this specific situation, there could be many reasons why someone would lie. A teen's parent is in the room when the doctor asks about THC, an adult is worried about work related or legal repercussions, etc. These are valid possibilities. The youngest, a 19 yr old male and 21 yr old female both admitted to THC use. The other people are older. Here's the people who didn't admit to THC 67 year old male 35 year old male 42 year old female 44 year old male You think they're scared of admitting THC use in front of their parents? Neat theory though. Even if people lying is completely ruled out, the one question that remains to be answered by doctors, researchers or people in this thread...Why have a tiny fraction of vapers experienced such drastic illnesses or death, in such a short period of time, when hundreds of thousands or even millions of others, have had no issue with their ecig use, even when used for many YEARS longer than those who got sick or died? There is clearly a common denominator that no one has figured out yet. |
|
Quoted: I wasn't aware of the ages. Just tossing ideas out there. Could be a spouse in the room, kid in the room, general taboo surrounding illicit drug use, whatever. Even if people lying is completely ruled out, the one question that remains to be answered by doctors, researchers or people in this thread...Why have a tiny fraction of vapers experienced such drastic illnesses or death, in such a short period of time, when hundreds of thousands or even millions of others, have had no issue with their ecig use, even when used for many YEARS longer than those who got sick or died? There is clearly a common denominator that no one has figured out yet. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
You don't think moving the drinking age from 18 to 21 had any effect? I heard it used to be mayhem around my town back in the 80s. IE people passed out drunk on the sidewalks. Not anymore, moving it to 21 had a huge effect. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Maybe people have been lying or concealing it from their doctors thinking it couldn't possibly be the very healthy safe vape. So they don't tell their doctor and these problems have been around but only recently has all the attention gotten people thinking about it as a possibility when diagnosing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I wasn't aware of the ages. Just tossing ideas out there. Could be a spouse in the room, kid in the room, general taboo surrounding illicit drug use, whatever. Even if people lying is completely ruled out, the one question that remains to be answered by doctors, researchers or people in this thread...Why have a tiny fraction of vapers experienced such drastic illnesses or death, in such a short period of time, when hundreds of thousands or even millions of others, have had no issue with their ecig use, even when used for many YEARS longer than those who got sick or died? There is clearly a common denominator that no one has figured out yet. That theory also ignores the fact that metric shit tons of people have been using ecigs without issue, for a decade or more. So I guess we're back to square one. |
|
Quoted: That would mean there would have been a bunch of "mystery lung illnesses", as they've been calling this, all along. And if they all had similarities, it would have most likely been picked up on. That theory also ignores the fact that metric shit tons of people have been using ecigs without issue, for a decade or more. So I guess we're back to square one. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
How do you know there haven't? I posted an article of a vape death back in 2011 (in the UK) that they're just now classifying as a vape death. As you guys have been saying, its a very low percentage. Or is it rampant as you say now? I'm confused. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: That would mean there would have been a bunch of "mystery lung illnesses", as they've been calling this, all along. And if they all had similarities, it would have most likely been picked up on. That theory also ignores the fact that metric shit tons of people have been using ecigs without issue, for a decade or more. So I guess we're back to square one. As for your last question; An incredibly low number of people who have developed lung illnesses, have been confirmed to have used ecigs. This has all happened within a relatively short period of time. But you keep ignoring the fact that the amount of people who have gotten sick/died that use ecigs, is astronomically disproportionate to the amount of people who have used ecigs for many, many, many years, and have had no issues as of yet. What are you theories about that? The numbers and timelines simply don't add up. |
|
|
Quoted: I suppose there could have been. Numerous people dying or getting sick from "mystery lung illnesses" would draw attention, though. Then people would start looking for common denominators. As for your last question; An incredibly low number of people who have developed lung illnesses, have been confirmed to have used ecigs. This has all happened within a relatively short period of time. But you keep ignoring the fact that the amount of people who have gotten sick/died that use ecigs, is astronomically disproportionate to the amount of people who have used ecigs for many, many, many years, and have had no issues as of yet. What are you theories about that? The numbers and timelines simply don't add up. View Quote |
|
A story written by NBC News about the vaping illnesses tells the tale of pesticides found in black market THC carts as another possible cause of the illnesses.
I have copy & pasted a portion of it below. you can read it in it's entirety HERE ...seeking answers, NBC News commissioned one of the nation's leading cannabis testing facilities to test a sampling of THC cartridges — 18 in all — obtained from legal dispensaries and unlicensed dealers.
The findings were deeply troubling. Of the three purchased from legal dispensaries in California, the CannaSafe testing company found no heavy metals, pesticides or residual solvents like Vitamin E. But 13 out of the other 15 samples from black market THC cartridges were found to contain Vitamin E. CannaSafe also tested 10 of the unregulated cartridges for pesticides. All 10 tested positive. The products all contained myclobutanil, a fungicide that can transform into hydrogen cyanide when burned.... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
A story written by NBC News about the vaping illnesses tells the tale of pesticides found in black market THC carts as another possible cause of the illnesses. I have copy & pasted a portion of it below. you can read it in it's entirety HERE View Quote |
|
Quoted: Machine guns, bump stocks and alcohol are all legal and regulated. Nobody is advocating for heroin dispensers in elementary schools. View Quote |
|
16 out of what 30 million vapers. And how many of the 16 were using it for pot and other things.
|
|
Quoted:
A story written by NBC News about the vaping illnesses tells the tale of pesticides found in black market THC carts as another possible cause of the illnesses. I have copy & pasted a portion of it below. you can read it in it's entirety HERE View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
A story written by NBC News about the vaping illnesses tells the tale of pesticides found in black market THC carts as another possible cause of the illnesses. I have copy & pasted a portion of it below. you can read it in it's entirety HERE ...seeking answers, NBC News commissioned one of the nation's leading cannabis testing facilities to test a sampling of THC cartridges — 18 in all — obtained from legal dispensaries and unlicensed dealers.
The findings were deeply troubling. Of the three purchased from legal dispensaries in California, the CannaSafe testing company found no heavy metals, pesticides or residual solvents like Vitamin E. But 13 out of the other 15 samples from black market THC cartridges were found to contain Vitamin E. CannaSafe also tested 10 of the unregulated cartridges for pesticides. All 10 tested positive. The products all contained myclobutanil, a fungicide that can transform into hydrogen cyanide when burned.... It isn't that product's fault, it is Juul and their marketing fruit flavors to children that are the cause of this. |
|
Quoted:
You're arguing both sides, saying numerous people dying from a mystery illness, then saying its an incredibly low number. So what is it? A lot or a little? Or does it depend on what point you're trying to make? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I suppose there could have been. Numerous people dying or getting sick from "mystery lung illnesses" would draw attention, though. Then people would start looking for common denominators. As for your last question; An incredibly low number of people who have developed lung illnesses, have been confirmed to have used ecigs. This has all happened within a relatively short period of time. But you keep ignoring the fact that the amount of people who have gotten sick/died that use ecigs, is astronomically disproportionate to the amount of people who have used ecigs for many, many, many years, and have had no issues as of yet. What are you theories about that? The numbers and timelines simply don't add up. You've deleted part of the quote tree. If my stance on this issue is unclear to you or you think I'm trying to argue both sides (I'm not), let me simplify my view on this issue: An infinitesimal number of people, when considering the number of ecig users, have had their deaths/illnesses linked to vaping. It doesn't even raise an eyebrow for me, given the timelime of ecig use since it began and the amount of vapers who've had no issue with prolonged use. Edit: Also to add the fact that the vast majority of cases involved black market THC vapes with whoknowswhat in them. Again, what is your theory about the fact that so many long term users of ecigs have never had any health issues? |
|
Quoted: Whent the drinking age was 18, a ton of people in high school drank because a lot of high school seniors are 18. But how many high school students know someone over 21, other than a brother or sister? It definitely cut down on the underage drinking. Didn't stop it, but definitely had an impact. https://i2.wp.com/www.alcoholproblemsandsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/alcohol_abuse_chart3_students.png?ssl=1 View Quote |
|
i think that I wanna start vaping because I think that its cool
|
|
Quoted: The "numerous people dying/getting sick" part was in response to your "Well maybe people have been getting sick and dying from vaping, but the cases just haven't been blamed on vaping yet" post from earlier in that quote tree. You've deleted part of the quote tree. If my stance on this issue is unclear to you or you think I'm trying to argue both sides (I'm not), let me simplify my view on this issue: An infinitesimal number of people, when considering the number of ecig users, have had their deaths/illnesses linked to vaping. It doesn't even raise an eyebrow for me, given the timelime of ecig use since it began and the amount of vapers who've had no issue with prolonged use. Edit: Also to add the fact that the vast majority of cases involved black market THC vapes with whoknowswhat in them. Again, what is your theory about the fact that so many long term users of ecigs have never had any health issues? View Quote In some posts you've mentioned that this epidemic is of few numbers and insignifcant. "Why have a tiny fraction of vapers experienced such drastic illnesses or death, in such a short period of time, when hundreds of thousands or even millions of others, have had no issue with their ecig use, even when used for many YEARS longer than those who got sick or died? There is clearly a common denominator that no one has figured out yet." Then in other posts, you seem to argue the opposite. How so many vapers getting sick would be noticed. "Numerous people dying or getting sick from "mystery lung illnesses" would draw attention, though. Then people would start looking for common denominators." |
|
I've stated my view on this subject. It's clear for anyone following along in this thread who isn't being deliberately obtuse.
This isn't an epidemic of any proportion, despite the media, government and fear mongers doing their best to make it out to be. It's a group of people who got their hands on some tainted THC juice (and a handful of people who "only used nicotine", supposedly), out of quite possibly millions of users. So...meh. |
|
My humble understanding is the first time most people take a drag on a cigarette, cigar, joint, etc, it is pretty common to cough. Either the nic or the smoke is a bit of a throat irritant. Vaping does the same thing, kind of. The higher the nic, the more the throat hit. I use 3mg, 6 is annoying to me. Pretty much nobody does greater than 12mg of direct lung freebase nic. Nic salt is slightly less irritating - so most people can handle about 3x the nic. I think part of this is also because salt nic is generally used in mount to lung devices - which are much more restrictive and have much smaller “puffs”.
That all said, during the last year or so, low nic salts have come out for the direct to lung divides. —— Direct to lung is how you normally breath, also what an inhaler does. Mouth to lung is more how you smoke. You draw smoke into your mouth by sucking with your mouth - then inhale (or not) —- I look forward to the source of this to be honestly identified. I had no problem with Texas passing tobacco 21 - which will also be the death of confidence store flavored cartridges and juice. But honestly - the flavoring is all marketing. People don’t buy this stuff just because they like the flavor. |
|
Quoted:
I've stated my view on this subject. It's clear for anyone following along in this thread who isn't being deliberately obtuse. This isn't an epidemic of any proportion, despite the media, government and fear mongers doing their best to make it out to be. It's a group of people who got their hands on some tainted THC juice (and a handful of people who "only used nicotine", supposedly), out of quite possibly millions of users. So...meh. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I've stated my view on this subject. It's clear for anyone following along in this thread who isn't being deliberately obtuse. This isn't an epidemic of any proportion, despite the media, government and fear mongers doing their best to make it out to be. It's a group of people who got their hands on some tainted THC juice (and a handful of people who "only used nicotine", supposedly), out of quite possibly millions of users. So...meh. Nearly four in five people who suffered vaping-related lung injury reported using products that contained THC, alone or combined with nicotine, prompting health officials to declare THC-packed cartridges often purchased on the black market "may play a role" in the outbreak. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said of 514 injured patients who reported details on their use of vaping devices and e-liquids, 77% used products that contained THC, alone or combined with nicotine. Only 16% of injured vapers said they used nicotine-only products. Lets not forget that marijuana is about the most detectable drug in the world. A $10 piss test could determine if they did marijuana in the last 30 days. |
|
Quoted: Ok lets address that https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2019/09/27/cdc-reports-most-injured-vapers-used-products-contain-thc/3787731002/ Lets not forget that marijuana is about the most detectable drug in the world. A $10 piss test could determine if they did marijuana in the last 30 days. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
My humble understanding is the first time most people take a drag on a cigarette, cigar, joint, etc, it is pretty common to cough. Either the nic or the smoke is a bit of a throat irritant. Vaping does the same thing, kind of. The higher the nic, the more the throat hit. I use 3mg, 6 is annoying to me. Pretty much nobody does greater than 12mg of direct lung freebase nic. Nic salt is slightly less irritating - so most people can handle about 3x the nic. I think part of this is also because salt nic is generally used in mount to lung devices - which are much more restrictive and have much smaller “puffs”. That all said, during the last year or so, low nic salts have come out for the direct to lung divides. —— Direct to lung is how you normally breath, also what an inhaler does. Mouth to lung is more how you smoke. You draw smoke into your mouth by sucking with your mouth - then inhale (or not) —- I look forward to the source of this to be honestly identified. I had no problem with Texas passing tobacco 21 - which will also be the death of confidence store flavored cartridges and juice. But honestly - the flavoring is all marketing. People don’t buy this stuff just because they like the flavor. View Quote I guess nic salts just don't sit well with me. I tried premade and homemade nic salt juices, and they all irritated my throat. Even at very low power. I'm looking forward to hearing if they ever figure out what's going on, too. I'm certainly not personally concerned about whatever it is, happening to me, since I don't use THC vapes, and that's clearly the culprit here. If I were to want to use marijuana, I would just smoke it. |
|
I don't read that they did. Just says in the study limitations
Third, specific details of the vaping devices, products, and vaping habits were lacking in many of the subjects and the chemical composition of the vaping product(s) used by the subjects were unknown. |
|
|
Quoted: One small problem - why would one's health care team administer such a test? Upon what legal basis? View Quote |
|
I think I'm right. I gotta look into this a little more, but read this:
Cannabinoids, including THC, contribute substantially to the particulate mass of MJ smoke comprising 20 to 30% of the total tar weight for cigarettes containing 3.9% ?9-THC (13). To determine whether the increased particulate material in MJ smoke was responsible for the enhanced DCF oxidation, MJ cigarette smoke was passed through Cambridge filters before exposure to cells. Such filters trap > 98% of particulate material but permit passage of all gaseous elements. This procedure not only failed to attenuate DCF oxidation, but also greatly stimulated oxidation in both unmodified MJ and THC-deficient smoke. This stimulation was consistent with reports of strong oxidizing activity of the gaseous phase of tobacco cigarette smoke after removal of particulates by filtration. For example, in studies on the role of tobacco smoke in atherosclerosis, oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been observed with filtered smoke but not whole smoke (34). Filter-trapped particulates can inhibit LDL oxidation induced by cupric chloride or azo-bis (2-amidinopropane), and it has been suggested that antioxidants, such as polyphenolic compounds found in smoke particulate fractions, may be responsible for inhibition of LDL oxidation (35, 36). In the present studies, the concept that particulate components of MJ smoke had antioxidant properties was further supported by the finding that DMSO extracts of a Cambridge filter pad absorbed with MJ smoke particulates suppressed ROS generation. Thus, the level of smoke-induced cellular ROS appears to be a function of the relative amounts of gaseous-phase pro-oxidants and particle-phase antioxidants.
The cannabinoids present in the particle phase of MJ smoke, including ?9-THC and cannabinol, have been reported to have antioxidant properties as measured by cyclic voltametry and by their ability to prevent H2O2-mediated oxidation of a fluorescent probe (37). This is consistent with their known structure, which includes hydroxyl groups and aliphatic rings. However, the addition of ?9-THC to our assays before smoke exposure did not provide any measurable antioxidant protection, suggesting that this effect is relatively weak compared with the pro-oxidant activity induced by smoke. View Quote edit I'm going to email someone in those studies later today. I'd feel bad if this was eventually proven to be the reason and I didn't say anything. |
|
|
Epidemic of youth nicotine addiction? What does the National Youth Tobacco Survey reveal about high school e-cigarette use in the USA?
Abstract Background: In November 2018 the US Food and Drug Administration announced restrictions on e-cigarette manufacturers in response to a perceived epidemic of e-cigarette use among high school students. The stimulus was headline figures from the 2018 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). We analyse e-cigarette use and dependence in the NYTS in relation to lifetime history of use of tobacco products. Design and setting: Nationally representative survey of high school students in 2017 and 2018. Participants: 10,186 students in 2017 and 10,991 in 2018. Measurements: Any use of e-cigarettes in past 30 days, frequent e-cigarette use (=20 of past 30 days) and indicators of dependence (craving in past 30 days; use within 30 minutes of waking and days used in lifetime) were analysed in relation to lifetime tobacco product use history, ranging from never use through to lifetime smoking of >100 cigarettes. Findings: Past-30-day e-cigarette use increased by 78% from 11.7% in 2017 to 20.8% in 2018. In both years, use was strongly associated with lifetime tobacco use history: it was seen in 8.4% of never tobacco users in 2018, in 29.0% of those who had tried a non-combustible, but never a combustible, product (OR 4.4 (CI 2.8-7.2) by comparison with never tobacco users), and in 71.0 % of those who had smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime (OR 26.8, CI 17.7-40.5) Frequent use occurred in 0.1% of never tobacco users in 2017 and 1.0% in 2018. Findings from 2014 and 2015 showed that first product tried was overwhelmingly cigarettes among those with a substantial lifetime cigarette history. Among past-30-day e-cigarette users who had never tried tobacco products in 2018, 3.8% reported craving, 3.1% reported wanting to use within 30 minutes of waking, and 61.8% said they had used e-cigarettes on =10 days in their life. Conclusions: Data from the NYTS do not support claims of a new epidemic of nicotine addiction stemming from use of e-cigarettes, nor concerns that declines in youth tobacco addiction stand to be reversed after years of progress. Among current e-cigarette users who had never tried tobacco products, responses consistently pointed to minimal dependence. Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London https://www.qeios.com/read/article/391 |
|
Quoted:
Choking is the fourth most common accidental cause of death, so a lot more than 11. Lets put every one under 5 and over 60 on total parenteral nutrition. For the children and elderly. Eating is dangerous. End food violence now! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
11 people have probably died this year from simply eating. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.