User Panel
F-22 is the sexiest, like an Aston Martin Vanquish.
F-14 tickles my nostalgia boner, like a '70 Chevelle SS. F-16 is sleek and sporty, like a Porsche 911. |
|
Quoted: I guess there is a degree of fascination of watching trainwrecks, airplane programs or strippers. View Quote Ha, I’ll take it. I am growing a little tired of all three anymore. I wish my timeline with the airplane programs was more aligned with yours, maybe even a generation earlier. It’s a depressing world now. |
|
Me-262. Next question. Shark shaped fuselage, swept back wings, very symmetrical design.
|
|
Quoted: The Voodoo had some sexy lines to it. The century jet era was a really cool time for fighter designs! https://heavywhalley.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/f-101-voodoo.jpg View Quote |
|
Harrier jet shooting up building scene, True Lies (1994) |
|
Pains me to say this but single seat SU-27 variants are the best looking in my eyes.
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm probably a bit biased, but I'm an F-15 guy. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/44525/33fw-f15-eglin_jpg-2612920.JPG I'm biased too. This one was the first one I was assigned to as an ADCC fresh out of tech school in 1995 and then as the DCC in 1998. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/272886130_5105270872865754_9042112225163-2612957.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/16803_jpg-2612958.JPG I started my F-15 work in the fall of 1975 in the automatics shop at Langley AFB, then as a strength engineer in the production group at McAir where I also supported flight test and the wing for the F-15E (all y'all pilots are flying wings with a main spar I sized) then later in the Advanced F-15 project, and finally a short stint several years later on a first look at extensive redesign to get manufacturing cost out of the aft fuselage. Any F-15 replacement with a LO shape will do very well to copy the fuselage load paths to make a successful airplane. |
|
Quoted: Ha, I'll take it. I am growing a little tired of all three anymore. I wish my timeline with the airplane programs was more aligned with yours, maybe even a generation earlier. It's a depressing world now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I guess there is a degree of fascination of watching trainwrecks, airplane programs or strippers. Ha, I'll take it. I am growing a little tired of all three anymore. I wish my timeline with the airplane programs was more aligned with yours, maybe even a generation earlier. It's a depressing world now. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Here she is … Miss Americaaaaaaa …… http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7Ch4i6oHHFE/UTS4SPr5KJI/AAAAAAAABC4/9R6JM2b3bsA/s1600/x-32.jpg View Quote And here's Midcap's choice! Me I gotta go with the F-22 followed by the F-86. Pure sex. |
|
F16 Viper and its not close.
The F4 does get special credit for looking like it actively wants to hurt something though. I read Skunkworks years ago and the idea that beautiful planes tend to fly well is actually pretty well established. |
|
F14
F16 close second Honorable Mentions to Mig28, F15, and F4 |
|
|
|
Quoted: I am a bit biased. A Wall of Eagles going to the Merge. Sucks to be you motherfucker https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/98989/f-15-firing-missiles_jpg-2613234.JPG View Quote |
|
View Quote FPNI, without a doubt. |
|
View Quote FPNI in spades. |
|
That photo cost the taxpayers more than I will make in my lifetime.
|
|
The look of the Swedish Saab jets is pretty unique and are some of the best looking.
But for me the F-4 and F-14 are the best. |
|
|
Quoted: Over the years I've learned to revel in pointing out to my trainees the pull start on the front of the engine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Without regard for modern developments or other details, what comes to mind as simple "the jet fighter" will always be the 262. Over the years I've learned to revel in pointing out to my trainees the pull start on the front of the engine. Feature of the engine, rather than the airframe, as the Arado 234A and 234B used the same engines and also had the pull starter. The pull starter started a two-cycle piston engine, which had a clutch to connect it to the jet engine. Two sets of controls in the cockpit - one for the piston starter engines, and one for the jet engines. The B-57 also had an odd, by modern standards, starting system, but it was apparently based on a similar system that had been used in some radial engine Navy planes. Canberra Start up As for the thread topic, if I had to pick one jet fighter from the 1940s to now, it would probably be the F-15. |
|
I’m a weirdo.... I like the early straight wing jets.
P-80 Shooting Star F9F Panther F2H Banshee Eta- I guess those wingtip tanks do it for me. |
|
Quoted: F-22, followed by the SU-57 https://wallpapercave.com/wp/rVIUgmv.jpg https://www.gladiusds.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Sukhoi_T-50_Maksimov.jpg View Quote Attached File |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: That photo cost the taxpayers more than I will make in my lifetime. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: That photo cost the taxpayers more than I will make in my lifetime. About $100k+ a pop. ETA: AIM-120's are around $1,000,000 each. |
|
Quoted: Not being snarky - why isn't there an F17? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes There is an F-17, but after the prototypes were built and evaluated by the Air Force, they decided to buy the F-16 instead. The F-17 was then redesigned to make the F-18. |
|
|
Quoted: The F-18 was originally the F-17 when it was competing against the F-16 in the USAF lightweight fighter program. Navy adopted it and changed the name View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not being snarky - why isn't there an F17? The F-18 was originally the F-17 when it was competing against the F-16 in the USAF lightweight fighter program. Navy adopted it and changed the name A little more involved than changing the name, as carrier capability required beefing up various things, and the Navy had different requirements than the Air Force. There was also the change in the manufacturer. |
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.