User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:43:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to fuck Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:44:07 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm not sure Roe vs Wade is going anywhere even on a 6-3 court. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:46:41 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They would absolutely do a transplant on her . She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 . Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again. One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver. While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one. Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body. They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver. Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them without doing any other treatment that we know of). PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum. PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago. I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her. If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis. We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues. Just my $.02. CG She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 . |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:49:45 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They don’t have to reverse Roe as it was really about the right to privacy; they only have to affirm that the baby is an unique individual which couldn’t be proven back in the 70’s. Today we know that the baby has an unique DNA and therefore isn’t part of the mother’s body, but an completely different human being. One individual doesn’t have the right to end the life of another individual simply out of convenience. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. Looking at it objectively in a vacuum I could understand individual rights and private property arguments. Your 46 year old son doesn't have a right to be cared for, nor does your 26 year old son. Where's the line legally? Again, I am pro life but legally I don't see that getting overturned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:50:58 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They want the 1st Amendment nullified as well, as least when it pertains to speech they don't like or agree with. The goal is destruction of 1st, 4th, and 5th. 2nd is in the way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 10:59:32 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm not a fan of abortion. Even beyond the religious aspects, I believe there are clear moral aspects to the debate. Furthermore there's a responsibility argument to be made regardless of religion (but it does overlap with morals.) Looking at it objectively in a vacuum I could understand individual rights and private property arguments. Your 46 year old son doesn't have a right to be cared for, nor does your 26 year old son. Where's the line legally? Again, I am pro life but legally I don't see that getting overturned. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. Looking at it objectively in a vacuum I could understand individual rights and private property arguments. Your 46 year old son doesn't have a right to be cared for, nor does your 26 year old son. Where's the line legally? Again, I am pro life but legally I don't see that getting overturned. If the left are forced to raise their children instead of killing them, there will be millions of new socialist citizens entering society every year. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:00:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The simple truth is that abortion is one of the few things stemming the tide of socialism. If the left are forced to raise their children instead of killing them, there will be millions of new socialist citizens entering society every year. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. Looking at it objectively in a vacuum I could understand individual rights and private property arguments. Your 46 year old son doesn't have a right to be cared for, nor does your 26 year old son. Where's the line legally? Again, I am pro life but legally I don't see that getting overturned. If the left are forced to raise their children instead of killing them, there will be millions of new socialist citizens entering society every year. But how dark is that? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:02:17 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're not wrong. But how dark is that? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
She was terminally ill under FBHO...she "knew" HRC was about to win. She chose poorly by listening to the fake MSM. Fuck her and fuck all she believed in like killing babies (abortion). Let her Trump replacement end this holocaust of the most innocent. The faster she is gone the more innocent lives will be saved. The sooner the better. Reversal of previous decisions is something pretty much all the justices have said would take A LOT. Not just abortion, any big ruling. I'm not a legal expert, but from my primitive understanding it has do with the aloofness of justices and preserving legal history. Looking at it objectively in a vacuum I could understand individual rights and private property arguments. Your 46 year old son doesn't have a right to be cared for, nor does your 26 year old son. Where's the line legally? Again, I am pro life but legally I don't see that getting overturned. If the left are forced to raise their children instead of killing them, there will be millions of new socialist citizens entering society every year. But how dark is that? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:04:04 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're not wrong. But how dark is that? But that's just be being way too optimistic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:07:50 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You're not wrong. But how dark is that? But that's just be being way too optimistic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:16:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Reversing Roe v. Wade would be an existential threat to the Republican party.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:17:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:19:15 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I get what you're saying, and I don't entirely disagree with your position. But it's a really dark position. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:21:20 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's the beauty of legalized abortion. People like you don't kill their babies. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:26:37 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doesn't make it right, man. Something something gaze into the abyss Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:31:59 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just imagine how much better the world would be if Obama's mother had an abortion. Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. Justifying murders of convenience in a specific context doesn't justify the practice. Look at Hong Kong. Plenty of people with Commie lineage standing for freedom. We're better than the left. We have morals, rule of law, religion and community. Advocating killing the unborn doesn't fit with my morality. Even in communist China, dissidents are born every day. They deserve to live. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:34:15 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just imagine how much better the world would be if Obama's mother had an abortion. Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/30/2019 11:54:02 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Alito got the nod after Miers withdrew. Roberts got bumped up to be Chief after Rhenquist died and was nominated before Miers. No one has any idea how Miers would have been as a justice. That was part of the problem with her nomination. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:01:30 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Mitt is a squish. He would only vote against if he has cover from Murkowski and Collins and neither of those will vote against the Female nominee. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If she does doe you can bet your ass Mitt Romney will not vote for a nominee to fuck Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:04:15 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Reversing Roe v. Wade would be an existential threat to the Republican party. You're as bad as they are. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:04:43 AM EDT
[#21]
So, is she dead yet?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:09:45 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So we should permit baby-murder-for-hire., because you perceive it to be beneficial to a political party? You're as bad as they are. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Reversing Roe v. Wade would be an existential threat to the Republican party. You're as bad as they are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:30:45 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:42:20 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're not wrong. But how dark is that? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:01:07 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So, is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:06:00 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They would absolutely do a transplant on her . She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 . |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:16:27 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:19:39 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Doesn't make it right, man. Something something gaze into the abyss Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss At a minimum I probably take the stance that there should be a long list of other things that are handled first before taking a look back at overturning Roe vs Wade, but my confliction goes to the point where I think arguments could be made to say just let them pile up abortion clinics like check advance places, who are we to stop the immoral from making immoral choices that’s between them and god, it is our duty to advise them & educate but not dictate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:21:05 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:21:39 PM EDT
[#30]
Well my birthday came and went, and still this bitch breathes....
  Sometimes, dead is better... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:27:30 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: President Bush nominated Roberts for the position of Chief Justice to replace Renquist who had died two days earlier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 12:33:29 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nah. You're wrong. Justifying murders of convenience in a specific context doesn't justify the practice. Look at Hong Kong. Plenty of people with Commie lineage standing for freedom. We're better than the left. We have morals, rule of law, religion and community. Advocating killing the unborn doesn't fit with my morality. Even in communist China, dissidents are born every day. They deserve to live. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. Justifying murders of convenience in a specific context doesn't justify the practice. Look at Hong Kong. Plenty of people with Commie lineage standing for freedom. We're better than the left. We have morals, rule of law, religion and community. Advocating killing the unborn doesn't fit with my morality. Even in communist China, dissidents are born every day. They deserve to live. Morality loses. Period. If they want to kill themselves off, sit back and let 'em do it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:06:29 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No need to rush unless she dies right before the election or inauguration (if Trump loses or the R's lose the Senate). Taking some time to make sure we don't get a Harriet Meiers (sp?) is a good thing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If she dies they should just nominate someone the very next day before the funeral and just ram that shit in with zero lube. Total of 5 minutes for debate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:08:37 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Romney will try. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Rinos will prevent senate confirmation until after 2020. Put $$ on it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:16:07 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Alyssa Milano would even donate her's to save RBG. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again. One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver. While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one. Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body. They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver. Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them without doing any other treatment that we know of). PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum. PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago. I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her. If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis. We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues. Just my $.02. CG She ain’t some farm boys gramma . They’ve cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 . |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:16:49 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:20:56 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pancreatic cancer is not an eligible condition for transplant. Besides it wouldn't have any effect on her condition. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For those who think they can keep her going on life support indefinitely, think again. One of pancreatic cancer's favorite places to metastasize to is the liver. While you can put someone on a heart/lung machine for circulation and oxygenation, and give them dialysis for kidney problems, you can't replicate the functions of a liver to replace a failing one. Its an enormously complex chemical factory that impacts just about every system in the body. They aren't going to transplant her at 86 and in her condition, which is the only fix for a dead liver. Those lung tumors last year may or may not have been PC mets (I'm guessing no because they operated on them without doing any other treatment that we know of). PC will go to the lungs too but it really likes heading for the liver and peritoneum. PC mets in the liver is what killed my father 6 years ago. I bet she had her stent replaced at Johns Hopkins and thats why they transferred her. If it was an infected stent she might have more time left than I initially thought when I thought it was generalized sepsis. We're all just guessing here anyway, there is little to no info coming out about this, which kind of pisses me off because she's technically an employee of We, the People, and we have a right to know if one of our employees is unable to fulfill her duties because of health issues. Just my $.02. CG She ain't some farm boys gramma . They've cured her cancers 4 times since she turned 66 . |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:24:27 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It was for Steve Jobs after he dicked around with alternative medicine and didn't get a whipple for his (relatively) "good" kind of PC. "If the super rich get medical treatment unavailable to the unwashed masses then why isn't Steve Jobs still alive?" To which I would say, "you don't actually know anything about the death of Steve Jobs, do you?" Either way, pancreatic cancer. That's one of those things that I only wish on the worst people in the world. Someday, even with the very best treatment there isn't going to be anything left of Ginsburg to salvage. But they will still keep posting pictures of her jogging and lifting weights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:38:11 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One of the stupidest things I ever heard in my life. "If the super rich get medical treatment unavailable to the unwashed masses then why isn't Steve Jobs still alive?" To which I would say, "you don't actually know anything about the death of Steve Jobs, do you?" Either way, pancreatic cancer. That's one of those things that I only wish on the worst people in the world. Someday, even with the very best treatment there isn't going to be anything left of Ginsburg to salvage. But they will still keep posting pictures of her jogging and lifting weights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:44:31 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They don’t have to reverse Roe as it was really about the right to privacy; they only have to affirm that the baby is an unique individual which couldn’t be proven back in the 70’s. Today we know that the baby has an unique DNA and therefore isn’t part of the mother’s body, but an completely different human being. One individual doesn’t have the right to end the life of another individual simply out of convenience. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:48:34 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fuck your morality. Morality loses. Period. If they want to kill themselves off, sit back and let 'em do it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. Justifying murders of convenience in a specific context doesn't justify the practice. Look at Hong Kong. Plenty of people with Commie lineage standing for freedom. We're better than the left. We have morals, rule of law, religion and community. Advocating killing the unborn doesn't fit with my morality. Even in communist China, dissidents are born every day. They deserve to live. Morality loses. Period. If they want to kill themselves off, sit back and let 'em do it. Even in prison the violent look down and assault child molesters because of morality. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 3:53:22 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So we should permit baby-murder-for-hire., because you perceive it to be beneficial to a political party? You're as bad as they are. Obama's drones had a 1 loosely defined enemy to 9 admitted civilians collateral damage ratio. The air raids on Hamburg or Dresden killed tens of thousands of civilians for every target factory. Abortionists' Democrat/Republican preemption ratios are a lot better. They're putting in (literally) surgical strikes on the home front, winning battles in a conflict actually relevant to American freedoms, and suddenly it's time to freak out? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 4:01:18 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We're holding out for Dec. 14th. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 5:07:56 PM EDT
[#44]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 9:13:59 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Roberts was originally nominated to replace O’Conner. Rehnquist died and Roberts nomination was moved to Chief Justice, then Bush nominated Miers. She withdrew, Alito was then nominated. Trump got Gorsuch confirmed with 52 GOP Senators, and Kavanaugh with only 51. I know some people here wanted someone "more better" than Kavanaugh, but I think he was a very good selection given the circumstances, and probably the best Trump could have done with a narrow Senate majority. With 53 GOP Senators now, if there is another vacancy, Trump will have more latitude in his choice. This is why it is so important to elect Republican Senators, even if they aren't 100% perfect. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/1/2019 9:15:07 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They don’t have to reverse Roe as it was really about the right to privacy; they only have to affirm that the baby is an unique individual which couldn’t be proven back in the 70’s. Today we know that the baby has an unique DNA and therefore isn’t part of the mother’s body, but an completely different human being. One individual doesn’t have the right to end the life of another individual simply out of convenience. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2019 12:28:48 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just imagine how much better the world would be if Obama's mother had an abortion. Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Would you rather their mothers kill them in the womb or to wait until they are old enough to mount a revolution and to have our sons and daughters fight them in the streets? Planned Parenthood is just taking care of the problem through early intervention. Quoted:
Maybe if they had to actually have some responsibility and take care of a child by having to actually work, earn pay, budget, and be scrupulous; hopefully they wouldn't be socialists. But that's just be being way too optimistic. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. People like you don't kill their babies. Something something gaze into the abyss Or if Mama Clinton and Mama Rodham had gone down that path. Or Mrs. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Marx. Abortion isn't the problem. Abortion is part of the solution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2019 12:34:57 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is she dead yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2019 12:37:27 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Shit they'd kill someone with a healthy liver to give her if they thought it would work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2019 12:39:26 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I get what you're saying, and I don't entirely disagree with your position. But it's a really dark position. Babies haven't developed yet, made their own choices, experienced the world, etc etc So yeah, abortion normally kills socialists and communists more than it does God fearing Constitutionalists... but does that make it right? I guess, succinctly put, I'm not okay with killing unborn commies. That's my line. Communists aren't born, they're made. An unborn child hasn't made conscious decisions to undermine Western society. Forcing people to take responsibility fosters a better kind of thinking. Hunger is a hell of a motivator. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
