User Panel
Quoted: https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Forum-Staff-and-Mods/5-2242460/ SR staff: EdSr Striker The_Beer_Slayer Staff: Bama-Shooter NorCal_LEO DK-Prof Mods: 1387Delta 40xb bcauz3y BushBoar DV8 Gloftoe John_Wayne777 kpel308 mcculver5 medicmandan Miami_JBT shotar Subnet Taft View Quote And I thought that there were one or two more in that group that were LEO or former LEO, but I don't want to say any names as I don't want to offend anyone. ETA: Some of those mods are inactive to the point that I don't even recognize their names. There is one LEO mod I see that isn't very active in GD. However, if you whittle that list down to currently active mods (of which I count 8 or 9 - a matter of opinion of course) very nearly half are LEO. |
|
Quoted: Well, in point of fact it's 5 out of 14 mods isn't it? And I thought that there were one or two more in that group that were LEO or former LEO, but I don't want to say any names as I don't want to offend anyone. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I thought one was retired California LEO but I could be wrong. View Quote But as I say above, if you throw out the mods that are no longer active, and the one LEO mod that is pretty inactive, that gets you to conservatively 4 (maybe 5) LEO mods out of 8 or 9 mods that are active. |
|
Quoted:
When you are a cop, the customer is always wrong... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I would wonder if having “moderation is GD is bad” in the title might bias the sample, and perhaps draw more people who are disgruntled into the thread. How about if the title were “what do you think about the moderation in GD these day?” - I think that would be slightly better and less likely to bias the sample. I would STILL expect that people who think there is something wrong would be more likely to express their opinion ... in customer service there seems to be an adage that you hear about unhappy customers at 10x the rate of happy customers, so I am not sure there even is a way to measure it in an unbiased way. I simply don it know - not trying to pre-qualify any results. Go ahead and start the thread, if you want. My guess-stimate of the results would be 20-25% unhappy, but it’s purely a guess. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/284225/Screen_Shot_2019-10-19_at_6_00_57_PM-1130279.png The TBL stance has damn sure hurt them and the fact that they are all lock step in responses, both here and IRL. It’s fucking horseshit! We all have fuck up’s among our ranks. NO institutions are above hiring the idiot every now and then, it’s how it’s handled that that has been telling. I was far more Pro LEO, when I joined a Pro LEO website than I am today. Some has real life reasons and some of the reasons are from the reactions from the LEO here. The solution is accountability among their peers, and we cant even begin to look at the problem until the people involved in the problem believe its a problem and expect any change. But there damn sure is one! When someone is an idiot, especially in your profession, call them one or it makes you all look bad. It’s much easier to do damage control when you call out your own idiots. And we’ve all hired our own, so get over the shame of making a bad hire. Don’t double down on the stupid. Same could be said about SS and Mods on a smaller scale. What TBS did to KPrind (sp), is fucking horseshit! That half ass attempt at an apology was fucking pathetic and every bit as insulting as the original call out! I’d be livid if I was him, and he damn sure didn’t deserve it from what us members on this side have seen. I honestly think most mods and staff are good folks looking out fo the community doing the best they can with what they’re given in a thankless job. They’re not paid and unorganized as fuck, or so it appears. Hopefully these are just hiccups as the new changes are being made, and I they to a certain degree it is. Training mods has got to be a PITA! ARFCom has some major fucking issues with this. Nothing that can’t be overcome. It’s the best forum on the net that I’ve found. But get the fucking house in order! I didn’t vote I wouldn’t renew, and I likely will barring a financial reason on my part. This is still the best shindig on the web. But I’d hate to see it head even more south. Hopefully we’re just experiencing growing pains. And the snarky comments to those suggesting and bitching by others and mods/staff. Understand, the bitching, a lot of it at least, is coming from those of us who care about this place as a second home. Kinda like your grandparent telling you how you’re fucking up raising your kid. It may not always be the best advice, but there’s some wisdom and it’s not being done out of spite and some suggest. |
|
Quoted:
Easy way to find out..Put up a poll on page one and let members vote...My guess is the numbers are much higher than you guys think... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Have you ever noticed that in every thread that criticized the site, the same few vocal people are drawn in and post a lot: Madcap72, Undefined, blinded, and a few others. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Have you ever noticed that in every thread that criticized the site, the same few vocal people are drawn in and post a lot: Madcap72, Undefined, blinded, and a few others. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. |
|
Don't know the Sr Staff people,
But.. 66% of Staff are LEO's. 35% of GD Mods are LEO's,give or take. What percentage of the membership aren't LEO's ? My guess it's probably more than 90%. I don't have a point |
|
|
|
Quoted: Have you ever noticed that in every thread that criticized the site, the same few vocal people are drawn in and post a lot: Madcap72, Undefined, blinded, and a few others. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
You have one ban, one comment, and two warnings. Unless you have another account! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Do you have a long history of infractions? |
|
I think the pole proves how the majority feel. It likely won’t change anything. I don’t usually pay attention to when is and isn’t a mod, but looking at the list a couple surprised me.
I would think good Mods would be people that had a history of being able to discuss issues reasonably. Some of those guys are hard line in their defense of the TBL. They may be great guys and great cops but they probably shouldn’t be the ones deciding if a comment is in fact anti LE. It’s like letting the rainbow coalition decide what is and isn’t hate speech. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Do you have a long history of infractions? I normally don't comment on ban and warning entries other than along the lines of, "that's a bunch" or similar. This time I perceived a need. |
|
Quoted:
I disagree. Once you accept the mod tag, you're a mod. That includes all the rights, and responsibilities, that come with the job. If you like being edgy, stirring the pot, or generally shitposting... don't become a mod. You shouldn't be able to post on one account and then log off, log back in as a mod, and then sanction the person you were having a "discussion" with. That would be abused, guaranteed. View Quote Shit, that might even help mods/staff get on the same page in the process and all of that could be logged to serve as a training tool/feedback for evaluating if someone is cutout to be a mod or not. |
|
Quoted: No. It will never be OK and it shouldn't have been OK for Bama. He should have been stripped of his position and locked for a month or two. Here is how crazy the world is. I have NOTHING even close to such a callous fucking post in my entire history here, yet DK is defending Bama and vilifying me in the pit. If you had told me that would have happened yesterday and gave me the opportunity to bet my entire net worth on DK's honor, I would have taken the bet in a second and be homeless today. View Quote The flames are getting brighter every day. |
|
What percentage of Mods / Site Staff elevated to that position in 2019 are LEO?
I'm guessing the answer to that will reveal the problem. |
|
Quoted:
What percentage of Mods / Site Staff elevated to that position in 2019 are LEO? I'm guessing the answer to that will reveal the problem. View Quote It's not just those assuming the role, but also those that retain that role while others that are non-LEO are removed from the role. |
|
Quoted:
No, it won't. It's not just those assuming the role, but also those that retain that role while others that are non-LEO are removed from the role. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What percentage of Mods / Site Staff elevated to that position in 2019 are LEO? I'm guessing the answer to that will reveal the problem. It's not just those assuming the role, but also those that retain that role while others that are non-LEO are removed from the role. Then if there are any complaints, they will investigate themselves. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: If you want to believe that I and other Staffers are lying to you, feel free. I have no control over your beliefs. I can only tell you what the reality is, and the rest is up to you. ETA: "very next day" .. are you sure about that? lol View Quote |
|
Sweep the leg....legs |
|
Quoted:
I have been here for over 15 years. In all that time, some folks gripped about GD Moderation. I have never been a Moderator in GD. But I have not seen any deterioration of the quality of the moderation in GD. I have seen some mistakes, but they are rare and if serious, Staff will correct them. And I have not seen ANY changes from the sale to Brownell's, or use of a new site hosting. Not a single thing. Some of you guys are just getting upset for nothing. This is still the best firearms related site on the net. View Quote |
|
If the staff really cares about this site, they need to get new mods...
|
|
|
Quoted:
When you have site staff openly shitting on moderators on the public side using made up BS that was an utter fabrication you have a complete failure of the administration here. Not only does it cause members to distrust staff statements, but furthermore, it is incredibly distasteful to have to watch. Moderators shouldn't have to take shit from anyone because they volunteer their time. It is in the COC I'm sure. For it to come from staff though and be pushed out on the public side - beyond belief. I would never let this happen to one of my mods. You need to fucking clean house around here as it is disgusting. That all the other mods and all of the staff aren't up in arms over this is extremely odd. Even if you wanted him out, the amount of disrespect shown here to a lifetime member, valuable contributor, and well trusted mod by the membership generally needs to be handled. View Quote Just disgusting. I'm really, REALLY, goddamn disappointed in folks I thought were good people. I only hope I can rely on joker and Aimless to be the change I want to be, goddamnit. No one fucking else will be - do you know how fucking galling it is to rely on a VAgy and a FUCKING NEW YORKER to fix things? More of these: Super serial: |
|
|
That thing between TBS and krpind -- I don't know how one can come back from that. That was fucked up.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
If the staff really scared about this site, they need to get new mods... Obviously, you're not one of those people. |
|
Quoted: Did you know there are people who can look at a misspelled word and based on the context in which it is used, auto-correct it in their mind without losing a beat? Obviously, you're not one of those people. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I think the pole proves how the majority feel. It likely won’t change anything. I don’t usually pay attention to when is and isn’t a mod, but looking at the list a couple surprised me. I would think good Mods would be people that had a history of being able to discuss issues reasonably. Some of those guys are hard line in their defense of the TBL. They may be great guys and great cops but they probably shouldn’t be the ones deciding if a comment is in fact anti LE. It’s like letting the rainbow coalition decide what is and isn’t hate speech. View Quote 66% of the almost 1,500 members who voted in the poll say they will not renew their membership. More long-time members are complaining about the moderation in GD than ever. A moderator was falsely accused by SS of making statements he didn't make. Houston, we have a problem. |
|
Quoted: A-fucking-men. Just disgusting. I'm really, REALLY, goddamn disappointed in folks I thought were good people. I only hope I can rely on joker and Aimless to be the change I want to be, goddamnit. No one fucking else will be - do you know how fucking galling it is to rely on a VAgy and a FUCKING NEW YORKER to fix things? View Quote I blame the Texans and Iowans. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
When you have site staff openly shitting on moderators on the public side using made up BS that was an utter fabrication you have a complete failure of the administration here. Not only does it cause members to distrust staff statements, but furthermore, it is incredibly distasteful to have to watch. Moderators shouldn't have to take shit from anyone because they volunteer their time. It is in the COC I'm sure. For it to come from staff though and be pushed out on the public side - beyond belief. I would never let this happen to one of my mods. You need to fucking clean house around here as it is disgusting. That all the other mods and all of the staff aren't up in arms over this is extremely odd. Even if you wanted him out, the amount of disrespect shown here to a lifetime member, valuable contributor, and well trusted mod by the membership generally needs to be handled. View Quote |
|
Lol. Arf has become a dumpster fire. I’ll say it again.
Avilas were smart to sell when they did. The way things are going in here and “out there” I wonder if this place will survive another five years. |
|
|
The Doors - The End |
|
Quoted:
Damcv62 had a long history of warnings, including stuff like “fuck the police” and had been previously banned and was allowed back after promising to stay within the rules - and then decided to deliberately troll a memorial thread. But yeah, he was totally just a whistleblower who was exposing hypocrisy and got punished for it, View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, well. Was the cop’s life more valuable than the woman’s? The Democratic party took the same approach to their leaked emails. But yeah, he was totally just a whistleblower who was exposing hypocrisy and got punished for it, ...and then decided to deliberately troll a memorial thread. ‘Bama- “Oh, well.” Ha, ha, funny. Good one! Damcv62- “Oh, well.” Banned. Is posting N.W.A.‘s, Fuck Tha Police video, song or lyrics verboten on this site? How about Steve Earle’s, Copperhead Road? How about a picture of some troop with, “FTA“ on their helmet cover? At least a warning, right? |
|
Quoted:
Have you ever noticed that in every thread that criticized the site, the same few vocal people are drawn in and post a lot: Madcap72, Undefined, blinded, and a few others. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, well. Was the cop's life more valuable than the woman's? The Democratic party took the same approach to their leaked emails. But yeah, he was totally just a whistleblower who was exposing hypocrisy and got punished for it, Same six letters, same number of bodies, one member was banned. That is hypocrisy and a double standard, whether or not he had a history. Look around. When one person thinks the moderation is bad, that person is probably the problem. When everyone thinks the moderation is bad, the moderation is probably the problem. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. |
|
Quoted:
. That all the other mods and all of the staff aren't up in arms over this is extremely odd. Even if you wanted him out, the amount of disrespect shown here to a lifetime member, valuable contributor, and well trusted mod by the membership generally needs to be handled. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Have you ever noticed that any thread that has anything to do with cops has the same hard-core “blue-liners” defending any action by police no matter how egregious? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, well. Was the cop's life more valuable than the woman's? The Democratic party took the same approach to their leaked emails. But yeah, he was totally just a whistleblower who was exposing hypocrisy and got punished for it, Same six letters, same number of bodies, one member was banned. That is hypocrisy and a double standard, whether or not he had a history. Look around. When one person thinks the moderation is bad, that person is probably the problem. When everyone thinks the moderation is bad, the moderation is probably the problem. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. |
|
Quoted: 70% disapprove of how GD is moderated. 66% of the almost 1,500 members who voted in the poll say they will not renew their membership. More long-time members are complaining about the moderation in GD than ever. A moderator was falsely accused by SS of making statements he didn't make. Houston, we have a problem. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
When you're a cop, everyone is a suspect. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, well. Was the cop's life more valuable than the woman's? The Democratic party took the same approach to their leaked emails. But yeah, he was totally just a whistleblower who was exposing hypocrisy and got punished for it, Same six letters, same number of bodies, one member was banned. That is hypocrisy and a double standard, whether or not he had a history. Look around. When one person thinks the moderation is bad, that person is probably the problem. When everyone thinks the moderation is bad, the moderation is probably the problem. The estimate that “everyone thinks the moderation is bad” might be just a TINY bit over-estimated. |
|
Quoted:
When you have site staff openly shitting on moderators on the public side using made up BS that was an utter fabrication you have a complete failure of the administration here. Not only does it cause members to distrust staff statements, but furthermore, it is incredibly distasteful to have to watch. Moderators shouldn't have to take shit from anyone because they volunteer their time. It is in the COC I'm sure. For it to come from staff though and be pushed out on the public side - beyond belief. I would never let this happen to one of my mods. You need to fucking clean house around here as it is disgusting. That all the other mods and all of the staff aren't up in arms over this is extremely odd. Even if you wanted him out, the amount of disrespect shown here to a lifetime member, valuable contributor, and well trusted mod by the membership generally needs to be handled. View Quote He's good people, and seeing staff suggesting he was a problem isnt a good look for this site. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.