Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 48
Link Posted: 8/28/2024 4:07:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History



When will the climate boondoggle end?  It's just one giant wealth transfer and these zealots are backing up plane loads of our money to give away.
Link Posted: 8/28/2024 10:02:18 PM EDT
[#2]
Couldn’t remember if this was posted yet so here it is again if it was.

66% of Americans believe Taiwan should invest more in defense, poll says
30% say US should use its military to defend Taiwan from China at any cost

https://taiwannews.com.tw/news/5917181
Link Posted: 8/28/2024 11:50:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:

How did we lose Thailand? I'm not up on that history.
View Quote

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-28/thai-air-force-to-replace-old-f-16s-with-swedish-fighter-jets
Link Posted: 8/28/2024 11:50:55 PM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 12:49:20 AM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 4:15:11 AM EDT
[#6]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 4:24:37 AM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 9:01:43 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 11:27:12 AM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 3:46:33 PM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 4:06:12 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GoldenMead] [#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote


Before they fired them in a big exercise you would think they there would be lots of training beforehand.  The way the article is written this doesn’t seem to be the case.  Hopefully the missiles we gave them didn’t have that high of failure rate, cause if they did that’s a huge liability going into a real conflict.  But I am going with it’s mostly operator error from lack of training.
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 4:11:30 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GoldenMead:


Before they fired them in a big exercise you would think they there would be lots of training beforehand.  The way the article is written this doesn’t seem to be the case.  Hopefully the missiles we gave them didn’t have that high of failure rate, cause if they did that’s a huge liability going into a real conflict.  But I am going with it’s mostly operator error from lack of training.
View Quote

I believe even US training found operator error to be the primary contributor to failure but we’ll see
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 4:19:30 PM EDT
[#13]
Link Posted: 8/29/2024 9:12:05 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?



There were people on this site that said nah never happen China will never be competent enough so we can keep using them to build our shit.

Absolute free traders live in a utopia that assumes everyone is rational  and that every act will be based on an economic outcome.  


Some of us said but national security and free trade are some times at odds.   We were called all kinds of things communists protectionist Smoot Hawley lovers etc.    Funny I don't see many libertarians beating thier chest over China trade any more.  

To your point china trade is dropping off but it's too little too late they're already enriched emboldened  and now desperate.  Much of it because of our money and technology.  
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 8:07:13 AM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 8:10:01 AM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 9:21:42 AM EDT
[Last Edit: CarmelBytheSea] [#17]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 3:21:18 PM EDT
[#18]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 3:51:03 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 7:17:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CarmelBytheSea] [#20]
Link Posted: 8/30/2024 7:42:58 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 1:36:38 AM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 1:40:30 AM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 1:43:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: CarmelBytheSea] [#24]
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 2:11:31 AM EDT
[#25]
Whoa, do I have a lot of catching up to do!!!

Score Cards!!!
Taiwan tracks 13 Chinese military aircraft, 10 ships
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Ministry of National Defense (MND) tracked 13 Chinese military aircraft, eight naval vessels, and two official ships around Taiwan between 6 a.m. on Wednesday (Aug. 28) and 6 a.m. on Thursday (Aug. 29).

Of the 13 People's Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft, 10 crossed the Taiwan Strait median line in the country's central and southwest air defense identification zone (ADIZ), according to the MND.
View Quote
Attachment Attached File

This pattern will make more sense with the next flight tracker.

Taiwan tracks 25 Chinese military aircraft, 9 ships
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Ministry of National Defense (MND) tracked 25 Chinese military aircraft, seven naval ships, and two official ships around Taiwan between 6 a.m. on Thursday (Aug. 29) and 6 a.m. on Friday.

Of the 25 People's Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft, 17 crossed the Taiwan Strait median line in the country's northern, central, southwestern, and southeastern air defense identification zone (ADIZ), according to the MND.
View Quote
Attachment Attached File


It looks like they're practicing stacking up waves to the South. PLAAF aircraft are gound controlled. It's not just the pilots that need the practice. It's the entire controller force as well. Nobody in the lower levels can make a decision. They can only choose from pre-determined choices, and there had better be good reason to do that.
So far this month, Taiwan has tracked PLA aircraft 505 times and Chinese ships 278 times.
View Quote

Link Posted: 8/31/2024 2:12:46 AM EDT
[#26]
More indiginous weapon systems news!
Taiwan Navy plans budget for 6 rapid mine-laying ships
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Navy has listed a budget of NT$1.8 billion (US$56.49 million) to procure six more rapid mine-laying ships from a Taiwanese manufacturer, reports said Friday (Aug. 30).

The last of four earlier mine-laying vessels budgeted at NT$917.77 million were delivered to the Navy in 2021. The information about the new orders was included in budget documents supplied to the Legislative Yuan on Friday, the Liberty Times reported.

The budget is valid from 2025 to 2027, with NT$780 million to be spent during the first year.

The ships, manufactured by Lung Teh Shipbuilding Co., will help counter amphibious landings by enemy forces, according to the Navy. They could also penetrate enemy defenses to lay mines in enemy harbors and waters.
View Quote

Link Posted: 8/31/2024 2:24:29 AM EDT
[#27]
Got an update on the story about the publicized meeting between the US and the PRC:
China's top general tells US to stop 'military collusion' with Taiwan
You may recall that Jake Sullivan was supposed to meet with Wang Yi. Didn't happen that way.

TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   China's top general on Thursday (Aug. 29) told US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan the US must cease its "military collusion" with Taiwan.

On Thursday, Sullivan held talks with General Zhang Youxia (   ), Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), marking the first meeting of a Biden administration official with Zhang, per VOA. This is also the first time a senior US official has met with the CMC's vice chairman since 2018.

In his opening remarks at the People's Liberation Army's Bayi building in Beijing, Sullivan noted that it was a rare opportunity to hold such an exchange. He added, "Given the state of the world and the need for us to responsibly manage the US-China relationship, I think this is a very important meeting," per AFP.

Zhang responded by thanking Sullivan for his visit and said the meeting demonstrated the values the US government places on military security.
View Quote
Now, that the pleasantries are out of the way:
According to a readout of the meeting released by the US Embassy in China, Sullivan said, "Both countries have a responsibility to prevent competition from veering into conflict or confrontation." He added the two sides "reaffirmed the importance of regular military-to-military communications as part of efforts to maintain high-level diplomacy and open lines of communication."

Sullivan emphasized the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and Washington's commitment to freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. He also addressed concerns about China's support for Russia's military manufacturers, the need to prevent miscalculation and escalation in cyberspace, and efforts to reach a ceasefire and hostage agreement in Gaza.
View Quote
Then China said:
However, in the minutes of the talks released by China's Ministry of National Defense, Zhang urged the US to, "Correct its strategic perceptions of China, adopt a rational and pragmatic policy toward China, truly respect China's core interests, promote military-to-military communication and exchanges together with China, and jointly shoulder responsibilities as major countries."

Zhang said the "Taiwan question" is at the core of China's interests and the bedrock of China-US relations. He claimed that "Taiwan independence forces are incompatible with peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait as fire with water."

The general warned the PLA would take "countermeasures against the provocations of the 'Taiwan independence' forces."

He added, "China urges the US side to stop military collusion with Taiwan, stop arming Taiwan, and stop spreading false narratives on Taiwan."
View Quote
You guys may not remember (I'll look for a video of the news story if the media hasn't hidden them) way back when at the beginning of the Harris-Biden Administration, Blinken met with whoever the "wolf-warrior" diplomat was at the time. Blinken just kind of sat there while being lambasted by some clown who came in the room looking for a fight.

The US complained about the treatment, and the PRC diplomat was removed from high level talks with US statemen, but then the PRC countered with charges that Blinken was not just as bad, but way worse, so they will not be meeting with him any longer either. Hence, this is why Jake Sullivan is doing this.

Here are links to the readouts of what the US says happened and to what the PRC says happened during the meeting.
Readout of National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan's Meeting with Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission Zhang Youxia of the People's Republic of China

CMC Vice-Chairman Zhang Youxia meets US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 2:25:51 AM EDT
[#28]
Here's Taiwan's response to it all:
Taiwan slams Chinese military expansion after Sullivan-Wang talks
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) condemned China's military expansion and claims following two days of meetings between US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi (  ).

On Thursday (Aug. 29), MOFA said China's post-meeting readout made "spurious claims about Taiwan that do not accord with reality." It also "strongly condemned these false narratives" and stressed that Taiwan is not subordinate to China.

The ministry said China's intimidation and suppression of Taiwan and its "naked ambition for military expansion" pose a major risk to peace and stability in the region.

MOFA said China is jeopardizing transatlantic security by being Russia's key backer in its war with Ukraine. The ministry said this partnership with Moscow demonstrates that Beijing's ambitions stretch past Taiwan to other regions, making it a "major global threat."

The ministry pointed out that China's "malicious actions" have heightened concern among democratic nations worldwide.

MOFA pledged that Taiwan will continue to bolster its defenses and coordinate with the US and other like-minded countries to "safeguard the rules-based international order and preserve peace, stability, and prosperity across the Taiwan Strait and the Indo-Pacific."

Following talks between Sullivan and Wang on Aug. 27 and 28, the White House issued a statement pointing out that Sullivan had emphasized the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. According to China's Foreign Ministry, Wang stressed to Sullivan that "Taiwan belongs to China" with unification inevitable and said "Taiwan independence is the biggest risk to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait."
View Quote

Link Posted: 8/31/2024 7:53:36 AM EDT
[#29]
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 1:03:58 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

Japan protests second territorial incursion by China in under a week
TOKYO, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Japan lodged a protest with China after one of its naval survey vessels entered Japanese waters on Saturday, the second incursion into its territory by the Chinese military in less than a week.

An uptick in Chinese military activity near Japan and around Taiwan in recent years has stoked concerns in Tokyo. Japan has responded with a defence buildup that it says aims to deter Beijing from using military force to push its territorial claims in the region.

The ship was detected off the coast of Kagoshima Prefecture, in Japan's southwest, at around 6 a.m. local time (2100 GMT Friday), and departed within two hours, the country's defence ministry said.

Tokyo registered its "strong concern and protest over this incident" with a Chinese embassy official, the foreign ministry said in a statement that also referenced the first airspace intrusion by a Chinese military plane on Monday.

Tokyo told Chinese diplomats earlier this week that Monday's violation of it airspace was "utterly unacceptable."

A telephone call to the Chinese embassy in Tokyo went unanswered when Reuters called outside regular business hours.

Saturday's incident was the tenth time in the past year that a Chinese naval survey ship has sailed through Japan's territorial waters, and the 13th time if submarines and other intelligence-gathering vessels are included, according to national broadcaster NHK.

Second incursion in less than a week, and the Chinese Ambassador does not even talk on the phone; it's merely a Chinese embassy official.

Gentlemen, Japan has China's response.
Link Posted: 8/31/2024 1:29:47 PM EDT
[#31]
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 2:27:52 AM EDT
[#32]
Second to last Score Card for August:
Taiwan detects 30 Chinese military aircraft and 11 ships
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Ministry of National Defense tracked 30 Chinese military aircraft, seven naval ships, and four official ships around Taiwan between 6 a.m. on Friday (Aug. 30) and the same time Saturday.

Twenty of the aircraft crossed the Taiwan Strait median line in the country's northern, central, southwestern, and eastern air defense identification zone (ADIZ), according to the defense ministry.
View Quote
Attachment Attached File

This is the second time in as many weeks as a full encirclement of Taiwan took place. It might be the first aircraft entered this pattern at 1550 hrs, and the last aircraft cleared it at 2308 hrs.
So far this month, Taiwan has tracked Chinese aircraft 535 times and ships 289 times.
View Quote

The big things that have gone on in the area were the two PLAN ship incursions into Japanese waters, the US-China meeting, or bait and switch meeting where Sullivan met a PLA General instead of a Foreign Ministry person, and in Taiwan a number of TPP party officials including the leader of the party are being arrested, invesitigated, charged and we've already covered the convicted party personel all for political corruption. Plus, they all have the same excuse in that underlings made accounting mistakes. It's very bad for the Party on the one hand, but on the other, it couldn't have happened to nicer people.

The Taiwan's People Party largely attracts young voters. The Party itself is attracted to the KMT and is rather a junior partner to it. So, this is bad for the KMT in the long term as you may remember when we covered the KMT trying to increase its power in the Legislative Yuan at the expense of the Executive Branch of Gov't. Huge Protests and we covered it.

You may also remember that we've been covering the KMT with the outlook that they are now co-opted by the CCP, their once mortal enemies. Politics being a zero-sum game, as the KMT loses political power, the DPP will only increase in political power. I'm assuming this is going to shift time-tables upward.

I'll get off my ass soon enough and catch up to it all. (as soon as my stupid ear stops bleeding.)


Another Hope Springs Eternal purchase!!
Taiwan to purchase additional Stinger missiles to bolster deterrence
TAIPEI (Taiwan News)   The Ministry of National Defense (MND) intends to purchase more than 1,000 additional Stinger missiles to meet defense needs amid the increased Chinese military threat.

The Army and Navy each ordered 250 Stinger missiles in 2019 and 2015, respectively. However, Taiwanese forces urgently require more effective countermeasures and deterrence, prompting the Army to order 1,985 more Stinger missiles from the US for approximately NT$55.54 billion, Liberty Times reported.

According to the MND's 2025 budget report, the Army will procure 549 launch systems and 549 identification, friend or foe (IFF) systems. The missiles are expected to be delivered by 2031.

The Navy also plans to buy 45 man-portable Stinger missiles, 15 launch systems, and 15 IFF devices, scheduled for delivery by 2031. However, the military has not commented on whether these purchases are included in the Army's procurement plan.

In March, the Navy revealed that it had sent 11 letters to the US urging the expedited delivery of 250 Stinger missiles it previously requested. Since 2019, there has been a significant backlog of arms deliveries to Taiwan, which has affected Taiwan's efforts to strengthen defense capabilities against China.

Talks of purchasing additional Stinger missiles from the US first came about under then-President Tsai Ing-wen (   ) to meet air defense needs and prepare for more live-fire target practice as conscript service increased to one year.
View Quote

Link Posted: 9/1/2024 3:16:03 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
Ah, Brother xd341, please allow me to offer you a different outlook or perspective on what's going on and what's going to happen.

First and foremost ignoring and shunnning an ideology and its adherents will not make them go away.

These people cannot be "bought off" nor even be expected to hold to the agreements they make. This 2.5 year thread has shown that what ever agreements made back then are now being incrimentally dismantled.

You can't even surrender to them!! The won't allow that as they think you're just trying to pull a "fast one" on them. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, if that bit of human history serves no other point, it's the lesson that even if you surrender and submit, they'll still kill you. They didn't break you!! Killing you is the only way to make sure!!!

And why is all this happening?? They believe in an ideology that says it all has to happen in a specific way. We're not talking about a religion; we're not talking about any form of rationalism. This is an ideology, and we cannot escape its consequences.

Every time we use the word "capitalism", we're talking Marxism. Our entire system has now been defined in this manner. We no longer speak of the "free Market" where individuals or goups can meet, agree to a price without coercion etc. We are at a point where a complete idiot can running for President can openly suggest a plan where pricing will be controlled. We've already lost much, not all, but much.

A war is coming. It cannot be stopped. The Idelology states it must happen. The Adherents will simply obey. They've been doing it their whole lives to get to the positions of power they control now and will not be stopped simply because the US isn't buying products. It's not what they're interested in. It's simply a means to an end. Nothing more. They "romantize' nothing.

That's their side of the equation. Our side of the equation goes like this: we're in this position because of the political opportunism of a dedicated political party. They get elected to become rich. How many millionaires has being a member of Congress created over the decades?

China is paying and is paying well. These politicians are not going to give that up for the sake of an historical anomaly called the United States of America. They'll leave for elsewhere and remind anyone that will listen how they did all they could, but the People let them down.

As for us, we don't get to claim "innocence." It would do us no good. The adherents only see that as both a lie and an attempt to evade their righteous punishment.

The table was set before we came of age. There is no way to avoid it. Surrendering Taiwan or the Philippines only postpones it. If we're smart, we pick the battlefield. If we're not smart, maybe God will have mercy on us as we won't get that from the Chinese.

Have a great Labor Day!!!!
Seriously...LOL...I mean it. And the rest of you guys as well!!!!!!!!
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 10:02:44 AM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 10:10:19 AM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 10:24:55 AM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Ah, Brother xd341, please allow me to offer you a different outlook or perspective on what's going on and what's going to happen.

First and foremost ignoring and shunnning an ideology and its adherents will not make them go away.

These people cannot be "bought off" nor even be expected to hold to the agreements they make. This 2.5 year thread has shown that what ever agreements made back then are now being incrimentally dismantled.

You can't even surrender to them!! The won't allow that as they think you're just trying to pull a "fast one" on them. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, if that bit of human history serves no other point, it's the lesson that even if you surrender and submit, they'll still kill you. They didn't break you!! Killing you is the only way to make sure!!!

And why is all this happening?? They believe in an ideology that says it all has to happen in a specific way. We're not talking about a religion; we're not talking about any form of rationalism. This is an ideology, and we cannot escape its consequences.

Every time we use the word "capitalism", we're talking Marxism. Our entire system has now been defined in this manner. We no longer speak of the "free Market" where individuals or goups can meet, agree to a price without coercion etc. We are at a point where a complete idiot can running for President can openly suggest a plan where pricing will be controlled. We've already lost much, not all, but much.

A war is coming. It cannot be stopped. The Idelology states it must happen. The Adherents will simply obey. They've been doing it their whole lives to get to the positions of power they control now and will not be stopped simply because the US isn't buying products. It's not what they're interested in. It's simply a means to an end. Nothing more. They "romantize' nothing.

That's their side of the equation. Our side of the equation goes like this: we're in this position because of the political opportunism of a dedicated political party. They get elected to become rich. How many millionaires has being a member of Congress created over the decades?

China is paying and is paying well. These politicians are not going to give that up for the sake of an historical anomaly called the United States of America. They'll leave for elsewhere and remind anyone that will listen how they did all they could, but the People let them down.

As for us, we don't get to claim "innocence." It would do us no good. The adherents only see that as both a lie and an attempt to evade their righteous punishment.

The table was set before we came of age. There is no way to avoid it. Surrendering Taiwan or the Philippines only postpones it. If we're smart, we pick the battlefield. If we're not smart, maybe God will have mercy on us as we won't get that from the Chinese.

Have a great Labor Day!!!!
Seriously...LOL...I mean it. And the rest of you guys as well!!!!!!!!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
Ah, Brother xd341, please allow me to offer you a different outlook or perspective on what's going on and what's going to happen.

First and foremost ignoring and shunnning an ideology and its adherents will not make them go away.

These people cannot be "bought off" nor even be expected to hold to the agreements they make. This 2.5 year thread has shown that what ever agreements made back then are now being incrimentally dismantled.

You can't even surrender to them!! The won't allow that as they think you're just trying to pull a "fast one" on them. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, if that bit of human history serves no other point, it's the lesson that even if you surrender and submit, they'll still kill you. They didn't break you!! Killing you is the only way to make sure!!!

And why is all this happening?? They believe in an ideology that says it all has to happen in a specific way. We're not talking about a religion; we're not talking about any form of rationalism. This is an ideology, and we cannot escape its consequences.

Every time we use the word "capitalism", we're talking Marxism. Our entire system has now been defined in this manner. We no longer speak of the "free Market" where individuals or goups can meet, agree to a price without coercion etc. We are at a point where a complete idiot can running for President can openly suggest a plan where pricing will be controlled. We've already lost much, not all, but much.

A war is coming. It cannot be stopped. The Idelology states it must happen. The Adherents will simply obey. They've been doing it their whole lives to get to the positions of power they control now and will not be stopped simply because the US isn't buying products. It's not what they're interested in. It's simply a means to an end. Nothing more. They "romantize' nothing.

That's their side of the equation. Our side of the equation goes like this: we're in this position because of the political opportunism of a dedicated political party. They get elected to become rich. How many millionaires has being a member of Congress created over the decades?

China is paying and is paying well. These politicians are not going to give that up for the sake of an historical anomaly called the United States of America. They'll leave for elsewhere and remind anyone that will listen how they did all they could, but the People let them down.

As for us, we don't get to claim "innocence." It would do us no good. The adherents only see that as both a lie and an attempt to evade their righteous punishment.

The table was set before we came of age. There is no way to avoid it. Surrendering Taiwan or the Philippines only postpones it. If we're smart, we pick the battlefield. If we're not smart, maybe God will have mercy on us as we won't get that from the Chinese.

Have a great Labor Day!!!!
Seriously...LOL...I mean it. And the rest of you guys as well!!!!!!!!

I agree with everything you stated here. My thinking is that ww3 including a nuclear exchange between Nato and the sino-russian alliance is a possible outcomes here. We are clearly heading for a world war and I do not see how this ends with a strategic nuclear exchange.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 10:25:11 AM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Ah, Brother xd341, please allow me to offer you a different outlook or perspective on what's going on and what's going to happen.

First and foremost ignoring and shunnning an ideology and its adherents will not make them go away.

These people cannot be "bought off" nor even be expected to hold to the agreements they make. This 2.5 year thread has shown that what ever agreements made back then are now being incrimentally dismantled.

You can't even surrender to them!! The won't allow that as they think you're just trying to pull a "fast one" on them. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, if that bit of human history serves no other point, it's the lesson that even if you surrender and submit, they'll still kill you. They didn't break you!! Killing you is the only way to make sure!!!

And why is all this happening?? They believe in an ideology that says it all has to happen in a specific way. We're not talking about a religion; we're not talking about any form of rationalism. This is an ideology, and we cannot escape its consequences.

Every time we use the word "capitalism", we're talking Marxism. Our entire system has now been defined in this manner. We no longer speak of the "free Market" where individuals or goups can meet, agree to a price without coercion etc. We are at a point where a complete idiot can running for President can openly suggest a plan where pricing will be controlled. We've already lost much, not all, but much.

A war is coming. It cannot be stopped. The Idelology states it must happen. The Adherents will simply obey. They've been doing it their whole lives to get to the positions of power they control now and will not be stopped simply because the US isn't buying products. It's not what they're interested in. It's simply a means to an end. Nothing more. They "romantize' nothing.

That's their side of the equation. Our side of the equation goes like this: we're in this position because of the political opportunism of a dedicated political party. They get elected to become rich. How many millionaires has being a member of Congress created over the decades?

China is paying and is paying well. These politicians are not going to give that up for the sake of an historical anomaly called the United States of America. They'll leave for elsewhere and remind anyone that will listen how they did all they could, but the People let them down.

As for us, we don't get to claim "innocence." It would do us no good. The adherents only see that as both a lie and an attempt to evade their righteous punishment.

The table was set before we came of age. There is no way to avoid it. Surrendering Taiwan or the Philippines only postpones it. If we're smart, we pick the battlefield. If we're not smart, maybe God will have mercy on us as we won't get that from the Chinese.

Have a great Labor Day!!!!
Seriously...LOL...I mean it. And the rest of you guys as well!!!!!!!!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Originally Posted By xd341:
Why does it seem that we would rather shoot it out with China than simply stop giving them money?

We have fucked up priorities.  We could dramatically reduce our trade with China, support our like minded friends with that trade, reduce the economic base that the PLA can draw resources from and strengthen the base of allies...Likely forestalling an armed conflict like we haven't seen in 80 years...but instead we do the opposite.  

Am I the only one seeing this?
Ah, Brother xd341, please allow me to offer you a different outlook or perspective on what's going on and what's going to happen.

First and foremost ignoring and shunnning an ideology and its adherents will not make them go away.

These people cannot be "bought off" nor even be expected to hold to the agreements they make. This 2.5 year thread has shown that what ever agreements made back then are now being incrimentally dismantled.

You can't even surrender to them!! The won't allow that as they think you're just trying to pull a "fast one" on them. Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, if that bit of human history serves no other point, it's the lesson that even if you surrender and submit, they'll still kill you. They didn't break you!! Killing you is the only way to make sure!!!

And why is all this happening?? They believe in an ideology that says it all has to happen in a specific way. We're not talking about a religion; we're not talking about any form of rationalism. This is an ideology, and we cannot escape its consequences.

Every time we use the word "capitalism", we're talking Marxism. Our entire system has now been defined in this manner. We no longer speak of the "free Market" where individuals or goups can meet, agree to a price without coercion etc. We are at a point where a complete idiot can running for President can openly suggest a plan where pricing will be controlled. We've already lost much, not all, but much.

A war is coming. It cannot be stopped. The Idelology states it must happen. The Adherents will simply obey. They've been doing it their whole lives to get to the positions of power they control now and will not be stopped simply because the US isn't buying products. It's not what they're interested in. It's simply a means to an end. Nothing more. They "romantize' nothing.

That's their side of the equation. Our side of the equation goes like this: we're in this position because of the political opportunism of a dedicated political party. They get elected to become rich. How many millionaires has being a member of Congress created over the decades?

China is paying and is paying well. These politicians are not going to give that up for the sake of an historical anomaly called the United States of America. They'll leave for elsewhere and remind anyone that will listen how they did all they could, but the People let them down.

As for us, we don't get to claim "innocence." It would do us no good. The adherents only see that as both a lie and an attempt to evade their righteous punishment.

The table was set before we came of age. There is no way to avoid it. Surrendering Taiwan or the Philippines only postpones it. If we're smart, we pick the battlefield. If we're not smart, maybe God will have mercy on us as we won't get that from the Chinese.

Have a great Labor Day!!!!
Seriously...LOL...I mean it. And the rest of you guys as well!!!!!!!!

I agree with everything you stated here. My thinking is that ww3 including a nuclear exchange between Nato and the sino-russian alliance is a possible outcomes here. We are clearly heading for a world war and I do not see how this ends with a strategic nuclear exchange.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 1:48:24 PM EDT
[#38]
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 2:14:55 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


For those keeping score at home, the shoal is 90 miles from Palawan, over 500 to Vietnam, and something like 700 to Hainan Island.

The PRC will keep pushing, up to and including Corregidor as a 'historically Chinese possession', if not stopped.  We care because the Philippines is an ally, and we'd prefer keeping it that way.

Agree with xd341.  My own guess as to why, is that a decent chunk of our leadership has been bought off, and thinks they'll still be in charge, even after any revolutionary changes in the Sino-US relationship.  Moreover, the course of United States conflicts of the last 80 years have been limited wars that did not cause widespread social strife, effects on US citizenry or destruction in the US.  "Demonstrations" such as those in 1968 aren't significant on this scale.  I wouldn't be surprised if US leadership thought they could manage and control a WestPac conflict, even one with significant naval losses.  Manage and control here meaning keeping it limited in scope to the Western Pacific, and in any event, without material damage to the NoVa/DC area.

Restricting Chinese trade before now, would have cost the donor class too much money.  So it wasn't done.  Even now, significant domestic industrial sectors have yet to meaningfully decouple from China.   (Pharmaceutical precursors come to mind.  I'm sure you all can think of others.)

It's going to be profoundly ugly.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 2:23:03 PM EDT
[#40]
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 4:54:29 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
It's behind a paywal that the wayback machine can't handle, and neither can I!!
China on Thursday told the Philippines to "immediately withdraw" its coastguard ship from hotly contested Sabina Shoal in the South China Sea after a helicopter airdropped supplies for the ship's crew.

The warning followed Manila's confirmation earlier on Thursday that the Philippine Coast Guard had resupplied crew on board the BRG Teresa Magbanua (MRRV-9701) using a helicopter after the Chinese side blocked previous resupply missions by boat.
And again as a reminder, the Sabina Shoal is clearly in the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:17:27 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CarmelBytheSea:
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/104291322
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CarmelBytheSea:
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/104291322
This post and Carmel's post below cover the same meeting.
Title:
China responds furiously as Pacific Islands leaders reject bid to cut Taiwan from bloc meetings
The long and the short of it is that for over 30 years the Pacific Islands Forum has always included Taiwan's name as a partner since the PRC was granted Taiwan's status the "CHINA" through a UN resolution. That's how it happened. It was certainly nothing that the PRC accomplished in and of itself.

And that only happened because of the Nixon Admin wanting to divide up the ComBloc World.

China's ambassador to the Pacific has responded furiously after the region's leaders rejected a push from Solomon Islands to stop Taiwan participating in its top diplomatic gathering.
Solomon Islands had been pressing other Pacific nations to strip Taiwan of its status as a "development partner" for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), with its foreign minister Peter Shanel saying this week that Taiwan was "not a sovereign country" and PIF should "follow international law".
But China's ambassador to the Pacific nations, Qian Bo, said the final communique "must be a mistake".

"The situation is obvious, among the 18 members of the PIF, 15 countries have diplomatic relations with China and 15 countries have categorically stated they stand by the One China principle," he told reporters after the meeting.

[color=#ff0000]"So this is a surprising mistake made by someone, I'm not sure [who] but I think it must be corrected!"[/color]

The ambassador suggested that he was also blindsided by the reference to Taiwan and China in the final communique.

"Surprisingly we also learned there is language concerning [Taiwan and China]   this should not be the final communique, there must be a correction on the text," he said.

"We have already talked to the secretariat and to the [secretary-general] and other delegations where we have received wide understanding and support."
In the original story, they increase the font size of the quote to make sure we all understand how pissed off Qian Bo is. I'd do that here, but I don't know how much of this his little bladder can take.

They also did this at the meeting:
Pacific leaders have also formally endorsed a major new policing pact championed by Australia, as well as signing off on the terms for a high-level mission to the troubled Pacific territory of New Caledonia.
This is actually good. As stated here a couple of years ago, and apologies for not putting in the "reminders", these nations don't have an Army or even a Coast Guard. They have Police. The PRC is slowly adding Chinese para-military police to the Countries that will accept them.

This is Carmel's second story on the same topic.
Title:
Pacific Islands Forum communique taken down after Chinese envoy calls Taiwan reference 'unacceptable'
Visibly angry' Qian Bo demands correction of Taiwan's 'development partner' label despite its use for more than three decades
A summit of Pacific leaders has ended in drama after China's regional envoy demanded the scrapping of language about Taiwan, with the communique later republished without the offending paragraph.

The Pacific Islands Forum (Pif) summit in Tonga this week brought together Australia, New Zealand and 16 Pacific island countries or territories, only three of which still have diplomatic relations with Taiwan.

China is not a member of the regional grouping, but   like the US and numerous other major countries   attends some of the Pif events as a "dialogue partner".
Here's a fun fact!!!!

The peoples we call "polynesians" originated from the island that is now called Taiwan. Why no one opens up a history book from time to time is beyond me.

But the final communique published on the Pif website on Friday rebuffed any push for change and stood by existing arrangements.

"Leaders reaffirmed the 1992 Leaders decision on relations with Taiwan/Republic of China," it said.

China's special envoy for the Pacific, Qian Bo, called for changes to the communique.

Nikkei Asia reported that it saw a "visibly angry" Qian confront the Pif secretary general, Baron Waqa, immediately after the closing news conference and that he called the statement "unacceptable".

Qian later told reporters in Tonga's capital, Nuku'alofa, that it was "a surprising mistake made by someone" and it "must be corrected".

The Guardian has seen and verified a copy of the final communique that appeared on the Pif website earlier on Friday. It included a line reaffirming the decades-long arrangements regarding Taiwan.

But as of Friday evening local time, this communique was no longer easily accessible on the website.

The communique was republished on the Pif website on Saturday morning local time, but with paragraph 66 about Taiwan no longer included.

A paragraph about Solomon Islands being the host of next year's Pif was moved up to become the new paragraph 66.

A spokesperson for the Pif secretariat said the new document was "the correct version", but played down the practical impact of the change.

China's foreign ministry said on Friday: "Any attempt by the Taiwan authorities to brush up their sense of presence by rubbing shoulders with the forum can only be self-deceptive."

Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:37:04 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
This story is an amazing story!!

For this reason: the PRC/CCP is telling the US what it can and cannot do with its foreign policies.
Title:
China's top diplomat warns visiting US official over support for the Philippines

BEIJING, China   China's top diplomat Wang Yi on Wednesday warned visiting US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan over supporting the Philippines in the disputed South China Sea, state media reported.

"The United States must not use bilateral treaties as an excuse to undermine China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, nor should it support or condone the Philippines's actions of infringement," Wang told Sullivan, according to state broadcaster CCTV.

According to CCTV, Wang emphasised to Sullivan that "China is firmly committed to safeguarding its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights over the South China Sea islands".

Tensions between Manila and Beijing over disputed reefs and waters in the South China Sea have escalated in recent days.

Beijing said on Monday it had taken "control measures" against two Philippine Coast Guard ships that "illegally" entered the waters near the shoal.

Manila said the Chinese vessels had prevented Philippine ships from resupplying their own coast guard vessels in the area, blasting the move as "aggressive" and calling Beijing the "biggest disrupter" of peace in Southeast Asia.

Wang also stressed that Taiwan belonged to Beijing and that China will "certainly be unified".

He told Sullivan that the US should "put into practice its commitment not to support Taiwan independence", according to CCTV.

The US should "abide by the one-China principle and the three joint communiques of China and the United States, stop arming Taiwan, and support China's peaceful reunification", Wang said.

China has kept up its sabre-rattling since the inauguration this year of President Lai Ching-te, whose party emphasises Taiwan's separate identity.

Wang and Sullivan also discussed issues including Ukraine, the Middle East and the Korean Peninsula, CCTV said.

"China has always been committed to advocating for peace and promoting dialogue, and working towards a political solution to the Ukraine crisis," he said.

"The US should not shift responsibility onto China, nor should it impose illegal unilateral sanctions."
We have always been on the target list.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:41:14 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Title:
China's chip capabilities just 3 years behind TSMC, teardown shows
I have to come back to this one later as I just got locked out of the website.

The important take away from this article is that the US has failed in stopping hardware and IP from getting to China.

And, no, the PRC also being able to develop chips on par with TMSC will not stop the PRC from taking over the South China Seas.


Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:47:56 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History



Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has criticised dangerous actions in the contested South China Sea after the Chinese Coast Guard rammed a Philippines vessel, sparking counterclaims from China that the smaller nation was at fault.

It follows a backflip by the Pacific Islands Forum, a bloc of 18 countries including Australia, to remove a reference to Taiwan from an official communique after Chinese complaints, showing the superpower's growing influence in the region.

Saturday's ramming incident was the fifth confrontation between China and the Philippines in a month as China asserts its claim over most of the crucial trade route, including sections claimed by nations including Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam.

Philippines Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela displayed footage of a Chinese ship that "directly and intentionally rammed the Philippine vessel" without provocation, and revealed damage to the 97-metre Philippines ship. Nobody was injured in the incident.

The US ambassador to the Philippines, MaryKay Carlson, said the US "condemns the multiple dangerous violations of international law by the [People's Republic of China], including today's intentional ramming".

"We stand with the Philippines in upholding international law."

China has repeatedly laid blame on the Philippines and the US for the driving up regional tension.

Last week, a Chinese defence ministry spokesperson said Washington was emboldening Manila to make "reckless provocations".

Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:51:28 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Looky here! The EU actually makes a statement:
EU 'condemns dangerous actions' by China against Philippines ship
The European Union accused China on Sunday of taking "dangerous actions" against the Philippines, as Beijing and Manila blamed each other for deliberately ramming their coastguard ships.
The collision marks the latest in a spate of similar incidents in recent weeks in the South China Sea, where Beijing claims almost all of the economically vital body of water despite competing claims from other countries and an international court ruling that its assertion has no legal basis.
Here it is, the statement:
"The EU condemns the dangerous action by Chinese coastguard vessels against lawful Philippine maritime operations in the area of the Sabina Shoal," said Nabila Massrali, spokeswoman for the EU's top diplomat Josep Borrell, in a statement.
After a 2.5 year wait, yeah, it's worth it.
The incidents "endanger the safety of life at sea and violate the right to freedom of navigation to which all nations are entitled under international law", the EU statement said.

"The EU condemns all unlawful, escalatory and coercive actions that undermine these principles of international law and threaten peace and stability in the region."

Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:51:46 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Title:
I have to come back to this one later as I just got locked out of the website.

The important take away from this article is that the US has failed in stopping hardware and IP from getting to China.

And, no, the PRC also being able to develop chips on par with TMSC will not stop the PRC from taking over the South China Seas.


View Quote


Here’s the article,

TOKYO -- An analysis of China's current semiconductor technology revealed that the country is approaching a level three years behind industry leader Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., showing the limitations of U.S. efforts to stem Beijing's development of cutting-edge chips.

Hiroharu Shimizu, CEO of Tokyo-based TechanaLye, a semiconductor research company that disassembles 100 electronic devices a year, told Nikkei about China's capabilities.

Shimizu showed semiconductor circuit diagrams for two application processors, the brains of a smartphone: one from Huawei Technologies' Pura 70 Pro, released in April, and one from a top-of-the-line Huawei smartphone from 2021.

The Kirin 9010 -- the newest phone's chip -- was designed by Huawei subsidiary HiSilicon and mass-produced by major Chinese contract chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (SMIC). The 2021 phone's Kirin 9000 chip was also designed by HiSilicon, but mass-produced by TSMC.

SMIC, which is subject to U.S. measures to suppress advanced chip technology, is capable of producing 7-nanometer chips. TSMC supplied 5-nm processors to Huawei for the 2021 phone.

Generally, the smaller the nanometer size, the higher the performance and the smaller the chip. However, SMIC's 7-nm mass-produced chip is 118.4 square millimeters, while TSMC's 5-nm chip is 107.8 sq. mm. The two chips have similar areas and performance levels.

Although a difference in yield still exists, SMIC's capabilities are approaching a level three years behind TSMC, based purely on performance of the chips that were shipped. HiSilicon's design capabilities have also improved, as shown by its ability to produce chips with comparable performance as TSMC's 5-nm products, despite their wider circuit width.

Huawei's Pura 70 Pro is equipped with a total of 37 semiconductors that support memory, sensors, cameras, power supply and display functions. Of these, 14 were from HiSilicon, 18 from other Chinese manufacturers and just five from foreign manufacturers, including South Korea's SK Hynix for DRAM and Germany's Bosch for motion sensors. Some 86% of the phone's chips were made in China.

"In effect, the only semiconductors subject to the U.S. regulations are cutting-edge server chips for artificial intelligence and other applications," Shimizu said. "As long as the chips do not pose a military threat, the U.S. is probably allowing their development."

Chinese players made 34.4% of global chipmaking equipment purchases in 2023, roughly double the figure for South Korea and Taiwan, according to industry group SEMI. The country is expanding its mass-production capabilities by focusing on equipment that is not targeted by export restrictions on cutting-edge technologies.

Given this trend, the fact that SMIC's 7-nm chips now rival TSMC's 5-nm chips in processing capability could have major implications for the industry. TSMC also faces growing hurdles to stay ahead of Chinese rivals technologically as miniaturizing circuits become increasingly difficult.

"The U.S. regulations so far have only slightly delayed Chinese innovation, while sparking efforts by the Chinese chip industry to boost domestic production," Shimizu said.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 5:54:25 PM EDT
[#48]
Thanks, GoldenMead!!! (It's my favorite beer!!)
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 6:00:17 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoinks:
Thanks, GoldenMead!!! (It's my favorite beer!!)
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/1737/Chimay_Red_png-3310884.JPG
View Quote


You said that before.  So I ordered some last week and it arrives this week.  I’ll let you know what I think of it.
Link Posted: 9/1/2024 6:37:27 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By GoldenMead:


You said that before.  So I ordered some last week and it arrives this week.  I'll let you know what I think of it.
View Quote
I am standing by.

It's a "bottled live" beer, so there's sediment in the bottom. Some like it as it has a nutty taste, some don't. Most pour the beer into a large enough glass to hold it all first time, so as not to stir up the sediment. Hope you like it!!!
Page / 48
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top