User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/25/2020 9:25:14 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Any updates? Expect orders and opinions on Monday. They would typically release one or two a weekday before argument, but since they aren’t doing arguments they just release them on Monday electronically. So, I suspect we will have some on Monday. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2020 9:29:14 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Expect orders and opinions on Monday. They would typically release one or two a weekday before argument, but since they aren’t doing arguments they just release them on Monday electronically. So, I suspect we will have some on Monday. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Any updates? Expect orders and opinions on Monday. They would typically release one or two a weekday before argument, but since they aren’t doing arguments they just release them on Monday electronically. So, I suspect we will have some on Monday.  Most of us will be dead by then. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2020 9:55:56 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Expect orders and opinions on Monday. They would typically release one or two a weekday before argument, but since they aren’t doing arguments they just release them on Monday electronically. So, I suspect we will have some on Monday. Thank you & thanks for fighting for our rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/30/2020 8:07:21 AM EDT
[#4]
Hopefully we'll get some good news today.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/30/2020 1:53:00 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hopefully we'll get some good news today. Late June. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/30/2020 3:45:05 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Late June. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2020 10:57:47 AM EDT
[#7]
Not today
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/15/2020 10:40:18 PM EDT
[#8]
Speculation reading if you are bored.
NYSRPA & COVID-19 https://sites.law.duke.edu/secondthoughts/2020/04/15/nysrpa-covid-19/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/18/2020 12:25:57 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Speculation reading if you are bored. NYSRPA & COVID-19 https://sites.law.duke.edu/secondthoughts/2020/04/15/nysrpa-covid-19/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2020 12:10:48 PM EDT
[#10]
Can I assume there is nothing noteworthy to the Second Amendment in today's Orders of the Court?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/20/2020 12:16:15 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can I assume there is nothing noteworthy to the Second Amendment in today's Orders of the Court? The big news today is unanimous verdicts required for criminal cases |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2020 10:36:18 AM EDT
[#12]
Who does everyone think is writing NYSRPA?
I hope it’s Thomas but believe it’s Kavanaugh. I fear it’s Roberts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/21/2020 3:34:33 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:17:50 AM EDT
[#14]
and the case is for all intents and purposes, moot:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-280_ba7d.pdf |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:19:52 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: and the case is for all intents and purposes, moot: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-280_ba7d.pdf Quote HistoryQuoted: and the case is for all intents and purposes, moot: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-280_ba7d.pdf Well. Dang. After the initial arguments and so much focus being on mooting it I suppose it's not much of a surprise. Thanks so much Kavanaugh.  ETA: I shouldn't be so down about his concurrence with mooting the case. He did go on to say: I also agree with JUSTICE ALITO’s general analysis of Heller and McDonald. Post, at 25; see District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570 (2008); McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010); Heller v. District of Columbia, 670 F. 3d 1244 (CADC 2011) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting). And I share JUSTICE ALITO’s concern that some federal and state courts may not be properly applying Heller and McDonald. The Court should address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the Court. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:37:54 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well. Dang. After the initial arguments and so much focus being on mooting it I suppose it's not much of a surprise. Thanks so much Kavanaugh. ETA: I shouldn't be so down about his concurrence with mooting the case. He did go on to say: Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: and the case is for all intents and purposes, moot: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-280_ba7d.pdf Well. Dang. After the initial arguments and so much focus being on mooting it I suppose it's not much of a surprise. Thanks so much Kavanaugh. ETA: I shouldn't be so down about his concurrence with mooting the case. He did go on to say: I also agree with JUSTICE ALITO’s general analysis of Heller and McDonald. Post, at 25; see District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570 (2008); McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010); Heller v. District of Columbia, 670 F. 3d 1244 (CADC 2011) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting). And I share JUSTICE ALITO’s concern that some federal and state courts may not be properly applying Heller and McDonald. The Court should address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases with petitions for certiorari now pending before the Court. You have four Justices saying the lower courts are doing it wrong and a new case must be taken, it takes four votes to grant cert, and they can drag Roberts into the fold. Mance (interstate handgun sales) or Pena (CA handgun roster) are my bets for the next case to be granted. Kharn |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:41:06 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You have four Justices saying the lower courts are doing it wrong and a new case must be taken, it takes four votes to grant cert, and they can drag Roberts into the fold. Mance (interstate handgun sales) or Pena (CA handgun roster) are my bets for the next case to be granted. Kharn This is correct. Kavanaugh said THIS case was moot, but the lower courts have been thumbing their nose at the 2nd Amendment. He is saying let's fix this and take up a case that won't be moot. Roberts is the only open question. He basically decides the scope of the 2nd Amendment. The bad thing is that this won't be done this term. It will be next term. We desperately need Trump to replace Breyer or Ginsburg on the court. We can't count on Roberts. That is and should be the SOLE ISSUE IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION FOR GUN OWNERS. Replacing Ginsburg or Breyer, it all hinges on that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:44:20 AM EDT
[#18]
Where's that Charlie Brown cartoon with the football again?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 10:57:53 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We desperately need Trump to replace Breyer or Ginsburg on the court. We can't count on Roberts. That is and should be the SOLE ISSUE IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION FOR GUN OWNERS. Replacing Ginsburg or Breyer, it all hinges on that. Trump wins in 2020 and we'll see a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS for 20 years, every circuit court flipped, and the demise of Chevron. I used to be a single issue gun voter, now I'm a single issue Judicial voter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:03:17 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Trump wins in 2020 and we'll see a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS for 20 years, every circuit court flipped, and the demise of Chevron. I used to be a single issue gun voter, now I'm a single issue Judicial voter. AMEN We must get Trump reelected, lets hope all the "bu bu my bumpstocks" schmucks get their heads out of their asses! One more SCOTUS pick & things will drastically change in our favor & the Commies know it! |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:04:57 AM EDT
[#21]
PER CURIAM. In the District Court, petitioners challenged a New York City rule regarding the transport of firearms. Petitioners claimed that the rule violated the Second Amendment. Petitioners sought declaratory and injunctive relief against enforcement of the rule insofar as the rule prevented their transport of firearms to a second home or shooting range outside of the city. The District Court and the Court of Appeals rejected petitioners' claim. See 883 F. 3d 45 (CA2 2018). We granted certiorari. 586 U. S. ___ (2019). After we granted certiorari, the State of New York amended its firearm licensing statute, and the City amended the rule so that petitioners may now transport firearms to a second home or shooting range outside of the city, which is the precise relief that petitioners requested in the prayer for relief in their complaint. App. 48. Petitioners' claim for declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to the City's old rule is therefore moot. Petitioners now argue, however, that the new rule may still infringe their rights. In particular, petitioners claim that they may not be allowed to stop for coffee, gas, food, or restroom breaks on the way to their second homes or shooting ranges outside of the city. The City responds that those routine stops are entirely permissible under the new rule. We do not here decide that dispute about the new rule; as we stated in Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U. S. 472, 482483 (1990): "Our ordinary practice in disposing of a case that has become moot on appeal is to vacate the judgment with directions to dismiss. See, e.g., Deakins v. Monaghan, 484 U. S., at 204; United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36, 3940 (1950). However, in instances where the mootness is attributable to a change in the legal framework governing the case, and where the plaintiff may have some residual claim under the new framework that was understandably not asserted previously, our practice is to vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings in which the parties may, if necessary, amend their pleadings or develop the record more fully. See Diffenderfer v. Central Baptist Church of Miami, Inc., 404 U. S. 412, 415 (1972)." Petitioners also argue that, even though they have not previously asked for damages with respect to the City's old rule, they still could do so in this lawsuit. Petitioners did not seek damages in their complaint; indeed, the possibility of a damages claim was not raised until well into the litigation in this Court. The City argues that it is too late for petitioners to now add a claim for damages. On remand, the Court of Appeals and the District Court may consider whether petitioners may still add a claim for damages in this lawsuit with respect to New York City's old rule. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for such proceedings as are appropriate. It is so ordered. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:10:02 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Trump wins in 2020 and we'll see a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS for 20 years, every circuit court flipped, and the demise of Chevron. I used to be a single issue gun voter, now I'm a single issue Judicial voter. For that wet dream to come true we also need to keep/increase our lead in Congress. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:10:57 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For that wet dream to come true we also need to keep/increase our lead in Congress. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Trump wins in 2020 and we'll see a 6-3 or 7-2 SCOTUS for 20 years, every circuit court flipped, and the demise of Chevron. I used to be a single issue gun voter, now I'm a single issue Judicial voter. For that wet dream to come true we also need to keep/increase our lead in Congress. Nervous Republicans See Trump Sinking, and Taking Senate With Him |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:19:16 AM EDT
[#24]
Scotus will never help NY. It would be too sweeping and effect too many people. They don't like to make waves.
We are forever screwed. Even if a strict scrutiny ruling comes down this decade NY will ignore it and the 2nd circus will just uphold it. Scotus will ignore it. NY is just too big to fail regarding gun laws. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:24:32 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryNYT? It's nice that the Never_Trumpers got their own mod. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:26:30 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: NYT? It's nice that the Never_Trumpers got their own mod. Quote HistoryQuoted: NYT? It's nice that the Never_Trumpers got their own mod.  Try again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:28:49 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryI don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:31:29 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Trump must be worshipped,like a God,no matter what,and anyone that criticizes him is a damned NeverTrumper.............. Same same with the Republican Party. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:34:05 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:36:47 AM EDT
[#30]
FUCK!
another year wasted |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:39:44 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you read the article even though it is from the NYT. Republicans are afraid of Trump losing approval by the public and how it affects the down ballot votes. that's bs and anyone believing that are dopes. I'll tell you what, if reps don't start doing their job, I won't vote because I'm seeing very little difference between them an dems |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:41:05 AM EDT
[#32]
Expand?? The language of the 2nd says "arms" which means basically all weapons and armor. Can't expand much beyond that.
I thought it was already settled that the 2nd was a individual/personal right? So this seems screwy to even be in question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 11:56:39 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Trump must be worshipped,like a God,no matter what,and anyone that criticizes him is a damned NeverTrumper.............. Same same with the Republican Party. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Trump must be worshipped,like a God,no matter what,and anyone that criticizes him is a damned NeverTrumper.............. Same same with the Republican Party. yeah they are negative for our gun rights, bump stock, fallen states, and yeah more lip service hack, we did much better in obama years |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:03:47 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: yeah they are negative for our gun rights, bump stock, fallen states, and yeah more lip service hack, we did much better in obama years Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Trump must be worshipped,like a God,no matter what,and anyone that criticizes him is a damned NeverTrumper.............. Same same with the Republican Party. yeah they are negative for our gun rights, bump stock, fallen states, and yeah more lip service hack, we did much better in obama years 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:06:13 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryThe same New York Times that reported that Hillary has a 95% chance of victory? The one recently caught blaming Hannity for some guy taking his Coronavirus advice two weeks before he gave it? https://thefederalist.com/2020/04/21/nyt-author-who-faulted-fox-news-for-mans-tragic-passing-also-downplayed-coronavirus/ That’s a reliable source for sure. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:08:48 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The same New York Times that reported that Hillary has a 95% chance of victory? The one recently caught blaming Hannity for some guy taking his advice two weeks before he gave it? That's a reliable source for sure. Quote HistoryQuoted: The same New York Times that reported that Hillary has a 95% chance of victory? The one recently caught blaming Hannity for some guy taking his advice two weeks before he gave it? That's a reliable source for sure. Trump's poor poll numbers trigger GOP alarms over November President Trump faces a major hurdle with swing state voters GOP panicked over Trump's collapsing poll numbers as president's campaign aides battle over strategy |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:10:35 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't have to try again, your posts speak for themselves. Trump must be worshipped,like a God,no matter what,and anyone that criticizes him is a damned NeverTrumper.............. Same same with the Republican Party. yeah they are negative for our gun rights, bump stock, fallen states, and yeah more lip service hack, we did much better in obama years https://i.imgur.com/EouKuM5.jpg 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:39:18 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The same New York Times that reported that Hillary has a 95% chance of victory? The one recently caught blaming Hannity for some guy taking his advice two weeks before he gave it? That's a reliable source for sure. Trump's poor poll numbers trigger GOP alarms over November President Trump faces a major hurdle with swing state voters GOP panicked over Trump's collapsing poll numbers as president's campaign aides battle over strategy Can we keep this on track about gun rights litigation and that path forward rather than another bash the GOP distraction? People haven’t even had time to read All 34 pages yet |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:40:55 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: and the case is for all intents and purposes, moot: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-280_ba7d.pdf Does Alito’s dissent help us at all in other lower court cases? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:43:31 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryA Politico article and an article that references the Politico article. Yawn. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:47:25 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: NYT? It's nice that the Never_Trumpers got their own mod. https://i.imgur.com/qrH1VFY.jpg Try again. You've already stated in another thread that "Trump fooled me once, he won't fool me again." You're a N_T now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:55:26 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can we keep this on track about gun rights litigation and that path forward rather than another bash the GOP distraction? People haven’t even had time to read All 34 pages yet Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: The same New York Times that reported that Hillary has a 95% chance of victory? The one recently caught blaming Hannity for some guy taking his advice two weeks before he gave it? That's a reliable source for sure. Trump's poor poll numbers trigger GOP alarms over November President Trump faces a major hurdle with swing state voters GOP panicked over Trump's collapsing poll numbers as president's campaign aides battle over strategy Can we keep this on track about gun rights litigation and that path forward rather than another bash the GOP distraction? People haven’t even had time to read All 34 pages yet That’s the problem. There is no path forward. Trumps picks are perfectly willing to let infringements stand. He could pick the whole court and nothing will change. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 12:57:38 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That’s the problem. There is no path forward. Trumps picks are perfectly willing to let infringements stand. He could pick the whole court and nothing will change. Don't bother them with facts they have more Kool Aid to drink about Trumps 2A Utopia being just around corner. These things take time you gotta trust the 2A Coalitions picks for SCOTUS that Trump is using. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 1:02:20 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You've already stated in another thread that "Trump fooled me once, he won't fool me again." You're a N_T now. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: NYT? It's nice that the Never_Trumpers got their own mod. https://i.imgur.com/qrH1VFY.jpg Try again. You've already stated in another thread that "Trump fooled me once, he won't fool me again." You're a N_T now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 1:03:35 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't bother them with facts they have more Kool Aid to drink about Trumps 2A Utopia being just around corner. These things take time you gotta trust the 2A Coalitions picks for SCOTUS that Trump is using. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: That's the problem. There is no path forward. Trumps picks are perfectly willing to let infringements stand. He could pick the whole court and nothing will change. Don't bother them with facts they have more Kool Aid to drink about Trumps 2A Utopia being just around corner. These things take time you gotta trust the 2A Coalitions picks for SCOTUS that Trump is using. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 1:05:21 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: In their defense and to play Devil's Advocate. Justice Kavanaugh did state that he wants other cases to be thrown at SCOUTS. Fair enough call me when something actually gets done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 1:06:49 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fair enough call me when something actually gets done. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: In their defense and to play Devil's Advocate. Justice Kavanaugh did state that he wants other cases to be thrown at SCOUTS. Fair enough call me when something actually gets done. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 3:44:59 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you read the article even though it is from the NYT. Republicans are afraid of Trump losing approval by the public and how it affects the down ballot votes. Written by Maggie Haberman, enough said. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 3:50:36 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You've already stated in another thread that "Trump fooled me once, he won't fool me again." You're a N_T now. So when exactly did I say this? Even going back to the 2016 primary era I don't think I said that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2020 3:52:50 PM EDT
[#50]
It's very heartwarming to see the Share_Blue Squad show up to defend their favorite mod.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
