User Panel
Posted: 10/14/2009 5:53:55 PM EDT
Since microwave ovens were invented as an outgrowth of radar technology, is it possible to build a radar using some of the components of a microwave oven?
|
|
Theoretically yes. But it would take a lot of effort and parts. So it's not really worth it.
|
|
You have to hear as well as you transmit, and the transmitter is made to cook food... not send signals out to 'listen to' so... yea, but not easily.
|
|
I don't really know much about Radar, but I would imagine that you could turn your microwave oven into the transmission side of a radar set, but you would then need the receiving side to make it useful.
|
|
I was thinking the oven parts, some kind of antenna, ( satellite dish?) and then some kind of reciever.
I haven't the foggiest idea how to actually build it since installing a car radio is about as involved in electronics as I get, But was wondering how powerful even though it would be crude, it would be. |
|
Hmm, I have given this some thought as well.
I live near an airfield, and I always wanted to take some magnetrons and make the planes that buzz my house drop flares. So, tag for information. ETA: one of my co-workers took our Thermal Imaging Camera out one night and found some Apache helicopters flying into base in formation. He took a peek at them, forgetting that the device has a laser built into it (called a laser pyrometer). The birds scattered, as it set off some warning siren in them. ) |
|
Quoted:
Don't do it....your wife will be pissed. Really pissed. She don't need a microwave to make sammiches. |
|
Place a magnetron in a properly tuned cavity, and you'll start moving in the right direction.
Then modulate it and look for reflections and ... |
|
It seems anyone with a good understanding of electronics and radio equipment could do it.
Leaves me out, but maybe I could make something to mess with the mexicans next door that play that rotchy crotchy music. |
|
Holy Crap
"The NWS transmits at 750,000 watts of power for their S band" Don't think a magnatron will put out that much. |
|
I remember in school we used microwave transmitters and receivers in a class to demonstrate the abilities of microwaves.
I think the hardest part about building a homebrew radar system would be the computer and the cone. The cone has to be specially designed to focus the waves and then funnel the returning waves into the receiver. |
|
Quoted:
It seems anyone with a good understanding of electronics and radio equipment could do it. Leaves me out, but maybe I could make something to mess with the mexicans next door that play that rotchy crotchy music. I'm an electronic engineer and one of my last company projects was building a new DME(distance measuring equipment) for aircraft. DME operates at in the range of frequencies around 1090MHz, it's not radar but timing of the transmission and reception is very loosely somewhat similar and very complicated. To answer your question, yes theoretically I suppose it would be possible to use the magnetron as an emitter, but it would really be impractical and I mean REALLY IMPRACTICAL to the point where I would say nobody would even attempt the design or the extreme cost of implementation to even try it. |
|
Quoted:
It seems anyone with a good understanding of electronics and radio equipment could do it. Leaves me out, but maybe I could make something to mess with the mexicans next door that play that rotchy crotchy music. Not really. Making a RADAR (it's an acronym, not a noun, RAdio Detection And Ranging) is an extraordinarily challenging project, and, as posted before, you'd only get part of the transmit side out of a microwave set. Sounds like a great way to damage your own body... Know which two parts of your body fry first? |
|
bzzzt inverse square law.
Now if you really managed to get cookin with electromagnatism, your brain is the first place to cook.. Full of fat and water. You really do fry that first |
|
Quoted:
bzzzt inverse square law. Now if you really managed to get cookin with electromagnatism, your brain is the first place to cook.. Full of fat and water. You really do fry that first Actually it's testicles and eyeballs... |
|
I actually have part of a portable radar set from the US Navy, circa the late 1970's. When I opened it up, it still had a vacuum inside and all the vacuum tubes were good.
Now I'm thinking of finding it (probably out in the shed) and taking apart the old microwave. Hmmm... Better not. Air force base is just two miles from my house. |
|
Quoted:
I was thinking the oven parts, some kind of antenna, ( satellite dish?) and then some kind of reciever. I haven't the foggiest idea how to actually build it since installing a car radio is about as involved in electronics as I get, But was wondering how powerful even though it would be crude, it would be. I'm thinking a microwave and some ham radio parts could be canniibalized for a makeshift radar. It'd be an interesting experiment, that's for sure. |
|
Damage from microwave radiation is not painful during infliction. Exposure to microwave radiation is very dangerous, the radiation causes water molecules to vibrate, which causes friction, which causes things to heat up. This concept is the reason that dry foods don't fair well in microwaves. People are made mostly of water. The microwave oven in your home is shielded, that is why it doesn't cause damage to people who are near it during operation (you have noticed that the inside is all metal, and it has a metal mesh inside the glass in the door, as well as a metal seal around the door?
If the microwave oven is operated with the shielding breached you will be introducing microwave radiation into the atmosphere around the oven, which could potentially be harmful to yourself and others. Be careful when you work on any project involving the generation of microwave signals. |
|
It is possible, WWII air radar used a magnetron just like a microwave has. There is a lot of other stuff that would need to be created, you would need a modulator to drive the magnetron, and a complete receiver side. In addition to the health aspects that has already been mentioned there is the legal aspect that the FCC regulates all radio transmitters. You might be able to fool around with a transmitter that was narrow bandwidth and in a little used band. However S band units are fairly common, and microwave magnetron wide band with lots on spurious splatter signals. You probable screw up someone else radio equipment and get found out and in trouble, before you got a working radar.
|
|
2.4 ghz is a poor frequency, water absorbs it the radiation. which is why it cooks so well!
|
|
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. I would imagine a SPS-49 could cook just about anything, and probably do it quickly as well. Personally, never actually saw it happen though. |
|
Interesting thread. I have a 1000w Microwave that I don't use that I have been saving for some evil design. I thought about making a microwave gun that I could point at a bag of popcorn and cook it at a distance. I don't know enough about electronics to do such a thing really, but the idea of it sure sounds cool. Maybe it is not a good idea.
|
|
Quoted:
Interesting thread. I have a 1000w Microwave that I don't use that I have been saving for some evil design. I thought about making a microwave gun that I could point at a bag of popcorn and cook it at a distance. I don't know enough about electronics to do such a thing really, but the idea of it sure sounds cool. Maybe it is not a good idea. Definitely NOT a good idea. You'd need a whole lot of knowledge on how to properly direct that energy without frying yourself. |
|
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. This. Making a cooker out of RADAR equipment is much easier than the other way around. It will be difficult to build and inaccurate unless you're already up on your electromagnetics (waveguides, antennas, microwave circuits) - and if you are up on it, you should know a better way to go. First you'll have to gate the transmission into a pulse. The pulse duration has to be long enough to detect, but short enough that you are already listening for the reflection before it comes back. Then process the return data to resolve an approximate range. Of course, you'll have to know something about the return signal or you can easily burn up your receiver chain by reflecting from something too close (or coupling if Tx and Rx are both on). Then dealing with the goofy signal put out by the magnetron... Not worth the hassle, IMO. Trust me, what I do every day is research in what ultimately amounts to 3-D RADAR tracking in the xxGHz range. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Interesting thread. I have a 1000w Microwave that I don't use that I have been saving for some evil design. I thought about making a microwave gun that I could point at a bag of popcorn and cook it at a distance. I don't know enough about electronics to do such a thing really, but the idea of it sure sounds cool. Maybe it is not a good idea. Definitely NOT a good idea. You'd need a whole lot of knowledge on how to properly direct that energy without frying yourself. Yeah, not a good idea to build a directed energy weapon without knowledge of directed energy handling. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. This. Making a cooker out of RADAR equipment is much easier than the other way around. It will be difficult to build and inaccurate unless you're already up on your electromagnetics (waveguides, antennas, microwave circuits) - and if you are up on it, you should know a better way to go. First you'll have to gate the transmission into a pulse. The pulse duration has to be long enough to detect, but short enough that you are already listening for the reflection before it comes back. Then process the return data to resolve an approximate range. Of course, you'll have to know something about the return signal or you can easily burn up your receiver chain by reflecting from something too close (or coupling if Tx and Rx are both on). Then dealing with the goofy signal put out by the magnetron... Not worth the hassle, IMO. Trust me, what I do every day is research in what ultimately amounts to 3-D RADAR tracking in the xxGHz range. Transmission lines alone are a significant challenge in homebuilt systems in the appropriate frequency range –– good point. Most people don't realize that above a certain frequency you simply can't connect things with wires anymore. |
|
Quoted:
Holy Crap "The NWS transmits at 750,000 watts of power for their S band" Don't think a magnatron will put out that much. Don't worry, NEXRADS are optimized at 700KW Klystrons crank more power than maggies. DMEs operate around 1025–1150-MHz, 1090 is the aircraft xponder freq Normally, if you can spell RADAR backwards, you're qualified! Like Joe4567 said, you would need a modulator to transmit, plus a timing system to sync the xmitter to the rcvr, STALO, COHO, mixers, a processor (to process) the returns for the display, AFC circuits for a maggie, and a transmission line - usually waveguide tuned to the frequency, and maybe an antenna. Don't forget the multi-voltage power supplies for the individual assemblies. Rotary joint and drive train w/ a pedestal if you want it to scan. Oh, some sort of T/R tube or circulator so you don't blow out the sensitive receiver with the first transmit pulse! Check w/ your friendly FCC people to get authorization to transmit, they may require that you have the specific bandpass filters to severely restrict spurious transmissions. Now, if you want to ditch the mechanical antenna and digitally scan, chirp, freq hop, and really extract tgts out of the grass, gotta get a different kinda oven. I'll crawl back into my hole now. |
|
Quoted:
Transmission lines alone are a significant challenge in homebuilt systems in the appropriate frequency range –– good point. Most people don't realize that above a certain frequency you simply can't connect things with wires anymore. You ain't kidding - esp.with waveguide. If the w/g isn't constructed properly - to include the feedhorn or array, Unacceptable VSWR (reflections) will result and severely cancel the transmit signals, or create arcs which could eventually damage the equipment |
|
As a former Navy Electronics Technician (ET), I'm just going to...
|
|
Quoted:
As a former Navy Electronics Technician (ET), I'm just going to... Current Active Duty ETC here... |
|
Theoretically possible, but a bad idea as stated above. Any experimentation with high-power sources like that require a great deal of thought put into shielding, safety, and exposure levels. I actually tore up a couple of junky chinese microwaves for the magnetrons, was thinking of using them for plasma experiments.
Given the risk of cooking yourself, treat that thing as a gun. Make sure it is well shielded, and pointed in a safe direction when operating(essentially any time it is plugged in, whether switched on or not). You will require a significant amount of knowledge in the area of antenna theory and RF design and shielding. Most people don't know jack shit about that stuff at microwave frequencies(and it's a much different animal than lower frequency radio gear). The ARRL has some decent books about working with microwave communications gear, it would be a good place to start - but they are usually working with VERY low power levels. |
|
sure could
im also pretty certain my brain is fried from naval radar; on a surfaced submarine the radars are just above the heads of the guys in the sail. Ive spent lots of time up there with those things on... |
|
The only part of a microwave oven that could be put to use is the magnetron, and it's a very poor choice of a magnetron. The HV power supply for a pulse radar that would be compatible with your magnetron would have to generate 1 microsecond wide pulses 1000 times a second with a voltage of -4KV - that's negative 4000 volts. The pulse forming network parts and HV switching tubes required for this are not readily available, even as surplus parts.
The RF output from a microwave oven is not remotely close to being usable for range and bearing detection. It's essentially useful only for cooking food, heating things up, and broadband jamming of other services in the same frequency range. Take the door off, fiddle with the door interlock switches so it will transmit, aim at the airport or aircraft in the area, wait for The Man to come crashing through your door looking at you through the sights of an AR or HK sub gun. Have fun! The waveguide and antenna construction would be a difficult task. It gets really complicated if you try to use the same waveguide and antenna for both transmit and receive. The receive waveguide path has to be electrically shorted across a thousand times a second to prevent burnout of the receiver front end, usually a simple diode detector. This requires a gas filled tube called a T/R switch and a HV power supply for it, to keep it ready to instantly trigger like a strobe flash tube on a camera. And so on, and so on, and so on. How would you process and interpret the noisy crap and clutter coming from the detector / receiver circuits? Better be really good at analog / digital hardware design and construction, and high speed programming of whatever hardware ends up in the system. And so on, and so on, and so on. About the only radars operating in this frequency range are "small boat radars" - Google that to see what all is available and what limited utility that it has, even when designed by Raytheon, Litton, Sperry, you name it. I've had odds and ends of 2450 MHz hardware laying around for 40 years and it never occurred to me to try to build a pulse radar with it, or even a simple receive converter. It's not very easy at all to work on stuff in the microwave frequency ranges. ETA Dicking around like this is an extremely excellent way to invite The Man into your life - FCC, FAA, DHS, on down the list. |
|
Quoted:
2450 MHz. Bye Bye wireless Lan The shitty microwave my mom had used to knock me offline 90% of the time it was used. |
|
Quoted: I was an IFF Tech (NEC 1572) and SNAP III tech (no NEC) on USS Rodney M. Davis (FFG 60). In other words, being a frigate ET, I worked on all kinds of shit in the ET / IC / DS (FC) rates.Quoted: As a former Navy Electronics Technician (ET), I'm just going to... Current Active Duty ETC here... Now I'm a 2E171 Satellite, Wideband & Telemetry Systems Maintainer in the Air National Guard. Come Nov. 1, I'll be a 3D171 RF & Transmission Systems Specialist. Fucking AFSC merger clusterfuck... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. I would imagine a SPS-49 could cook just about anything, and probably do it quickly as well. Personally, never actually saw it happen though. Didn't Mythbusters shoot down that one? |
|
I've always thought it'd be fun to throw a bag of microwave popcorn into the radome and then hot transmit.
But then again, burnt popcorn reeks something awful. |
|
About the only thing useful for a radar set is the magnetron and associated power and control circuitry. You'll still need a receiver and proper frequency tuning circuits, control circuits, some way to convert your rf data to a format that you can display on something. Then there is the antenna array. Not to mention it would be a pretty low power set and not have very much range.
Here's a cheap bottom end radar set for about $1400 bucks. I think you'd end up spending as much money and still not be anywhere close to something like this in quality. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. I would imagine a SPS-49 could cook just about anything, and probably do it quickly as well. Personally, never actually saw it happen though. Didn't Mythbusters shoot down that one? I doubt mythbusters could get access to a SPS-49. I don't think there are many (if any) commercial sets that output the power a Navy air search radar does. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I was an IFF Tech (NEC 1572) and SNAP III tech (no NEC) on USS Rodney M. Davis (FFG 60). In other words, being a frigate ET, I worked on all kinds of shit in the ET / IC / DS (FC) rates.
Quoted:
As a former Navy Electronics Technician (ET), I'm just going to... Current Active Duty ETC here... Now I'm a 2E171 Satellite, Wideband & Telemetry Systems Maintainer in the Air National Guard. Come Nov. 1, I'll be a 3D171 RF & Transmission Systems Specialist. Fucking AFSC merger clusterfuck... Yeah, I was a victim of the DS rate disesstablishment (was a 1624-DS initially), then was an FC for a couple of years (after the force conversion in 98), then crossed to ET. 1678 (GCCS-M), 9502, etc, etc... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know about a radar from a microwave, but you can use a radar as a microwave. I've seen a turkey cooked with a SPS-49. I would imagine a SPS-49 could cook just about anything, and probably do it quickly as well. Personally, never actually saw it happen though. Didn't Mythbusters shoot down that one? I doubt mythbusters could get access to a SPS-49. I don't think there are many (if any) commercial sets that output the power a Navy air search radar does. IIRC, they did their testing onboard a USCG cutter... |
|
I have built several high output wireless LAN/WAN setups, and i would strongly suggest you not fuck around with microwaves :) A typical microwave magnetron has ~160-180degree dispersion angle, while this may sound awesome, it is incredibly hard to build shielding that focuses that into a useful range without frying oneself. ~2.4Ghz is not a frequency you want to be waving around, especially with the power output and dispersion available from a microwave magnetron.
If anyone actually does this please send me a PM with your address first so i can claim dibs on guns and ammo while you try to keep your liquefied organs from leaking out. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.