User Panel
Can someone clarify for me...
What's up with the British Anti-ship missiles? I have read several recent references to Harpoons, but from many pages ago I thought those were expired and the thinking was they may be sending Sea Skua missiles instead as they aren't past their use-by date and would be easier for the Ukrainians to use. Has there been any confirmation yet? |
|
It is said that Democracy is a form of government where the people get what they vote for. And sometimes they get it good and hard.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war. |
Originally Posted By AlabamaFan64: As a Catholic, I’m somewhat skeptical of some relics, especially those supposedly from an object actually used in the Crucifixion. A relic of this type on a Russian warship isn’t even on the radar, imo, though the ship obviously was. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlabamaFan64: Originally Posted By M-1975: Maybe not a nuke, but: https://www.businessinsider.com/sunk-russia-warship-may-have-carried-holy-relic-on-board-2022-4 As a Catholic, I’m somewhat skeptical of some relics, especially those supposedly from an object actually used in the Crucifixion. A relic of this type on a Russian warship isn’t even on the radar, imo, though the ship obviously was. Yeah I’m kinda thinking a piece of the cross would have set the ship on fire like the Ark in Indiana Jones did the nazi crate. |
|
|
Originally Posted By MattyCR: Lets not overlook the possibility that other governments second guess going strategic and Russia gets away with using a tac nuke. I wouldnt rule that out AT ALL. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By MattyCR: Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, Lets not overlook the possibility that other governments second guess going strategic and Russia gets away with using a tac nuke. I wouldnt rule that out AT ALL. If Russia uses nukes at all, tactical or otherwise, they will be treated to the complete destruction of their conventional military. Within hours. That would lead to an escalation and their nuclear forces would be completely destroyed as well. While Putin may be an egomaniacal asshole, his military and the Russian people are not suicidal. It's just as likely if he orders the use of nukes, he'll fall on some bullets behind the ears. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Capta: Russia potentially fucked themselves internally with their handling of the sinking. They said it sank due to a fire and that everyone was saved, both of which are complete lies. The Russian government cannot admit that Ukraine sank their ship, but a significant percentage of the Russian population probably already suspect the truth. Furthermore, Russia claimed zero casualties while Ukraine now claims “sunk with all hands.” The only reports we have suggest about 50 survivors, which is 90% casualties. This is 5% of their total casualties in just one incident. This will absolutely get out in Russia and MAY actually spark some cognitive dissonance in the populace. Moskva was a prestige unit and it’s not like losing one of several thousand anonymous and expendable T72s. This can’t be swept under the rug and the more evidence there is that the Russian government is grossly misleading the Russian people the better. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Capta: Russia potentially fucked themselves internally with their handling of the sinking. They said it sank due to a fire and that everyone was saved, both of which are complete lies. The Russian government cannot admit that Ukraine sank their ship, but a significant percentage of the Russian population probably already suspect the truth. Furthermore, Russia claimed zero casualties while Ukraine now claims “sunk with all hands.” The only reports we have suggest about 50 survivors, which is 90% casualties. This is 5% of their total casualties in just one incident. This will absolutely get out in Russia and MAY actually spark some cognitive dissonance in the populace. Moskva was a prestige unit and it’s not like losing one of several thousand anonymous and expendable T72s. This can’t be swept under the rug and the more evidence there is that the Russian government is grossly misleading the Russian people the better. While I agree, I’m not sure the truth matters much. Neo-Nazi arrested in Moscow for publicly criticizing operation in Ukraine MOSCOW, April 15 - RIA Novosti. A man who publicly criticized the special operation of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine at a metro station in Moscow, "accompanying his actions with Nazi salutes", received 18 days of arrest and a fine of 50 thousand rubles, according to the website of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Media. In the lobby of the Kievskaya station on the Filevskaya line of the Moscow Metro , he publicly displayed tattoos in the form of Nazi symbols, accompanying his actions with Nazi salutes and loud public slogans aimed at discrediting the use of the Russian Armed Forces. Cartoonishly transparent. The message is still there though. |
|
|
Russia tells Biden administration to STOP arming Ukraine: Moscow tells D.C. that shipments of Switchblade drones and long-range artillery will lead to 'unpredictable consequences' and are 'adding fuel' to invasion
Russia accused the Biden administration of 'adding fuel' to the conflict in Ukraine and warned there could be 'unpredictable consequences' if it continued to supply the most sensitive weapons to the war-torn nation, according to details of a diplomatic message published on Friday. It came after Washington stepped up its support to Ukrainian armed forces with an $800 million package that for the first time included 155 mm howitzer long-range artillery, as well as armored vehicles, and coastal defense drones. The supply of weapons - particularly anti-tank and anti-aircraft systems - has been credited with thwarting Russian efforts to seize the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. A two-page diplomatic note or démarche, dated Tuesday, was sent to the State Department by the Russian Embassy in Washington. It was titled, 'On Russia's concerns in the context of massive supplies of weapons and military equipment to the Kyiv regime,' according to the Washington Post which obtained a copy of the note in Russian. It accused the U.S. and N.A.T.O. allies of trying to force Ukraine to 'abandon' negotiations with Russia 'in order to continue the bloodshed,' while pressuring other countries to end military and technical cooperation with Moscow. 'We call on the United States and its allies to stop the irresponsible militarization of Ukraine, which implies unpredictable consequences for regional and international security,' the note said. And among the weapons Russia described as 'most sensitive' were 'multiple launch rocket systems' - although the U.S. and N.A.T.O. have not said they are sending such items to Ukraine. That amounted to violation of 'rigorous principles' governing transfer of weapons to conflict zones and of ignoring 'the threat of high-precision weapons falling into the hands of radical nationalists, extremists and bandit forces in Ukraine.' Russia has repeatedly tried to claim that is fighting to 'denazify' Ukraine, claims that do not stand up to scrutiny. Instead a senior administration official said the note was an admission that the U.S. strategy was working. 'What the Russians are telling us privately is precisely what we've been telling the world publicly — that the massive amount of assistance that we've been providing our Ukrainian partners is proving extraordinarily effective,' said the official. The latest tranche of security support was announced this week. The $800 million package takes the total to $3.2 billion since the invasion began at the end of February, according to Pentagon spokesman John Kirby. On Wednesday, President Joe Biden said: 'This new package of assistance will contain many of the highly effective weapons systems we have already provided and new capabilities tailored to the wider assault we expect Russia to launch in eastern Ukraine. 'These new capabilities include artillery systems, artillery rounds, and armored personnel carriers.' The U.S. has already sent deadly kamikaze Switchblade drones, single-use aircraft that crash into their target. Some can be equipped with armor-piercing warheads to target tanks. Russia watchers said the diplomatic note may herald a new phase, in which Moscow targets arms convoys entering Ukraine. 'They have targeted supply depots in Ukraine itself, where some of these supplies have been stored,' George Beebe, former director of Russia analysis at the CIA, told the Washington Post. 'The real question is do they go beyond attempting to target on Ukrainian territory, try to hit the supply convoys themselves and perhaps the NATO countries on the Ukrainian periphery.' Continued |
|
|
Originally Posted By Capta: The only reports we have suggest about 50 survivors, which is 90% casualties. This is 5% of their total casualties in just one incident. This will absolutely get out in Russia and MAY actually spark some cognitive dissonance in the populace. View Quote So what. Anybody who complains will be disappeared. And based on what I have see about current russians I zero believe they have any inclination of overthrowing their own government. So they will complain about their dead military children and the governments lies. They will only complain to each other and only when they can do it with nobody listening. |
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: Can Ukraine withstand total war with Russia? They've done really great on a limited basis for the first six weeks. But can they survive a total mobilization of all of Russia bent on extermination? View Quote Whatever people’s feelings about this or that western politician, the west will not allow an all-out genocide in Ukraine. We’re edging toward intervention already as Russia gets more and more barbaric and unhinged. Germany’s response so far has been rightly lambasted, but if Russia goes over the edge I strongly believe that Germany will cut the gas regardless of consequence to themselves. Their electorate simply will not allow them to pay Putin to commit all-out genocide. Once that happens Russia will be in an horrifically bad spot and we’re probably looking at either 1)Putin killed and replaced or 2)nuclear war. |
|
|
Originally Posted By CZ75_9MM: I find that very hard to believe. If they have been sitting for decades they will need some serious work before being anywhere near reliable enough to use. When equipment like that sits, engines can get stuck, clutches stuck, wiring chewed up by rodents, antifreeze failed and blocks cracked, heads cracked, fuel systems need cleaned/repaired/replaced etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By CZ75_9MM: Originally Posted By Doritodust: Hey guys found an interesting video on Russian tanks and the actual field-able number they have. Idk how accurate it is but seems to be a reasonable estimate. TLDR the [color=#ff0000]got around 3000 give or take a few hundred that they can actually bring to theater [/color]with out needing any major refurbishment. Also they still have T-34 and T-55 in those numbers https://youtube.com/watch?v=eHhgVrKJJoA&feature=share And don’t forget, most of those replacement parts come from Ukraine. |
|
|
"Russian warship, go fuck yourself"
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/u4d5xi/an_interesting_title/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share |
|
NorCal_LEO Callsign - "10-Ring"
Sylvan: "That awkward moment when a tranny is beating your fucking ass on a livestream while calling you a faggot." |
Originally Posted By Firearmsenthusiast: That is precisely why Putin will do it. Because he can, and he knows Brandon won't do a fucking thing about it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Firearmsenthusiast: Originally Posted By MattyCR: Lets not overlook the possibility that other governments second guess going strategic and Russia gets away with using a tac nuke. I wouldnt rule that out AT ALL. That is precisely why Putin will do it. Because he can, and he knows Brandon won't do a fucking thing about it. This has been my belief all along. We currently have the weakest "leadership" in the history of our nation. |
|
|
I definitely don't think Ukraines is stupid. They have seemed to make super good tactical decisions just about every time. Sinking the russian ship was sure to insanely piss off putin and freak out the military in general. The bigger picture in this has to be far more important than sinking 1 ship. I think Ukraine did this for a specific reason or multiple specific reasons and decided the advantage was worth more than the lost lives and destruction of russian revenge bombings, which definitely will happen. They made the russian military look like fools, they did it on purpose. I expect it was to provoke putin into a particular behavior though I haven't the foggiest what that is. Those ships heading toward Ukraine could be the response Ukraine is hoping for.
|
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By Special-K: Can someone clarify for me... What's up with the British Anti-ship missiles? I have read several recent references to Harpoons, but from mane pages ago I thought those were expired and the thinking was they may be sending Sea Skua missiles instead as they aren't past their use-by date and would be easier for the Ukrainians to use. Has there been any confirmation yet? View Quote I've been wondering the same thing. When it was first announced it was stated as "anti-ship missiles" which people started saying it was Harpoons, but I cannot find any official statement from the UK saying what they are sending. If it is Harpoons, then WTF are they going to be launching them from? |
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I definitely don't think Ukraines is stupid. They have seemed to make super good tactical decisions just about every time. Sinking the russian ship was sure to insanely piss off putin and freak out the military in general. The bigger picture in this has to be far more important than sinking 1 ship. I think Ukraine did this for a specific reason or multiple specific reasons and decided the advantage was worth more than the lost lives and destruction of russian revenge bombings, which definitely will happen. They made the russian military look like fools, they did it on purpose. I expect it was to provoke putin into a particular behavior though I haven't the foggiest what that is. Those ships heading toward Ukraine could be the response Ukraine is hoping for. View Quote Russia has a pattern. Humiliation in public, attempts to have openness to wheel dissent, revolution. Sinking the ship humiliates Russia. It’s a threat to Putin. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By stone-age: I definitely don't think Ukraines is stupid. They have seemed to make super good tactical decisions just about every time. Sinking the russian ship was sure to insanely piss off putin and freak out the military in general. The bigger picture in this has to be far more important than sinking 1 ship. I think Ukraine did this for a specific reason or multiple specific reasons and decided the advantage was worth more than the lost lives and destruction of russian revenge bombings, which definitely will happen. They made the russian military look like fools, they did it on purpose. I expect it was to provoke putin into a particular behavior though I haven't the foggiest what that is. Those ships heading toward Ukraine could be the response Ukraine is hoping for. View Quote They defiantly have some smart decision makers, They have surely surprised the Big Bear with there tactics. Russia has to be embarrased by the fact they are getting there ass kicked by the west. they over estimated the West's technology and tactics thats pouring into Ukraine and I hope China is taking notice. |
|
Only God will judge me.
|
Originally Posted By lorazepam: Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, Attached File |
|
“This is America damnit! I don’t think we will become like these other countries. I don’t think we can. Courage is too contagious here.” -James O’Keefe, 1/17/22
|
Originally Posted By agillig: Because the likelihood of anyone getting pieces of the actual cross Jesus died on are just about zero. The apostles were terrified, and were in no position to get it. And even if they could...why would they? It's pretty likely the Romans reused them anyway. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By agillig: Originally Posted By AROKIE: Originally Posted By kncook: Originally Posted By sawgunner73: Originally Posted By M-1975: Maybe not a nuke, but: https://www.businessinsider.com/sunk-russia-warship-may-have-carried-holy-relic-on-board-2022-4 What brainiac of the Russian Orthodox Church thought it a good idea to put a holy relic, much less a piece of the true Cross, on a warship? It's not. It's a piece of wood someone found in 1520 and thought he would get famous. How would one know for sure? I agree that's something that should not be on any warship. Dumb move if it's true It probably wasn't hard... Joseph of Arimathea and others did stay with Jesus. Joseph petitioned for the body. I am sure the cross wasn't hard to retrieve as well. The Apostles weren't everyone. He had quite a few disciples around to include his mother and St John. Completley plausible. .... now I will return to the gloomy region to watch this shit show... God Bless Happy Easter. |
|
"Out of every one hundred men, ten shouldn't be there. Eighty are just targets. Nine are the real fighters, and we are glad to have them. For they make the battle. Ah! But THE one! The One is a WARRIOR, and he will bring the others home." -Heraclitus
|
Originally Posted By Glock63: Makes sense. Combine that with the rough sea conditions diring the time of the attack making surface skimming missiles very hard to detect. Their patience and planning paid off big. View Quote All info I have seen is that Ukraine had maybe 12-14 at the start of the conflict. Keeping the in reserve and hidden until the Russians got comfortable, and the conditions were right was a solid strategic move. Using drones to distract was also brilliant. Honestly the British missiles are a downgrade. The neptunes appear to be a pretty decent weapon from the data I have seen. At least as good as what nato deploys now. |
|
|
Originally Posted By sq40: I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG I think you underestimate the response populations across the modern world would demand from their governments if they see hi-def near-realtime footage of millions of people burning in atomic fire. Severely underestimate. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Third_Rail: I think you underestimate the response populations across the modern world would demand from their governments if they see hi-def near-realtime footage of millions of people burning in atomic fire. Severely underestimate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Third_Rail: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG I think you underestimate the response populations across the modern world would demand from their governments if they see hi-def near-realtime footage of millions of people burning in atomic fire. Severely underestimate. People also seem to forget that the UK and France have independent nuclear forces. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 2A373: I've been wondering the same thing. When it was first announced it was stated as "anti-ship missiles" which people started saying it was Harpoons, but I cannot find any official statement from the UK saying what they are sending. If it is Harpoons, then WTF are they going to be launching them from? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 2A373: Originally Posted By Special-K: Can someone clarify for me... What's up with the British Anti-ship missiles? I have read several recent references to Harpoons, but from mane pages ago I thought those were expired and the thinking was they may be sending Sea Skua missiles instead as they aren't past their use-by date and would be easier for the Ukrainians to use. Has there been any confirmation yet? I've been wondering the same thing. When it was first announced it was stated as "anti-ship missiles" which people started saying it was Harpoons, but I cannot find any official statement from the UK saying what they are sending. If it is Harpoons, then WTF are they going to be launching them from? Good to know I wasn't imagining that! So if it is, in fact, the Sea Skua that the British are sending (and we DON'T KNOW if that is actually the case), where does that leave Ukraine with regard to Anti-ship capabilities? It looks like the Sea Skua missile is well proven in combat but with a rather short range and small warhead choices. Assuming they could even get it to work with their helicopters, a 15 mile range would likely put them well within range of defensive systems - unless the loss of the Moskva really screwed their air defense that badly... Maybe it would be more useful against an amphibious landing? |
|
It is said that Democracy is a form of government where the people get what they vote for. And sometimes they get it good and hard.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war. |
Originally Posted By AROKIE: They defiantly have some smart decision makers, They have surely surprised the Big Bear with there tactics. Russia has to be embarrased by the fact they are getting there ass kicked by the west. they over estimated the West's technology and tactics thats pouring into Ukraine and I hope China is taking notice. View Quote |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Ruck: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/102941/photo_2022-04-15_23-59-39_jpg-2350666.JPG View Quote |
|
nothing of value here
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Doritodust: Hey guys found an interesting video on Russian tanks and the actual field-able number they have. Idk how accurate it is but seems to be a reasonable estimate. TLDR the got around 3000 give or take a few hundred that they can actually bring to theater with out needing any major refurbishment. Also they still have T-34 and T-55 in those numbers… https://youtube.com/watch?v=eHhgVrKJJoA&feature=share View Quote I’d put their usable tank fleet closer to 1500 -550 or so they now have about 1000 more to go. Most of those 3000 have been pillaged for parts, seized engines, and rusting barrels. Mostly older T72s and some T64s and T80s. Forget about the 64s, they scavenge parts for the ones they do have. The T64 is actually a better tank than the 72 but parts came mostly from Ukraine. A lot of the T80 components too. They would require a complete overhaul and upgrade to sights, sensors, radios, explosive armor and trained crews. It would take 3 months for Russia to get any of those other 1500 to the front. They could pull in another 500 somewhat quickly if they stripped every garrison and reserve formation immediately. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Special-K: Good to know I wasn't imagining that! So if it is, in fact, the Sea Skua that the British are sending (and we DON'T KNOW if that is actually the case), where does that leave Ukraine with regard to Anti-ship capabilities? It looks like the Sea Skua missile is well proven in combat but with a rather short range and small warhead choices. Assuming they could even get it to work with their helicopters, a 15 mile range would likely put them well within range of defensive systems - unless the loss of the Moskva really screwed their air defense that badly... Maybe it would be more useful against an amphibious landing? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Special-K: Originally Posted By 2A373: Originally Posted By Special-K: Can someone clarify for me... What's up with the British Anti-ship missiles? I have read several recent references to Harpoons, but from mane pages ago I thought those were expired and the thinking was they may be sending Sea Skua missiles instead as they aren't past their use-by date and would be easier for the Ukrainians to use. Has there been any confirmation yet? I've been wondering the same thing. When it was first announced it was stated as "anti-ship missiles" which people started saying it was Harpoons, but I cannot find any official statement from the UK saying what they are sending. If it is Harpoons, then WTF are they going to be launching them from? Good to know I wasn't imagining that! So if it is, in fact, the Sea Skua that the British are sending (and we DON'T KNOW if that is actually the case), where does that leave Ukraine with regard to Anti-ship capabilities? It looks like the Sea Skua missile is well proven in combat but with a rather short range and small warhead choices. Assuming they could even get it to work with their helicopters, a 15 mile range would likely put them well within range of defensive systems - unless the loss of the Moskva really screwed their air defense that badly... Maybe it would be more useful against an amphibious landing? An amphibious landing is exactly what I read that they'd be useful for. It's possible UA was holding the Neptunes in reserve for this possibility but the arrival of the new missiles frees them up for targets of opportunity. |
|
|
More info on those coastal defense UAV's.
The Department of Defense is sending robotic ships to Ukraine to aid its fight against Russia. While the Pentagon is being tight-lipped about the vessels and what missions they'll be performing, analysts gave FedScoop some insights into what the systems might be and what role they might play in the war. A DOD fact sheet on the latest $800 million security assistance package announced Wednesday included an unspecified number of "unmanned coastal defense vessels" among the items being provided to the Ukrainians. "Coast defense is something that Ukraine has repeatedly said they're interested in," Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby told reporters after the arms package was announced. "It is particularly an acute need now, as we see the Russians really refocus their efforts on the east and in the south." He added: "When you talk about the east and the south, you're talking about the Sea of Azov in a maritime environment and you're talking about the northern Black Sea. So these [unmanned] capabilities will be, we hope, helpful in their coastal defense needs." Even after the loss of their Black Sea Fleet flagship Moskva, the Russians still have "quite a bit of naval capability available to them," Kirby noted. "They have used the maritime environment to strike inland. They have used the maritime environment to assault the mainland in terms of an amphibious assault. And they have used the maritime environment to intimidate and we think, in some cases, try to pin down Ukrainian ground forces near Odessa," he said. What DOD has revealed about the coastal defense vessels "It's an unmanned surface vessel (USV) that can be used for a variety of purposes in coastal defense. I think I'll just leave it at that," Kirby told reporters. He said the systems are coming from Navy stocks. When pressed for more details, Kirby said: "I'm not gonna promise you a fact sheet [but] I can promise you the damn thing works." Kirby was later asked if the systems will be armed. "They're designed to help Ukraine with its coastal defense needs. And I think I'm just going to leave it at that. I'm not going to get into the specific capabilities," he said. Kirby was also asked if the vessels will be coming from Navy prototype programs, when they are expected to arrive in Ukraine waters, and whether they are intended to attack Russian vessels. "As I can get you more information about actual deliveries, we'll do that. I'm just not in a position to do that. The authorization just came down yesterday. And we're working very hard at sourcing these things and getting them on the way to Ukraine as quickly as possible," he replied. He continued: "I'm not going to talk about the specific capabilities of these USVs. I've talked about them to the degree that we're going to go." A senior defense official, speaking to reporters on condition of anonymity, declined to say more about the system itself, but did note that some Ukrainian personnel have already been trained to use it. FedScoop sent a list of questions to the Navy to try to learn more about the system, but a service spokesperson said they could not provide any of the information requested. A spokesperson for the White House's National Security Council referred FedScoop to the Pentagon. Roles and missions While it's unclear exactly how the Ukrainians will use the USVs, analysts told FedScoop there are several types of missions such vessels could conduct. "There's a wide variety of roles that unmanned surface systems could play, from helping to extend Ukraine's surveillance out further and further away from its coastline, to potentially aiding in the targeting of Russian vessels, to helping to sweep Ukrainian waterways of mines if Russia goes that route," said Peter W. Singer, a military technology expert and the author of Ghost Fleet, a novel that features USVs and other robotic systems. "The more that you equip the Ukrainians to be able to defend their coastline, there's a double benefit," he said. "One, it pushes the Russian fleet back. Two, it frees up Ukrainian ground forces that might have had to have been deployed to defend coastline to operate elsewhere." The platforms could also potentially be used to directly attack Russian ships. The ones being sent to Ukraine are likely designed for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and countermine operations, said Bryan Clark, director of the Center for Defense Concepts and Technology at the Hudson Institute. "But I would not be surprised if the Ukrainians, once they start using them, think about ways to put lethal payloads on them," he said. "Once they get them, the Ukrainians can choose to equip them however they want. So, I wouldn't be surprised if the Ukrainians incorporate, you know, maybe some weapons systems on there in case they want to use those to attack Russian ships." Such weapons could potentially include small missiles that are essentially "guided rockets," or machine guns. Alternatively, the Ukrainians could load the boats with explosives and ram them into Russian vessels like al-Qaida operatives did to the USS Cole in 2000, he said. Some potential robo-ship candidates The Navy and other DOD agencies have been building and experimenting with a wide range of USVs, from commercial pleasure craft types of vessels to large platforms like the 132-foot-long Sea Hunter prototype built by defense contractor Leidos. Analysts say the systems being shipped to Ukraine are most likely small platforms. "They've got various prototype USVs that they've used for testing over the years but the ones that they've bought, that they actually have a program of record around, is this small USV built by Textron" called the Common Unmanned Surface Vehicle (CUSV), Clark said. The system is about 30-feet long, he said. According to a Textron fact sheet, the CUSV is a "multi-mission and multi-payload capable vehicle with significant in-water experience" that can be used for mine weeping and neutralization, ISR, harbor security, monitoring or protection. "That's the one [DOD is] probably shipping over there. It's the one they've got in the most numbers, they've got the most experience with," Clark said. "I suspect that's the one that's been transferred, just because the other ones the U.S. has are all prototype vehicles of various kinds" and it's unlikely the Pentagon would transfer a prototype to Ukraine, he added. Brent Sadler, senior fellow for naval warfare and advanced technology at the Heritage Foundation, said the Mantas T-12, built by MARTAC, might be what's headed to Ukraine, noting that Ukrainians were recently training at a Navy base in Little Creek, Virginia. "When they say they've been trained [on the coastal defense vessels], that could have been in that training, because we're talking small surface unmanned vessels that could be used for a variety of missions," Sadler said. The systems are 12-feet-long and have a maximum payload weight of 140 pounds, according to MARTAC. The U.S. Navy's Task Force 59, which has been testing unmanned tech, used the T-12 in an international exercise last year in the Central Command area of operations, Sadler noted. "They've been tasked with integrating unmanned systems into port operations and security," he said. "If there was a system that could be provided to Ukraine, it's going to be something that was in that exercise, in my mind. And this Mantas T-12 comes to mind as an unmanned surface vessel." The impact on the war The transfer of the unmanned coastal defense vessels isn't likely to tip the balance in the Ukraine-Russia war, analysts say. Weapons like air-defense systems and anti-tank weapons are likely to have a bigger impact. However, the move is not insignificant either. "What this shows though is the fact that the U.S. is starting to diversify and widen the range of capabilities it's providing to Ukraine, and also move into some more technologically sophisticated capabilities that, you know, represent what the U.S. military is on the cutting edge of developing," Clark said. He continued: "These USVs are like the newest technology that the U.S. Navy is developing for ISR and mine warfare. And so the fact that they're going to share that with Ukraine is significant from the psychological standpoint" even if the capabilities themselves don't have a major effect on the outcome of the war. The U.S. military might also benefit from the technology transfer, according to Sadler. "What it does for the United States is it allows us to better refine how we [might] actually use these systems in combat, too. So we also learn and are able to benefit from the combat experience that the Ukrainians get from these and how they employ them. We learn a lot. So I think we also benefit by giving them this capability," he said. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Tiberius: Read a interview with one of the leaders of the Chechens fighting for Ukraine, he said Kadyrov was a traitor who had violated every single commandment of the Chechen’s honor code. He believed a Ukrainian victory would bring down the RF, and when it did and Kadyrov’s subsidies from Moscow dried up…..a general uprising would take place and all scores would be settled. View Quote Adam Osmaev truely a Ukrainian hero. His sniper wife was killed on the third assignation attempt, but she smoked one assassin with a malaria. |
|
|
Originally Posted By sq40: I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG View Quote If Russia got to the point of nuking multiple Ukrainian cities, it would GUARANTEE a retaliatory strike from the west. People here put way too much stock in their politically convenient impressions of western governments being “weak/pussies.” The west is absolutely capable of utterly ruthless action to deal with an existential threat to themselves. If you think otherwise you are fooling yourself. At that point it has nothing to do with saving/avenging Ukraine. It’s about self-preservation and removing Russia from the global chessboard permanently. Throughout the conflict I’ve seen indications that the west has a highly placed source of information inside Russia. If we get even a hint of a nuclear strike, you can bet a first strike will be on the table. Furthermore, Russia by their actions have done everything in their power to justify to the world such a course of action against themselves. No one cries when the rabid stray dog gets put down. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BerettaGuy: I had a Q-Tard who is also a Charismatic Christian and medical doctor tell me that two days ago - he said Putin is doing us a favor by invading corrupt Ukraine and that Putin is on "our" side. He follows Pro-Putin talk show host Stew Peters and Pro-Putin Republican candidate/"researcher"/documentary film producer Lauren Witzke who have huge followings on Rumble and other internet sites. He said that all will know soon when God reveals the truth. (One could just imagine my response...) Here are six search results for Lauren Witzke when her name is searched with "Putin": https://i.ibb.co/NK0hbzV/Screenshot-20220414-142935-Samsung-Internet.jpg https://i.ibb.co/sKDygGn/Screenshot-20220414-142909-Samsung-Internet.jpg These people are influencing millions with their crap along with Alex Jones (who just ran a story yesterday that AZOV Battalion are shooting Ukrainian citizens), Paul Joseph Watson, Paul Craig Roberts, BeforeItsNews.com, Hal Turner, WhatReallyHappened.com, The Burning Platform, SteveQuayle.com, etc., etc.. Most of the so-called Patriot Right is nothing but a mouth price for Kremlin propaganda these days. Gotta give 'em credit, only took like 15 years for communists to control a large hard core segment of the American conservative right wing. @Ryan_Ruck (your 2 cents?) View Quote MAX VELOCITY TACTICAL is a Russian stooge and his wife has a top secret clearance at the NSA or some shit. |
|
|
One thing concerns me about the loss of Russian officers. For the last generation or more, officers have been promoted on the basis of loyalty and probably corruption. Russia's officer corps has shown themselves pretty awful. Aside from officers getting killed in combat, Putin has been arresting bunches of military & intelligence leaders. If they suddenly start promoting competent people who had been kept down up to now, could Russia's military do a quick turnaround and show rapid gains in competence? That would be bad for Ukraine, given Russia's depth of men & materiel. How quickly might newer and more effective leaders make a difference in the battle space?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By sq40: I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG Prevailing winds will carry the rollout into Russias bread basket, won’t happen |
|
|
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu: One thing concerns me about the loss of Russian officers. For the last generation or more, officers have been promoted on the basis of loyalty and probably corruption. Russia's officer corps has shown themselves pretty awful. Aside from officers getting killed in combat, Putin has been arresting bunches of military & intelligence leaders. If they suddenly start promoting competent people who had been kept down up to now, could Russia's military do a quick turnaround and show rapid gains in competence? That would be bad for Ukraine, given Russia's depth of men & materiel. How quickly might newer and more effective leaders make a difference in the battle space? View Quote |
|
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
|
Originally Posted By 4thbreak: I wouldn't be surprised if the SAS or some other outfit is really running the show, or at least providing guidance with tons of logistical info to the point where even Ukraine can't mess it up. View Quote They (UK) have been out in front on this, and thank god because Joe would fuck it up major. After seeing Afghanistan, the UK understands they cant depend on our strategic decision making again until 2024. |
|
|
|
nothing of value here
|
Originally Posted By Capta: Russia potentially fucked themselves internally with their handling of the sinking. They said it sank due to a fire and that everyone was saved, both of which are complete lies. The Russian government cannot admit that Ukraine sank their ship, but a significant percentage of the Russian population probably already suspect the truth. Furthermore, Russia claimed zero casualties while Ukraine now claims “sunk with all hands.” The only reports we have suggest about 50 survivors, which is 90% casualties. This is 5% of their total casualties in just one incident. This will absolutely get out in Russia and MAY actually spark some cognitive dissonance in the populace. Moskva was a prestige unit and it’s not like losing one of several thousand anonymous and expendable T72s. This can’t be swept under the rug and the more evidence there is that the Russian government is grossly misleading the Russian people the better. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Capta: Originally Posted By PurpleOtter: Originally Posted By xmission: Wouldn't it be something if that Moskva tub sank within Neptune range, and the rusties had to spend a bunch of time trying to recover a nuke from the bottom? A pair of nukes apparently. According to some of the news stories being published the Moskva had two nukes onboard that could be fitted to the P-1000's Meanwhile, Mykhailo Samus, director of a Lviv-based military think-tank; Andriy Klymenko, editor of Black Sea News; and Ukrainian newspaper Defence Express all warned that the Moskva could have been carrying two nuclear warheads designed to be fitted to its P-1000 'carrier killer' missiles. Relatives of doomed Moskva crew defy Russian censors with unofficial memorial Russia potentially fucked themselves internally with their handling of the sinking. They said it sank due to a fire and that everyone was saved, both of which are complete lies. The Russian government cannot admit that Ukraine sank their ship, but a significant percentage of the Russian population probably already suspect the truth. Furthermore, Russia claimed zero casualties while Ukraine now claims “sunk with all hands.” The only reports we have suggest about 50 survivors, which is 90% casualties. This is 5% of their total casualties in just one incident. This will absolutely get out in Russia and MAY actually spark some cognitive dissonance in the populace. Moskva was a prestige unit and it’s not like losing one of several thousand anonymous and expendable T72s. This can’t be swept under the rug and the more evidence there is that the Russian government is grossly misleading the Russian people the better. Plus it will be hard for them to use it as an excuse for escalation if it wasn't Ukraine who sank it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 4thbreak: I wouldn't be surprised if the SAS or some other outfit is really running the show, or at least providing guidance with tons of logistical info to the point where even Ukraine can't mess it up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 4thbreak: Originally Posted By AROKIE: They defiantly have some smart decision makers, They have surely surprised the Big Bear with there tactics. Russia has to be embarrased by the fact they are getting there ass kicked by the west. they over estimated the West's technology and tactics thats pouring into Ukraine and I hope China is taking notice. Better believe Ukraine is lousy with every western power's spooks and tier one units. Pretty much guaranteed. |
|
|
Ukraine Sinks Russian Flag Ship Moscow |
|
It's 2022&
Welcome to the Soviet comeback tour. For a short time only! "Cause tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1945." |
Originally Posted By lisagrantbb: If you crunch the numbers they are dropping it from about 260 feet with a rate of 130fps upon impact. I think I’m going to have to rig my quad up to drop a baseball and see how accurate I could be at that distance. Thought about putting some sort of reticle on the landing gear and point the camera down and see if I can see the reticle and if it’s repeatable. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By lisagrantbb: Originally Posted By HIPPO:
Another one bites the dust If you crunch the numbers they are dropping it from about 260 feet with a rate of 130fps upon impact. I think I’m going to have to rig my quad up to drop a baseball and see how accurate I could be at that distance. Thought about putting some sort of reticle on the landing gear and point the camera down and see if I can see the reticle and if it’s repeatable. Apparently those are drone dropped RPG warheads with 3D print fins / possibly some mod to the fuzing to allow impact activation from gravity. If RPG shells can be converted into drone dropped anti-armor munitions, expect this to become a global weapon of choice across the 3rd world - theres a whole hell of a lot more RPG7 warheads around then those weird AntiTank hand grenades. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 2A373: I've been wondering the same thing. When it was first announced it was stated as "anti-ship missiles" which people started saying it was Harpoons, but I cannot find any official statement from the UK saying what they are sending. If it is Harpoons, then WTF are they going to be launching them from? View Quote They were domestically produced Neptune missiles that hit moskva. The harpoons arnt there yet afaik. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Third_Rail: I think you underestimate the response populations across the modern world would demand from their governments if they see hi-def near-realtime footage of millions of people burning in atomic fire. Severely underestimate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Third_Rail: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By lorazepam: Originally Posted By MattyCR: I wish that was true, but no, they havent got their best shot yet. The best shot will effect you directly and we dont want that. Nah, nukes are for pussies that want to commit suicide. Putin pushes the button, and any future he or his children had is over, I keep running scenarios through my head on this one. If he nukes all of Ukraines major and a few minor cities, the war for Ukraine is over. Millions will be dead, and Russia will have shown they are willing to go all the way. If Ukraine is a nuclear wasteland, then what are we fighting for? Revenge? Standing up to a bully? Punishing Russia? Do we then start taking nukes in an exchange over it? Then there is the flip side. Russia can’t nuke Ukraine, or most European countries not just because of nato, but because of their pipelines. It’s a huge spiderweb that requires not just the pipes, but power, people, infrastructure to run it. I mean, look at it, https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/49447/D3B74E50-BEAC-4019-A290-80EBC7E82923_jpe-2350654.JPG I think you underestimate the response populations across the modern world would demand from their governments if they see hi-def near-realtime footage of millions of people burning in atomic fire. Severely underestimate. It is really kind of hard to say what the reaction from the western people and governments would be. Yeah they would be upset but they would also realize that might happen to them if we launch as well. The virtue signaling liberals are not willing to pay that price. What our government would do, I really don't know. I could see both possibilities being legitimately possible. |
|
|
Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Apparently those are drone dropped RPG warheads with 3D print fins / possibly some mod to the fuzing to allow impact activation from gravity. If RPG shells can be converted into drone dropped anti-armor munitions, expect this to become a global weapon of choice across the 3rd world - theres a whole hell of a lot more RPG7 warheads around then those weird AntiTank hand grenades. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By spydercomonkey: Originally Posted By lisagrantbb: Originally Posted By HIPPO:
Another one bites the dust If you crunch the numbers they are dropping it from about 260 feet with a rate of 130fps upon impact. I think I’m going to have to rig my quad up to drop a baseball and see how accurate I could be at that distance. Thought about putting some sort of reticle on the landing gear and point the camera down and see if I can see the reticle and if it’s repeatable. Apparently those are drone dropped RPG warheads with 3D print fins / possibly some mod to the fuzing to allow impact activation from gravity. If RPG shells can be converted into drone dropped anti-armor munitions, expect this to become a global weapon of choice across the 3rd world - theres a whole hell of a lot more RPG7 warheads around then those weird AntiTank hand grenades. I haven’t seen RPGs being dropped. You may be mistaking the RKG-3 Anti-Tank grenade (kinda resembles a potato masher ww2 German grenade) that they made fins for. |
|
|
Tu-141 Strizh - Tu-143 Reys - Tu-243 Reys-D | The Soviet UAVs that defy time
Tu-141 Strizh - Tu-143 Reys - Tu-243 Reys-D | The Soviet UAVs that defy time Attached File Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear: Yeah I’m kinda thinking a piece of the cross would have set the ship on fire like the Ark in Indiana Jones did the nazi crate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear: Originally Posted By AlabamaFan64: Originally Posted By M-1975: Maybe not a nuke, but: https://www.businessinsider.com/sunk-russia-warship-may-have-carried-holy-relic-on-board-2022-4 As a Catholic, I’m somewhat skeptical of some relics, especially those supposedly from an object actually used in the Crucifixion. A relic of this type on a Russian warship isn’t even on the radar, imo, though the ship obviously was. Yeah I’m kinda thinking a piece of the cross would have set the ship on fire like the Ark in Indiana Jones did the nazi crate. Maybe it acted like a magnet. |
|
Liberals are a curious mix of communism and fascism, they want to destroy you but want to use your own money to do it.
I'd rather be CALLED a fascist then BE a liberal. |
Originally Posted By M-1975: Maybe not a nuke, but: https://www.businessinsider.com/sunk-russia-warship-may-have-carried-holy-relic-on-board-2022-4 View Quote I would've thought it was the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch, which would've make more sense. |
|
Got my 45 on so I can rock on.
|
Originally Posted By wyomingnick: It is really kind of hard to say what the reaction from the western people and governments would be. Yeah they would be upset but they would also realize that might happen to them if we launch as well. The virtue signaling liberals are not willing to pay that price. What our government would do, I really don't know. I could see both possibilities being legitimately possible. View Quote If Putin used a nuke inside UKR, I don’t believe the World would do anything militarily, the US/UK/France wouldn’t nuke Russia unless there was a strike on a NATO country. However, Russia would be a World pariah, they would be finished until Putin and everyone associated with the invasion was in prison or dead. Even India and China wouldn’t be able to sit back and do nothing. The Europeans would turn the pipelines off themselves. The protests in front of their embassies would be epic, in less “civilized” countries embassies would burn. Hell, Russia would be finished for decades as any sort of World or economic power. They would get a hard time if they even so much as dropped a fluorescent lightbulb. Using WMDs against arabs is okay, using WMDs against white people is not okay. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.