User Panel
It's like my finding a meteorite and claiming I shot it from the sky
Russian spin is best spin |
|
Quoted:
Is the average Russian stupid enough to believe this garbage? I mean, some low IQ Americans get suckered in but MOST Russians? Must be all the HIV, vodka, and krokadil coursing thru their veins. View Quote Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water |
|
Quoted:
We should troll our enemies by putting back dated date plates on our missiles before launching-yo, your shit just got pushed in by a missile made back when disco was popular. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While the Russians are exaggerating, our Cruise missiles are a bit long in the tooth. We could do much more to reduce the radar cross section, and the fact that they are subsonic makes them easier to shoot down. |
|
|
Quoted:
They released pictures of the actual parts recovered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Russians NEVER lie or exaggerate, it's simply not in their character... It's like the Iranians photoshopping one missile launch into ten missiles launching. Either way, the answer is to just launch an overwhelming number of missiles. In a REAL attack we would whack their radar sites as soon as they go active. They can replenish missiles easily. Radar sites not so much. |
|
Quoted: Not proof they intercepted anything... Just looks like parts recovered after a missile destroyed its target... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/17973/parts-526223.jpg View Quote |
|
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to.
No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. |
|
Quoted:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_L6pDyjqqsvY/RsMQuzefx0I/AAAAAAAAGgw/nLMY0h675JU/s1600/sadr+city+woman.jpg View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Russians NEVER lie or exaggerate, it's simply not in their character...
|
|
Quoted:
There's zero reason that reasonably modern ADA systems wouldn't be able to shoot down 70s era cruise missiles View Quote Stinger gunner gets the bcu in place and tries to get a lock and it is gone before he got tone. |
|
Quoted:
The pigeons |
|
Let's see comparison photos of parts from shot down missiles and parts from missiles that hit their target and exploded.
What if the parts are from decoy missiles the ADA shot down while the actual missiles passed by and hit the targets? |
|
View Quote I mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? |
|
Quoted:
Cool video, but doesn't look like that effective a missile strike. I mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Russians at least got pictures of rocket fragments. Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Is the average Russian stupid enough to believe this garbage? I mean, some low IQ Americans get suckered in but MOST Russians? Must be all the HIV, vodka, and krokadil coursing thru their veins. Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water |
|
|
|
He is still jealous of Obama winning 108% of the vote in some places, it's more magical than a Kim Il Sung story lol
|
|
Quoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Cool video, but doesn't look like that effective a missile strike. I mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? |
|
Quoted:
To me they look similar to the fragments of passenger jet engines recovered on 9/11. Obviously no exploding warheads involved (except on AM radio and infowars ) https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png |
|
Quoted:
So you're saying terminal velocity impacts and disintegration of turbine blades look similar? No shit I agree. Both hit their targets. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png |
|
Apparently we went after 10 targets but only hit 3....according to the Russkies.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20168/four-outlandish-russian-ministry-of-defense-claims-about-the-syrian-missile-raid |
|
Quoted:
To me they look similar to the fragments of passenger jet engines recovered on 9/11. Obviously no exploding warheads involved (except on AM radio and infowars ) https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png |
|
Quoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Ok fair enough. There's a certain logic there, though why have a warhead on in the first place? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. Seriously though, warheads need testing too. |
|
|
Quoted: Ok fair enough. There's a certain logic there, though why have a warhead on in the first place? View Quote |
|
Lol
It said evidence on the ground, including missile fragments, holes made by the warheads and damage to the targets, could positively confirm only 25 successful hits, calling the US claim of 105 missiles reaching their targets dubious. 25 hits, fucking bullshit. One video alone from one strike area showed 40+ strikes making it to the ground. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.