User Panel
|
|
|
The earliest mentions by Europeans about Chili Say it was a mixture of BEANS. Meat and spices. Do not listen to the Nancy boy revisionist.
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I am willing as well. Choose your weapon. Are you friend or foe? Choose wisely. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chili should be a seamless experience, every bite a homage to its rich heritage. Beans are the speed bumps on the road to flavor town. Why would anyone willingly choose a bumpy ride?
|
|
|
Texas style chili = no beans, no tomato, chunks of beef, basically a tasty spicy beef stew.
Non-texas style chili = ground beef (or venison/elk etc), beans ok, tomato ok, basically a tasty spicy meat sauce. Cincinnati chili = an abomination that shouldn't exist. |
|
Your chili over rice is incredible. |
|
|
I guess every generation needs its culinary mistake. Like bell bottoms in fashion, this too shall pass.
|
|
|
|
View Quote Did you see my previous argument? What exactly is the sin rice commits against chili? No one has answered yet. |
|
|
Chili has beans. This reminds me of the morons who get mad when someone refers to people from the United States as "americans".
"Buh wuh wuh about South and Central Americans! Could be them, so it doesn't mean people from the US!! Durrr!". Which is dumb and bullshit. Ask everyone in the world to point to an American and 9/10 will point to the guy holding the US flag. Words mean things, and if you did a poll most people by far would say chili has fucking beans. |
|
|
Quoted: Chili has beans. This reminds me of the morons who get mad when someone refers to people from the United States as "americans". "Buh wuh wuh about South and Central Americans! Could be them, so it doesn't mean people from the US!! Durrr!". Which is dumb and bullshit. Ask everyone in the world to point to an American and 9/10 will point to the guy holding the US flag. Words mean things, and if you did a poll most people by far would say chili has fucking beans. View Quote Most people would be wrong then. |
|
Quoted: Chili has beans. This reminds me of the morons who get mad when someone refers to people from the United States as "americans". "Buh wuh wuh about South and Central Americans! Could be them, so it doesn't mean people from the US!! Durrr!". Which is dumb and bullshit. Ask everyone in the world to point to an American and 9/10 will point to the guy holding the US flag. Words mean things, and if you did a poll most people by far would say chili has fucking beans. View Quote And if 8 out of 10 people said that 2+2=5 then they'd be wrong too. Words do indeed mean things, and chili does not have beans. Chili WITH beans does, but not chili. |
|
Quoted: Chili has beans. This reminds me of the morons who get mad when someone refers to people from the United States as "americans". "Buh wuh wuh about South and Central Americans! Could be them, so it doesn't mean people from the US!! Durrr!". Which is dumb and bullshit. Ask everyone in the world to point to an American and 9/10 will point to the guy holding the US flag. Words mean things, and if you did a poll most people by far would say chili has fucking beans. View Quote |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I used to respect you. I will pray for you |
|
Quoted: As long as you say "I'm going to ladle chili over rice" then you're good to go. View Quote Correct, chili over rice, not rice in chili. And for the record, my Connecticut chili is seared beef and a mixture of dried peppers reconstituted, blended and strained into a slurry, some garlic and some onion. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Did you see my previous argument? What exactly is the sin rice commits against chili? No one has answered yet. View Quote Ah, the age-old debate of adding rice to chili. To truly understand why some might consider this a cardinal sin in the culinary world, we must delve deep into the heart of chili tradition, the passion of purists, and the essence of flavor profiles. Prepare for a whirlwind of emotions and scalding truths! Sacred Simplicity: Chili, in its original form, is a celebration of minimalism. It basks in the glory of meat, spices, and sauce. This trinity, so to speak, is a testament to the beauty of simplicity. Rice, with its distinct flavor and texture, disrupts this sanctified trio, and in doing so, detracts from the very essence of chili. Textural Turmoil: Chili has a rich, chunky, and meaty texture that allows each ingredient to shine. Introducing rice into this beautiful medley turns the experience into a muddied clash of textures. It's the gastronomic equivalent of wearing polka dots with stripes. Flavor Fidelity: For chili purists, the intense, spicy, and smoky flavor of chili shouldn't be diluted or tamed. Rice, as a neutral and absorbent ingredient, acts as a sponge. It can mute the chili's potent profile, robbing one's palate of the full chili experience. Historical Honor: Tradition plays a significant role in food. Some chili aficionados hold on to recipes passed down through generations, cherishing the authenticity and story behind each dish. Adding rice, for some, might feel like rewriting a cherished family history. The Balance of Boldness: Chili is bold; it's a dish that demands attention. It's not meant to be a side note or a mere companion. Adding rice may be perceived by some as relegating chili to the role of a sauce or a topping, which for chili enthusiasts, is nothing short of sacrilege. So, the next time you're tempted to merge these two worlds, remember: for some, chili isn't just a dish; it's an experience, a tradition, and a bold statement. To them, adding rice might just be akin to diluting the very soul of chili! |
|
Quoted: Chili has beans. Pasta sauce is completely different. I would venture to guess that most of you Texans would eat roadkill armadillo as long it had tomato and chilies. View Quote Roadkill armadillo is quite handy. You can be walking down the road, see one, build a fire, and cook it in its own shell. No pots or pans needed. Try to do that with chili...with or without beans. |
|
Beans are disgusting filler for poors who can't afford a true all meat chili.
The same goes for rice, etc. You may ADD beans TO chili, but beans do not MAKE chili, chili. now... /thread. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Oh, we do. You just don't know that a representative Republic is a form of democracy. We are of course both. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Condensed history of chili:
People have always stewed meat and spices since there was fire and a cooking pot, but we're talking about a SPECIFIC version that has a definite taste profile. The dish we know as chili today originated in the area around San Antonio, sometime around the early 1800s. WITHOUT BEANS. Chili is first mentioned by name around 1880. Chili started becoming very popular and spread out from there. Northerners lost their minds by turning it into a soup and adding beans. The end. |
|
Quoted: Ah, the age-old debate of adding rice to chili. To truly understand why some might consider this a cardinal sin in the culinary world, we must delve deep into the heart of chili tradition, the passion of purists, and the essence of flavor profiles. Prepare for a whirlwind of emotions and scalding truths! Sacred Simplicity: Chili, in its original form, is a celebration of minimalism. It basks in the glory of meat, spices, and sauce. This trinity, so to speak, is a testament to the beauty of simplicity. Rice, with its distinct flavor and texture, disrupts this sanctified trio, and in doing so, detracts from the very essence of chili. Textural Turmoil: Chili has a rich, chunky, and meaty texture that allows each ingredient to shine. Introducing rice into this beautiful medley turns the experience into a muddied clash of textures. It's the gastronomic equivalent of wearing polka dots with stripes. Flavor Fidelity: For chili purists, the intense, spicy, and smoky flavor of chili shouldn't be diluted or tamed. Rice, as a neutral and absorbent ingredient, acts as a sponge. It can mute the chili's potent profile, robbing one's palate of the full chili experience. Historical Honor: Tradition plays a significant role in food. Some chili aficionados hold on to recipes passed down through generations, cherishing the authenticity and story behind each dish. Adding rice, for some, might feel like rewriting a cherished family history. The Balance of Boldness: Chili is bold; it's a dish that demands attention. It's not meant to be a side note or a mere companion. Adding rice may be perceived by some as relegating chili to the role of a sauce or a topping, which for chili enthusiasts, is nothing short of sacrilege. So, the next time you're tempted to merge these two worlds, remember: for some, chili isn't just a dish; it's an experience, a tradition, and a bold statement. To them, adding rice might just be akin to diluting the very soul of chili! View Quote Brother, I'm not adding chili to rice. That would be the same as adding beans or pasta. Rather, chili is being served on top of rice. Chili is consumed as the pure, unadulterated ecstasy that it is on its own. Its wholesome goodness drips down upon the rice and extends its enjoyment, co-mingled with a lesser but nearly equally important staple. |
|
|
Another argument in favor of Texas: The powdered spice most people call chili is primarily made from peppers in Texas. They certainly weren't grown in Pennsylvania, Illinois, or some of the other states that blanch at the idea of spice. Ergo: Chili is a Texas dish.
Q.E.D. |
|
Quoted: Brother, I'm not adding chili to rice. That would be the same as adding beans or pasta. Rather, chili is being served on top of rice. Chili is consumed as the pure, unadulterated ecstasy that it is on its own. Its wholesome goodness drips down upon the rice and extends its enjoyment, co-mingled with a lesser but nearly equally important staple. View Quote If you are still requiring enjoyment after your first bowl of chili, grab a second. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.