Mueller Investigation Updates - Page 157

General » General Discussion

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Mueller Investigation Updates (Page 157 of 214)

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:39:43 PM EST

[#1]

Quote History

Quoted:

The Trump team’s meeting with Mueller’s office this week could trigger a new, more contentious phase between the special counsel and a frustrated president https://t.co/XT1IDsLa0b
Washington Post (@washingtonpost) December 19, 2017

View Quote

This headline brought to you by the same people who posted fake news yesterday about CDC speech codes

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:39:49 PM EST

[#2]

Attached File

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:39:56 PM EST

[#3]

Quote History

Quoted:
So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:40:53 PM EST

[#4]

Quote History

Quoted:

Watergate took years. Nixon was even re-elected in the meantime.

View Quote

Watergate did not take down Nixon. The investigation and his interaction with that investigation that began with Watergate ultimately took down Nixon.

Democrats know they don't have anything of substance that can take down Trump which is why they needed an investigation to "create" that substance.

If you can't see this then I don't know what to tell you.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:40:59 PM EST

[#5]

Quote History

Quoted:
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/in-fbi-agents-account-insurance-policy-text-referred-to-russia-probe-1513624580?__twitter_impression=true

View Quote

According to “PEOPLE”? Are these “PEOPLE” FBI agents? If so, I believe it to be a lie and coverup. Any other source?

BTW, if that story is true, and it’s apparently the best they can come up with, that is still corruption.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:43:17 PM EST

[#6]

Quote History

Quoted:
It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:46:10 PM EST

[#7]

Quote History

Quoted:
And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

And we're back to wishcasting...

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:46:39 PM EST

[#8]

Quote History

Quoted:

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

View Quote

Lol

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:47:01 PM EST

[#9]

Quote History

Quoted:
And we're back to wishcasting...

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

And we're back to wishcasting...

I must be a bat signal for you. I'll be here for a few more hours, so I hope you're comfortable.

ETA: I'm not the one wishing with my every penny at the well that Trump get's perp walked or impeached.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:47:30 PM EST

[#10]

Quote History

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

View Quote

That's all this entire thread is

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:49:20 PM EST

[#11]

Quote History

Quoted:

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

View Quote

Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:50:03 PM EST

[#12]

Quote History

Quoted:
That's all this entire thread is

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

That's all this entire thread is

Shhh, he's getting high fives from his buddies for that witty comeback while lacking anything of substance.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:50:41 PM EST

[#13]

Quote History

Quoted:
No, I'm an honest guy with integrity.
Anyone who works with a shitbag dictator like Putin should pay the price.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

No, that was a smear and a lie by a stalker here.

Been here since 2004 and a always a staunch conservative unlike the sjw's who claim to be conservatives these days.

Fucking kids...

*bullshit* If you were a staunch conservative.....you would be calling out the blatant corruption and bias involved with the people running/involved in this investigation.....but since it is Trump....you probably think the ends justify the means.......

If they were doing something like this to Ryan.....you would probably be screaming for an investigation into the investigators......

Not a Ryan fan but he's better than Boehner.

I'm a Cruz guy.

Fine.......if there was an investigation into Cruz and biases like this were present..........you would probably be screaming for an investigation into the investigators

No, I'm an honest guy with integrity.
Anyone who works with a shitbag dictator like Putin should pay the price.

Then why aren't calling out he obvious bias and conflicts of interest in this investigation?

define "work with" because alerting them to a possible terror attack is not exactly a negative thing.....

Not to mention Obama and his caught on camera.... "after my election....I will have more flexiblity" .... I didn't see you crying for him to be investigated for collusion over that...

face it....Trump could hand you $1M of his own money and you would find a way to bitch......Trump could personally cure cancer and you would find a way to bitch.....Trump could reverse the '34 NFA, '68 GCA, and the Hughes Amendment and you would still find a way to hate him....it's what you do.......nothing Trump does is ever good enough for people like you.

And if you are so honest and have integrity.......then why are you going with Trump is guilty till proven innocent in this Russia? matter?

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:50:44 PM EST

[#14]

Quote History

Quoted:

Bias for a life long conservative? Yup. Lock me up!

View Quote

So Mr. 'Staunch Conservative'

Just heard Marc Levin on the way home from Lodge tonight, admitting that Trump is THE MOST CONSERVATIVE
President we've had since Reagan. Laid out good arguments on all of his actions thus far, most importantly the job
he's done with judiciary appointments.......you know the ones that leave a lasting mark on this nation.

Now if you doubt the conservative credentials of Levin, then you are hopelessly delusional

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:50:57 PM EST

[#15]

Quote History

Quoted:
Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

FISA warrant....fake dossier....wire tapping...something something.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:51:12 PM EST

[#16]

Quote History

Quoted:
Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:52:09 PM EST

[#17]

Quote History

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

View Quote

Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:55:01 PM EST

[#18]

Quote History

Quoted:
And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

also by all accounts, the Trump administration does not appear to be stonewalling the investigation, whereas the by word and password for the Nixon administration was stonewall. Where has the TRump administration had a Rose Mary Woods erasing tapes, emails, or what have you? It is quite obvious that is the other team's playbook. Has the Trump administration ever been accused of holding back anything?

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:55:11 PM EST

[#19]

Quote History

Quoted:
So Mr. 'Staunch Conservative'

Just heard Marc Levin on the way home from Lodge tonight, admitting that Trump is THE MOST CONSERVATIVE
President we've had since Reagan. Laid out good arguments on all of his actions thus far, most importantly the job
he's done with judiciary appointments.......you know the ones that leave a lasting mark on this nation.

Now if you doubt the conservative credentials of Levin, then you are hopelessly delusional

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

Bias for a life long conservative? Yup. Lock me up!

So Mr. 'Staunch Conservative'

Just heard Marc Levin on the way home from Lodge tonight, admitting that Trump is THE MOST CONSERVATIVE
President we've had since Reagan. Laid out good arguments on all of his actions thus far, most importantly the job
he's done with judiciary appointments.......you know the ones that leave a lasting mark on this nation.

Now if you doubt the conservative credentials of Levin, then you are hopelessly delusional

And it's not even hard to lay out what Trump is fighting for with "conservative" values and has consistently spoke, acted, or signed into law

Immigration reform
Pushing to end OCare
Cutting Taxes
Says God Bless America every chance he gets (and I'm a fucking atheist and I approve)
Realizes and acting on the fact Islam is not compatible with Western culture
Supports LE/Mil
Auditing the fed/mil/everyone
Trying to actually create a smaller government. My agency is STILL in a hiring freeze.
Actually is good at foreign diplomacy and has been kicking ass all over the world w/out putting hardly any boots on the ground
Effectively cut the head off the snake of ISIS (funding)

But yes, I'm sure Cruz would have accomplished all that and more within a year of taking office.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:55:49 PM EST

[#20]

Quote History

Quoted:
We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

How long have they been screaming Trump/Russia, about double your guesstimate, right? Still nothing?

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:55:52 PM EST

[#21]

Quote History

Quoted:
Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:56:00 PM EST

[#22]

Quote History

Quoted:

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

View Quote

Sure. I understand. Moreover, I am patient. But, I also believe they should have a much easier time of this.

This, reputedly, is the investigation of a candidate. Not a sitting president.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:56:48 PM EST

[#23]

Quote History

Quoted:
also by all accounts, the Trump administration does not appear to be stonewalling the investigation, whereas the by word and password for the Nixon administration was stonewall. Where has the TRump administration had a Rose Mary Woods erasing tapes, emails, or what have you? Has the Trump administration ever been accused of holding back anything?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

I voted for him

Really? No one cares. Nor is your tribe affiliation important to the subject of this thread. Nor is anyone else's tribe affiliation

You know what is relevant? That so far the Trump colluding with the Russians story looks like complete bullshit.

Also, the people who were in government between 1998 and 2015 are investigating him. Without success.

You know,the people who cannot account for 23 trillion dollars.

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

And I would venture a guess that information spreads and is obtained much quicker in 2017 than 1972. And by moving much more rapidly, it seems like they really aren't getting anywhere, quick.

also by all accounts, the Trump administration does not appear to be stonewalling the investigation, whereas the by word and password for the Nixon administration was stonewall. Where has the TRump administration had a Rose Mary Woods erasing tapes, emails, or what have you? Has the Trump administration ever been accused of holding back anything?

Speaking of stonewalling, why did Ohr miss his Intelligence Committee testimony today?

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:58:12 PM EST

[#24]

Quote History

Quoted:
"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

I search 60,000 - 140,000 emails a week. Do I read every one of them, no. That's what filters are for. But then, I have the players I'm really after, and that narrows it down quite a bit, to I would guess a few thousand. I can browse those in a day, in their entirety. Try again.

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:58:30 PM EST

[#25]

Quote History

Quoted:
"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Time consuming? Sure.

Harder? Not one bit. And with 21 trillion reasons to work my ass off, if it was there I would have found it by now. YMMV

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:58:40 PM EST

[#26]

Quote History

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

View Quote

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

Posted: 12/18/2017 9:59:07 PM EST

[#27]

Quote History

Quoted:
So how long are we supposed to wait until this "investigation" has matured to not declare it bullshit? With as much paperwork, legalities, and what have you that most of these "players" go through on a daily basis, jamming Flynn up on what they did is the equivalent of getting you on a speeding violation or failure to come to a complete stop. Surely you've never sped before, in your lifetime, right? And if you have, you would surely tell us EXACTLY the time and place it occurred, right? B/C if you can't give us the exact details or don't remember, you're lying, and that's a crime also.

View Quote

They've been illegally wiretapping Trump since before the election.
They've seized every document they could possibly use for 2020 opposition research.
They've found absolutely nothing so they moved on to tricking people into lying about stuff that isn't even a crime.

The entire thing is bullshit & should be shut down now instead of wasting more taxpayer money because a small minority of sore losers are still angry about the election results...

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:00:41 PM EST

[#28]

Quote History

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

View Quote

You've been "wishcasting" since you started this thread...

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:01:42 PM EST

[#29]

Quote History

Quoted:
We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

It took a couple years before people started getting indicted for Watergate. This seems to be moving much more rapidly.

Watergate is an apt example. A sitting president using dirty tricks like bugging his opponents.

Anyway, in an age where everything is recorded this should be moving faster.

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

Lol. If it weren't for the 2018 elections, you and everyone else on the left would be demanding answers "now!". But the more this thing looks like a dud, the more we are told "it takes time..", in the hopes it will be part of next year's elections.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:01:57 PM EST

[#30]

Quote History

Quoted:
Time consuming? Sure.

Harder? Not one bit. And with 21 trillion reasons to work my ass off, if it was there I would have found it by now. YMMV

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

And we're back to wishcasting...

Not really. The ease of modern investigations into data should not be underestimated. This should go faster.

That's not wishcasting, that's a reasonable conclusion based on the state of the world and reason.

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Time consuming? Sure.

Harder? Not one bit. And with 21 trillion reasons to work my ass off, if it was there I would have found it by now. YMMV

So it's time consuming - but it's supposed to be done quick. I guess I'm not following...

We're also dealing with probably a zillion different subpoenas, plus some overseas MLATS - those can take months to get returns...even with some DOJ / DOS arm twisting...

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:02:07 PM EST

[#31]

Quote History

Quoted:
Sure. I understand. Moreover, I am patient. But, I also believe they should have a much easier time of this.

This, reputedly, is the investigation of a candidate. Not a sitting president.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

Sure. I understand. Moreover, I am patient. But, I also believe they should have a much easier time of this.

This, reputedly, is the investigation of a candidate. Not a sitting president.

The Special Counsel is also tasked with any investigating related crimes that are uncovered. If the President is attempting to cover up those crimes, it falls within the Special Counsel's role.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:02:19 PM EST

[#32]

Quote History

Quoted:

We're at what, 8 months? These things take time...

View Quote

We're well over a year since 0bama weaponized the alphabet agencies against the Trump campaign...

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:02:32 PM EST

[#33]

Quote History

Quoted:
And it's not even hard to lay out what Trump is fighting for with "conservative" values and has consistently spoke, acted, or signed into law

Immigration reform
Pushing to end OCare
Cutting Taxes
Says God Bless America every chance he gets (and I'm a fucking atheist and I approve)
Realizes and acting on the fact Islam is not compatible with Western culture
Supports LE/Mil
Auditing the fed/mil/everyone
Trying to actually create a smaller government. My agency is STILL in a hiring freeze.
Actually is good at foreign diplomacy and has been kicking ass all over the world w/out putting hardly any boots on the ground
Effectively cut the head off the snake of ISIS (funding)

But yes, I'm sure Cruz would have accomplished all that and more within a year of taking office.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

Bias for a life long conservative? Yup. Lock me up!

So Mr. 'Staunch Conservative'

Just heard Marc Levin on the way home from Lodge tonight, admitting that Trump is THE MOST CONSERVATIVE
President we've had since Reagan. Laid out good arguments on all of his actions thus far, most importantly the job
he's done with judiciary appointments.......you know the ones that leave a lasting mark on this nation.

Now if you doubt the conservative credentials of Levin, then you are hopelessly delusional

And it's not even hard to lay out what Trump is fighting for with "conservative" values and has consistently spoke, acted, or signed into law

Immigration reform
Pushing to end OCare
Cutting Taxes
Says God Bless America every chance he gets (and I'm a fucking atheist and I approve)
Realizes and acting on the fact Islam is not compatible with Western culture
Supports LE/Mil
Auditing the fed/mil/everyone
Trying to actually create a smaller government. My agency is STILL in a hiring freeze.
Actually is good at foreign diplomacy and has been kicking ass all over the world w/out putting hardly any boots on the ground
Effectively cut the head off the snake of ISIS (funding)

But yes, I'm sure Cruz would have accomplished all that and more within a year of taking office.

Actions speak louder than words.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:02:34 PM EST

[#34]

Quote History

Quoted:

is this another link to another news source that we have to subscribe to?

View Quote

Dude it's the WaPo......like the CNN and MSLSD of the newspaper world. Not even worth the click

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:02:56 PM EST

[#35]

Quote History

Quoted:
Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:05:17 PM EST

[#36]

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/01/obama-expanding-nsa-powers/513041/

And then I'm reminded of this, so again, why is this taking so long to find that smoking gun that Trump surely colluded with Russia, or at least his team did, or his dog, or maybe the cricket in his front lawn.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:05:50 PM EST

[#37]

Quote History

Quoted:
I search 60,000 - 140,000 emails a week. Do I read every one of them, no. That's what filters are for. But then, I have the players I'm really after, and that narrows it down quite a bit, to I would guess a few thousand. I can browse those in a day, in their entirety. Try again.

View Quote

How long did it take them to go through FHRC's 33K found emails after the reopened the investigation? 3 days?

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:06:00 PM EST

[#38]

Quote History

Quoted:
I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:07:48 PM EST

[#39]

Quote History

Quoted:
How long did it take them to go through FHRC's 33K found emails after the reopened the investigation? 3 days?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:
I search 60,000 - 140,000 emails a week. Do I read every one of them, no. That's what filters are for. But then, I have the players I'm really after, and that narrows it down quite a bit, to I would guess a few thousand. I can browse those in a day, in their entirety. Try again.

How long did it take them to go through FHRC's 33K found emails after the reopened the investigation? 3 days?

Did they even look at them? With intent to investigate, I mean.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:08:06 PM EST

[#40]

Quote History

Quoted:
But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:09:09 PM EST

[#41]

Quote History

Quoted:
Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

So how do IT guys end up arresting people? And you meant hashed right?

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:09:53 PM EST

[#42]

Quote History

Quoted:
So how do IT guys end up arresting people?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

So how do IT guys end up arresting people?

I'm an "IT guy"?

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:10:11 PM EST

[#43]

Quote History

Quoted:

We have people making plea deals and a long way to go.

It's premature to declare it "Bullshit."

View Quote

It's bullshit. Their plea deals are for procedural crimes, nothing more.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:11:55 PM EST

[#44]

Quote History

Quoted:
I'm an "IT guy"?

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

So how do IT guys end up arresting people?

I'm an "IT guy"?

I'm taking a shot in the dark. Don't "hase" me bro.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:17:27 PM EST

[#45]

Quote History

Quoted:
I'm taking a shot in the dark. Don't "hase" me bro.

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

So how do IT guys end up arresting people?

I'm an "IT guy"?

I'm taking a shot in the dark. Don't "hase" me bro.

lol. Forgot an "h". You finally got the Bullet_Sponge!

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:17:28 PM EST

[#46]

Quote History

Quoted:

So it's time consuming - but it's supposed to be done quick. I guess I'm not following...

We're also dealing with probably a zillion different subpoenas, plus some overseas MLATS - those can take months to get returns...even with some DOJ / DOS arm twisting...

View Quote

A zillion different subs? Ok, figure of speech, but with a purpose. Interesting.

Look, I'm not a low information dude. I have a bit of a clue how a criminal investigation works. Also, a perusal of the structure of this investigation nd the resources at its disposal leads to my informed conclusion.

Perhaps someone look at the "zillions" and your acronyms of authority and buy what you're saying. But not me based on what I see so far.

At the end of the day, I am prepared to say I was wrong. But at present my conclusions are reasonble.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:18:23 PM EST

[#47]

Quote History

Quoted:

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

View Quote

Surely there would be one small sliver of evidence within a years time right?

Oh yeah I forgot. Procedural 'crimes' are out there to be had.

Collusion my ass

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:18:36 PM EST

[#48]

Quote History

Quoted:

The Special Counsel is also tasked with any investigating related crimes that are uncovered. If the President is attempting to cover up those crimes, it falls within the Special Counsel's role.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/73/Appointment_of_Special_Counsel_to_Investigate_Russian_Interference_with_the_2016_Presidential_Election_and_Related_Matters.pdf/page1-1200px-Appointment_of_Special_Counsel_to_Investigate_Russian_Interference_with_the_2016_Presidential_Election_and_Related_Matters.pdf.jpg

View Quote

Sure sure, haven't seen any evidence of those either.

Time will tell.

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:19:24 PM EST

[#49]

Quote History

Quoted:
But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

View Quote

Stop making him look bad

Posted: 12/18/2017 10:19:45 PM EST

[#50]

Quote History

Quoted:
lol. Forgot an "h". You finally got the Bullet_Sponge!

View Quote View All Quotes

View All Quotes

Quote History

Quoted:

Quoted:

"Ease of modern investigations into data"? The huge amounts of data involved in large-scale investigations makes these cases harder, not easier...

Naw, they cleared Hillary from all of those thousands upon thousands of e-mails on Weiner's laptop in a couple of days.

Want to try again?

I could do that without my coffee getting cold. Try again.

But didn't you just use the excuse that all that data takes a long time to look at it. So which is it?

Nope. Some tasks are made easier. Finding duplicates in two data sets when one is already known/hased? Easy.

So how do IT guys end up arresting people?

I'm an "IT guy"?

I'm taking a shot in the dark. Don't "hase" me bro.

lol. Forgot an "h". You finally got the Bullet_Sponge!

You better hope and pray that Atilla the Turnip doesn't see this.