User Panel
Sorento or Tucson, especially the new electric ones. Fully loaded at a low price, great warranty,
|
|
Quoted: /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/B926BC70-2451-4EC1-A889-3A3C070B9F9D-404.gif I can't stand low cars for dailying View Quote It's one of those things I never thought about until I started commuting for work. My Impreza is low enough it's impossible to see around cars to pass. I ride motorcycles and my other car is a lifted Excursion so I'm used to being able to see Quoted: Maybe if they stretched it. And gave it a manual transmission. TC View Quote If they stretched it you'd have an Outback. No bueno on the manual anymore though. Quoted: They say everything. I think it starts in 22 model year. View Quote Nice. I love AWD. |
|
Another vote for the Mazda CX-5.
Awesome little car. They drive great, look decent, are economical, reliable, have great interiors, and Mazda still puts 6-speed automatics in their vehicles (no CVT's). They are far better than anything the competition offers. Go test drive a Subaru, Honda, Toyota, and Mazda back to back. You will notice a big difference with the Mazda. Not saying the others make bad cars, but IMHO Mazda makes a better vehicle currently, and they are still priced very reasonably on the used market. And before someone says anything about Ford/Mazda: That partnership ended in 2015. |
|
Quoted: Another vote for the Mazda CX-5. Awesome little car. They drive great, look decent, are economical, reliable, have great interiors, and Mazda still puts 6-speed automatics in their vehicles (no CVT's). They are far better than anything the competition offers. Go test drive a Subaru, Honda, Toyota, and Mazda back to back. You will notice a big difference with the Mazda. Not saying the others make bad cars, but IMHO Mazda makes a better vehicle currently, and they are still priced very reasonably on the used market. And before someone says anything about Ford/Mazda: That partnership ended in 2015. View Quote This is obviously someone who has driven them. As did I two years ago. |
|
Quoted: My hybrid highlander has done great work on all the snow and ice around northern VA the last week or so. It’s 13 years old, has a quarter million miles on it, routine maintenance and I’d expect it to go another quarter million with zero problems if I weren’t about to trade up to a 4Runner. The AWD is literally idiot proof, it just works, no buttons or any reason to think about it at all. Just drive. View Quote I couldn’t get my wife’s AWD Highlander out of the driveway earlier this week during the snow. It couldn’t decide which tires to spin. The old Expedition with regular 4x4 did fine. |
|
Quoted: This topic came up at work where people were talking about foresters vs outbacks and a bunch of automotive niches I know nothing about. Say you already have a massive petrol or Diesel engine 3/4 ton 4x4, a Rubicon, a trail rated V8 Grand Cherokee, G-wagon, X5, Land Cruiser, manual transmission FJ, 4Runner, whatever- This is not a discussion for kick ass GD vehicles. It’s also not the discussion for how you have kept your 1994 4Runner going for 500K miles doing all your own work. What AWD car/CUV with great price to value ration, great mpg, great size/storage for price, great resale, can handle adverse road conditions, light off road stuff do people get? The kind of thing you would get if your favorite daughter was going off to college in Maine or you son was starting his first job in Colorado sort of thing. Or to recommended to someone starting out on a budget that must get to work in bad weather? That they would not be embarrassed in. That is available new or fairly new. View Quote Rav4 is probably your best bet. They have an adventure trim that apparently has some high tech stuff that increases the off road / bad weather performance. I don't own one or know anyone who does. Might be worth a look. Of course, good luck buying in today's market with price and availability. |
|
Quoted: I couldn’t get my wife’s AWD Highlander out of the driveway earlier this week during the snow. It couldn’t decide which tires to spin. The old Expedition with regular 4x4 did fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: My hybrid highlander has done great work on all the snow and ice around northern VA the last week or so. It’s 13 years old, has a quarter million miles on it, routine maintenance and I’d expect it to go another quarter million with zero problems if I weren’t about to trade up to a 4Runner. The AWD is literally idiot proof, it just works, no buttons or any reason to think about it at all. Just drive. I couldn’t get my wife’s AWD Highlander out of the driveway earlier this week during the snow. It couldn’t decide which tires to spin. The old Expedition with regular 4x4 did fine. That is odd. I drove mine all over the area. It performed flawlessly. |
|
Quoted: That is odd. I drove mine all over the area. It performed flawlessly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: My hybrid highlander has done great work on all the snow and ice around northern VA the last week or so. It's 13 years old, has a quarter million miles on it, routine maintenance and I'd expect it to go another quarter million with zero problems if I weren't about to trade up to a 4Runner. The AWD is literally idiot proof, it just works, no buttons or any reason to think about it at all. Just drive. I couldn't get my wife's AWD Highlander out of the driveway earlier this week during the snow. It couldn't decide which tires to spin. The old Expedition with regular 4x4 did fine. That is odd. I drove mine all over the area. It performed flawlessly. Toyota Highlander AWD | Diagonal test GONE BAD! | Review part 3/4 |
|
|
|
Quoted: I paid $1000 for this https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/423847/20220103_122512_jpg-2233758.JPG I'm not gonna not shitpost a vehicross pic in an AWD thread View Quote I can jerk the wheel and mash the gas pedal at speed. Can you? |
|
Quoted: Subaru Outback is what you seek, OP. View Quote I’m not the one in the market. If I was, I don’t think it’s tall enough for the kind of stuff I do, like to put in the back, etc. My desired / best combo would be something like the 5.7L Hemi trail rated Full TIME AWD QUADRA-TRAC with 4LO drivetrain in the Grand Cherokee, but in a vehicle like the Wrangler Unlimited, but from Toyota. Or a new X-Terra shaped like the old one, based on the new Frontier platform and drivetrain, but with a rea door/rear mounted spare. |
|
Quoted: Lets have an "L" shaped drag race... I can jerk the wheel and mash the gas pedal at speed. Can you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I paid $1000 for this https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/423847/20220103_122512_jpg-2233758.JPG I'm not gonna not shitpost a vehicross pic in an AWD thread I can jerk the wheel and mash the gas pedal at speed. Can you? I CAN, but I may end up looking like your avatar |
|
|
Quoted: That is odd. I drove mine all over the area. It performed flawlessly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: My hybrid highlander has done great work on all the snow and ice around northern VA the last week or so. It’s 13 years old, has a quarter million miles on it, routine maintenance and I’d expect it to go another quarter million with zero problems if I weren’t about to trade up to a 4Runner. The AWD is literally idiot proof, it just works, no buttons or any reason to think about it at all. Just drive. I couldn’t get my wife’s AWD Highlander out of the driveway earlier this week during the snow. It couldn’t decide which tires to spin. The old Expedition with regular 4x4 did fine. That is odd. I drove mine all over the area. It performed flawlessly. Mine is a 2009 Hybrid, it’s got a V6 and two electric motors so it may be different in operation than that. Whatever it is, it works great for me. |
|
For AWD vehicles there is Subaru and then there is everything else. Very pleased with our Outback 2.5i. With snow tires it’s unstoppable, hauls people comfortably, gets reasonable mileage, and is cheap to maintain. Subaru is still tops if you need the best AWD performance. If you don’t there are some other good options that are not full time AWD like Mazda.
|
|
Toyota is now offering the Camry (sedan) in AWD for 26k and change.
|
|
Quoted: Toyota is now offering the Camry (sedan) in AWD for 26k and change. View Quote What’s old is new. There were some all-track Corollas and Camrys in the late 80s, early 90s- and in certain regions were still pretty sought after in the used market for years after. I think it was the same system on the first RAV4s. |
|
Quoted: What’s old is new. There were some all-track Corollas and Camrys in the late 80s, early 90s- and in certain regions were still pretty sought after in the used market for years after. I think it was the same system on the first RAV4s. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Toyota is now offering the Camry (sedan) in AWD for 26k and change. What’s old is new. There were some all-track Corollas and Camrys in the late 80s, early 90s- and in certain regions were still pretty sought after in the used market for years after. I think it was the same system on the first RAV4s. There were quite a few in Alaska. Subaru always seemed to have the edge. The new Corolla Cross is pretty interesting and starts at $23,500 for the base AWD. On paper it's really close to the Rav so I'd like to really check them out side by side. |
|
Quoted: There were quite a few in Alaska. Subaru always seemed to have the edge. The new Corolla Cross is pretty interesting and starts at $23,500 for the base AWD. On paper it's really close to the Rav so I'd like to really check them out side by side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Toyota is now offering the Camry (sedan) in AWD for 26k and change. What’s old is new. There were some all-track Corollas and Camrys in the late 80s, early 90s- and in certain regions were still pretty sought after in the used market for years after. I think it was the same system on the first RAV4s. There were quite a few in Alaska. Subaru always seemed to have the edge. The new Corolla Cross is pretty interesting and starts at $23,500 for the base AWD. On paper it's really close to the Rav so I'd like to really check them out side by side. Oh yeah, in that timeframe I saw way more Subarus as well. It’s like those GL wagons bred like rabbits. It was like Toyota didn’t make near as many as the market wanted, and only did it for a few years. |
|
Quoted: Oh yeah, in that timeframe I saw way more Subarus as well. It’s like those GL wagons bred like rabbits. It was like Toyota didn’t make near as many as the market wanted, and only did it for a few years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Toyota is now offering the Camry (sedan) in AWD for 26k and change. What’s old is new. There were some all-track Corollas and Camrys in the late 80s, early 90s- and in certain regions were still pretty sought after in the used market for years after. I think it was the same system on the first RAV4s. There were quite a few in Alaska. Subaru always seemed to have the edge. The new Corolla Cross is pretty interesting and starts at $23,500 for the base AWD. On paper it's really close to the Rav so I'd like to really check them out side by side. Oh yeah, in that timeframe I saw way more Subarus as well. It’s like those GL wagons bred like rabbits. It was like Toyota didn’t make near as many as the market wanted, and only did it for a few years. It was a weird market space especially then. We also had an Eagle dealer in town so there were lots of those running around. The old Loyale and GL wagons were absolute tanks but had shit corrosion protection. Saw many more sidelined due to rust vs mechanical issues. |
|
Quoted: I’m not the one in the market. If I was, I don’t think it’s tall enough for the kind of stuff I do, like to put in the back, etc. My desired / best combo would be something like the 5.7L Hemi trail rated Full TIME AWD QUADRA-TRAC with 4LO drivetrain in the Grand Cherokee, but in a vehicle like the Wrangler Unlimited, but from Toyota. Or a new X-Terra shaped like the old one, based on the new Frontier platform and drivetrain, but with a rea door/rear mounted spare. View Quote Brother in law is 6'4, he routinely uses my sister's outback when he has to drive more than 10 miles. His Daily drive is either a lexus Fsport(5 liter v8 ..., or a 91 land cruiser) . His improved MPG and such using her rig makes it worth it. they both love it for camping trips(car campiong) and my nephew likes it too(he is 18 months old so his vote only counts half). Ive gota forester with a 2 inch lift, 29 inch AT tires, and hang out with the tamer jeep club locally. Though my MPG did drop with those tires when i city drive, adn the lift did drop my highway a full mile per gallon to 25. |
|
|
Being an outlier, I vote something KIA or Hyundai.
You can get a pretty darn well equipped AWD thing for under $35k with a 10 year warranty. We went palisade, its a bit outside the budget of $35k, but we walked away from the dealership for $36649 for ours brand new. The AWD has been awesome. Comfortable and gets almost 30 mpg on the highway. The smaller vehicles will get better for sure. |
|
We have a 4runner, X5 and Range Rover Sport.
They each fill a role. |
|
What's the point of a awd sedan in GA? I get by just fine in the snow belt in a fwd commuter. The cost, complexity, and fuel costs aren't worth the slight benefit.
|
|
@ramairthree
Are you looking for a vehicle with a spare tire? It seems like the norm these days is just a patch kit. |
|
Quoted: @ramairthree Are you looking for a vehicle with a spare tire? It seems like the norm these days is just a patch kit. View Quote I’m not in the market for one. It’s a niche I knew nothing about. I am knowledgable about some other niches so I often get dragged into conservations as a “car guy.” ( I have over a dozen, drivable, insured and registered vehicles from 1968 to 2019- 6 of which are AWD or old school 4WD) When it comes to a frame on an SUV- I feel interior spares in the cargo area, like on a Jeep Cherokee XJ- just kill you on interior storage. Under cargo area storage, like on a Grand Cherokee WK/WK2- also kill potential storage area, and suck to get at when you have to take out your cargo to get to it. Under body spares, like on a truck or 4Runner, kill potential gas tank size, and can suck to get to in snow, ice, mud, - sometimes you can’t even get to- And that a read door mounted spare is ideal on a true SUV. We are too into the convenience of hatch backs for soccer moms, wannabes parallel parked at the vegan coffee shop, etc. and a lot of SUVs compromise this. |
|
Quoted: They used to be the ugly duckling of the segment, but they grew up well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I just bought a Rav4 2022 it should be in this weekend I hope I really like the wife's '19 RAV4. https://nextcloud.fstech.ltd/s/W9qyNbNj9WaonBB/preview They used to be the ugly duckling of the segment, but they grew up well. QFT The early 2000s Highlander, RAV, and Honda CRV appeared to be 95% owned by 60+ year old women. |
|
RAV4. We live in the mountains up north. With snow tires they are mountain goats. Wife got one and it was so good I got another (hybrid) for commuting, as the truck was killing me in gas with FJB prices. They drive great and have been ridiculously reliable. My local dealer is not marking them up but you do have to wait a couple months after you order one.
|
|
Quoted: QFT The early 2000s Highlander, RAV, and Honda CRV appeared to be 95% owned by 60+ year old women. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I just bought a Rav4 2022 it should be in this weekend I hope I really like the wife's '19 RAV4. https://nextcloud.fstech.ltd/s/W9qyNbNj9WaonBB/preview They used to be the ugly duckling of the segment, but they grew up well. QFT The early 2000s Highlander, RAV, and Honda CRV appeared to be 95% owned by 60+ year old women. I rember when the RAV4 came out. I had a 4Runner at the time. Every automaker had a frame on SUV at the time. AWD cars seemed to be just not catching on in most regions. You had had the eagle, there were Subarus, there were temporarily some other AWD cars, there were some sport oriented AWDs, but in general it seemed people wanted the higher ride height and visibility of an SUV, the increased storage, etc. When CUVs like the RAV4 we’re new, they were essentially mimicking the looks of SUVs. Trying to find the sweet spot of the benefits of a SUV and the benefits of cheaper, lighter, better mpgs of a car while looking like the massively popular SUVs. Now we are in an era of massive CUV popularity. With SUV styles mimicking CUVs and destroying many of the benefits of having a SUV. Combined with aerodynamics for mpg mandates, you end up with a bunch of the same looking vehicles. If you look at the dotted lines, which just quicky outline classic SUV shapes, you see what a massive amount of interior storage is lost. Wranglers did not go this route and have massive sales numbers. The new Bronco and Bronco Sport are a true SUV and unibody SUV/CUV return to classic body shape. Anyways, I got sidetracked. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.