Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 24
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:08:17 PM EST
[#1]
Damn.  I had a feeling berthing got hit hard when I saw those images.

Fair winds and following seas.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:08:28 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

... Where's the rest of this documentary?
View Quote
Part 2

Shooting down of Iran Air 655 (Pt 2 of 3)





Part 3

Shooting down of Iran Air 655 (Pt 3 of 3)
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:08:32 PM EST
[#3]
from news report the ram could well be intentional

Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:08:38 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Missing Sailors found dead:


(CNN)All seven missing sailors from the USS Fitzgerald were found dead in flooded berthing compartments following the warship's collision with a merchant vessel, a US Navy official told CNN on Saturday.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/17/us/missing-sailors-found/index.html
View Quote


Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:09:50 PM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If you are talking about that Iran flight in 88, it was squawking as an F14 fighter.  They attempted to contact the aircraft multiple times on multiple frequencies.  It never responded, it got to close, and they shot it down.  They thought they were being attacked.  They didn't shoot down an airliner because it got to close.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Pretty sure the US shot an innocent airliner out of the fucking sky one time.  So did the Russians.
If you are talking about that Iran flight in 88, it was squawking as an F14 fighter.  They attempted to contact the aircraft multiple times on multiple frequencies.  It never responded, it got to close, and they shot it down.  They thought they were being attacked.  They didn't shoot down an airliner because it got to close.
They were in the middle of a surface action when all of that was happening, too, against Iranian small combatants.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:11:07 PM EST
[#6]
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:17:17 PM EST
[#7]
It obviously would be super helpful to have the Fitzgeralds trackline.

But just knowing what direction they were traveling would help to make sense of that AIS trackline.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:18:54 PM EST
[#8]
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:19:18 PM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It obviously would be super helpful to have the Fitzgeralds trackline.

But just knowing what direction they were traveling would help to make sense of that AIS trackline.
View Quote
You can see where Crystal turns hard to starboard (it shows as 0130, but almost certainly is 0230) -- that's almost certainly where the collision occurs, and from the marks on the side of Fitz it's not too hard to see the direction they were travelling.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:25:57 PM EST
[#10]
RIP shipmates.


Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:27:51 PM EST
[#11]
can't believe they can just ram and sail away, as if nothing has happened? hit and run on the sea?
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:30:47 PM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
that's pretty retarded, tax payer money, do we need to give them 50% more?
View Quote
Log out, and don't log back in.....
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:31:43 PM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Iran 655 was not squawking f-14 IFF.  It was squawking civilian airliner IFF, was in an air lane ascending, and shouldn't have been shot down.  They thought they were being attacked because someone read a scope wrong and that misreading cued a bunch of other screwups throughout CIC.

There was an F-14 IFF code that popped up in CIC once, probably ducted from Bandar Abbas (where the aircraft came from), but it was never confirmed and never came from that aircraft.

The investigation report has been online for at least a decade.  Go read it before you make up stories.
View Quote
AEGIS track swap and no re-interrogation.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:33:42 PM EST
[#14]
Posted for context for those who have never been in a heavy shipping traffic area.

Add night and if you're really unlucky poor weather.

Strait of Singapore - Singapore Strait Traffic
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:36:54 PM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Missing Sailors found dead:


(CNN)All seven missing sailors from the USS Fitzgerald were found dead in flooded berthing compartments following the warship's collision with a merchant vessel, a US Navy official told CNN on Saturday.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/17/us/missing-sailors-found/index.html
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:45:48 PM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Have you ever conned a ship through the Strait of Malacca?  30-40 contacts, all tracking to within 500 yards.
View Quote
English Channel... Started the midwatch with Skunk A, next thing I realized my relief was at my shoulder and I was on Skunk CZ. All with CPAs of <500 yds.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:48:12 PM EST
[#17]
ETA:  Josh and Desert_AIP already covered it.

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If you are talking about that Iran flight in 88, it was squawking as an F14 fighter.  They attempted to contact the aircraft multiple times on multiple frequencies.  It never responded, it got to close, and they shot it down.  They thought they were being attacked.  They didn't shoot down an airliner because it got to close.
View Quote
Not even the US government has claimed that.  They thought it was assuming an attack profile consistent with an F-14, even though the ship's Aegis showed that Flight 655 was actually ascending.
It was a tragic mistake that Iran milked for all it could.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 10:50:48 PM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote
The rest of us called it "Jerktown."  The model of Aegis Arrogance.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 11:04:42 PM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


By the time a ship the size of that container ship was determined to be a threat it would be unstoppable. If you trained every gun on it and fired  till you ran out of ammo , it wouldn't stop it. It would sink or burn AFTER it rammed you and cut you in half if that is any consolation.


http://i.imgur.com/9cHEVFt.jpg
View Quote
So if this were an ISIS control vessel then it would have been inevitable that they collide??
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 11:07:43 PM EST
[#20]
Dakota Rigsby
Fluvanna County, Virginia

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 11:07:55 PM EST
[#21]
RIP.
Link Posted: 6/17/2017 11:17:52 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Thank you.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:07:34 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Missing Sailors found dead:


(CNN)All seven missing sailors from the USS Fitzgerald were found dead in flooded berthing compartments following the warship's collision with a merchant vessel, a US Navy official told CNN on Saturday.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/17/us/missing-sailors-found/index.html
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:08:01 AM EST
[#24]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:24:44 AM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


How could a cargo ship intentionally ram a ship that can maneuver like an Arleigh Burke? I have no idea how it happened, but I don't see how it would be possible for a cargo ship to ram a destroyer like The Fitzgerald unless a lot of shit went wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzveUz-WRGQ
View Quote
For fucks sake that ship is already moving at full speed before it starts maneuvering like that.

They don't get up to speed like that in a few seconds and they don't normally cruise around at full speed.

There are some guys posted in here a few pages back that know a lot more about navigation than I that lay out good luck info on it.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:25:51 AM EST
[#26]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:27:39 AM EST
[#27]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:35:20 AM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The cargo ship didn't drop out of hyperspace right beside it did it?

The point is that it would be hard as hell to intentionally ram an AB destroyer. Is that really hard to grasp?
View Quote
And you don't know that it did.

That ship was very likely operating on split plant, meaning one shaft is turning and the other is windmilling.

To bring the ship up to full plant to evade collision does not happen in a few seconds. Its not like a car where you just floor it.

Edit: There are also some spots out at sea where there is a lot of vessels going to a lot of places, your "hyperspace" comparison is really silly and in no way realistic.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:37:25 AM EST
[#29]
Depending on the destroyers speed at the time. She can't turn if she isn't moving. And we are all speculating cause we just don't know.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:45:45 AM EST
[#30]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 12:53:17 AM EST
[#31]
So the destroyer was hit on the starboard front and the container ship hit on the port side up front. Maybe the destroyer was passing alongside a few hundred yards off and the container ship turned hard port, being 2am and dark as hell, before you know it, it's too late.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:02:06 AM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


And you don't know that it did.

That ship was very likely operating on split plant, meaning one shaft is turning and the other is windmilling.

To bring the ship up to full plant to evade collision does not happen in a few seconds. Its not like a car where you just floor it.

Edit: There are also some spots out at sea where there is a lot of vessels going to a lot of places, your "hyperspace" comparison is really silly and in no way realistic.
View Quote
Split plant means two turbines are driving one shaft and two turbines are driving the other.  I.E. the plant is split.  What you're describing is trail shaft.  There's really no good reason to do that in normal ops, though most likely they were running one turbine per side.

It only takes a minute or so to start a GTE, even if they were running trail shaft.  They may not have had full power available, but slamming the throttles forward, even if they were trailing one shaft, still gives pretty impressive acceleration.  It would basically be similar to a FFG configuration with one engine running.  Still plenty of pickup available, but you'd need to apply lots of offsetting rudder to compensate for the asymmetric thrust.

I take it you've never served on a gas turbine ship... watching a DDG or CG go from DIW to Ahead Flank 3 is impressive.  The stern digs in and it throws up a rooster tail like you wouldn't believe.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:08:34 AM EST
[#33]
God damnit



Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:25:22 AM EST
[#34]


























Bodies found on doomed destroyer: Divers recover some of the Navy's seven missing sailors who were TRAPPED in wreck of USS
Fitzgerald after it hit cargo ship - as crash is treated as 'negligence'

Despite the significant damage to the USS Fitzgerald, Aucoin said 'the ship is salvageable' and will hopefully
take just under a year to repair.Aucoin also said that there were at least two investigations launched into the collision, including a JAG investigation. The Japanese coast guard said it received an emergency call from the
container ship, the ACX Crystal, reporting the collision with the USS
Fitzgerald around 2.20am on Saturday.Officials from the Japanese coast guard were questioning crew members of the ACX
Crystal, which is operated by the Japanese shipping company Nippon Yusen
K.K., and are treating the incident as a case of possible professional
negligence, said Masayuki Obara, a regional coast guard official.

more
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:27:39 AM EST
[#35]
Ugh I'm so angry.  And sad. And bewildered.   Kids serving our country.  

Why.  Why.  Why..

Reat in peace heroes.

Best wishes to the families.   Your sons did us proud.   I hope we get answers.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:34:16 AM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I think the operative word is "returned" to all steel construction. Still a lot of aluminum superstructure running around out there.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I think the operative word is "returned" to all steel construction. Still a lot of aluminum superstructure running around out there.
And that's a fail on you in two parts.

First, you said (and I quote):

Quoted:
The super structures of modern Naval ships are built mostly of aluminum, not steel.
Second, when I correctly pointed out that no, they are not, you denied you said it and instead pointed to one word in my post.

Care to try for part three?
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:52:16 AM EST
[#37]
Damn that is one hell of a list.

There will probably be some good lessons learned from the DC portion of this terrible accident.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 1:52:41 AM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Split plant means two turbines are driving one shaft and two turbines are driving the other.  I.E. the plant is split.  What you're describing is trail shaft.  There's really no good reason to do that in normal ops, though most likely they were running one turbine per side.

It only takes a minute or so to start a GTE, even if they were running trail shaft.  They may not have had full power available, but slamming the throttles forward, even if they were trailing one shaft, still gives pretty impressive acceleration.  It would basically be similar to a FFG configuration with one engine running.  Still plenty of pickup available, but you'd need to apply lots of offsetting rudder to compensate for the asymmetric thrust.

I take it you've never served on a gas turbine ship... watching a DDG or CG go from DIW to Ahead Flank 3 is impressive.  The stern digs in and it throws up a rooster tail like you wouldn't believe.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


And you don't know that it did.

That ship was very likely operating on split plant, meaning one shaft is turning and the other is windmilling.

To bring the ship up to full plant to evade collision does not happen in a few seconds. Its not like a car where you just floor it.

Edit: There are also some spots out at sea where there is a lot of vessels going to a lot of places, your "hyperspace" comparison is really silly and in no way realistic.
Split plant means two turbines are driving one shaft and two turbines are driving the other.  I.E. the plant is split.  What you're describing is trail shaft.  There's really no good reason to do that in normal ops, though most likely they were running one turbine per side.

It only takes a minute or so to start a GTE, even if they were running trail shaft.  They may not have had full power available, but slamming the throttles forward, even if they were trailing one shaft, still gives pretty impressive acceleration.  It would basically be similar to a FFG configuration with one engine running.  Still plenty of pickup available, but you'd need to apply lots of offsetting rudder to compensate for the asymmetric thrust.

I take it you've never served on a gas turbine ship... watching a DDG or CG go from DIW to Ahead Flank 3 is impressive.  The stern digs in and it throws up a rooster tail like you wouldn't believe.
Do you happen to know of any videos of that I'd like to see it? The videos of the CVN and DDG turning at flank speed are impressive.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 2:43:55 AM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Split plant means two turbines are driving one shaft and two turbines are driving the other.  I.E. the plant is split.  What you're describing is trail shaft.  There's really no good reason to do that in normal ops, though most likely they were running one turbine per side.

It only takes a minute or so to start a GTE, even if they were running trail shaft.  They may not have had full power available, but slamming the throttles forward, even if they were trailing one shaft, still gives pretty impressive acceleration.  It would basically be similar to a FFG configuration with one engine running.  Still plenty of pickup available, but you'd need to apply lots of offsetting rudder to compensate for the asymmetric thrust.

I take it you've never served on a gas turbine ship... watching a DDG or CG go from DIW to Ahead Flank 3 is impressive.  The stern digs in and it throws up a rooster tail like you wouldn't believe.
View Quote
Gas turbine ships are impressive. I've been on numerous cruise ships(30+), and the ones that were GTE powered had noticeably greater acceleration than others with more conventional power plants. Also, many of the modern ships now have Azipod propulsion, and the maneuverability it provides to the ships is insane. Its fascinating to watch a giant cruise ship dock itself without the aid of any tugs.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 3:47:07 AM EST
[#40]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 3:51:45 AM EST
[#41]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 4:37:49 AM EST
[#42]



Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha has some answering to do, things like this should be prevented.   Busy route.   Bless those that are lost and are injured.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 5:17:22 AM EST
[#43]
Terrible tragedy

Some knowledgable people on here. It seems that the only damage is above the water line why is it listing, Is there some unseen damage under the water?
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 5:21:21 AM EST
[#44]
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 5:25:09 AM EST
[#45]
It wasn't a high speed collision, the tanker was going maybe 5kts and seems like the Frigate stopped.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 6:00:54 AM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It wasn't a high speed collision, the tanker was going maybe 5kts and seems like the Frigate stopped.
View Quote
She was going 17.3 kts if AIS is correct when the collision occurred.  That's a fuckton of kinetic energy.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 6:03:39 AM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
She was going 17.3 kts if AIS is correct when the collision occurred.  That's a fuckton of kinetic energy.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
It wasn't a high speed collision, the tanker was going maybe 5kts and seems like the Frigate stopped.
She was going 17.3 kts if AIS is correct when the collision occurred.  That's a fuckton of kinetic energy.
Damn. That's one hell of an impact.

The DDG could just have well been sunk.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 6:13:00 AM EST
[#48]
Fair winds and following seas sailors
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 7:25:37 AM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Split plant means two turbines are driving one shaft and two turbines are driving the other.  I.E. the plant is split.  What you're describing is trail shaft.  There's really no good reason to do that in normal ops, though most likely they were running one turbine per side.

It only takes a minute or so to start a GTE, even if they were running trail shaft.  They may not have had full power available, but slamming the throttles forward, even if they were trailing one shaft, still gives pretty impressive acceleration.  It would basically be similar to a FFG configuration with one engine running.  Still plenty of pickup available, but you'd need to apply lots of offsetting rudder to compensate for the asymmetric thrust.

I take it you've never served on a gas turbine ship... watching a DDG or CG go from DIW to Ahead Flank 3 is impressive.  The stern digs in and it throws up a rooster tail like you wouldn't believe.
View Quote
I meant to say trail shaft and I've served on USS Paul Hamilton and USS Port Royal.

At trail shaft or split plant they still are not going to be up to speed like that guy posted on that video in an instant like he thought it would.

Yes I've seen the ship do crash backs.
Link Posted: 6/18/2017 7:27:57 AM EST
[#50]
Anyone see the damage to Japanese cargo ship???
Can't seem to find a photo of it any where in the web..
Page / 24
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top