User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:35:51 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For posting the link to the BOTD in GD Happens all the time , usually just 3 days off Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You do realize Cruz has as good of a chance of winning the nomination as you do of walking into your bedroom and finding this waiting for you, right? http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_142/1836545_Candice_Swanepoel.html For what? I appreciate your concern, but there's nothing wrong with posting BOTD links in GD. I was already 99.99% sure it was okay, but I just got confirmation from site staff that it was GTG to make it 100%. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:36:02 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't remember that Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yes. As a matter of fact, he was I don't remember that From Wikipedia: "In 1999, Trump filed an exploratory committee to seek the presidential nomination of the Reform Party in 2000" |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:36:17 PM EDT
[#3]
BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear:
http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:36:18 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Indeed. It's kind of confirmed one of the reasons that throughout my life, as drawn to the conservative side as I might have been, it always felt like a veneer hiding a lot of ugly shit. This election has brought the festering boil to a head. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol we are so fucked Indeed. Republicans are the dumbest motherfuckers on the face of the earth. The only firing squad they've ever heard of was the circular one. Indeed. It's kind of confirmed one of the reasons that throughout my life, as drawn to the conservative side as I might have been, it always felt like a veneer hiding a lot of ugly shit. This election has brought the festering boil to a head. That is the point of the political process... It isn't for the 'sensitive' |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:36:51 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not as eloquent as 1Andy2 but definitely on target. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This thread has confirmed my initial misgivings about a great deal of Trump supporters. I know a lot of you aren't bad, but wow. Some of the vocal people ITT are really showing their colors. The National Enquirer National Enquirer Enquirer We're taking seriously an article from the National Enquirer. They took down John Edwards though! Yeah, they currently have .014% accuracy rating on their large swath of claims over the years. Strong credibility. If you know anybody who was falsely accused of extramarital affair, rape, etc, then you know this shit is not funny at all, and rumors can severely fuck up an upstanding person's reputation and life. The fact that some of you are so eager to run with this bullshit, and are joking about it is fucking ridiculous tbh. I sincerely hope none of you EVER experience your reputation getting dragged through the shit due to false accusations, but I'd venture to say a lot of you probably don't have that much of a reputation to begin with. After today I don't really know exactly who the fuck I will vote for this time around. Today's threads are so full on retarded douchebaggery I have changed my opinion that I would suck it up, take a chance, roll the dice and vote for Trump. Now I can say I will not vote for him. Not just because of him but because too many of his supporters have proven themselves to be no different than Hillary and Bernie supporters. There is absolutely nothing "conservative" about them. They are like anti-gun Blumberg types who pray for and wait eagerly for the next Newtown so they can twist it around to jump the NRA and the Tea Party and further their one issue agenda. Fuck it. By voting with people like this we will lose either way. I'm just not going to do it now. Not as eloquent as 1Andy2 but definitely on target. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:37:04 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I haven't taken any sides and have only observed you guys bickering with each other day after day, but IMHO Cruz supporters seem to be projecting an awful lot. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Its hilarious to me how the last two pages are filled with Trump backers posting links to the Washington Times...who fired the reporter pushing the rumor several hours ago. It illustrates their main motive is not the truth of the story...but that a slanderous story MUST get out. Well when you're head over heels in love with another man and think he is infallible and worship his every action then yeah, you're going to want to see him succeed. This election has really opened my eyes to what a pathetic bunch of lonely, basement dwelling vaginas we really are. Just desperate for a leader to show us the way, desperate to be a part of something. I finally realized the other day it isn't Trump that disgusts me, I actually think he'd be a decent president, its his followers. Good post... I haven't taken any sides and have only observed you guys bickering with each other day after day, but IMHO Cruz supporters seem to be projecting an awful lot. Projecting what? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:37:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeaczSrW4AEjAO_.jpg:large https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ So something from the archives contradicts something that just happened...You know what "archive" means, right? Kind of the opposite of "Current"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:37:44 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me help you out Balista, since honesty doesn't seem to be your strong suit today: http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz332/MichaelArcane/tweet5.jpg They fired his ass today over this nonsense. So he wasn't really on the payroll... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:37:52 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If someone re-posted a picture that your wife took and published in a magazine, you'd find that to be just as bad as if someone accused you publicly in print of having a sexual affair with 5 different women. So plausible you'd view both acts equally. You're not only an idiot if that is your claim, but a liar, because nobody would consider them to be equally egregious acts. No your right, your compass isn't just selective, its actually pretty fucked up. Lies AND/or manipulation are the same thing. Trumps lies, ted manipulates. You also willfully continue to leave out the crucial and important points. If someone reposted my wife's picture it wouldn't bother me. But if they reposted it with disparaging and defaming remarks, that would be manipulative(and lies), but you refuse to see that. Keep those blinders on buddy! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:38:20 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One of the women in the article that supposedly fucked Cruz is a Trump spokesperson... Do you honestly think they would include her if this was all bullshit fabricated by the Trump camp? How exactly does it benefit them to assassinate her character with a fake story? Common sense... Try it sometime. Because hypothetically, it would allow them to run with the BS story which many will not take the time to investigate fully (the stink of scandal will be enough), and say we had nothing to do with it, why would we implicate our own spokesperson... she is the victim. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:38:42 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You mean like this one? http://i.imgur.com/5DnDuNm.png His bio from the Washington Times webpage from yesterday shows that he published multiple times a month and was listed as a staff writer, columnist. No mention as a 'citizen journalist'. http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png What changed in 24 hours? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ Post all 4 tweets. Together they explain he is fired as of today. Nice try tho, albeit thoroughly dishonest. You mean like this one? http://i.imgur.com/5DnDuNm.png His bio from the Washington Times webpage from yesterday shows that he published multiple times a month and was listed as a staff writer, columnist. No mention as a 'citizen journalist'. http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png What changed in 24 hours? Apparently reading isn't your strong suit...they didn't say he was a citizen journalist, citizen journalist is how they described the portal he wrote for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:38:59 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You mean like this one? http://i.imgur.com/5DnDuNm.png His bio from the Washington Times webpage from yesterday shows that he published multiple times a month and was listed as a staff writer, columnist. No mention as a 'citizen journalist'. http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png What changed in 24 hours? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ Post all 4 tweets. Together they explain he is fired as of today. Nice try tho, albeit thoroughly dishonest. You mean like this one? http://i.imgur.com/5DnDuNm.png His bio from the Washington Times webpage from yesterday shows that he published multiple times a month and was listed as a staff writer, columnist. No mention as a 'citizen journalist'. http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png What changed in 24 hours? The NE report and EPIC butthurt, the throwing of an election, and potential litigation... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:39:20 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yet Carson forgave any alleged Trump transgressions but has not forgiven Lying Ted. That should really tell you something about how dishonest Ted is. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So many lies and such a pathetic argument, must be a Cruz supporter. Your BS doesn't have a basis in reality. If Trump smeared Carson through the NE then why did Carson endorse Trump? The only one who lied and smeared Carson was Ted Cruz. Oh, for God's sake...Trump compared Ben Carson to a child molester during a nationally televised debate and Carson still endorsed him. Surely you've got a better line of reasoning than that. Yet Carson forgave any alleged Trump transgressions but has not forgiven Lying Ted. That should really tell you something about how dishonest Ted is. Or what a total dullard Uncle Ben is... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:39:27 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So something from the archives contradicts something that just happened...You know what "archive" means, right? Kind of the opposite of "Current"? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeaczSrW4AEjAO_.jpg:large https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ So something from the archives contradicts something that just happened...You know what "archive" means, right? Kind of the opposite of "Current"? The archive was from yesterday 24 March 2016. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:39:39 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
+1 I'm tired of replying in these threads but then someone says something so fucking stupid I can't help it, even though I know it's pointless. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Politics is disgusting, but this race really takes the cake. The kind of behavior it elicits in some of you shocks me. The lows get lower every week and you get more frenzied with each new disgusting turn. This thread is embarrassing. And not in the way some of the Trump supporters might think. I'm embarrassed for some of them. The glee and malice I see in some of these posts, wishing for Cruz to have cheated on his wife. Wishing for his wife to have had some kind of nervous breakdown or something. Wishing for all of this stuff to be true about a Senator with a record of staunch second Amendment support is beyond perplexing. It's insane. I'm not going to lie... I don't like Trump. I like Cruz for this job. But I don't like anyone the way some of you apparently like Trump. Many of you have basically joined a cult of personality with regard to Trump. And I honestly don't want to have anything to do with you. Not now. Not after the election, regardless of outcome. And it doesn't have anything to do with not wanting to hear what you have to say, but rather knowing that it isn't ideas that matter to you, but tactics, regardless of collateral damage, worthiness, or falsity. A few of you have shown us all what kind of character you have. At this point, I'm going to look on the bright side of this whole disgusting political cycle and see it as an opportunity to watch more toxic people self-identify. I finally found a good use for the ignore list. It isn't because you're saying stuff I don't want to hear. It's because I don't want to fuck up and accidentally interact with sociopaths. Not because I can't stand to hear you, but because there's no upside to talking to you or being around you. Frankly, I'm surprised we haven't seen a few instances of arocking on this board over this political cycle. I expect to see it. Now who has that browser script for hard filtering certain topics? I'm ready for it. Fuck this shit. Yep. +1 I'm tired of replying in these threads but then someone says something so fucking stupid I can't help it, even though I know it's pointless. A lot of the rabid "Trump! In Yo Face!" posts on this forum are a response to the "Cruz! In your face!" posts that have popped up in every thread for the past 6mo. It's just gotten worse as time went by. I was a firm Paul and Cruz supporter on here at the beginning, but his rabid fanbase on ARF left a bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't surprise me you folks are getting this reaction. And no, that doesn't mean I'm automatically a "trumpbot" 
If you all had acted a little more like adults and used some tact, I think things wouldn't be so bad right now. Just my opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:39:50 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you think I called Cruz a scumbag, that means you believe hes trying to hide the truth. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Scumbags try to hide stories like this.
Lol. I don't know if it's true or not. You CLEARLY already have bought in 100% Then why would you call Cruz a "scumbag" for "trying to hide a story like this"? Shits and Giggles? If you think I called Cruz a scumbag, that means you believe hes trying to hide the truth. No. That isn't what it means at all. It means I think you are implying Cruz is a scumbag. And you clearly were. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:39:50 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's because he's "religious". They hate "religion" more than they love their freedoms. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What is this DU bullshit, OP? I swear, gun owners are their own worst enemy. Never in a million years would i have imagined such disdain for the most conservative Pro 2A candidate I've porbably seen in my lifetime. For fucks sake.  It's because he's "religious". They hate "religion" more than they love their freedoms. The hate some have for Christians on this page is scary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:41:09 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No your right, your compass isn't just selective, its actually pretty fucked up. Lies AND/or manipulation are the same thing. Trumps lies, ted manipulates. You also willfully continue to leave out the crucial and important points. If someone reposted my wife's picture it wouldn't bother me. But if they reposted it with disparaging and defaming remarks, that would be manipulative, but you refuse to see that. Keep those blinders on buddy! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: If someone re-posted a picture that your wife took and published in a magazine, you'd find that to be just as bad as if someone accused you publicly in print of having a sexual affair with 5 different women. So plausible you'd view both acts equally. You're not only an idiot if that is your claim, but a liar, because nobody would consider them to be equally egregious acts. No your right, your compass isn't just selective, its actually pretty fucked up. Lies AND/or manipulation are the same thing. Trumps lies, ted manipulates. You also willfully continue to leave out the crucial and important points. If someone reposted my wife's picture it wouldn't bother me. But if they reposted it with disparaging and defaming remarks, that would be manipulative, but you refuse to see that. Keep those blinders on buddy! Nobody but nobody believes you when you say you'd be equally bothered by both incidents. You're either that dumb or being dishonest. Having your wife's photo re-posted is nowhere near as bad as being falsely accused of infidelity in a tabloid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:41:11 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. Didn't trump already make his position clear? Savage is trying to cover his ass playing good cop bad cop to maintain his listener base... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:41:16 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So he wasn't really on the payroll... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Let me help you out Balista, since honesty doesn't seem to be your strong suit today: http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz332/MichaelArcane/tweet5.jpg They fired his ass today over this nonsense. So he wasn't really on the payroll... Washington Times as of yesterday called him a "staff member", "staff writer", etc. 
LOL. How do you 'fire' someone who is not on your payroll or staff. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:41:20 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. So Weiner 's got a problem with Pecker? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:42:17 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Apparently reading isn't your strong suit...they didn't say he was a citizen journalist, citizen journalist is how they described the portal he wrote for. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ Post all 4 tweets. Together they explain he is fired as of today. Nice try tho, albeit thoroughly dishonest. You mean like this one? http://i.imgur.com/5DnDuNm.png His bio from the Washington Times webpage from yesterday shows that he published multiple times a month and was listed as a staff writer, columnist. No mention as a 'citizen journalist'. http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png What changed in 24 hours? Apparently reading isn't your strong suit...they didn't say he was a citizen journalist, citizen journalist is how they described the portal he wrote for. Confused now. LOL. So 'staff writers' write for the 'citizen journalist' section? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:42:17 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The archive was from yesterday 24 March 2016. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Washington Times posted that Drew was not a columnist yet their own archived webpage states he was. http://i.imgur.com/EkKTYgU.png VERSUS http://i.imgur.com/kPZYmWj.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeaczSrW4AEjAO_.jpg:large https://web.archive.org/web/20160324112102/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/ So something from the archives contradicts something that just happened...You know what "archive" means, right? Kind of the opposite of "Current"? The archive was from yesterday 24 March 2016. Yeah, and they fired him today. Per their own tweets, specifically the ones you opted not to post. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:42:57 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A lot of the rabid "Trump! In Yo Face!" posts on this forum are a response to the "Cruz! In your face!" posts that have popped up in every thread for the past 6mo. It's just gotten worse as time went by. I was a firm Paul and Cruz supporter on here at the beginning, but his rabid fanbase on ARF left a bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't surprise me you folks are getting this reaction. And no, that doesn't mean I'm automatically a "trumpbot"
If you all had acted a little more like adults and used some tact, I think things wouldn't be so bad right now. Just my opinion. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Politics is disgusting, but this race really takes the cake. The kind of behavior it elicits in some of you shocks me. The lows get lower every week and you get more frenzied with each new disgusting turn. This thread is embarrassing. And not in the way some of the Trump supporters might think. I'm embarrassed for some of them. The glee and malice I see in some of these posts, wishing for Cruz to have cheated on his wife. Wishing for his wife to have had some kind of nervous breakdown or something. Wishing for all of this stuff to be true about a Senator with a record of staunch second Amendment support is beyond perplexing. It's insane. I'm not going to lie... I don't like Trump. I like Cruz for this job. But I don't like anyone the way some of you apparently like Trump. Many of you have basically joined a cult of personality with regard to Trump. And I honestly don't want to have anything to do with you. Not now. Not after the election, regardless of outcome. And it doesn't have anything to do with not wanting to hear what you have to say, but rather knowing that it isn't ideas that matter to you, but tactics, regardless of collateral damage, worthiness, or falsity. A few of you have shown us all what kind of character you have. At this point, I'm going to look on the bright side of this whole disgusting political cycle and see it as an opportunity to watch more toxic people self-identify. I finally found a good use for the ignore list. It isn't because you're saying stuff I don't want to hear. It's because I don't want to fuck up and accidentally interact with sociopaths. Not because I can't stand to hear you, but because there's no upside to talking to you or being around you. Frankly, I'm surprised we haven't seen a few instances of arocking on this board over this political cycle. I expect to see it. Now who has that browser script for hard filtering certain topics? I'm ready for it. Fuck this shit. Yep. +1 I'm tired of replying in these threads but then someone says something so fucking stupid I can't help it, even though I know it's pointless. A lot of the rabid "Trump! In Yo Face!" posts on this forum are a response to the "Cruz! In your face!" posts that have popped up in every thread for the past 6mo. It's just gotten worse as time went by. I was a firm Paul and Cruz supporter on here at the beginning, but his rabid fanbase on ARF left a bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't surprise me you folks are getting this reaction. And no, that doesn't mean I'm automatically a "trumpbot"
If you all had acted a little more like adults and used some tact, I think things wouldn't be so bad right now. Just my opinion. You're saying KARMA struck the vicious emotional Trump Haters... Things often work this way... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:42:58 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. I'm sure this will lead Trump to distance himself from the story using the same force and vigor with which he distanced himself from David Duke. "What, you want me to disavow? Fine, I disavow. Happy?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:43:14 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Or what a total dullard Uncle Ben is... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So many lies and such a pathetic argument, must be a Cruz supporter. Your BS doesn't have a basis in reality. If Trump smeared Carson through the NE then why did Carson endorse Trump? The only one who lied and smeared Carson was Ted Cruz. Oh, for God's sake...Trump compared Ben Carson to a child molester during a nationally televised debate and Carson still endorsed him. Surely you've got a better line of reasoning than that. Yet Carson forgave any alleged Trump transgressions but has not forgiven Lying Ted. That should really tell you something about how dishonest Ted is. Or what a total dullard Uncle Ben is... Uncle Ben...LOL. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:45:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Confused now. LOL. So 'staff writers' write for the 'citizen journalist' section? Staff writers are basically the entry level of journalists. Description: A career in journalism often begins with a role as a staff writer. Staff writers are responsible for providing standard content, such as news reports, reviews and features. In the internet age, that title can be bestowed on anybody who provides basic content. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:46:29 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Didn't trump already make his position clear? Savage is trying to cover his ass playing good cop bad cop to maintain his listener base... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. Didn't trump already make his position clear? Savage is trying to cover his ass playing good cop bad cop to maintain his listener base... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:46:35 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm sure this will lead Trump to distance himself from the story using the same force and vigor with which he distanced himself from David Duke. "What, you want me to disavow? Fine, I disavow. Happy?" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. I'm sure this will lead Trump to distance himself from the story using the same force and vigor with which he distanced himself from David Duke. "What, you want me to disavow? Fine, I disavow. Happy?" Trump is exceptionally cool the way he dismisses things... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:07 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good post... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Its hilarious to me how the last two pages are filled with Trump backers posting links to the Washington Times...who fired the reporter pushing the rumor several hours ago. It illustrates their main motive is not the truth of the story...but that a slanderous story MUST get out. Well when you're head over heels in love with another man and think he is infallible and worship his every action then yeah, you're going to want to see him succeed. This election has really opened my eyes to what a pathetic bunch of lonely, basement dwelling vaginas we really are. Just desperate for a leader to show us the way, desperate to be a part of something. I finally realized the other day it isn't Trump that disgusts me, I actually think he'd be a decent president, its his followers. Good post... I was planning to vote for Trump if he got the nomination but I'm reconsidering and a big reason are his sycophant followers. I'll probably vote for the constitution party candidate, whoever that will be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:32 PM EDT
[#31]
But as Balista chases this down the rabbit hole, it doesn't change the fact that the source you were just citing as support for the story got fired today because he threw his weight behind such a flimsy National Enquirer story.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:45 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're saying KARMA struck the vicious emotional Trump Haters... Things often work this way...
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
A lot of the rabid "Trump! In Yo Face!" posts on this forum are a response to the "Cruz! In your face!" posts that have popped up in every thread for the past 6mo. It's just gotten worse as time went by. I was a firm Paul and Cruz supporter on here at the beginning, but his rabid fanbase on ARF left a bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't surprise me you folks are getting this reaction. And no, that doesn't mean I'm automatically a "trumpbot"
If you all had acted a little more like adults and used some tact, I think things wouldn't be so bad right now. Just my opinion. You're saying KARMA struck the vicious emotional Trump Haters... Things often work this way...
No, I'm saying every action begets reaction. The bigger the action, the bigger the reaction. People trying to shove Cruz down the throats of GD's undecided beget the equal and opposite reactions of Trump supporters. In the most simplest terms I know how to say, "people don't like to be told what to do" |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:51 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No you haven't. You think you have but your argument was weak. You are right in one aspect though: like you said earlier this all comes down to the receiving party and their bias. Its obvious that you're biased in what she did, so in your mind it never was a smear, only retelling a story. However thats where you're wrong, and thats why you can't differentiate between what Melanias did and cruzes actions afterwards (defamation). Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:]
I've explained it as well as I know how already. No you haven't. You think you have but your argument was weak. You are right in one aspect though: like you said earlier this all comes down to the receiving party and their bias. Its obvious that you're biased in what she did, so in your mind it never was a smear, only retelling a story. However thats where you're wrong, and thats why you can't differentiate between what Melanias did and cruzes actions afterwards (defamation). I believe Bart is a lawyer, are you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:54 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's been confirmed by multiple reliable sources. I suspect it will hit Drudge tomorrow. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If true he's going to drop out within a week It's been confirmed by multiple reliable sources. I suspect it will hit Drudge tomorrow. You know Cruz probably was telling all these women it was the will of God while he was filling them with his vile seed. How could he do this to his wife and children. He should be ashamed. Damn sodomite sinners |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:47:59 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This thread has confirmed my initial misgivings about a great deal of Trump supporters. I know a lot of you aren't bad, but wow. Some of the vocal people ITT are really showing their colors. The National Enquirer National Enquirer Enquirer We're taking seriously an article from the National Enquirer. They took down John Edwards though! Yeah, they currently have .014% accuracy rating on their large swath of claims over the years. Strong credibility. If you know anybody who was falsely accused of extramarital affair, rape, etc, then you know this shit is not funny at all, and rumors can severely fuck up an upstanding person's reputation and life. The fact that some of you are so eager to run with this bullshit, and are joking about it is fucking ridiculous tbh. I sincerely hope none of you EVER experience your reputation getting dragged through the shit due to false accusations, but I'd venture to say a lot of you probably don't have that much of a reputation to begin with. After today I don't really know exactly who the fuck I will vote for this time around. Today's threads are so full on retarded douchebaggery I have changed my opinion that I would suck it up, take a chance, roll the dice and vote for Trump. Now I can say I will not vote for him. Not just because of him but because too many of his supporters have proven themselves to be no different than Hillary and Bernie supporters. There is absolutely nothing "conservative" about them. They are like anti-gun Blumberg types who pray for and wait eagerly for the next Newtown so they can twist it around to jump the NRA and the Tea Party and further their one issue agenda. Fuck it. By voting with people like this we will lose either way. I'm just not going to do it now. Not as eloquent as 1Andy2 but definitely on target. NE may have broken this into the mainstream, but rumors of this have been swirling in certain circles for some time. Rick Wilson(Republican strategist) has been hinting about this on twitter for a while now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:48:11 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So Weiner 's got a problem with Pecker? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: BREAKING: Michael Savage threatens to withdraw Trump support over Enquirer smear: http://therightscoop.com/michael-savage-threatens-to-withdraw-support-from-trump-over-national-enquirer-smear/#ixzz43wp8XttI Savage threatens to withdraw his support of Trump if he doesn’t completely disavow the story and the man who owns the National Enquirer, David Pecker. So Weiner 's got a problem with Pecker? LOL. I don't think a guy named Pecker (or Weiner) would have survived in my high school. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:49:25 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Because hypothetically, it would allow them to run with the BS story which many will not take the time to investigate fully (the stink of scandal will be enough), and say we had nothing to do with it, why would we implicate our own spokesperson... she is the victim. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
One of the women in the article that supposedly fucked Cruz is a Trump spokesperson... Do you honestly think they would include her if this was all bullshit fabricated by the Trump camp? How exactly does it benefit them to assassinate her character with a fake story? Common sense... Try it sometime. Because hypothetically, it would allow them to run with the BS story which many will not take the time to investigate fully (the stink of scandal will be enough), and say we had nothing to do with it, why would we implicate our own spokesperson... she is the victim. I have a pretty good feeling it's true, as I've been hearing it in certain circles for a few weeks now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:49:45 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But as Balista chases this down the rabbit hole, it doesn't change the fact that the source you were just citing as support for the story got fired today because he threw his weight behind such a flimsy National Enquirer story. Obviously there was a blackout of this story as the news agencies have had it for months now. Sounds like the reporter went against orders and commented anyway. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:49:56 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I was planning to vote for Trump if he got the nomination but I'm reconsidering and a big reason are his sycophant followers. I'll probably vote for the constitution party candidate, whoever that will be. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Its hilarious to me how the last two pages are filled with Trump backers posting links to the Washington Times...who fired the reporter pushing the rumor several hours ago. It illustrates their main motive is not the truth of the story...but that a slanderous story MUST get out. Well when you're head over heels in love with another man and think he is infallible and worship his every action then yeah, you're going to want to see him succeed. This election has really opened my eyes to what a pathetic bunch of lonely, basement dwelling vaginas we really are. Just desperate for a leader to show us the way, desperate to be a part of something. I finally realized the other day it isn't Trump that disgusts me, I actually think he'd be a decent president, its his followers. Good post... I was planning to vote for Trump if he got the nomination but I'm reconsidering and a big reason are his sycophant followers. I'll probably vote for the constitution party candidate, whoever that will be. That's the sensitive Girly approach. Best to ask, how would an Alpha think... Then DO it... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:50:48 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Staff writers are basically the entry level of journalists. Description: A career in journalism often begins with a role as a staff writer. Staff writers are responsible for providing standard content, such as news reports, reviews and features. In the internet age, that title can be bestowed on anybody who provides basic content. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Confused now. LOL. So 'staff writers' write for the 'citizen journalist' section? Staff writers are basically the entry level of journalists. Description: A career in journalism often begins with a role as a staff writer. Staff writers are responsible for providing standard content, such as news reports, reviews and features. In the internet age, that title can be bestowed on anybody who provides basic content. You forgot the part where the Times also calls him an '"columnist, editorial writer, and government waste expert at the Washington Times". Anyway, we can drop it. As no matter what facts I provide you will stand by your position. Next topic. National Enquirer is standing by the story. So either they are unafraid of a lawsuit or they have good sources. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:50:50 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Projecting what? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Its hilarious to me how the last two pages are filled with Trump backers posting links to the Washington Times...who fired the reporter pushing the rumor several hours ago. It illustrates their main motive is not the truth of the story...but that a slanderous story MUST get out. Well when you're head over heels in love with another man and think he is infallible and worship his every action then yeah, you're going to want to see him succeed. This election has really opened my eyes to what a pathetic bunch of lonely, basement dwelling vaginas we really are. Just desperate for a leader to show us the way, desperate to be a part of something. I finally realized the other day it isn't Trump that disgusts me, I actually think he'd be a decent president, its his followers. Good post... I haven't taken any sides and have only observed you guys bickering with each other day after day, but IMHO Cruz supporters seem to be projecting an awful lot. Projecting what? Their own rabid fanaticism for their candidate. I see more Cruz supporters acting like they accuse Trump supporters of acting than actual Trump supporters. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:50:58 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That is the point of the political process... It isn't for the 'sensitive' Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol we are so fucked Indeed. Republicans are the dumbest motherfuckers on the face of the earth. The only firing squad they've ever heard of was the circular one. Indeed. It's kind of confirmed one of the reasons that throughout my life, as drawn to the conservative side as I might have been, it always felt like a veneer hiding a lot of ugly shit. This election has brought the festering boil to a head. That is the point of the political process... It isn't for the 'sensitive' That might have been true years ago but these days elections are won by pandering and marketing to the lowest common denominator of the voter pool. Fucking sickening to see our own camp buy this shit up so thoughtlessly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:51:46 PM EDT
[#43]
I'm in
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:08 PM EDT
[#44]
I'm just here for the memes
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:17 PM EDT
[#45]
DT
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:19 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Team Cruz, Capitol Police Emails Pop Up in Ashley Madison Data Dump (Updated) http://www.rollcall.com/news/team-cruz-capitol-police-pop-up-in-ashley-madison-data-dump Quote HistoryQuoted:
Team Cruz, Capitol Police Emails Pop Up in Ashley Madison Data Dump (Updated) http://www.rollcall.com/news/team-cruz-capitol-police-pop-up-in-ashley-madison-data-dump A Cruz aide assured HOH that nary a soul in that office is surreptitiously on the prowl.
“The email address in question is [email protected], a publicly and widely available forwarding address that is often entered into web contact forms by people with no connection to our office,” Team Cruz said of the generic mailbox. - See more at: http://www.rollcall.com/news/team-cruz-capitol-police-pop-up-in-ashley-madison-data-dump#sthash.3w49WBam.dpuf |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:32 PM EDT
[#47]
never mind. The mommy button will probably get mashed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:41 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Slow day at work for you, nothing better to do than make stuff up? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: >Investigation continues to find "Lollipop", potential tranny prostitute GD gonna love this now . . . Slow day at work for you, nothing better to do than make stuff up? Ted Cruz RaPE. Now you know who lollipop is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:52:48 PM EDT
[#49]
Conservative Nation ?@Cons_Nation 3m
Story about #CruzSexScandal was known long before, but it appears that @benshapiro refused to publish it! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/25/2016 4:53:20 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You know Cruz probably was telling all these women it was the will of God while he was filling them with his vile seed. How could he do this to his wife and children. He should be ashamed. Damn sodomite sinners Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If true he's going to drop out within a week It's been confirmed by multiple reliable sources. I suspect it will hit Drudge tomorrow. You know Cruz probably was telling all these women it was the will of God while he was filling them with his vile seed. How could he do this to his wife and children. He should be ashamed. Damn sodomite sinners He should be ashamed that some Trump-backing rag published lies about him? |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
