Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 25
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 4:39:45 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This.  They will keep her on artificial life support for years rather than let her die, and thus Trump won't get to nominate her replacement.  The democrats will do a complete 180 and suddenly be the pro-life party.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

It won't matter if she is in a medically induced coma for 3 years,if they can keep her alive by any means it will happen. If she kicks it and somehow,say,Breyer and Sotomayor also shuffle off and Trump is able to pack the court I would bet everything that the biggest D rallying cry will be "
SCOTUS needs additional justices" as soon as they get the chance.
This.  They will keep her on artificial life support for years rather than let her die, and thus Trump won't get to nominate her replacement.  The democrats will do a complete 180 and suddenly be the pro-life party.
She won’t be able to vote.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 4:42:46 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
...marked, tic-toc
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
...marked, tic-toc
I kid you not. A poster somewhere in this thread said she'll succumb to her illness in a few weeks. He predicted she'll be dead by the middle of December, so I'm just rolling along with it. Ain't we mean.  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 5:37:30 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
That bitch dead yet?
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
December
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 5:39:13 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
December
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That bitch dead yet?
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
December
December. I screwed it up. Thanks for the correction.  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 5:41:27 PM EST
[#5]
I hope it's painful, you treasonous wrench.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 5:55:52 PM EST
[#6]
I am just here for the liberal-progressive meltdown. It WILL be something else.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:01:47 PM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
A member here said earlier this week she has maybe two weeks tops, then she finally heads off to the pearly gates. So I did a little math, and since I'm fair, I decided to give her a few extra days.
View Quote
You know, that's mighty nice of you.

Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:05:32 PM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Doesnt the nomination have to pass the house?
View Quote
There are literally dozens of posts in this thread clearly outlining the fact that the senate, which is under the control of the Republicans, also completely controls the nomination/approval process, but here you are asking this question.

Post less and read more.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:24:34 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You know, that's mighty nice of you.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
A member here said earlier this week she has maybe two weeks tops, then she finally heads off to the pearly gates. So I did a little math, and since I'm fair, I decided to give her a few extra days.
You know, that's mighty nice of you.

I try my best.  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:30:11 PM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
That bitch dead yet?
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
I thought that date was behind us already. You must live a bunch of timezones west of me.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:45:20 PM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I am just here for the liberal-progressive meltdown. It WILL be something else.
View Quote
It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is not the vastly overwhelming opinion of citizens.

Right now I'm a Thomas/Gorsuch guy. I really like Gorsuch writing his own dissents so early. I think Beer Bro will be Alito tier.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:53:12 PM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is not the vastly overwhelming opinion of citizens.

Right now I'm a Thomas/Gorsuch guy. I really like Gorsuch writing his own dissents so early. I think Beer Bro will be Alito tier.
View Quote
No.  It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is considered extreme.  The same people who want to shred the 2nd would be losing their fucking minds if the same effort was being put forth to dismantle the 1st.  The sad part is they'll never have the honesty to admit as much.  Hell, you restrict the 1st Amendment like they wish to do the 2nd, and the booger shoe would be here within the week.

Added:  Why don't we get a R congresscritter to troll the left and introduce bill after bill offering the same restrictions on other Constitutional rights?  How about a universal background check to avoid having soldiers quarter in your home?  Maybe you should be vetted before you can be secure in your papers and affects?  We really need to close the Twitter and Facebook loophole.  Those opinions of yours are dangerous and should be limited to 1 per month.  High-capacity shitposting should require fingerprinting and approval from an anti-1A judge.  Your phone is a "shoulder thing that goes up".  Ban that.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:55:02 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I thought that date was behind us already. You must live a bunch of timezones west of me.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That bitch dead yet?
Saturday, 14 November of this year she will be.
I thought that date was behind us already. You must live a bunch of timezones west of me.
My mind was on mars at the time of posting. I meant December, and was notified earlier of my error.  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 6:58:37 PM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No.  It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is considered extreme.  The same people who want to shred the 2nd would be losing their fucking minds if the same effort was being put forth to dismantle the 1st.  The sad part is they'll never have the honesty to admit as much.  Hell, you restrict the 1st Amendment like they wish to do the 2nd, and the booger shoe would be here within the week.
View Quote
They want the 1st Amendment nullified as well, as least when it pertains to speech they don't like or agree with.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:01:05 PM EST
[#15]
I think I stated this earlier in this thread.  This is a perfect example of why Supreme Court justices need to have the ability to remove someone from the bench.  If Ginsberg's physical health is failing, there is a good chance her mental health is failing as well.  An 85-year old individual in failing health is not going to b near as sharp as they need to be and should not be allowed to make a decision that determines the path of this country in the future.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:04:31 PM EST
[#16]
Bye bye, Ruthie!
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:09:32 PM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They want the 1st Amendment nullified as well, as least when it pertains to speech they don't like or agree with.
View Quote
Yes.  To a degree.  The backlash comes when they figure out the same restrictions they want on someone else, apply to them.  What happens when the Right grows some balls and goes on the offensive and labels the Left similarly?  Notice they weren't as hard up on restricting speech when obama was in the White House.  When the average undecided voter decides to vote R because they are sick of the Left's shit, things will change.  We've got a favorable environment, sans the mainstream media(which is losing credibility by the minute), for things to move our way.  antifa makes a couple apolitical people that are big into social media lose their jobs because they blocked a highway and you've got someone voting against the party that supports that garbage.  Let a couple independents who don't own guns get their doors kicked in in the middle of the night and see how that plays out.

I have high hopes for the future of our country.  I really do.  I also understand that it will take some pain before things improve.  It's no different than remodeling a house.  You've got to rip the old shit out and make a mess before your wife gets her dream kitchen.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:14:14 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No.  It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is considered extreme.  The same people who want to shred the 2nd would be losing their fucking minds if the same effort was being put forth to dismantle the 1st.  The sad part is they'll never have the honesty to admit as much.  Hell, you restrict the 1st Amendment like they wish to do the 2nd, and the booger shoe would be here within the week.

Added:  Why don't we get a R congresscritter to troll the left and introduce bill after bill offering the same restrictions on other Constitutional rights?  How about a universal background check to avoid having soldiers quarter in your home?  Maybe you should be vetted before you can be secure in your papers and affects?  We really need to close the Twitter and Facebook loophole.  Those opinions of yours are dangerous and should be limited to 1 per month.  High-capacity shitposting should require fingerprinting and approval from an anti-1A judge.  Your phone is a "shoulder thing that goes up".  Ban that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is not the vastly overwhelming opinion of citizens.

Right now I'm a Thomas/Gorsuch guy. I really like Gorsuch writing his own dissents so early. I think Beer Bro will be Alito tier.
No.  It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is considered extreme.  The same people who want to shred the 2nd would be losing their fucking minds if the same effort was being put forth to dismantle the 1st.  The sad part is they'll never have the honesty to admit as much.  Hell, you restrict the 1st Amendment like they wish to do the 2nd, and the booger shoe would be here within the week.

Added:  Why don't we get a R congresscritter to troll the left and introduce bill after bill offering the same restrictions on other Constitutional rights?  How about a universal background check to avoid having soldiers quarter in your home?  Maybe you should be vetted before you can be secure in your papers and affects?  We really need to close the Twitter and Facebook loophole.  Those opinions of yours are dangerous and should be limited to 1 per month.  High-capacity shitposting should require fingerprinting and approval from an anti-1A judge.  Your phone is a "shoulder thing that goes up".  Ban that.
We've already passed Federal hate speech and hate laws.

We're not secure in our papers, in our persons and at home.

1st, 2nd, 4th, and 10th are a joke
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:15:07 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I think I stated this earlier in this thread.  This is a perfect example of why Supreme Court justices need to have the ability to remove someone from the bench.  If Ginsberg's physical health is failing, there is a good chance her mental health is failing as well.  An 85-year old individual in failing health is not going to b near as sharp as they need to be and should not be allowed to make a decision that determines the path of this country in the future.
View Quote
That's a dangerous precedent.

I am for lifetime appointment.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:45:27 PM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We've already passed Federal hate speech and hate laws.

We're not secure in our papers, in our persons and at home.

1st, 2nd, 4th, and 10th are a joke
View Quote
You forgot about the 5th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 19th and 23rd.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:53:39 PM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You forgot about the 5th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 19th and 23rd.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

We've already passed Federal hate speech and hate laws.

We're not secure in our papers, in our persons and at home.

1st, 2nd, 4th, and 10th are a joke
You forgot about the 5th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 19th and 23rd.


5th is kinda debatable.

Blacks voting is fine. Before the Democrats governmentally destroyed the black family, life was good politically speaking. (Obviously we're all aware of the tensions throughout our nation's history.) Old black guys are some of my favorite people. Always dressed very nice, with their priorities in order and no one hates modern culture more than them. True "get your ass to work" guys. True "nobody gives you shit, work for it" guys.

Wimminz voting has been a detriment, but I'm kinda split on that. They helped huge during WW2 and basically functioned as head of household. But then they stayed on, which damaged wages and the nuclear family. I don't think that's really women's fault, more of a end result from the situation our country was in.

Fuck income tax, I can't believe that passed.

Fuck direct election of Senators. REPUBLIC FOREVER!

23rd is also horseshit but it really doesn't matter in reality.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 7:57:14 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm not sure Roe vs Wade is going anywhere even on a 6-3 court.

Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT.  Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better.
I'm not sure Roe vs Wade is going anywhere even on a 6-3 court.

Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT.  Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history.
Don't kid yourself.  Both sides have cases ready to go.  The only problem is that the Liberal are all about Lies.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:08:01 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


5th is kinda debatable.

Blacks voting is fine. Before the Democrats governmentally destroyed the black family, life was good politically speaking. (Obviously we're all aware of the tensions throughout our nation's history.) Old black guys are some of my favorite people. Always dressed very nice, with their priorities in order and no one hates modern culture more than them. True "get your ass to work" guys. True "nobody gives you shit, work for it" guys.

Wimminz voting has been a detriment, but I'm kinda split on that. They helped huge during WW2 and basically functioned as head of household. But then they stayed on, which damaged wages and the nuclear family. I don't think that's really women's fault, more of a end result from the situation our country was in.

Fuck income tax, I can't believe that passed.

Fuck direct election of Senators. REPUBLIC FOREVER!

23rd is also horseshit but it really doesn't matter in reality.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

We've already passed Federal hate speech and hate laws.

We're not secure in our papers, in our persons and at home.

1st, 2nd, 4th, and 10th are a joke
You forgot about the 5th, 14th, 16th, 17th, 19th and 23rd.


5th is kinda debatable.

Blacks voting is fine. Before the Democrats governmentally destroyed the black family, life was good politically speaking. (Obviously we're all aware of the tensions throughout our nation's history.) Old black guys are some of my favorite people. Always dressed very nice, with their priorities in order and no one hates modern culture more than them. True "get your ass to work" guys. True "nobody gives you shit, work for it" guys.

Wimminz voting has been a detriment, but I'm kinda split on that. They helped huge during WW2 and basically functioned as head of household. But then they stayed on, which damaged wages and the nuclear family. I don't think that's really women's fault, more of a end result from the situation our country was in.

Fuck income tax, I can't believe that passed.

Fuck direct election of Senators. REPUBLIC FOREVER!

23rd is also horseshit but it really doesn't matter in reality.
To be clear, I was referring to the "due process" portions of the 5th and 14th, and the case law emanations from their penumbras.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:14:52 PM EST
[#24]
Is she dead yet?
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:15:45 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Is she dead yet?
View Quote
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:22:59 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is she dead yet?
Saturday, 14 December, 2019 should be her day. That is if my math works out correctly.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:29:48 PM EST
[#27]
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:37:59 PM EST
[#28]
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again.

One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver.  While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one.  Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body.

They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver.

Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them  without doing any other treatment that we know of).
PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum.
PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago.

I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her.
If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis.

We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a  right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues.

Just my $.02.
CG
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:40:00 PM EST
[#29]
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to fuck Trump.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:41:05 PM EST
[#30]
Thank you again Crowgirl.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:41:54 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No.  It's nuts when strict Constitutionalism is considered extreme.  The same people who want to shred the 2nd would be losing their fucking minds if the same effort was being put forth to dismantle the 1st.  The sad part is they'll never have the honesty to admit as much.  Hell, you restrict the 1st Amendment like they wish to do the 2nd, and the booger shoe would be here within the week.

Added:  Why don't we get a R congresscritter to troll the left and introduce bill after bill offering the same restrictions on other Constitutional rights?  How about a universal background check to avoid having soldiers quarter in your home?  Maybe you should be vetted before you can be secure in your papers and affects?  We really need to close the Twitter and Facebook loophole.  Those opinions of yours are dangerous and should be limited to 1 per month.  High-capacity shitposting should require fingerprinting and approval from an anti-1A judge.  Your phone is a "shoulder thing that goes up".  Ban that.
View Quote
Or how about a full background check before you can even cast a vote?  Each, and every time, and it costs you $30?
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:42:24 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again.

One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver.  While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one.  Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body.

They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver.

Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them  without doing any other treatment that we know of).
PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum.
PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago.

I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her.
If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis.

We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a  right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues.

Just my $.02.
CG
View Quote
Thanks for the details. You did great right up to the part where she is an employee of the people. In the old days...
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:42:53 PM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to fuck Trump.
View Quote
It's doubtful we'll need his vote anyway.

.02
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:47:34 PM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again.

One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver.  While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one.  Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body.

They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver.

Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them  without doing any other treatment that we know of).
PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum.
PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago.

I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her.
If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis.

We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a  right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues.

Just my $.02.
CG
View Quote
They would absolutely do a transplant on her .

She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 .
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:49:06 PM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They would absolutely do a transplant on her .

She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 .
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again.

One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver.  While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one.  Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body.

They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver.

Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them  without doing any other treatment that we know of).
PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum.
PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago.

I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her.
If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis.

We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a  right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues.

Just my $.02.
CG
They would absolutely do a transplant on her .

She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 .
It's a special kind of collectivism they aspire to.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:52:31 PM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I kid you not. A poster somewhere in this thread said she'll succumb to her illness in a few weeks. He predicted she'll be dead by the middle of December, so I'm just rolling along with it. Ain't we mean.  
View Quote
Well I might as well buy a ticket to that train ride.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:52:54 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Steve Jobs and all his billions didn't change reality.
View Quote
The grim reaper ALWAYS collects.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:54:11 PM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to fuck Trump.
View Quote
Doesn't matter. We easily have 50 + Electric Pence.

And that's the way appointments are gonna go from here on out.

No Senate no pick. No 50 no pick.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:57:40 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The grim reaper ALWAYS collects.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Steve Jobs and all his billions didn't change reality.
The grim reaper ALWAYS collects.
Especially if you go to a shaman as your cancer doc.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:57:56 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They would absolutely do a transplant on her .

She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 .
View Quote
Agreed. They'll look someone and harvest it if they have to. Hell, there's probably a line of liberal volunteers who will gladly donate theirs for the cause.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 8:59:20 PM EST
[#41]
Could be best Christmas ever.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:01:28 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

December
View Quote
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:02:31 PM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Saturday, 14 December, 2019 should be her day. That is if my math works out correctly.
View Quote
Should see if Vegas will give you odds... might make the news.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:05:31 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Should see if Vegas will give you odds... might make the news.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Saturday, 14 December, 2019 should be her day. That is if my math works out correctly.
Should see if Vegas will give you odds... might make the news.
Vegas has been paying off good as of late. Perhaps I should call my host at Luxor and see what she says.  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:07:59 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again.

One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver.  While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one.  Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body.

They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver.

Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them  without doing any other treatment that we know of).
PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum.
PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago.

I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her.
If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis.

We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a  right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues.

Just my $.02.
CG
View Quote
Alyssa Milano will give RBG her liver.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:13:27 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Especially if you go to a shaman as your cancer doc.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Steve Jobs and all his billions didn't change reality.
The grim reaper ALWAYS collects.
Especially if you go to a shaman as your cancer doc.
Well exactly. RBG isn't doing a raw food diet and meditation for her treatment.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:20:17 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They would absolutely do a transplant on her .

She ain't some farm boys gramma . They've cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 .
View Quote
Likely she wouldn't survive the transplant, even with top care.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:23:05 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to f**k Trump.
View Quote
I don't know about that.  He has voted for every one of Trump's judicial nominees so far, and even the rule that lowered post-cloture debate from 30 hours to 2 hours.  The effect of this rule change was over 100 Trump nominees getting confirmed who would not otherwise have been confirmed.

And even if Romney plus the two moderates vote "no", that still leaves it 50-50 with the VP to break the tie.

And now you understand why it was so important to win Senate seats last year, even Rick Scott, who is not popular here.
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:28:01 PM EST
[#49]
are we ever in my lifetime going to get a Final update?  
Link Posted: 11/30/2019 9:33:59 PM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
are we ever in my lifetime going to get a Final update?  
View Quote
No because this thread will renamed the RBG riot boogaloo thread.
Page / 25
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top