User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 6:34:33 AM EDT
[#1]
"No you have it all wrong he was a real Amerikan Hero" -Bagdad Susan 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 6:44:06 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I thinkIt is now proven this Administration is HIGHLY sympathetic to radical Islam and anyone associated with it. This Administration represents the antithesis of traditional America and want it destroyed IMHO. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Just wanted to put a random "fuck this piece of shit traitor" post on here. I thinkIt is now proven this Administration is HIGHLY sympathetic to radical Islam and anyone associated with it. This Administration represents the antithesis of traditional America and want it destroyed IMHO. FIFY 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:12:11 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FIFY Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just wanted to put a random "fuck this piece of shit traitor" post on here. I thinkIt is now proven this Administration is HIGHLY sympathetic to radical Islam and anyone associated with it. This Administration represents the antithesis of traditional America and want it destroyed IMHO. FIFY Thank you!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:16:18 AM EDT
[#4]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:16:41 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There was some idiot at the end claiming "29 years of service in the military" saying that we shouldn't hold it against him because we as Americans "put him in the uniform, let a drill sergeant scream at him, then sent him off to some foreign country to do our bidding" or some other nonsense. Guy basically said we shouldn't hold it against him because YOU wouldn't be able to handle it if you were in his shoes. Weird that none of his other squad mates had those issues...... Something tells me that guy never served a day in his life. In an all-volunteer force? Good gravy... it really is forever the Vietnam Era in the minds of the political Left. Somebody ought to tell that genius that we don't have a draft or conscript army any more. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:21:47 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryMust have studied under Susan Rice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:22:05 AM EDT
[#7]
The WH's minions are going into "what difference does it make" mode now about releasing the Taliban leaders. They claim after the war is over what else are we going to do with the Taliban in Gitmo?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:25:50 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The WH's minions are going into "what difference does it make" mode now about releasing the Taliban leaders. They claim after the war is over what else are we going to do with the Taliban in Gitmo? Curious how the 'tards feel about trying Nazi and Japanese war criminals after WWII? Why are they so FUCKING STUPID!!?? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:27:35 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. We hold them in accordance with our requirements regarding POW handling but they do not have POW status. While the rest of the world bitches, the ICRC generally agrees with the position of the USG as a reasonable compromise. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A bit of devil's advocacy. Once we leave Afghanistan, we have no basis for indefinitely holding Taliban members. Our GITMO detainees are unlawful combatants, not POWs. They are afforded no protection under the Geneva Convention or any other international treaties or accords. We can hold them until they rot, and there is no law that says otherwise. This. We hold them in accordance with our requirements regarding POW handling but they do not have POW status. While the rest of the world bitches, the ICRC generally agrees with the position of the USG as a reasonable compromise. The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:29:55 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
A bit of devil's advocacy. Once we leave Afghanistan, we have no basis for indefinitely holding Taliban members. Our GITMO detainees are unlawful combatants, not POWs. They are afforded no protection under the Geneva Convention or any other international treaties or accords. We can hold them until they rot, and there is no law that says otherwise. This. We hold them in accordance with our requirements regarding POW handling but they do not have POW status. While the rest of the world bitches, the ICRC generally agrees with the position of the USG as a reasonable compromise. The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. I doubt the military will take many prisoners in future conflicts of this kind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:30:30 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............... The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. And a tough pro American president would say "tough shit, these guys were involved in organizations who killed 3,000 innocent people on 9/11". |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:32:30 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And a tough pro American president would say "tough shit, these guys were involved in organizations who killed 3,000 innocent people on 9/11". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
............... The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarrassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. And a tough pro American president would say "tough shit, these guys were involved in organizations who killed 3,000 innocent people on 9/11". Why would you deliberately give the terrorists a propaganda weapon to use against you? Being public about the Gitmo prisoners was a colossal mistake. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:34:08 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............ Why would you deliberately give the terrorists a propaganda weapon to use against you? Being public about the Gitmo prisoners was a colossal mistake. After secretly getting all the info we could out of them I would have killed them. As to the propaganda weapon..........I doubt much is needed to keep radical Islam hateful towards the West. We could nuke Israel and they would still want us destroyed IMHO. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:35:00 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. That's both stupid and illegal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:37:46 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why would you deliberately give the terrorists a propaganda weapon to use against you? Being public about the Gitmo prisoners was a colossal mistake. Our big mistake was not understanding that the EuroLeft and our domestic Left would not understand that Salafi Terrorism is as big or bigger a threat to them than it is to the U.S. Or, believing the lies of the European Left, who, as far as I'm concerned, can enjoy choosing between Russia and Al Qaeda. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:38:48 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's both stupid and illegal. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarrassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. That's both stupid and illegal. Not any more stupid than keeping this clusterfuck going indefinitely, and it's only illegal if you get caught. If you're squeamish about it, you could have handed them over to a friendly regime without such qualms. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:39:22 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............... The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarrassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. Do. Not. Care. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:41:05 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Our big mistake was not understanding that the EuroLeft and our domestic Left would not understand that Salafi Terrorism is as big or bigger a threat to them than it is to the U.S. Or, believing the lies of the European Left, who, as far as I'm concerned, can enjoy choosing between Russia and Al Qaeda. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Why would you deliberately give the terrorists a propaganda weapon to use against you? Being public about the Gitmo prisoners was a colossal mistake. Our big mistake was not understanding that the EuroLeft and our domestic Left would not understand that Salafi Terrorism is as big or bigger a threat to them than it is to the U.S. Or, believing the lies of the European Left, who, as far as I'm concerned, can enjoy choosing between Russia and Al Qaeda. The US loses wars because it fails politically. You've proven time and time again that you don't understand the political aspect of war. This is just another example of that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:41:47 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do. Not. Care. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
............... The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarrassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. Do. Not. Care. It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:44:48 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............. It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. So, you agree with Obama handing them over for a deserter because we are an embarrassment to other countries? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:45:55 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, you agree with Obama handing them over for a deserter because we are an embarrassment to other countries? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
............. It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. So, you agree with Obama handing them over for a deserter because we are an embarrassment to other countries? No I don't. Read it again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 7:46:25 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............ No I don't. Read it again. Good! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:02:21 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:03:43 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's both stupid and illegal. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The problem is that the indefinite detention is a source of embarassment for the US, and it will continue as long as the prisoners remain. It would have been better to interrogate them in secret, and then simply kill them. Instead you're pretty much stuck with them now. That's both stupid and illegal. It is illegal. What we make "legal" and require to conform to "legality" is stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:06:37 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. I seem to recall plenty of Americans getting killed by radical islamists before there was ever a Gitmo. In fact, we set up Gitmo precisely because there were so many Americans dead at islamist hands that we were pretty much forced to go hunt them down to interrupt other plans to kill Americans. Executing terrorists isn't "illegal", either. We could very easily have tried them and executed them like we did Germans and Japanese in WW2. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:10:02 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I seem to recall plenty of Americans getting killed by radical islamists before there was ever a Gitmo. In fact, we set up Gitmo precisely because there were so many Americans dead at islamist hands that we were pretty much forced to go hunt them down to interrupt other plans to kill Americans. Executing terrorists isn't "illegal", either. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. I seem to recall plenty of Americans getting killed by radical islamists before there was ever a Gitmo. In fact, we set up Gitmo precisely because there were so many Americans dead at islamist hands that we were pretty much forced to go hunt them down to interrupt other plans to kill Americans. Executing terrorists isn't "illegal", either. GTFO, its obviously all about gitmo and retards burning the koran. Euros are much more enlightened , hence they have none of these problems. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:10:24 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They can't be that dumb. They're not dumb. They're supremely arrogant. Which makes them utterly tone deaf. They are so high on their own fumes they are incapable of looking rationally at facts or comprehending how people who aren't convinced they shit sherbert might react to them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:11:23 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Must have studied under Susan Rice. Quote HistoryQuoted: Must have studied under Susan Rice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:12:05 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He didn't look to be in acute distress in the video. I thought he was supposed to be on the verge of death.... Like that Lybian terrorist the UK let go a few years back? They don't even bother with reasonably constructed lies anymore. We probably could have negotiated the release of this shitbird for a ham sandwich and a reasonably attractive virgin goat. Instead we got rolled by some goat-fucking primitives into handing over high value targets that a lot of dudes bled to capture in the first goddamn place. It probably wasn't even much of a negotiation. The administration probably offered them up off the bat because that's how fucking clueless these motherfuckers are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:12:21 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They're not dumb. They're supremely arrogant. Which makes them utterly tone deaf. They are so high on their own fumes they are incapable of looking rationally at facts or comprehending how people who aren't convinced they shit sherbert might react to them. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
They can't be that dumb. They're not dumb. They're supremely arrogant. Which makes them utterly tone deaf. They are so high on their own fumes they are incapable of looking rationally at facts or comprehending how people who aren't convinced they shit sherbert might react to them. I now have an insight into why you and I disagree on this basic fundamental (i.e., that they are or are not stupid). I agree they have that attitude........we are in agreement on that. The difference is that I think people with that attitude are stupid because of that very attitude. Interesting that we can both agree on the attitude but attribute it to something different mentally. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:12:34 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I seem to recall plenty of Americans getting killed by radical islamists before there was ever a Gitmo. In fact, we set up Gitmo precisely because there were so many Americans dead at islamist hands that we were pretty much forced to go hunt them down to interrupt other plans to kill Americans. Executing terrorists isn't "illegal", either. We could very easily have tried them and executed them like we did Germans and Japanese in WW2. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It gets Americans killed whether you care or not. I seem to recall plenty of Americans getting killed by radical islamists before there was ever a Gitmo. In fact, we set up Gitmo precisely because there were so many Americans dead at islamist hands that we were pretty much forced to go hunt them down to interrupt other plans to kill Americans. Executing terrorists isn't "illegal", either. We could very easily have tried them and executed them like we did Germans and Japanese in WW2. As it stands, Gitmo is a valuable propaganda tool for anyone who hates the US. To Al Qaida it's the gift that keeps on giving. It's short sighted and counter productive to keep them. Now the problem won't go away. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:12:45 AM EDT
[#32]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:13:18 AM EDT
[#33]
You think Big Green is wishing they had declared him a deserter now?
I understand why they wouldn't: obvious morale and propaganda issues as well as,to be honest,there would have been those claiming he had been abandoned and such a declaration was a cover up and the good chance that without being useful as a "POW",the Talibs might make him a horror movie star. This will blow over within weeks unless he hits the talkshow circuit,which will be funny if they also have his unit comrades on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:14:11 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
.......... As it stands, Gitmo is a valuable propaganda tool for anyone who hates the US. To Al Qaida it's the gift that keeps on giving. It's short sighted and counter productive to keep them. Now the problem won't go away. We disagree on this one in the sense that I don't think freeing all the Gitmo prisoners will make a substantial difference in how radical Jihadists treat us in the future. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:16:08 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We disagree on this one in the sense that I don't think freeing all the Gitmo prisoners will make a substantial difference in how radical Jihadists treat us in the future. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
.......... As it stands, Gitmo is a valuable propaganda tool for anyone who hates the US. To Al Qaida it's the gift that keeps on giving. It's short sighted and counter productive to keep them. Now the problem won't go away. We disagree on this one in the sense that I don't think freeing all the Gitmo prisoners will make a substantial difference in how radical Jihadists treat us in the future. Reading is for faggots. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:16:16 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistorySaw that this morning. Needed much more releasing of the scary men in the Blackhawk or Hellfire rain. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:16:37 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He didn't look to be in acute distress in the video. I thought he was supposed to be on the verge of death.... Looked more like a kid on the last day of summer camp who wasn't going to see his friends anymore... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:17:11 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............. Reading is for faggots. Why do I keep disagreeing with you when you are agreeing with me!!?? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:20:46 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As it stands, Gitmo is a valuable propaganda tool for anyone who hates the US. To Al Qaida it's the gift that keeps on giving. Quote HistoryQuoted:
As it stands, Gitmo is a valuable propaganda tool for anyone who hates the US. To Al Qaida it's the gift that keeps on giving. Had something like Gitmo been set up by the Clinton administration when OBL was offered up by a couple of countries that found him obnoxious, there wouldn't fucking BE an Al Quaeda. See, the Clinton administration didn't take OBL because they didn't know what to do with him once they had him. They lacked the stones to send some guys from Dam Neck to shoot the fucker in the back of the head, and they didn't want to set up a Gitmo where they could pump him for intel because it was all very messy. ...and that led to multiple terrorist attacks which helped give credibility to a strain of radical islam that had been a pain in the ass for at least thirty years by that point but got kicked into overdrive once the towers fell. The fact that a bunch of murdering savages cites something in their propaganda doesn't make it true, son. It's short sighted and counter productive to keep them. Now the problem won't go away. Gitmo was set up to keep animals in a cage so they could be pumped for intel. It was made necessary by the acts of the animals themselves. The Obama administration has pretty much dispensed with the idea of pumping these guys for intel and is doing all that is possible to kill them rather than capture and get more info. They want dead terrorists, not more guys they can store in Gitmo...and despite this it doesn't seem like the islamic world is all that happy with dead jihadists either. It's almost as if there's no pleasing radical jihadist nutcases. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:21:19 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I now have an insight into why you and I disagree on this basic fundamental (i.e., that they are or are not stupid). I agree they have that attitude........we are in agreement on that. The difference is that I think people with that attitude are stupid because of that very attitude. Interesting that we can both agree on the attitude but attribute it to something different mentally. They're not stupid. They're evil. Evil is worse. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:21:33 AM EDT
[#41]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:22:01 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They're not stupid. They're evil. Evil is worse. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I now have an insight into why you and I disagree on this basic fundamental (i.e., that they are or are not stupid). I agree they have that attitude........we are in agreement on that. The difference is that I think people with that attitude are stupid because of that very attitude. Interesting that we can both agree on the attitude but attribute it to something different mentally. They're not stupid. They're evil. Evil is worse. Once again we agree..........but you missed my point........to me evil IS stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:23:46 AM EDT
[#43]
Why Team Obama Was Blindsided by the Bergdahl Backlash
The president and Ms. Rice seem to think that the crime of desertion in wartime is kind of like skipping class. This is a fundamental culture clash. Team Obama and its base cannot comprehend the values still cherished by those young Americans “so dumb” they joined the Army instead of going to prep school and then to Harvard. Values such as duty, honor, country, physical courage, and loyalty to your brothers and sisters in arms have no place in Obama World. (Military people don’t necessarily all like each other, but they know they can depend on each other in battle — the sacred trust Bergdahl violated.) http://m.nationalreview.com/article/379481/why-team-obama-was-blindsided-bergdahl-backlash-ralph-peters |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:26:53 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's almost as if there's no pleasing radical jihadist nutcases. You don't have to please them, but you also don't have to help them win the propaganda war. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:30:18 AM EDT
[#45]
I don't think this deal was about Bergdahl at all. He was a way to make the deal appear better to the US public. Behind the scenes I bet the deal with the Taliban is the following -
We release their top 5 leaders and before the next Presidential election we close Guantanamo bay and release the rest of the prisoners. In return the Taliban agree to not topple Karzai until after the election and Obama's legacy is secured (and with no Afghanistan problems to derail Hillary's election). This is all about Obama's ego - he wants to bring home the only POW, he wants to close Guantanamo, he wants to be remembered as the President that left office with a stable Afghanistan and Iraq. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:31:44 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You don't have to please them, but you also don't have to help them win the propaganda war. Quote HistoryQuoted:
You don't have to please them, but you also don't have to help them win the propaganda war. Again: we didn't have a Gitmo prior to 9/11. They attacked us anyway...supposedly pissed off about everything from an alliance with Israel to a military presence in Saudi Arabia...a military presence the Saudis wanted. Anything short of adopting Sharia law and completely subjugating our society to radical islam is a source of butthurt with these goat raping primitives. You cannot win a propaganda war with them because they are never, EVER, going to be running short of grievances which justify slaughtering the innocent wholesale. What you can do is cage them or kill them. Gitmo was built to cage them and pump them for intel to stop other attacks they'd planned on innocent people since before there WAS a Gitmo. This isn't hard. Quoted:
I don't think this deal was about Bergdahl at all. He was a way to make the deal appear better to the US public. Behind the scenes I bet the deal with the Taliban is the following - We release their top 5 leaders and before the next Presidential election we close Guantanamo bay and release the rest of the prisoners. In return the Taliban agree to not topple Karzai until after the election and Obama's legacy is secured (and with no Afghanistan problems to derail Hillary's election). This is all about Obama's ego - he wants to bring home the only POW, he wants to close Guantanamo, he wants to be remembered as the President that left office with a stable Afghanistan and Iraq. If that's his plan then more power to him. After spending his entire presidency blaming everything that's not turned out well on a previous administration if he thinks that turning the Taliban loose for a promise to behave long enough for him to get out of office will earn him the "legacy" of having left a "stable" Afghanistan and Iraq then he's a Kim-Jong-Un level nutter who deserves the major bollocking he's going to get. A president cannot get to the last day of his term and holler OLLYOLLYOXENFREE!!! and thus absolve himself of any accountability for his decisions while in office. "Afghanistan was stable when I left office! It's somebody else's fault!" Nobody is going to take that seriously, and it's not going to be sufficient to bolster his grander world-leader intentions when he leaves office. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:33:39 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Again: we didn't have a Gitmo prior to 9/11. They attacked us anyway...supposedly pissed off about everything from an alliance with Israel to a military presence in Saudi Arabia...a military presence the Saudis wanted. Anything short of adopting Sharia law and completely subjugating our society to radical islam is a source of butthurt with these goat raping primitives. You cannot win a propaganda war with them because they are never, EVER, going to be running short of grievances which justify slaughtering the innocent wholesale. What you can do is cage them or kill them. Gitmo was built to cage them and pump them for intel to stop other attacks they'd planned on innocent people since before there WAS a Gitmo. This isn't hard. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You don't have to please them, but you also don't have to help them win the propaganda war. Again: we didn't have a Gitmo prior to 9/11. They attacked us anyway...supposedly pissed off about everything from an alliance with Israel to a military presence in Saudi Arabia...a military presence the Saudis wanted. Anything short of adopting Sharia law and completely subjugating our society to radical islam is a source of butthurt with these goat raping primitives. You cannot win a propaganda war with them because they are never, EVER, going to be running short of grievances which justify slaughtering the innocent wholesale. What you can do is cage them or kill them. Gitmo was built to cage them and pump them for intel to stop other attacks they'd planned on innocent people since before there WAS a Gitmo. This isn't hard. Read what I've written again. You seem to be struggling. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:34:45 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
................. Read what I've written again. You seem to be struggling. He is not alone. 
You are getting a bit too nuanced for simple old RDak. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:37:04 AM EDT
[#49]
Interesting that the flight crew frisked him before he got on the helicopter.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2014 8:37:44 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He is not alone.
You are getting a bit too nuanced for simple old RDak. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
................. Read what I've written again. You seem to be struggling. He is not alone.
You are getting a bit too nuanced for simple old RDak. What I'm saying is that they should have been disposed of after interrogation. They no longer have any value to the US, and have become a liability. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
