User Panel
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 1stID: Originally Posted By iggy1337: Moar Javelin food I hope. I've been bingeing YouTube about the T-90 and other Ruski tanks. The pre conflict hype fest sure has been debunked. Watching those vids makes that Ruski stuff out to be able to go toe to toe with the full power of the US armed forces while in reality they are getting completly fucked over by farmers of a relativly poor country. The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). |
|
|
Originally Posted By kilroymcb: Oh gods sake, do we really need to hear a lecture about how the American military was beaten by goat herders with sandals again? Your historical perspective is skewed. The US military wasn't fighting in Afghanistan for years. Nor should they have been. Afghanistan had its own government and military. At what point does the security of a country become their own problem? Absolutely sick of you silly fucks. If we'd wrecked the place and left after the Taliban was kicked out in 2001 and they came back into power 3-4 years later, would you say the US military got its butt kicked? Stop getting your talking points from reddit. View Quote When we pulled out of Afghanistan (what a cluster). More cops had been killed on the job in Chicago than soldiers killed in combat in Afghanistan the last 2 years. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Beltfed308: What is the record now? 5th floor? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Beltfed308: Originally Posted By CS223: Hopefully their turrets are more aerodynamic and launch to even greater heights. What is the record now? 5th floor? Attached File |
|
“This is America damnit! I don’t think we will become like these other countries. I don’t think we can. Courage is too contagious here.” -James O’Keefe, 1/17/22
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Aren't they like 70K per shell?! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By sq40: I wonder if a man could get one with the appropriate stamps? A few pallets of Excalibur rounds would complete the set. Perfect for securing acrrage. Aren't they like 70K per shell?! Id love to see the Sheriffs face when you came in to get your Form 4 signed off for a million plus dollars worth of guided munitions. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. View Quote With a caveat that our fighting forces was handicapped by policy makers in DC turning a counter-terrorist battle into a complete clown show. Look at the beginning of Afghanistan 9/11. Special operations, battlefield intelligence, air supremacy-absolute enemy devastation. Direct action warfare where we dictate the terms, large conventional warfare, we do it the best in the world. When your ROE gets turned around 180. When you go from running offensive operations to turning a stone age civilization into a modern western democracy things go wrong real fast. Now your bogged down in a guerilla warfare environment. Your passing on pre mission planning and operation details with corrupt Afghan leadership who passes it on to the Taliban. I could go on and on, but the guys who truly operated over there know what I'm talking about. I know a lot of Americans at home were just watching a utter shit show, they see a wasted 20 years. And in many ways I agree. Specially with dead mates over there. But when we "operated" the way we wanted to, we fucked them up. In a war with Russia, it would be a large scale conflict with a shit ton of assets, Americans would fight the war they are good at, and yeah it would not be even close. Thank you. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. View Quote We shoved their face in shit got bored left the keys on the table and walked out. Our tangible military capability is not in question there. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Circuits: FY2021 budget shows them at $118.2k per shell. While technically legal with DD tax stamps, it's doubtful Bofors would sell you any. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By sq40: Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By sq40:I wonder if a man could get one with the appropriate stamps? A few pallets of Excalibur rounds would complete the set. Perfect for securing acrrage. After seeing what Ben has gone through to have a single grenade, I bet you’re right. Virtually impossible. |
|
“This is America damnit! I don’t think we will become like these other countries. I don’t think we can. Courage is too contagious here.” -James O’Keefe, 1/17/22
|
Originally Posted By Drakich: We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). View Quote Child please. When you have to rely on the goodwill of the side you lost to (the Talliban), to keep the single, indefensible airport (Kabul airport could have been shut down at any time by 3 dudes with a motar) open to get your embassy staff out, you were kicked out. You sound like Kevin Kline in "A Fish Called Wanda". "We didn't lose, it was a tie!". And to listen to the military during the time frame of 2001 to 2022, everything was going to plan, and things were going good. To have said otherwise would have been to ruin your career, and the prospect of that sweet, sweet star on your hat, followed by an even sweeter lobby job with a defense contractor after your retirement. I mean Slow Joe is an idiot who wears diapers and shits himself, but he was just saying what Miley and Austin and every other milter leader told him about how long it was going to take to have the country taken over. And all those same worthless military leaders would be the same ones in change of any future war the US gets in. There's no reason to derail a Russo-Ukraine war thread for a recap of the Afgan war loss (too late?) but, as the Romans would have someone say "All fame is fleeting" to their conquering hero during a Triumph, the US needs a bit of grim realism for how difficult war is, and how infrequent we've won them for the past 77 years. |
|
|
Originally Posted By SpaceGuy: Twitter OSINT sources are claiming Ukrainians are 7km away from Vovchans'k which is the main supply hub to Izyum. Its riiiight on the border of Russia. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Vovchans'k,+Kharkiv+Oblast,+Ukraine/@50.18413,36.7724451,9.75z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x4126f0c2a341bfa5:0x16d34498bcba6acc!8m2!3d50.284234!4d36.9329429 View Quote I wonder if either 1)Ukraine is spreading false information to hide the real counter-offensive or 2)Is Ukraine’s counteroffensive wider than is being reported? Yesterday there was significant speculation that Ukraine was passing on a shot at Vovchansk to make a more direct effort at northern Izyum. This report indicates that both may be true. Maybe they’re launching a delaying attack on Izyum to prevent the BTGs south of Izyum from retreating in time to get out of the salient or save Vovchansk? I’ve been watching this area since Izyum “fell” and this whole series of events very much feels like a Ukrainian masterplan in action. Take Vovchansk and shit will get real fast. Supplies and communications for 20% of Russia’s forces in Ukraine go through that town. If they can take and hold, watch out for bigger developments, like NBC use by Russia, or Putin being overthrown. Or both. I honestly wonder how much information Russian commanders on the ground have? Are the BTG commanders aware they’re in a bad spot? Is the Russian command withholding info? Does the Russian command even know? |
|
|
"Republic, I like the sound of the word. It means people can live free, talk free, go or come, buy or sell, be drunk or sober however they choose." John Wayne
|
"Republic, I like the sound of the word. It means people can live free, talk free, go or come, buy or sell, be drunk or sober however they choose." John Wayne
|
View Quote Cool, now they can cut their defense spending in half and lean on Uncle Sugar. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US spent 20 years moving from a Cold War, defense of Europe mindset to being all about 3rd world insurgences. We still lost in Afgan, and in Iraq as well - a war won by Iran. The US is about the last country right now to be crowing about another country's tough slough in a war. Plus with the turds at the leadership of the US Military, I wouldn't trust fools like the traitor Miley to win anything. Lots of Smug Satisfaction! on how the Russians are doing, when the US track record for actually winning wars is the O-fer since WWII. I had a part of one of those ties myself. War is much, much harder that anything thinks it's going to be. The enemy has a vote in your plans as well. For all the thumbnail sketching of blown off turrets or articles from the UK Sun (same level of accuracy as a supermarket checkout mag), the Russians are slowly, ploddingly, grinding things out on the eastern front. Is it going slow? Yes. Are they losing lots of troops and equipment? Yes. Do they care about that? No. A big mistake in war is to think that what bothers you will bother your enemy. Now if the US was losing as much as the Russians are, we'd have quit two months ago - see Somalia, where one big battle caused the US to retreat and run away, errr, re-deploy. This war is shaping up very similar to the Finn/Russian Winter War. The Russians stumbled around at the start, losing a lot of troops in a failed effort to capture the capital. They fired / killed off the worthless generals, moved up some better ones, then relied on their numbers, and especially their powerful artillery to win a war of attrition. Finland finally had to settle for an agreement where they gave up more land than if they'd agreed to what the Soviets originally demanded prior to the war (not to say that the Soviets would have kept to that agreement either). I expect the same here. The Russians will capture most of the east part of Ukraine, fortify their positions, and consider things done. Ukraine may babble on about re-capturing all of their losses, including the pipe dream of the Crimea as well, but that will just for western ears to keep the flow of money coming into the country, all the more to steal. Ukraine will kick back enough taxpayer money to the US's ruling class to keep it flowing as well - or did you think it was an accident how much Hunter Biden made from Ukrainian companies? View Quote How confident are you in these expectations? Care to make a wager? I think the Russians will be lucky to get out of this war with what territory they started with (as of February 2022) |
|
Never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end—which you can never afford to lose—with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be. - Adm James Stockdale
|
Originally Posted By zx2man: With a caveat that our fighting forces was handicapped by policy makers in DC turning a counter-terrorist battle into a complete clown show. Look at the beginning of Afghanistan 9/11. Special operations, battlefield intelligence, air supremacy-absolute enemy devastation. Direct action warfare where we dictate the terms, large conventional warfare, we do it the best in the world. When your ROE gets turned around 180. When you go from running offensive operations to turning a stone age civilization into a modern western democracy things go wrong real fast. Now your bogged down in a guerilla warfare environment. Your passing on pre mission planning and operation details with corrupt Afghan leadership who passes it on to the Taliban. I could go on and on, but the guys who truly operated over there know what I'm talking about. I know a lot of Americans at home were just watching a utter shit show, they see a wasted 20 years. And in many ways I agree. Specially with dead mates over there. But when we "operated" the way we wanted to, we fucked them up. In a war with Russia, it would be a large scale conflict with a shit ton of assets, Americans would fight the war they are good at, and yeah it would not be even close. Thank you. View Quote Well put. Trying to draw parallels with Ukraine, versus the GWoT is folly. The US wasn’t fighting a war of conquest with a bent of genocide, as Is Russia. And the US was operating on the other side of the Earth, not barely across our border. All comparison is silly. |
|
“This is America damnit! I don’t think we will become like these other countries. I don’t think we can. Courage is too contagious here.” -James O’Keefe, 1/17/22
|
North of Kharkiv, battle at Pytomnyk, hunting down a lone Russian T-80 that's pretty on edge, and on fire.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/ury7b9/ukraine_forces_hunt_down_a_russian_t80_during_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. View Quote No, we weren't. We had an insurgency that could cross the border and reside in an nuclear armed country who we couldn't screw with; that nuclear armed country, armed, sheltered, advised and provided intelligence to the Muj. News flash: maybe you should read a book. Doesn't look like you even knew what we were up against. The ANA I worked with weren't worried about the Taliban, it was the Paks. Who the hell do you think bribed the ANA? There were guys like me who said before this started the Russians were going to lose, for the same reasons we lost; you go into a country where the people will fight to the bitter end, AND they are backed up by some large powers, serious muscle, with nukes, who will arm them, support them, give them intel up teh wazoo, train them how to use the cool toys they give away, and fight a proxy war, and you'll lose. We weren't beat by the Afghans. We were beat by the Paks. And in Vietnam, the NVA wouldn't have lasted two years without the support form the ChiComs and Russians. Same same Korea in 1950, same same Afghanistan 1979. The Muj didnt defeat the RUssians in the 1980s, it was Ronald Reagan. Same same Ukraine 2022...once this became a proxy war Putin should have folded. If a superpower gets beat by anyone its a proxy war with another superpower or at least a regional power. Its been 0-3-2 for the supers. The Russians are going to be beaten in this one. Like it or not that been the new normal for the last 70 years. Stop moping that the Taliban did anything special. |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By 1stID: The US spent 20 years moving from a Cold War, defense of Europe mindset to being all about 3rd world insurgences. We still lost in Afgan, and in Iraq as well - a war won by Iran. The US is about the last country right now to be crowing about another country's tough slough in a war. Plus with the turds at the leadership of the US Military, I wouldn't trust fools like the traitor Miley to win anything. Lots of Smug Satisfaction! on how the Russians are doing, when the US track record for actually winning wars is the O-fer since WWII. I had a part of one of those ties myself. War is much, much harder that anything thinks it's going to be. The enemy has a vote in your plans as well. For all the thumbnail sketching of blown off turrets or articles from the UK Sun (same level of accuracy as a supermarket checkout mag), the Russians are slowly, ploddingly, grinding things out on the eastern front. Is it going slow? Yes. Are they losing lots of troops and equipment? Yes. Do they care about that? No. A big mistake in war is to think that what bothers you will bother your enemy. Now if the US was losing as much as the Russians are, we'd have quit two months ago - see Somalia, where one big battle caused the US to retreat and run away, errr, re-deploy. This war is shaping up very similar to the Finn/Russian Winter War. The Russians stumbled around at the start, losing a lot of troops in a failed effort to capture the capital. They fired / killed off the worthless generals, moved up some better ones, then relied on their numbers, and especially their powerful artillery to win a war of attrition. Finland finally had to settle for an agreement where they gave up more land than if they'd agreed to what the Soviets originally demanded prior to the war (not to say that the Soviets would have kept to that agreement either). I expect the same here. The Russians will capture most of the east part of Ukraine, fortify their positions, and consider things done. Ukraine may babble on about re-capturing all of their losses, including the pipe dream of the Crimea as well, but that will just for western ears to keep the flow of money coming into the country, all the more to steal. Ukraine will kick back enough taxpayer money to the US's ruling class to keep it flowing as well - or did you think it was an accident how much Hunter Biden made from Ukrainian companies? View Quote I agree with the top half... But Russia is losing and will lose this war. If there was a NATO sending Finland all the latest weapons in 39, they would have won too. And back then Russia really did have a lot of manpower to waste, but not any more. As posted earlier, a totally corrupt and dysfunctional country with the GDP of Florida and weapons from 1980 is fighting the world. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: North of Kharkiv, battle at Pytomnyk, hunting down a lone Russian T-80 that's pretty on edge, and on fire. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/ury7b9/ukraine_forces_hunt_down_a_russian_t80_during_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb View Quote Too bad the guy in the road with the giant set of brass ball missed! |
|
|
Drone hijinks:
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/urbcnm/ukrainian_drone_films_russian_soldiers_as_they/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 |
|
|
Originally Posted By 2A373: Too bad the guy in the road with the giant set of brass ball missed! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 2A373: Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: North of Kharkiv, battle at Pytomnyk, hunting down a lone Russian T-80 that's pretty on edge, and on fire. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/ury7b9/ukraine_forces_hunt_down_a_russian_t80_during_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb Too bad the guy in the road with the giant set of brass ball missed! I know, looked like he had an NLAW, but missed. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Thanking Czechia for support,offering to avenge 1968 on an AAM.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Beltfed308: What is the record now? 5th floor? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Beltfed308: Originally Posted By CS223: Hopefully their turrets are more aerodynamic and launch to even greater heights. What is the record now? 5th floor? Height is not the measure of the turret vault. The landing is all important. AFIK, there has only been one close to perfect landing with the turret. The barrel of the gun was stuck in the ground, keeping the turret elevated. The barrel was not perpendicular to the ground. A higher score is possible. |
|
Z - Deplorable Neanderthal
|
Originally Posted By outofbattery: Thanking Czechia for support,offering to avenge 1968 on an AAM.
View Quote We thank the Czech Republic 🇨🇿 for helping Ukraine 🇺🇦 in the war. Russia has been interfering in the lives of free states for a long time. The Russians believed that foreign countries could be occupied with impunity. We will take revenge for that! |
|
KF7WNX If you want a picture of the future, imagine Clownshoes stomping on a human face—for ever.
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: 18 cops killed in Chicago in 2020/2021? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By kncook: When we pulled out of Afghanistan (what a cluster). More cops had been killed on the job in Chicago than soldiers killed in combat in Afghanistan the last 2 years. 18 cops killed in Chicago in 2020/2021? 45 killed by gunfire in 2020 My bad, thought data was for Chicago, its not. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By Undaunted: https://youtube.com/shorts/VKKoa1Qm-VQ?feature=share I've not been keeping up the last couple days....but awesome. View Quote Pretty sure ARMA 3 is a video game. MILSIM sounds like Military Simulation. I think this is CGI. Mike |
|
|
Originally Posted By Anastasios: It doesn't look like a tracking or imbalance problem to me. The fuselage and tires aren't jumping, just the wings. I think it's the equipment on the wings. They look like they were piled on with no concern for load limits or configuration. View Quote I’m no helicopter man but I do know a thing or two about vibration. Without analyzing a vibration spectrum I would call that a harmonic issue. Everything has a harmonic node, it’s how an opera singer breaks a wine glass, they match the frequency of their voice to the natural frequency of the glass and that causes it to vibrate and break if it absorbs enough energy. So the natural frequency of that pylon changes with added load, temperature, load location and many more variables. If the rotors or anything else that imparts energy into the pylons happens to match the frequency or a harmonic of the pylon’s frequency then you get the observed vibration. To me this may not be detrimental to the design but it tells me they didn’t perform a thorough analysis and testing to catch this issue in the design and testing phase. I would say this Is typical engineering for them, it flies and shoots, let’s go. Piece of advice, if you’re operating anything that rotates like lawnmower or a D9 if you listen to the machine it will tell you where it likes to run. As you change the rpm the machine will either get noisy and or you will feel vibration or it will “smooth out “. This lets you know if the harmonics are in or out of phase of each other and if you have the option operate it where it is quieter or smoother, it makes for a happier machine. |
|
|
Originally Posted By zach_:Height is not the measure of the turret vault. The landing is all important. AFIK, there has only been one close to perfect landing with the turret. The barrel of the gun was stuck in the ground, keeping the turret elevated. The barrel was not perpendicular to the ground. A higher score is possible. View Quote It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. |
|
Slava Ukraini! "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, CSSA Life, SAF Life, NRA Certified Instructor |
Ukrainian drone jammer EDM4S with a drone unit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/uryz3g/uaf_ukrainian_armed_forces_drone_unit_equipped/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By Drakich: We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Drakich: Originally Posted By 1stID: Originally Posted By iggy1337: Moar Javelin food I hope. I've been bingeing YouTube about the T-90 and other Ruski tanks. The pre conflict hype fest sure has been debunked. Watching those vids makes that Ruski stuff out to be able to go toe to toe with the full power of the US armed forces while in reality they are getting completly fucked over by farmers of a relativly poor country. The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). Wasn't it trump he planned the withdrawal timeline ? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Circuits: It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By zach_:Height is not the measure of the turret vault. The landing is all important. AFIK, there has only been one close to perfect landing with the turret. The barrel of the gun was stuck in the ground, keeping the turret elevated. The barrel was not perpendicular to the ground. A higher score is possible. It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. Like a 15 ton sunflower. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Not really. The US military was made to slay T-90s and since tanks and their supply lines can't be hidden. That stuff is what the US can crush. Having the will to stay long enough to defeat an insurgency in a failed state is another question. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By 1stID: The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. Not really. The US military was made to slay T-90s and since tanks and their supply lines can't be hidden. That stuff is what the US can crush. Having the will to stay long enough to defeat an insurgency in a failed state is another question. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Circuits: It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By zach_:Height is not the measure of the turret vault. The landing is all important. AFIK, there has only been one close to perfect landing with the turret. The barrel of the gun was stuck in the ground, keeping the turret elevated. The barrel was not perpendicular to the ground. A higher score is possible. It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. Top two so far... Attached File Attached File |
|
|
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Drakich: We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). View All Quotes Wasn't it trump he planned the withdrawal timeline ? Yep, he wanted to do it towards the end of 2020 but was overruled by the traitor Miley and others in the permanent government. Fun Fact - Miley was appointed to Chairman of JSC by Trump - Trump could not have hired worse people if he'd sub-contracted that out to his enemies. Still, would have been a better outcome, just for the weather. Winter wasn't the fighting months in Afgan, and a Nov-Dec evacuation of US forces would most likely not have resulted in the same collapse as doing it during the spring of 21. Even the Russians knew better than to withdraw during the fighting months. They also did a far better job than the US in picking a puppet - their guy stayed in power for a year or more, and was captured then killed, while our "guy" left for UAE with as much money as he could steal, before the US embassy even was evacuated. Good times. |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: North of Kharkiv, battle at Pytomnyk, hunting down a lone Russian T-80 that's pretty on edge, and on fire. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/ury7b9/ukraine_forces_hunt_down_a_russian_t80_during_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb View Quote Whoa. That was pretty intense. You've got to give that tank crew credit for fighting so aggressively. Lots of orc crews would have bailed by that point. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 2A373: Top two so far... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/download_jpg-2387521.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/52008972696_d10991586c_b_jpg-2387522.JPG View Quote
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Drakich: We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Drakich: Originally Posted By 1stID: Originally Posted By iggy1337: Moar Javelin food I hope. I've been bingeing YouTube about the T-90 and other Ruski tanks. The pre conflict hype fest sure has been debunked. Watching those vids makes that Ruski stuff out to be able to go toe to toe with the full power of the US armed forces while in reality they are getting completly fucked over by farmers of a relativly poor country. The US fought for 20 years in Afghanistan, spent a trillion dollars, and were kicked out by a bunch of goat hearder in sandals. Maybe temper a bit on who can do what. We weren't kicked out. We "elected" a feckless leader who unceremoniously had us withdraw after the prior 3 leaders failed to direct the military to come up with a victory plan (with the majority of the blame falling on Bush and Obama). |
|
|
Originally Posted By 2A373: Top two so far... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/download_jpg-2387521.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/52008972696_d10991586c_b_jpg-2387522.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 2A373: Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By zach_:Height is not the measure of the turret vault. The landing is all important. AFIK, there has only been one close to perfect landing with the turret. The barrel of the gun was stuck in the ground, keeping the turret elevated. The barrel was not perpendicular to the ground. A higher score is possible. It's true - everyone knows you gotta stick the landing for full points. Top two so far... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/download_jpg-2387521.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/54089/52008972696_d10991586c_b_jpg-2387522.JPG That second pic would make a pretty metal album cover. |
|
Membership thanks to ml2150! Thanks buddy !
Membership thanks to Retgarr ! Thanks buddy ! |
This thread will serve a dual purpose until M35ben is unbanned.
Okilly Dokilly - White Wine Spritzer (Official Video) |
|
|
Originally Posted By LoBrau: This thread will serve a dual purpose until M35ben is unbanned. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BEvh6HSQc0 View Quote He got banned? |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
Originally Posted By Chokey:
Even nature helps: in the Kyiv region, a racist projectile sticking out of a pine tree was neutralized. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FS96HABXoAMxgAU?format=jpg&name=medium View Quote any way we can send one of these who likes to camp outside my house at 5am and wake me up |
|
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:
View Quote Still strikes me as odd to see these guys wrapping yellow and white around their helmets. |
|
|
Originally Posted By kbi: any way we can send one of these who likes to camp outside my house at 5am and wake me up http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cJoY78MbUMA/To9LsHdaAdI/AAAAAAAADn4/QpK51NBAgrs/s1600/ActualSpeedWoodpecker.gif View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By kbi: Originally Posted By Chokey:
Even nature helps: in the Kyiv region, a racist projectile sticking out of a pine tree was neutralized. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FS96HABXoAMxgAU?format=jpg&name=medium any way we can send one of these who likes to camp outside my house at 5am and wake me up http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cJoY78MbUMA/To9LsHdaAdI/AAAAAAAADn4/QpK51NBAgrs/s1600/ActualSpeedWoodpecker.gif lol, he flys to my house at 6am, must be the same bird. |
|
It's not stupid, it's advanced!!
|
|
Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: From my understanding, the Excalibur shells would be most useful for a stationary target like a bridge, ammo dump, HQ, etc. for a 1st round hit assuming you have the exact grid. For 90% of UA action servicing Russian tanks and fighting positions, "regular" 155mm would be just fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By ITCHY-FINGER: Originally Posted By Billy_Ringo: "With eyes on target" can that be done via a drone? If a drone identifies a target can it send info and/or specific co-ordinates back and have the target hit? I understand they can walk/re-direct artillery but can it be done with a first strike via co-ordinates from a drone? Thanks in advance. One side-note. If the Russians announced Putin is gravely ill and a few days later claimed he was dead. Even with a burial, what percent of the people would believe he was actually dead? Conspiracy nuts would have a field day with that one for decades. From my understanding, the Excalibur shells would be most useful for a stationary target like a bridge, ammo dump, HQ, etc. for a 1st round hit assuming you have the exact grid. For 90% of UA action servicing Russian tanks and fighting positions, "regular" 155mm would be just fine. They are best to use against fixed targets, but PGMs save significant expenditures. In an older test a stationary battery target set would require over 900 dumb HE rounds of artillery to destroy, the same mission could accomplish with 9 guided rounds. 900 rounds takes a battery several hours to shoot and 9 ammo trucks worth of ammo. 9 guided rounds take about 45 seconds. Edited to correct total rounds to 900+ |
|
In the real world off-campus, good marksmanship trumps good will.
|
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: 45 killed by gunfire in 2020 My bad, thought data was for Chicago, its not. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest: Originally Posted By Ryan_Scott: Originally Posted By kncook: When we pulled out of Afghanistan (what a cluster). More cops had been killed on the job in Chicago than soldiers killed in combat in Afghanistan the last 2 years. 18 cops killed in Chicago in 2020/2021? 45 killed by gunfire in 2020 My bad, thought data was for Chicago, its not. The number is 16 for Illinois. 2 off for the state. I remember hearing it somewhere. Were the 18 in Afg combat related deaths or are you counting non-combat accidents as well? I think they had a good few unfortunately. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Prime:
View Quote That's still pretty impressive - like a 9, maybe 9.5 out of 10. Per usual, the Russian judge will spoil the perfect score of almost any accomplishment by someone associated with the West. |
|
Slava Ukraini! "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, CSSA Life, SAF Life, NRA Certified Instructor |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.