User Panel
Posted: 10/28/2019 6:05:02 AM EST
I saw a video of some cops learning how to use those square explosive charges to blow holes in walls in my Instagram feed. We can't even keep a police helicopter running but there are police departments sending deputies to classes on explosive breaching?
Has any police department really blown a hole in a wall? Is this something that you can really safely do if you aren't high speedy commando types with the time and money to practice all the time ? Isn't this exactly the kind of stuff George Washington would have had in his assault pack crossing the Delaware if he could have gotten it? Explosive Breaching Exercise |
|
Not small arms.
edit: this is pretty normal training stuff for SWAT teams |
|
First post fail. Of course it should be protected. Its just angry playdoh.
|
|
Yes.
I'm not real comfortable with it, but that's liberty. And just because I'm not comfortable with it doesn't mean that those who are should not be able to buy it, it just means that I wouldn't. Because that's how rights and liberty work. |
|
I have a natural right to wage war against tyranny and oppressors. The Second keeps the government from denying me access to the tools of war.
It’s another example of the words being perfect, but the men who have the power are flawed. |
|
Thought it would be about the German police (at the request of the Dutch ) blowing up the door of some suspected terrorists this morning.
https://www.tubantia.nl/enschede/opgepakte-personen-in-gronau-hebben-banden-met-islamitische-terroristen~a35ba785/ Guess the Baghdadi splattering caused some shitbirds to reschedule FO time Eta yes it is protected as you never know when you need to go a'breeching |
|
No restrictions. No tax stamps. Don't like it, got hurt feelings boo hoo, go feel sad somewhere else.
I'm surprised how many people pissed backward on this, there's a whole lot of brainwashed mothers out there. |
|
Is the cop in the still picture of the video pointing his gun at the cop in fronts head?
|
|
|
Quoted:
Is the cop in the still picture of the video pointing his gun at the cop in fronts head? View Quote |
|
Quoted: That is your ignorant interpretation. Find a court that agrees with you. Explosives are not arms. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: That is your ignorant interpretation. Find a court that agrees with you. Explosives are not arms. Quoted:
Not small arms. well I'll be danged. My bad. |
|
|
|
Quoted: what the fuck kind of commie bullshit is this "the right of the people to keep and bear small Arms, shall not be infringed" well I'll be danged. My bad. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Yes.
I bought some Hatton rounds and a breaching choke, but obviously I need shape charges from Amazon Prime |
|
|
Quoted:
That is your ignorant interpretation. Find a court that agrees with you. Explostives are not arms. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
People owned crew served weapons mounted on warships too
|
|
Quoted:
People owned crew served weapons back then View Quote It was more like Mr Dillon owning the expensive stuff he shows in his videos today. It was more a case of a small town to have communal ownership of a single small artillery field piece. Your occasional wealthy guy could afford to buy and equip a ship, which was brought up earlier in the thread . Equipping those ships was nowhere near the level of a Mon O' War, either. It was nowhere near as common for private citizens to own warships or artillery as is being inferred here. I don't see where this argument has anything to do with justifying people owning breaching charges today |
|
Quoted:
Not many individuals. It was more like Mr Dillon owning the expensive stuff he shows in his videos today. It was more a case of a small town to have communal ownership of a single small artillery field piece. Your occasional wealthy guy could afford to buy and equip a ship, which was brought up earlier in the thread . Equipping those ships was nowhere near the level of a Mon O' War, either. It was nowhere near as common for private citizens to own warships or artillery as is being inferred here. I don't see where this argument has anything to do with justifying people owning breaching charges today View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
People owned crew served weapons back then It was more like Mr Dillon owning the expensive stuff he shows in his videos today. It was more a case of a small town to have communal ownership of a single small artillery field piece. Your occasional wealthy guy could afford to buy and equip a ship, which was brought up earlier in the thread . Equipping those ships was nowhere near the level of a Mon O' War, either. It was nowhere near as common for private citizens to own warships or artillery as is being inferred here. I don't see where this argument has anything to do with justifying people owning breaching charges today ok |
|
Quoted: I've seen cops explosively breach CONUS. Mostly it's doors and locks which can be accomplished through mechanical breaches but theres a lot of other situations too. I went to a breacher course with the Colorado SWAT and they were telling me about an explosive roof breach they did into the basement of an armed nutcase who had barricaded himself in and was holding his wife hostage. Wife went into the bathroom, then boom, down comes part of the roof and a couple highly motivated individuals. In combat I breached quite a bit, both deliberately and emergency. It doesn't take much training to learn, but it does take a lot of training to correctly understand the when, where, and how much. This was another course I went to a few years ago, me holding the blanket. https://i.imgur.com/2Wfi9Nk.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Not many individuals. It was more like Mr Dillon owning the expensive stuff he shows in his videos today. It was more a case of a small town to have communal ownership of a single small artillery field piece. Your occasional wealthy guy could afford to buy and equip a ship, which was brought up earlier in the thread . Equipping those ships was nowhere near the level of a Mon O' War, either. It was nowhere near as common for private citizens to own warships or artillery as is being inferred here. I don't see where this argument has anything to do with justifying people owning breaching charges today View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
People owned crew served weapons back then It was more like Mr Dillon owning the expensive stuff he shows in his videos today. It was more a case of a small town to have communal ownership of a single small artillery field piece. Your occasional wealthy guy could afford to buy and equip a ship, which was brought up earlier in the thread . Equipping those ships was nowhere near the level of a Mon O' War, either. It was nowhere near as common for private citizens to own warships or artillery as is being inferred here. I don't see where this argument has anything to do with justifying people owning breaching charges today well I'll be darned again, it's right there in the Cuntstitution |
|
Orlando PD used explosive breaching charges at Pulse nightclub. Dallas PD used them on the robot during their active shooter in 2016.
I’ve heard of them being used a few other times during search warrants on barricaded buildings. It’s very rare. |
|
Quoted:
I saw a video of some cops learning how to use those square explosive charges to blow holes in walls in my Instagram feed. We can't even keep a police helicopter running but there are police departments sending deputies to classes on explosive breaching? Has any police department really blown a hole in a wall? Is this something that you can really safely do if you aren't high speedy commando types with the time and money to practice all the time ? Isn't this exactly the kind of stuff George Washington would have had in his assault pack crossing the Delaware if he could have gotten it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I6-NuN_ufc View Quote |
|
Quoted:
So your arguments that only rich people should be allowed to own breaching charges? ok View Quote |
|
Quoted:
No. I'm pointing out to all of the people arguing that private ownership of these things wasn't as common as they seem to think. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So your arguments that only rich people should be allowed to own breaching charges? ok Got it! |
|
Quoted:
No. I'm pointing out to all of the people arguing that private ownership of these things wasn't as common as they seem to think. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
"the right of the people to keep and bear only commonly owned Arms, shall not be infringed" View Quote Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. |
|
Quoted:
Tell us what Jamal in the section 8 apartment complex is likely to do with a breaching charge. Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"the right of the people to keep and bear only commonly owned Arms, shall not be infringed" Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. wait....are you talking about AR-15s or breaching charges now? Jammal in section 8 housing can do whatever he damn well wants because he's a free man. If he wants to cut his old car in half with a breaching charge, rock in roll. If he wants to break into his neighbors house, he goes to jail. BTW, you can use other stuff to break into houses. |
|
Quoted:
Tell us what Jamal in the section 8 apartment complex is likely to do with a breaching charge. Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
2nd Amendment - Yes.
Hazardous materials storage requirements - also yes. Need to make sure a house fire doesn't set off your breaching charge collection/fort. |
|
|
Ask the survivors from pulse night club how they feel about explosive breaching. Probably saved a bunch of them from joining the dead.
Much like shotgun breaching, when done properly, it is pretty darn safe. It just looks and sounds ugly, so the general population thinks it is evil. To answer your question about it being available to the public. I would have to say no. Look at the dumb shit that went on, and still goes on, with tannerite...... |
|
Quoted:
Tell us what Jamal in the section 8 apartment complex is likely to do with a breaching charge. Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"the right of the people to keep and bear only commonly owned Arms, shall not be infringed" Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. |
|
I will never stop pointing out the idiocy of people who want our freedom and natural rights restricted.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I will never stop pointing out the idiocy of people who want our freedom and natural rights restricted. View Quote You don't get to do anything you want to do. If you want maximum individual liberty, find an empty island in the South pacific and live there by yourself so that no one will ever disagree with you. |
|
|
Quoted:
Are you Jamal in the section 8 apartment? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Thank you for demonstrating how the left thinks about us. What you’re not realizing is, so are you. |
|
Everything is great until retards start blowing their arms off. I say no just because people are too stupid. Give us same day suppressors and legalize sbr without stamps then start talking goofy shit like explosives.
|
|
Quoted: I've seen cops explosively breach CONUS. Mostly it's doors and locks which can be accomplished through mechanical breaches but theres a lot of other situations too. I went to a breacher course with the Colorado SWAT and they were telling me about an explosive roof breach they did into the basement of an armed nutcase who had barricaded himself in and was holding his wife hostage. Wife went into the bathroom, then boom, down comes part of the roof and a couple highly motivated individuals. In combat I breached quite a bit, both deliberately and emergency. It doesn't take much training to learn, but it does take a lot of training to correctly understand the when, where, and how much. This was another course I went to a few years ago, me holding the blanket. https://i.imgur.com/2Wfi9Nk.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
No, I’m “that lowly commoner that can’t be trusted with these weapons of war.” Apparently, so is Jamal. What you’re not realizing is, so are you. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Tell us what Jamal in the section 8 apartment complex is likely to do with a breaching charge. Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"the right of the people to keep and bear only commonly owned Arms, shall not be infringed" Anything constructive? Good? Self-defensive? Probably NOT. Look, if the government wants to make these things available with the same restrictions as there are for dynamite, then go for it. Certainly not any acceptable reason for these things to be readily available to the general public. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.