The question is absurd. There is an abundance of proof for "white" people to have been in America (including S. America) for thousands of years. There is no "native." People are highly nomadic and apart from seemingly no light-skinned races wanting to enter Africa except recently in S. Africa, people are always on the move.

If we took out the direct contact with "Native Americans," and came over some 500 years after they had left or their civilization had passed on, we would know almost nothing about them. They left behind very little material culture apart from some stone tools. A good example are the Anasazi. We only know about them from verbal legends and the stone homes they left behind. Take away the verbal history, along with the rest of the "native" world, and it would mostly be a mystery as to who they were.

Given that 400 years of science has been "establishing" some sort of "truth" about the Americas, and it's going to be a long time before anyone changes their mind, even with bombshell findings.

Here's an interesting read on comparing Thor to Quetzalacoatl. There have also been numerous statues with completely caucasian features found throughout S. America.
Thor vs Quetzalacoatl

Well Mister AzzFaceKillah, British settlers deliberately began showing up in the 1500s, but serious colonization began in the 1600s.

The Ancient North Eurasians/Siberians are the group which share descent in Europeans and Precolumbians.  They were mammoth and wooly rhino hunters and dwelled in Beringia for a long time, and their descendants who stayed in the Americas mixed with East Eurasian Siberians and East Asians to form the Precolumbian population of the Americas.  Counterintuitively Ice Age Siberia was not a vast frozen wilderness, but there were regions

The genetics of some of the Tarim Basin Mummies were recently analyzed by a Chinese team and they found that the oldest mummies were relatively pure (about 80%) Ancient North Eurasian with some Siberian admixture, and the newer ones became more and more East Asian admixed.  The oldest of those mummies have a European look to their bodies, skull shapes, and complexions, while the newer ones look more Chinese.  Every population which has Ancient North Eurasian ancestry has some of these Europoid features.  It is not a one-to-one with modern Europeans but the similarity is quite significant.  European people apparently derive their blondism trait from the genetics of these Ancient North Eurasians.

The neat thing about the skull is that while lifestyle can change the lower face in a person's lifetime it does not affect the shape of the upper half of the skull without serious modifications such as head binding.  The oldest skull specimens recovered in the Americas have cranial shapes often mistaken for European such as Kennewick Man.  What will likely eventually be found is that there were pockets of the Ancient North Eurasian people, with relatively low Siberian and East Asian admixture, living throughout the Americas for a few thousand years.  Some of those populations may have preserved a light hair trait from their Ancient North Eurasians in their gene pool.

The Solutrean People were a Upper Paleolithic hunter gatherer population which stretched across Spain and France.  They were part of a brother race to the Western Hunter Gatherers who populated all of Europe in the Mesolithic, but the Solutreans contributed small amounts of ancestry to modern Europeans when compared to the contribution of the Western Hunter Gatherers.  The genetic evidence which was being used to support the Solutrean Hypothesis is much more simply and better explained with the Ancient North Eurasians, so if the Solutreans did make it to North America they left no discernable genetic heritage in the Precolumbians.  That doesn't disprove the Solutrean Hypothesis, but it does make its case very weak and unconvincing.

And it is sad to think this group struggled across the ice sheets just to face climactic devastation from the Younger Dryas Impacts, Volcanic events in the Cascade Range, Meltwater Deluge Flooding from the ending Ice Age maximal glaciation, wildlife die off from ecological changes, and eventual genocide at the hands of the infilling Beringian Precolumbians.  But yeah, English colonization kicked off in the 1600s.

O my

We already Know we waz Kings, so “..We waz Injunz” holds much appeal.    The Nobel Savage was exotic, brave and resourceful.  He ruled the roost and didn’t take scruff from no squaw.    

Plus, it moves the “rape of the new world” into the Re-conquest of the new world, which anyone can agree, sounds nicer.  

The interest in it is obvious and self evident, but the resistance against it is just a silly form of white guilt.   Similarities in craft and stonework, is how we’ve always measured the spread of ancient cultures.    Except now, because that would be politically incorrect.  
I hate that idiots stifle science, because they’re afraid the paradigm might shift.  



This was made in Cahokia Illinois, and similar renditions were spread all over the South.    Their God-myth was of an Outsider, who showed up one day, lived with them and brought knowledge, like how to work Copper.  It’s dated 1000-1100 AD.    Where did he get his Christian Scepter?  
Attached File

https://www.stlpr.org/arts/2014-08-01/cahokia-mounds-hosted-only-copper-works-in-north-america

"Finno-Ugric"

This Siberian race probably shares a lot of common ancestry with the Ancient North Eurasians who are the fathers of the Proto Indo Europeans (Aryans), and they have common myths. They have also been next to each other for a very long time so likely shared some language and myth concepts.  The intrusion of the Finno Ugric people into the Fennoscandian Peninsula appears to have happened after the Nordic people had already established themselves as a population.

Let me try this again.

Solutrean people bear no connection to modern European peoples.  Modern Europeans, to the extent such a label has any value, are mostly descendants of groups that wiped out the Solutreans long, long ago.

So, to use your argument, the post-Colombian migrations of modern Europeans to the Americas would just be an extension of the original conquest of the ancestors of those people, not a "reconquista."

There is evidence of Dutch settlements in Central Texas going back to the mid-1600's.  The one I'm personally aware of had an unusually large number of arrowheads found within the perimeter of the homestead site.

The interesting thing about "central Asia" origins.

Indo-Aryans are also from Central Asia
The Celts also came from the steppes of Central Asia
The Huns..

The other pre modern Japanese groups in todays Japan are the Jomon and Yayoi, neither originate on the Island either, If I recall correctly, most modern Japanese are related to the Yayoi.

Then in regard to eastern Eurasia, East Asia, Siberia and the Americas there are the old mongoloid, new mongoloid migrations...etc...

The Apache and the Navajo arent really from Arizona...The Apache maybe only ariving a few hundred years before the Spanish.
Then there are those way down in Central and South America.

Link?

There are a shit load of mounds in Ohio and KY. Most have been dug in to at one time or another but are protected now.

Why would I care what other people think?

If I recall the Navajo migrated from Canada. Interestingly the Catawba of North Carolina moved back to New York to rejoin the Iroquois after colonists arrived. The Cherokee and Catawba were originally from New York Iroquois. The one people scientists have little info on is the Denovisan of East Asia. Nobody knows exactly what they looked like. Also the Polynesians traveled all the way to the islands off South America and Malaysians traveled to Madagascar hundreds of years ago and that’s a pretty far distance.

Attached File

Attached File

Well, for one thing, OP can get government money, scholarships, and Casino revenue, if he can prove Native ancestry.

Sorry, I think this was 1700's not 1600's.  The property was the old El Rancho Cima property outside Wimberley that was recently sold to a developer. Best I can do:

https://republicranches.com/properties/texas/hill-country/el-rancho-cima/

Lah di dah.  It doesn't have to be that way Bohr, these things could have been rigorized, and were until the Boasian sex pests lied about literally everything.  It's disgusting to patronize the honest interest of people in the distant past because they are grasping at the straws of a vocabulary which was intentionally lobotomized and gelded.

Steppe, genetic ancestry,  began with Samara, Khvalynsk, Sredny Stog.  Horses. Elites. Wheels. Chariots. Then, wherever people wanted to go, they could.

Attached File

Don’t forget the ancient white people of Peru, with elongated skulls, who knew how to build megalithic structures.  

Read the whole article.  https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/breaking-new-dna-testing-2000-year-old-elongated-paracas-skulls-changes-020914

This read is an interesting ride into archeology, epigraphy, linguistics, and ancient mythology and trade and migration patterns showing vast evidence for North African, Phoenician, and Iberian other Celtic establishment in North America including the current continental US going back to the Bronze Age.

Mainline entrenched academia hated the author after this book in spite of his Harvard prof creds and multi-disciplinary scientific approach and connections.



Edit: typo

Thanks sir

This particular study and the Viracocha and megalithic structure origins are fascinating

Yeah, arguing from the suppositions of modern, Marxist racial morality is silly. Why look for excuses? For thousands of years nobody had a problem with winning, conquering, & advancing one's people, regardless of it being at the expense of other people, without any more justification that a hand-wave of divine will & providence on your side. The weak must always tolerate the strong, our current exaltation of victimhood is what is at odds with reality.

I guess the OPs were right.   Can't have nice things without ancient aliens stuff.

Asians via Bering Strait. Vikings from the East.

Everybody forgets the Swedes.

Because the Swedes are a sub-tribe of the Danes

Attached File


Expect Gustavus Adolphus  will visit you tonight

They're never forgotten sir

Let me see your red ochre stash.

Has anyone mentioned the gold plates Smith found in Western NY yet?

Im more a horse headed sceptre guy.

All 32,768 of your GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGparents or just a few of them?

I don’t give a fuck.  Europe made the world great.  Get over it, losers.

When I first read OP's question, I didn't notice the word "first". So I thought to myself,
"Well, golf courses, bluegrass music and old re-runs of the Lawrence Welk Show."

That's plenty of evidence of white folks being in America.

Not with that Swede1988 (or close) guy around

Little treatment is ever given to New Sweden or Fort Cristina. But it was minor as was the entire Swedish Colonial Empire. A ball at Lutzen surely ended all that punching above weight.

For a general fully comprehending the effectiveness of shock, he surely failed to grasp his value as King. Or maybe his value relied on it.?

  And those people most likely killed people and stole their land who had killed and stole it from someone else who killed and stole it from someone else and so on and so forth.  Nobody's ancestors are completely innocent.