User Panel
Posted: 2/11/2019 9:56:47 AM EST
China’s J-20 air superiority fighter could be developed into a stealthy strike and electronic attack jet.
Upon entering service in 2017 the Chengdu J-20 became the first active fifth generation fighter jet in the world developed outside the United States — providing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) with an analogue to the U.S. Air Force’s F-22 Raptor air superiority fighter. The J-20 was designed with a radar evading stealth profile to maximize its survivability both in air-to-air combat against enemy fighters and against enemy air defenses. The fighter’s air superiority airframe provides it with a high thrust/weight ratio, a high speed, high operational altitude, and the long range needed to dominate airspace both over Chinese territory and beyond across the South and East China Seas. Recent reports from Chinese state media outlet CCTV however indicate that the J-20 airframe could potentially be modified to fulfil different roles for the PLAAF — namely that of an electronic attack and a strike aircraft. The PLAAF has increasingly relied on modifying airframes of high performance combat aircraft to perform specialized roles – a lower cost alternative to developing new airframes altogether. The J-11B airframe, for example, was developed into an advanced strike fighter, the J-16, and the J-16 was itself in turn developed into an electronic attack jet, the J-16D. The J-15 carrier based air superiority fighter has also been developed into an electronic attack aircraft, the J-15D (or J-17), while the JH-7 strike fighter and H-6 bomber have undergone similar modifications. Alongside an electronic attack role, some H-6 bombers have also been developed into ballistic missile carrying strike bombers, capitalizing on the airframe’s versatility and reliability to develop specialized derivatives. The extent of modifications the J-20 airframe will undergo to develop a strike variant remain to be seen — fighters such as the F-15E and J-16 underwent relatively minor external changes while the Su-34 and FB-22 required major revisions to the original designs. Other EW and strike fighters have been modified to accommodate more fuel and extend their range, with the F-15E being a key example, deploying conformal fuel tanks that the original F-15 lacked. However, the J-20’s already considerable range and the difficulty of adding conformal fuel tanks while retaining a sleek stealth profile mean that such modifications may not be applied. View Quote |
|
What’s Next for China’s Fifth Generation Fighter Jet? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I have heard their engines suck View Quote |
|
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out.
America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. |
|
when they start helping Trump win elections, then, and only then, will they be considered a threat....
|
|
Quoted: They now have the technical ability to produce single crystal turbine blades. Focusing on what they can field today completely ignores the leaps and bounds they have made in the past 20 years. It wasn't too long ago at all that the best they could manage were warmed over MiG-21s. View Quote |
|
|
100% stealth. Not even our older WW II radars will pick up its signature. It's so simple it can be flown by virtually anyone. Nothing in our Air Force, Navy or Marine Corps can spot them unless they're super close.
But then again, anyone can fold a sheet of paper into an airplane. |
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote You don’t win battles by fighting fair. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Nuke the Chinese View Quote But you do know they can nuke us right back, right? As for the jet, by the time they get the bugs worked out it will probably be obsolete. As it is we could probably Zerg Rush them with F35s right now if we were feeling that desperate. Don't think we are going to be that desperate anytime soon though. |
|
|
Never seen that Clear and detailed pics of the inside of the weapons bays before.
This is what shit looks like when it actually works! Is that an umbilical attached to a missile on the F35 though? |
|
|
Quoted:
Never seen that Clear and detailed pics of the inside of the weapons bays before. This is what shit looks like when it actually works! Is that an umbilical attached to a missile on the F35 though? View Quote My guess some sort of physics testing package. (ETA: Not like nuclear physics package, lol... those weapons look different... . I mean like wind resistance, stress/strain). |
|
Whats next? Whatever America was doing two years ago, only shittier.
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I'm anything but a fan of the Chinese communist party. But you do know they can nuke us right back, right? As for the jet, by the time they get the bugs worked out it will probably be obsolete. As it is we could probably Zerg Rush them with F35s right now if we were feeling that desperate. Don't think we are going to be that desperate anytime soon though. |
|
I’m sure that thing has a pretty small RCS from the front compared to an F-15 or F/A-18, but probably still orders of magnitude greater than an F-22. Canards.
|
|
Quoted:
I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm anything but a fan of the Chinese communist party. But you do know they can nuke us right back, right? As for the jet, by the time they get the bugs worked out it will probably be obsolete. As it is we could probably Zerg Rush them with F35s right now if we were feeling that desperate. Don't think we are going to be that desperate anytime soon though. Then we can play the game. |
|
Quoted: I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. View Quote Perhaps it will just hit someplace like San Francisco? But if it was me playing the game it would probably be Malmstrom. |
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote X87 |
|
What I would be more worried about is the PRC selling those planes to states like Iran or Pakistan and encouraging them to start shit with them. That could destabilize the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia fairly quickly.
|
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, even if one nuke gets through it can make an awful mess. Perhaps it will just hit someplace like San Francisco? But if it was me playing the game it would probably be Malmstrom. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. Perhaps it will just hit someplace like San Francisco? But if it was me playing the game it would probably be Malmstrom. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. |
|
What's next for this pile of shit, is for one to get blown out of the sky and for the rest to have no idea what did it.
|
|
Quoted:
A guy wrote an article awhile back about the possibility of a really unhinged right wing Anerican president provoking China into a war and getting a lot of the west coast depopulated along with China being annihilated. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. Perhaps it will just hit someplace like San Francisco? But if it was me playing the game it would probably be Malmstrom. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. |
|
|
Considering modern systems rely on sensor fusion and networking between aircraft, and all sorts of communications, I hope we are heavily focused on anti-satellite weapons, including hunter-killer anti-satellite satellites, able to alter their position and orbit and fire missiles and/or projectiles at other satellites. This is what we need and this is what we are also vulnerable to.
Stealth or not, if we can take out their aircraft's ability to function as a unified system, they are screwed. |
|
Quoted:
A guy wrote an article awhile back about the possibility of a really unhinged right wing American president provoking China into a war and getting a lot of the west coast depopulated along with China being annihilated. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. Perhaps it will just hit someplace like San Francisco? But if it was me playing the game it would probably be Malmstrom. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. |
|
Quoted:
A guy wrote an article awhile back about the possibility of a really unhinged right wing American president provoking China into a war and getting a lot of the west coast depopulated along with China being annihilated. Which would solidify conservative control of national politics for a long time and solidify our global supremacy. View Quote |
|
“The WS-15 engine designed for the J-20 exploded during a ground running test in 2015,” a Chinese military source told the SCMP . “The explosion indicated the WS-15 is not reliable, and so far there is no fundamental solution to overcome such a problem … that’s why the J-20 is using WS-10B engines now.”
All of the Chinese J-20s observed thus have been equipped with either the Russian Salyut AL-31FN or the WS-10B. “Using the WS-10B engines is just a temporary, expedient stage of the J-20’s engine development … in the future, the aircraft may use another new engine, the improved performance engine (IPE) version of the WS-10, the WS-10 IPE, until the development of the WS-15 is successful,” a Chinese military source told the SCMP earlier this year. “It’s so embarrassing to change engines for such an important aircraft project several times … just because of the unreliability of the current WS-15 engines. It is the long-standing core problem among home-grown aircraft.” J-20 fatal flaws and Chinese fixes |
|
Quoted:
“The WS-15 engine designed for the J-20 exploded during a ground running test in 2015,” a Chinese military source told the SCMP . “The explosion indicated the WS-15 is not reliable, and so far there is no fundamental solution to overcome such a problem … that’s why the J-20 is using WS-10B engines now.” All of the Chinese J-20s observed thus have been equipped with either the Russian Salyut AL-31FN or the WS-10B. “Using the WS-10B engines is just a temporary, expedient stage of the J-20’s engine development … in the future, the aircraft may use another new engine, the improved performance engine (IPE) version of the WS-10, the WS-10 IPE, until the development of the WS-15 is successful,” a Chinese military source told the SCMP earlier this year. “It’s so embarrassing to change engines for such an important aircraft project several times … just because of the unreliability of the current WS-15 engines. It is the long-standing core problem among home-grown aircraft.” J-20 fatal flaws and Chinese fixes View Quote Thank you Walmart shoppers. |
|
Quoted:
When did that happen? I know they dumped billions into their jet propulsion industry because they have been so far behind for decades. I've been following a lot of Chinese sources on the status of the WS-15, but haven't seen claims of single Chrystal turbine blades. They're still doing external stores carriage testing on the J-20. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4_hrZpLSC7A/WGCneC7qvXI/AAAAAAABI_E/YLyfKw4FdDIgU_7-E3myH9ncNI0zi16fQCLcB/s640/J-20%2Bcarried%2Bwith%2Bfour%2Bdrop%2Btanks%2Bis%2Bunveiled%2Bfor%2Bthe%2Bfirst%2Btime%2B3.jpg https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRpCOxrUVwq2oZt9Pb7a_o-GICtusmE09U6Ly6XvwWHTZsPGPcU View Quote |
|
China will never surpass American aircraft.
Just keep telling yourself that... |
|
Quoted:
I AM a gambling man... but I'd prefer not to play a game with those odds if I don't have to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm anything but a fan of the Chinese communist party. But you do know they can nuke us right back, right? As for the jet, by the time they get the bugs worked out it will probably be obsolete. As it is we could probably Zerg Rush them with F35s right now if we were feeling that desperate. Don't think we are going to be that desperate anytime soon though. @beitodesstrafe ashheap here we come |
|
Quoted:
When did that happen? I know they dumped billions into their jet propulsion industry because they have been so far behind for decades. I've been following a lot of Chinese sources on the status of the WS-15, but haven't seen claims of single Chrystal turbine blades. They're still doing external stores carriage testing on the J-20. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4_hrZpLSC7A/WGCneC7qvXI/AAAAAAABI_E/YLyfKw4FdDIgU_7-E3myH9ncNI0zi16fQCLcB/s640/J-20%2Bcarried%2Bwith%2Bfour%2Bdrop%2Btanks%2Bis%2Bunveiled%2Bfor%2Bthe%2Bfirst%2Btime%2B3.jpg https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRpCOxrUVwq2oZt9Pb7a_o-GICtusmE09U6Ly6XvwWHTZsPGPcU View Quote |
|
Quoted:
But think road trip time! @beitodesstrafe ashheap here we come View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I'm anything but a fan of the Chinese communist party. But you do know they can nuke us right back, right? As for the jet, by the time they get the bugs worked out it will probably be obsolete. As it is we could probably Zerg Rush them with F35s right now if we were feeling that desperate. Don't think we are going to be that desperate anytime soon though. @beitodesstrafe ashheap here we come |
|
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote When you have a country that could not economically manufacture a hair curler or toaster at this point, the knowledge to do so will likely be gone soon as well. Outsourcing everything possible, letting in tens of thousands of spies on student and work visas every year, looking back, it will seem to historians that the western powers almost deliberately did everything to make it easier for their greatest strategic rivals to achieve industrial and eventually technological superiority. I remember as a child reading a book of stories from soldiers in the Vietnam War. A unit spent all night in the jungle looking for a lost NVD. The natives were poor, not stupid, he reflected. They were terrified of what they would do with it if they found it. They are not poor anymore. |
|
What is the deal about single-crystal turbine blades. If I understand that correctly are we growing the turbine blades?
|
|
Quoted:
It irritates me that people mock them on their ability to build a jet engine. Well, humans have proven to be good at problem solving. They're going to eventually figure it out. America sucked at building rockets. And then we figured out how to build them without it exploding on the launch pad. Planning for the future by banking on a foes current manufacturing capacity is fucking dumb. China is not someone to underestimate. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
And the USMC IOCed F-35 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
When did that happen? I know they dumped billions into their jet propulsion industry because they have been so far behind for decades. I've been following a lot of Chinese sources on the status of the WS-15, but haven't seen claims of single Chrystal turbine blades. They're still doing external stores carriage testing on the J-20. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4_hrZpLSC7A/WGCneC7qvXI/AAAAAAABI_E/YLyfKw4FdDIgU_7-E3myH9ncNI0zi16fQCLcB/s640/J-20%2Bcarried%2Bwith%2Bfour%2Bdrop%2Btanks%2Bis%2Bunveiled%2Bfor%2Bthe%2Bfirst%2Btime%2B3.jpg https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRpCOxrUVwq2oZt9Pb7a_o-GICtusmE09U6Ly6XvwWHTZsPGPcU We've been building the world's best fighter jet engines for the past 70 years, and are always chasing better performance, reliability, efficiency, and now self-diagnostic and management via FADEC, VLO characteristics, and integrated systems of systems so the engine is part of the aircraft. China's developmental engines are exploding because they can't manage temps, materials science, dimensional variances with coefficient of thermal expansion and rotational force, compression, combustion, and all the other challenges with running even a 4th Gen engine. Now imagine them having to produce the engine, even if they get one right in test and development. Meanwhile, we're already decades ahead on the 6th Gen Variable Cycle Engines with 2 competing manufacturers, one of which had samples on both ATF prototypes in the late 1980s. |
|
I have no idea why everyone keeps calling this a 5th Gen aircraft when we have no idea if it's even stealthy
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.