User Panel
Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM_PJacXoAE7Fxq?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. |
|
|
Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM_PJacXoAE7Fxq?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Even with the divide by 3 rule, thats pretty bad. |
|
God Bless Edward Snowden.
God Bless Ammon Bundy. quod est necessarium est licitum Interim call sign: Tiffany |
|
|
<Placeholder for future witty sigline>
|
Originally Posted By M-1975: OMG the comment
View Quote |
|
Thank you for my service. Where is my cake?
Thou may ingest a satchel of Richards. |
God Bless Edward Snowden.
God Bless Ammon Bundy. quod est necessarium est licitum Interim call sign: Tiffany |
Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNB55-gXIAgyISU?format=png&name=small View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By ludder093: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNB55-gXIAgyISU?format=png&name=small View Quote |
|
|
A Grendel's Love is different from a 5.56's Love
SC, USA
|
Originally Posted By anono: Really? The drones were up there since the kickoff, but this was the first time I saw evidence that we probably have fighters in the air too. Or am I wrong? (Not saying I'm right, genuinely curious). View Quote Fighters were squawking until just a couple of days ago. They have stopped now. |
Leave me alone. I’m a libertarian.
|
Originally Posted By Walleyeguy24: The S-400 performance is a serious question. With how shitty pretty much everything else Russian has shown in this, I really hope it is an overpriced steaming pile of shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Walleyeguy24: Originally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: Average Russian contract soldier is paid less than the average Russian citizen, which means they get the bottom of the barrel when it comes to intelligence out of Russia's young men. Whereas, the Ukraine has increased its military spending to the point where the average Ukrainian soldier makes about the average salary of the average Ukrainian (maybe just a bit over it actually) and so going into the Ukraine military is a "good" profession in Ukraine that has likely resulted in them having a slight better quality of soldiers in terms of intellect. U.S. and NATO military assistance and training has gone a long way as well to change the mindset of the Ukrainians from Soviet idiocy to western excellence. Ukraine tank crews, special operations, and pilots have been cross training and participating in competitive events with NATO members for some time now. I would also guess that U.S. and NATO intelligence is being made (although likely carefully and selectively) to Ukraine (even though Ukraine is clearly infiltrated with Russian agents) and that's likely going a long way towards helping them. Just imagine how well prepared Ukraine would have been for this conflict if NATO had actually helped them years ago instead of waiting for now to dump shit into the country? If older MIGs from NATO members that are upgrading aircraft had been sent to Ukraine, if more MANPADs and ATGMs had been sent in. If better communications equipment had been sent in. Hell, imagine what Ukraine could have done with all the equipment we just left for the Taliban in Afghanistan. One thing that I am anxious to see is how Ukraine is performing in terms of air combat and other air to ground operations. Ukraine pilots still in 2020 were receiving on paper fewer flight hours on average than Russian pilots, but now I'm starting to wonder whether the hours that the Russian pilots were credit with was total bullshit? I'm also wondering exactly how well or poorly the S-400s are doing for the Russians. The Swedish came out with a paper not too long ago basically stating that the S-400 was WAY overhyped and I think we might find out for sure now whether the Swedes were spot on. The S-400 performance is a serious question. With how shitty pretty much everything else Russian has shown in this, I really hope it is an overpriced steaming pile of shit. If it's true that the Ukrainian Air Force is still flying ground attack missions, the Swedes might be on to something. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BlueSetter: Are you ignoring that civilians are dying? Putin has only continued to escalate his attacks on civilians. Prolonging this is not the best approach. I understand that our intel was just as wrong about this as they were on leaving Afghanistan. That doesn’t change the fact that something must be done to stop the killing of civilians immediately. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BlueSetter: Originally Posted By racer765: you ignore the fact that Ukraine has turned "vlad rolls up Ukraine in 2-5 days" into "vlad loses a serious fraction of his equipment and manpower in the invasion and on day 9 he's looking like it will take another week and his forces are running out of food and fuel and vlad is trying to get more forces into theater from Siberia 3000 miles away" another couple days and what's left of vlad's folly will be out of fuel, food, and ammo. just keep supplying Ukraine with Javelins and Stingers and intel and keep killing russian conscripts until someone in vlad's inner circle fixes the decision making problems. Are you ignoring that civilians are dying? Putin has only continued to escalate his attacks on civilians. Prolonging this is not the best approach. I understand that our intel was just as wrong about this as they were on leaving Afghanistan. That doesn’t change the fact that something must be done to stop the killing of civilians immediately. But that is Ukrainian's decision to make and I have not seen any examples of them giving up, plenty of Russians seem ready to take a knee though... Give Ukraine the tools and let them fight for their land. |
|
|
Originally Posted By The_Steward: Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. View Quote Yet the Russians continue to make slow, but steady progress in the Southeast. Crimea is allowing the Russians to resupply. Ukraine needs to damage the Crimea ports and launch some serious special operations sabotage missions into Crimea to disrupt Russian southern resupply. Start planting mines on ships. Really hit the Crimea to prevent that Russian resupply. So far, it looks like Ukraine has just been relegated to defensive operations, but targeted offensive operations with minimum civilian collateral damage into Crimea would help change the game up a bit. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Brick: https://i.postimg.cc/C1rw7KRG/FNA1a1s-WUAgv-6-G.jpg That pilot didn't make it. That Krinkov has clearly absorbed some lead. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/yQOEgRw-67.gif Thanks for pulling in the handguard out I miss that when I first saw the picture View Quote Its more than that. The trigger guard was hit, the selector is gone (the trigger pin also, probably happened when the selector got hit), the carrier took a hit, and the lower hand guard. He got lit up. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hondaciv:
View Quote Looks like there might be a vacancy. Mike |
|
|
Originally Posted By CPT_CAVEMAN: Lol Take a look at everything Ukraine says they have destroyed, double it, then look at how much stuff Russia has total. You're right, it's not fast to make, but Russia has a ton on reserve and it sounds like they're about to start a draft of every dude in the country. If they took a break and came up with a new battle plan that isn't leaked they might actually accomplish something. Along with Ukraine and NATO possibly being off guard. Or whatever The biggest problem for Russia I think would be financing it View Quote Again, the stuff Russia has in reserve is falling apart. It is absolute shit. A lot of the stuff they put here, was absolute shit and this is the good stuff. Drafting 100,000s of 18 years and give them a few weeks of train, that will work too... Russia has been in country 9 days. They have not taken a single major city. Taking Kiev alone will cost them 1000s of men. A new battleplan might work, but that relies on the idea their equipment works, and they can pull of a combined arms movement, which they have not shown here. No, this is a lost war for Russia. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Blue_Devil_JD: From the FSB leak: As for losses: I do not know how many. Nobody knows. The first two days there was still control, now no one knows what's going on there. It is possible to lose large units from communication. They may be found, or they may be dispersed because they came under attack. And even their commanders may not know how many are running around, how many have died, how many have been taken prisoner. The death toll is definitely in the thousands. It can be 10 thousand, it can be 5, and it can be only 2. Even the headquarters do not know exactly. But it must be closer to 10. And we are not counting the corps of the LDNR now - they have their own count. https://telegra.ph/Ocenka-perspektiv-Rossii-analitikom-FSB-03-04?ref=tjournal.ru View Quote Is there an translation of the whole thing? |
|
The FBI delenda est!
|
Originally Posted By The_Steward: Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By The_Steward: Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM_PJacXoAE7Fxq?format=jpg&name=small Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. This site is certainly an UNDER estimate, but it's a tally of the confirmed losses, including only things with photographic proof: https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html?m=1 It's actually bad news for UKR, as while destroying 2-3 Russian vehicles for every 1 they lose is excellent performance, Russia's numerical advantage is larger than that. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Bassgasm: Yep. One of the harder truths is that civilian casualties are part of war. Escalating this war means MORE civilian casualties, not less. There is no "something" we can do "to stop the killing of civilians immediately." Ukraine is in a bad spot, but they're doing very well for a nation with no allies that's been invaded by a much larger nation. Russia has inflicted a lot of damage and pain on Ukraine, but Ukraine has Russia bleeding out. View Quote I don’t think US forces should join the fight, I think EU should. The western world absolutely has the capability to stop the mass killing of civilians immediately. Those convoys could be destroyed immediately. Missile defense could intercept launches from outside immediately. All remaining assets Russia has staged could be rendered useless immediately. If the nuke threat is a deterrent, we might as well roll over and watch Putin March on because it will forever be a threat. |
|
|
N.E.Ohio Grub-n-Gun Host / 4-H Shooting Sports Adv
OH, USA
|
Originally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: I've seen videos on YouTube, but I'd have to hunt for them again since I can't remember the channels or titles (I've been watching a lot of videos). Ukraine had a large weapons depot blown up near Kyiv though about day or two back, caused a massive explosion that lit up the sky at night. I'm hoping that there weren't a shit load of Western hardware sitting there that was blown up, but given the FUBAR that probably is Ukraine logistics right now I wouldn't be surprised if they had a lot of that shit centrally stockpiled. Russian agents or saboteurs are all over the place, they're coming out of the wood work left, right, and center. Ukrainians are trying to hunt them down, but it's no easy task and one that has largely been place into the hands of civilian volunteers with little policing experience. These saboteurs are using freaking cell phones to feed GPS coordinates to Russian military to target key sites with their cruise missiles coming out of the Black Sea and elsewhere. My guess is that the Russians also very likely have agents placed deep within Ukraine's military and government feeding them information about critical stockpiles of weapons and weapon collection points where they're being brought in, which isn't good. My hope would be that the U.S. Intelligence agencies are working closely with Ukraine to feed them signals intelligence and help weed out these Russians agents. Tracking those fuckers down and getting them is critical, but it looks like it's largely amateur hour for Ukraine in doing so. View Quote Has anyone said that your concern is noted? |
During the Middle Ages, probably one of the biggest mistakes was not putting on your armor because you were "just going down to the corner."
~Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey |
What do we have here?
|
|
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS Fact is stranger than fiction -Mark Twain |
Originally Posted By The_Steward: Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. View Quote |
|
"I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world." John 16:33
|
Not sure if this was talked about, but this guy is reporting a Russian General was killed by a sniper.
Ukrainian Sniper Takes Out High Level Russian Leader - Ukraine War Update |
|
|
Originally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: Yet the Russians continue to make slow, but steady progress in the Southeast. Crimea is allowing the Russians to resupply. Ukraine needs to damage the Crimea ports and launch some serious special operations sabotage missions into Crimea to disrupt Russian southern resupply. Start planting mines on ships. Really hit the Crimea to prevent that Russian resupply. So far, it looks like Ukraine has just been relegated to defensive operations, but targeted offensive operations with minimum civilian collateral damage into Crimea would help change the game up a bit. View Quote I suggested earlier (pre-invasion) in this thread that a Ukrainian offensive into Crimea to disrupt the Russian attack might be a good idea. |
|
<Placeholder for future witty sigline>
|
Originally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: Yet the Russians continue to make slow, but steady progress in the Southeast. Crimea is allowing the Russians to resupply. Ukraine needs to damage the Crimea ports and launch some serious special operations sabotage missions into Crimea to disrupt Russian southern resupply. Start planting mines on ships. Really hit the Crimea to prevent that Russian resupply. So far, it looks like Ukraine has just been relegated to defensive operations, but targeted offensive operations with minimum civilian collateral damage into Crimea would help change the game up a bit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By KaerMorhenResident: Originally Posted By The_Steward: Man I hope so but those numbers are hard to believe. Yet the Russians continue to make slow, but steady progress in the Southeast. Crimea is allowing the Russians to resupply. Ukraine needs to damage the Crimea ports and launch some serious special operations sabotage missions into Crimea to disrupt Russian southern resupply. Start planting mines on ships. Really hit the Crimea to prevent that Russian resupply. So far, it looks like Ukraine has just been relegated to defensive operations, but targeted offensive operations with minimum civilian collateral damage into Crimea would help change the game up a bit. Yeah, they need to get some hits on the board there for sure. Maybe they can smoke some of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea too. |
|
|
|
|
God Bless Edward Snowden.
God Bless Ammon Bundy. quod est necessarium est licitum Interim call sign: Tiffany |
Originally Posted By aswrg7: Here's the pic I keep ATTEMPTING to share: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/96579/UA_weapons_saints_jpg-2301212.JPG View Quote |
|
To err is human, to forgive was not SAC policy.
|
Originally Posted By martin248: This site is certainly an UNDER estimate, but it's a tally of the confirmed losses, including only things with photographic proof: https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html?m=1 It's actually bad news for UKR, as while destroying 2-3 Russian vehicles for every 1 they lose is excellent performance, Russia's numerical advantage is larger than that. View Quote That hasnt been updated in a while right? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Bale2011: Originally Posted By ludder093: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNB55-gXIAgyISU?format=png&name=small |
|
|
I hope Europe is sending the Ukraine POL.
|
|
|
Infantry, sales, nurse. Shoulda kept the rifle...
ME, USA
|
Originally Posted By mnd6563: Damn, is that why they said the average life expectancy of a TOW gunner in the Fulda Gap was estimated to be about 15 seconds in a WW3 scenario? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mnd6563: Originally Posted By Slayer0352: Originally Posted By Bassgasm: I was impressed by the ~9 second flight time in the Ukranian video, but I guess those things just fly that slow? I was a TOW gunner and the flight time to reach max range for the TOWs that I worked with with just over 20 seconds to go 3750 meters. Damn, is that why they said the average life expectancy of a TOW gunner in the Fulda Gap was estimated to be about 15 seconds in a WW3 scenario? To be fair, the life expectancy of the Fulda Gap itself was also 15 seconds... |
Proud Member of Team Ranstad. RIP RetMAC, we'll keep the mission alive.
Straddling the thin plastic line between psych nurse and patient. Now say 3 FBHOs and go in peace, my son-PorchDog Survivor of ARFBORTION 2016 |
Originally Posted By NunyaBidness: Is there an translation of the whole thing? View Quote Google translate: Assessment of Russia's prospects by an FSB analyst March 04, 2022 “I’ll be honest right away: I hardly slept all these days, almost all the time at work, my head is slightly floating, as if in a fog. And from overwork, sometimes I already catch states, as if all this is not real. To be honest, the Pandora's box is open - a real global horror will begin by the summer - global famine is inevitable (Russia and Ukraine were the main suppliers of grain in the world, this year's harvest will be smaller, and logistical problems will bring the catastrophe to a peak point). I can't tell you what guided those at the top when deciding on the operation, but now they are methodically lowering all the dogs on us (the Service). We are scolded for analytics - this is very in my profile, so I will explain what is wrong. Recently, we have been increasingly pressed to customize reports to the requirements of management - I once touched on this topic. All these political consultants, politicians and their retinue, influence teams - all this created chaos. Strong. The most important thing is that no one knew that there would be such a war, they hid it from everyone. And here's an example for you: you are asked (conditionally) to calculate the possibility of human rights protection in different conditions, including the attack of prisons by meteorites. You specify about meteorites, they tell you - this is so, reinsurance for calculations, nothing like this will happen. You understand that the report will be just for show, but you need to write in a victorious style so that there are no questions, they say, why do you have so many problems, did you really work badly. In general, a report is being written that when a meteorite falls, we have everything to eliminate the consequences, we are great, everything is fine. And you concentrate on tasks that are real - we don’t have enough strength anyway.And then suddenly they really throw meteorites and expect that everything will be according to your analytics, which was written from the bulldozer. That is why we have a total piz_ets - I don’t even want to pick another word. There is no protection from sanctions for the same reason: well, it’s quite possible that Nabiullina will be sewn up with negligence (rather, the switchmen from her team), but what are they to blame for? No one knew that there would be such a war, so no one prepared for such sanctions. This is the reverse side of secrecy: since no one was told, then who could calculate what no one told about? Kadyrov is going crazy. And the conflict almost started with us: perhaps even the Ukrainians threw in misinformation that it was we who handed over the routes of Kadyrov's special forces in the first days of the operation. They were covered there on the march in a terrible way, they had not yet begun to fight, but they were simply torn to pieces in some places. And off we go: it was the FSB that leaked the routes to the Ukrainians. I do not have such information, I will leave 1-2% for reliability (it cannot be ruled out at all either). Blitzkrieg failed. It is simply impossible to complete the task now: if Zelensky and the authorities were captured in the first 1-3 days, they seized all the key buildings in Kyiv, they gave them the order to surrender - yes, the resistance would subside to the minimum values. In theory. But what's next? Even with this ideal variant, there was an unsolvable problem: with whom to negotiate? If we demolish Zelensky, well, with whom should we sign agreements? If with Zelensky, then after we demolish it, these papers are worth nothing. Opposition Platform for Life refused to cooperate: Medvedchuk is a coward, he fled. There is a second leader there - Boyko, but he refuses to work with us - even his own people will not understand him. They wanted to return Tsarev, so even our pro-Russians turned against him.Return Yanukovych? But as? If we say that it is impossible to occupy, then any of our authorities will be killed there in 10 minutes, as we leave. Occupy? Where are we going to get so many people? Commandant's offices, military police, counterintelligence, security - even with minimal local resistance, we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist.we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist.we need 500 thousand or more people.Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist. What now? We cannot announce mobilization for two reasons: 1) Large-scale mobilization will undermine the situation inside the country: political, economic, social. 2) Our logistics are already overstretched today. We will drive a many times larger contingent, and what will we get? Ukraine is a hefty country in terms of territory. And now the level of hatred towards us is going through the roof. Our roads simply won't be able to handle such supply caravans - everything will come to a standstill. And we won't manage to pull it out - because it's chaos. And these two reasons fall out at the same time, although even one is enough to break everything off. Losses: I don't know how many there are. Nobody knows. The first two days there was still control, now no one knows what is going on there. You can lose large units in communication. They can be found, or they can dissolve due to being attacked. And there, even the commanders may not know how many of them are running around somewhere nearby, how many died, how many are in captivity. The number of deaths is definitely in the thousands. Maybe 10 thousand, maybe 5, or maybe only 2. Even at the headquarters they don’t know for sure. But it should be closer to 10. And now we don’t count the LDNR corps - they have their own accounting. Now, even if Zelensky is killed, captured, nothing will change. There is Chechnya in terms of hatred towards us. And now even those who were loyal to us are opposed. Because it was planned from above, because we were told that there would be no such option, unless we were attacked. Because they explained that it was necessary to create the most credible threat in order to peacefully agree on the right conditions. Because we were initially preparing protests within Ukraine against Zelensky. Excluding our direct entry. Intrusions, to put it simply. Further civilian losses will go exponentially - and resistance to us will also only increase. They already tried to enter the cities with infantry - out of twenty landing groups, only one had a conditional success. Remember the assault on Mosul - after all, this is the rule, so it was in all countries, nothing new. Keep under siege? According to the experience of military conflicts in the same Europe in recent decades (Serbia is the largest testing ground here), cities can be under siege for years, and even function. Humanitarian convoys from Europe there are a matter of time. We have a conditional deadline of June. Conditional - because in June we have no economy left, nothing remains. By and large, next week there will be a turning point in one of the sides, simply because the situation cannot be in such an overstrain. There are no analytics - it is impossible to calculate the chaos, here no one can say anything for sure. Act intuitively, and even on emotions - but this is not poker for you. Rates will rise, in the hope that suddenly some option will shoot through. The trouble is that we, too, can now miscalculate and lose everything in one move. By and large, the country has no way out. It’s just that there is no option for a possible victory, and defeat is everything, sailed at all. They 100% repeated the beginning of the last century, when they decided to kick weak Japan and get a quick victory, then it turned out that the army was in trouble. then they started the war to the bitter end, then they began to take the Bolsheviks for "re-education" into the army - after all, they were outcasts, uninteresting to anyone in the masses. And then, the Bolsheviks, who were not really known to anyone, picked up anti-war slogans and it started like this ... From the pros: we did everything so that even a hint of the mass sending of "penalty boxes" to the front line did not pass. Send convicts and "socially unreliable" political prisoners there (so that they don't mess with the water inside the country) - the morale of the army will simply go into the negative. And the enemy is motivated, terribly motivated. He knows how to fight, there are enough middle-level commanders there. There are weapons. They have support. We will simply set a precedent for human loss in the world. And that's it. What we are most afraid of: at the top, they act according to the rule of overlapping the old problem with a new problem. Largely for this reason, the Donbass of 2014 began - it was necessary to divert the attention of Westerners from the topic of the Russian spring in Crimea, so the Donbass crisis, it seems, should have drawn all the attention to itself and become the subject of bargaining. But there were even bigger problems. Then they decided to push Erdogan into 4 pipes of the South Stream and entered Syria - this is after Soleimani gave deliberately false inputs in order to solve his problems. As a result, it was not possible to close the issue with Crimea, there are also problems with the Donbass, the South Stream has shrunk to 2 pipes, and Syria has hung with another headache (if we go out, they will demolish Assad,which will make us look like idiots, but it’s also difficult and useless to sit). I don't know who came up with the "Ukrainian Blitzkrieg". If we were given real introductory information, we would at least indicate that the original plan is controversial, that we need to double-check a lot. A lot of things. Now we got into the shit somewhere up to the neck. And it is not clear what to do. "Denazification" and "demilitarization" are not analytical categories, because they do not have clearly defined parameters by which one can determine the level of accomplishment or non-completion of the task. Now it remains to be seen that some fucking adviser will convince the top to start a conflict with Europe demanding to reduce some sanctions. Or reduce, or war. What if they refuse? Now I do not rule out that then we will be drawn into a real international conflict, like Hitler in 1939. And then our Z will be compared to us with a swastika. Is there a possibility of a local nuclear strike? Yes. Not for military purposes (it will not give anything - this is a defense breakthrough weapon), but with the aim of intimidating others. At the same time, the soil is being prepared to turn everything to Ukraine - Naryshkin and his SVR are now digging the earth to prove that they secretly created nuclear weapons there. Damn, they are now hammering on what we have long studied and dismantled: you can’t draw evidence here on your knee, and the presence of specialists and uranium (Ukraine has a lot of depleted isotope 23:cool: - this is about nothing. You can’t even do a “dirty” bomb quietly, but the fact that their old nuclear power plants can produce weapons-grade plutonium (REB-1000 type stations provide it in minimal quantities as a “by-product” Do you know what will happen next week? Well, even after two. Now it will cover us so much that we will start to miss the hungry 90s. While the auction was closed, Nabiullina seemed to be taking normal steps - but it's all like plugging a hole in a dam with a finger. It will still break through, and even stronger. Nothing will be decided in 3, 5, or 10 days. Kadyrov beats his hoof for a reason - they have their own adventures there. He created for himself the image of the most influential and invincible. And if it falls once, it will be taken down by its own people. He will no longer be the owner of the winning teip. We go further. Syria. "The guys will hold out, everything will be over in Ukraine - and there in Syria we will again strengthen everything in positions." And now, at any moment, they can wait there for the contingent to run out of resources - and such a heat will set in ... Turkey blocks the straits - to transport supplies there by planes, it's like heating an oven with money. Notice that all this is happening at the same time, we don’t even have time to bring everything into one heap. We have a situation, like in Germany in the 43-44th. At the start right away. Sometimes I am already lost from this overwork, sometimes it seems that everything was a dream and it was a dream, that everything is as before. In prisons, by the way, it will be worse. Now the nuts will begin to tighten so that to the bloody ichor. Everywhere. To be honest, purely technically, this remains the only chance to keep the situation - we are already in the mode of total mobilization. But you can’t stay in such a regime for a long time, and we have ambiguity with the timing and it will only get worse for now. From mobilization, management always goes astray. Yes, and imagine: you can run a hundred meters in a snatch, but it’s bad to go to a marathon distance and give a jerk with all your might. Here we rushed with the Ukrainian question, as if we were running a hundred meters, and fit into a cross-country marathon. And that's what I'm talking about very, very briefly. From the cynical, I will only add that I do not believe that VV Putin will press the red button to destroy the whole world. Firstly, there is more than one person making a decision, at least someone will jump off. And there are a lot of people there - there is no "one-man red button". Secondly, there are some doubts that everything is functioning successfully there. Experience shows that the greater the transparency and control, the easier it is to identify shortcomings. And where it is not clear who controls and how, but always bravura reports - everything is always wrong there. I'm not sure if the red button system works as advertised. In addition, the plutonium charge must be changed every 10 years. Thirdly, and this is the most vile and sad thing, I personally do not believe in the readiness to sacrifice oneself of a person who does not let the members of the Federation Council, but his closest representatives and ministers, come close to him. For fear of the coronavirus or an attack, it doesn't matter. If you are afraid to let the most trusted people near you, then how will you dare to destroy yourself and your loved ones, inclusive? If anything - ask, but I can not answer for several days. We are in rush mode, and there are more and more tasks. In general, our reports are peppy, but everything flies in the pi_du. |
|
<Placeholder for future witty sigline>
|
Originally Posted By ludder093: What do we have here?
View Quote Some old shit |
|
|
Originally Posted By WildBill375: ITAR fucks all the good shit. If you really want to help donate straight to the Ukrainian military. They are purchasing what they need. Most guys have body armor in the army. It's the greater Territorial defense forces that are lacking. Territorial defense patrols in the cities have armor. Everyone's running around like it's a fucking paintball game. Our boys with yellow bands and the commies with red or white. View Quote I'm seeing some of the same stuff here but there are other needs for items that the military might not be getting to those fighting, like if AFG years ago. Bunch of guys standing around playing neighborhood watch now. Locals are pissed that all the cowards from the East & Central parts of Ukraine are going around town drunk so they've outlawed the sale of alcohol and are pushing to get these guys sent back to their Oblasts. This is a very difficult topic due to their culture but some now are fed up with the attitude of running/hiding and are standing strong. Just a few days a difference has made since I left Lviv last Saturday and returned early morning. The locals are very paranoid about bein infiltrated by Russians so they've set up roadblocks everywhere and aren't allowing pictures to be taken. I got in trouble twice already - taking pictures of wrapped statues and of Russian Consulate so I had to delete. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hondaciv: Even with the divide by 3 rule, thats pretty bad. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By hondaciv: Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM_PJacXoAE7Fxq?format=jpg&name=small Even with the divide by 3 rule, thats pretty bad. Agree. It's quite clear that Russia was not really prepared for what was going to happen. |
|
"I have guns to prevent tyrannical genocide. Anyone who tells me to just stop having guns is telling me they favor genocide. It really is that simple. You'll have to forgive me if I won't be quiet about it. " --memphisliving
|
Originally Posted By NunyaBidness: Is there an translation of the whole thing? View Quote Google Chrome translate Click To View Spoiler Assessment of Russia's prospects by an FSB analyst
March 04, 2022 “I'll be honest right away: I hardly slept all these days, almost all the time at work, my head is slightly floating, as if in a fog. And from overwork, sometimes I already catch states, as if all this is not real. To be honest, the Pandora's box is open - a real global horror will begin by the summer - global famine is inevitable (Russia and Ukraine were the main suppliers of grain in the world, this year's harvest will be smaller, and logistical problems will bring the catastrophe to a peak point). I can't tell you what guided those at the top when deciding on the operation, but now they are methodically lowering all the dogs on us (the Service). We are scolded for analytics - this is very in my profile, so I will explain what is wrong. Recently, we have been increasingly pressed to customize reports to the requirements of management - I once touched on this topic. All these political consultants, politicians and their retinue, influence teams - all this created chaos. Strong. Most importantly, no one knew that there would be such a war, they hid it from everyone. And here's an example for you: you are asked (conditionally) to calculate the possibility of human rights protection in different conditions, including the attack of prisons by meteorites. You specify about meteorites, they tell you - this is so, reinsurance for calculations, nothing like this will happen. You understand that the report will be just for show, but you need to write in a victorious style so that there are no questions, they say, why do you have so many problems, did you really work badly. In general, a report is being written that when a meteorite falls, we have everything to eliminate the consequences, we are great, everything is fine. And you concentrate on tasks that are real - we don't have enough strength anyway. That is why we have a total piz_ets - I don't even want to pick another word. There is no protection from sanctions for the same reason: well, it's quite possible that Nabiullina will be sewn up with negligence (rather, the switchmen from her team), but what are they to blame for? No one knew that there would be such a war, so no one prepared for such sanctions. This is the reverse side of secrecy: since no one was told, then who could calculate what no one told about? Kadyrov is going crazy. And the conflict almost started with us: perhaps even the Ukrainians threw in misinformation that it was we who handed over the routes of Kadyrov's special forces in the first days of the operation. They were covered there on the march in a terrible way, they had not yet begun to fight, but they were simply torn to pieces in some places. And off we go: it was the FSB that leaked the routes to the Ukrainians. I do not have such information, I will leave 1-2% for reliability (it cannot be completely ruled out either). Blitzkrieg failed. It is simply impossible to complete the task now: if Zelensky and the authorities were captured in the first 1-3 days, they seized all the key buildings in Kyiv, they gave them the order to surrender - yes, the resistance would subside to the minimum values. In theory. But what's next? Even with this ideal variant, there was an unsolvable problem: with whom to negotiate? If we demolish Zelensky, well, with whom should we sign agreements? If with Zelensky, then after we demolish it, these papers are worth nothing. Opposition Platform for Life refused to cooperate: Medvedchuk is a coward, he fled. There is a second leader there - Boyko, but he refuses to work with us - even his own people will not understand him. They wanted to return Tsarev, so even our pro-Russians turned against him. Return Yanukovych? But as? If we say that it is impossible to occupy, then any of our power there will be killed in 10 minutes, as we leave. Occupy? Where are we going to get so many people? Commandant's offices, military police, counterintelligence, security - even with minimal resistance from the locals, we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist. we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist. we need 500 thousand or more people. Not counting the supply system. And there is a rule that by covering the poor quality of management with quantity, you only spoil everything. And this, I repeat, would be with the ideal option, which does not exist. What now? We cannot announce mobilization for two reasons: 1) Large-scale mobilization will undermine the situation inside the country: political, economic, social. 2) Our logistics are already overstretched today. We will drive a many times larger contingent, and what will we get? Ukraine is a hefty country in terms of territory. And now the level of hatred towards us is going through the roof. Our roads simply won't be able to handle such supply caravans - everything will come to a standstill. And we won't manage to pull it out - because it's chaos. And these two reasons fall out at the same time, although even one is enough to break everything off. Losses: I don't know how many there are. Nobody knows. For the first two days there was still control, now no one knows what is going on there. You can lose large units in communication. They can be found, or they can dissolve due to being attacked. And there, even the commanders may not know how many of them are running around somewhere nearby, how many died, how many are in captivity. The number of deaths is definitely in the thousands. Maybe 10 thousand, maybe 5, or maybe only 2. Even at the headquarters they don't know for sure. But it should be closer to 10. And now we don't count the LDNR corps - they have their own accounting. Now, even if Zelensky is killed, taken prisoner, nothing will change. There is Chechnya in terms of hatred towards us. And now even those who were loyal to us are against it. Because it was planned from above, because we were told that there would be no such option, unless we were attacked. Because they explained that it was necessary to create the most credible threat in order to peacefully agree on the right conditions. Because we were initially preparing protests within Ukraine against Zelensky. Excluding our direct entry. Intrusions, to put it simply. Further civilian losses will go exponentially - and resistance to us will also only increase. They already tried to enter the cities with infantry - out of twenty landing groups, only one had a conditional success. Remember the assault on Mosul - after all, this is the rule, so it was in all countries, nothing new. Keep under siege? According to the experience of military conflicts in the same Europe in recent decades (Serbia is the largest testing ground here), cities can be under siege for years, and even function. Humanitarian convoys from Europe there are a matter of time. We have a conditional deadline of June. Conditional - because in June we have no economy left, nothing remains. By and large, next week there will be a turning point in one of the sides, simply because the situation cannot be in such an overstrain. There are no analytics - it is impossible to calculate the chaos, here no one can say anything for sure. Act intuitively, and even on emotions - but this is not poker for you. Rates will rise, in the hope that suddenly some option will shoot through. The trouble is that we, too, can now miscalculate and lose everything in one move. By and large, the country has no way out. It's just that there is no option for a possible victory, and defeat is everything, sailed at all. They 100% repeated the beginning of the last century, when they decided to kick weak Japan and get a quick victory, then it turned out that the army was in trouble. then they started the war to the bitter end, then they began to take the Bolsheviks for "re-education" into the army - after all, they were outcasts, uninteresting to anyone in the masses. And then, the Bolsheviks, who were not really known to anyone, picked up anti-war slogans and it started like this ... From the pros: we did everything so that even a hint of the mass sending of "penalty boxes" to the front line did not pass. Send convicts and "socially unreliable" political prisoners there (so that they don't mess with the water inside the country) - the morale of the army will simply go into the negative. And the enemy is motivated, terribly motivated. He knows how to fight, there are enough middle-level commanders there. There are weapons. They have support. We will simply set a precedent for human loss in the world. And that's all. What we are most afraid of: at the top, they act according to the rule of overlapping the old problem with a new problem. Largely for this reason, the Donbass of 2014 began - it was necessary to divert the attention of Westerners from the topic of the Russian spring in Crimea, so the Donbass crisis, it seems, should have drawn all the attention to itself and become the subject of bargaining. But there were even bigger problems. Then they decided to push Erdogan on 4 pipes of the South Stream and entered Syria - this is after Soleimani gave deliberately false inputs in order to solve his problems. As a result, it was not possible to close the issue with Crimea, there are also problems with the Donbass, the South Stream has shrunk to 2 pipes, and Syria has hung with another headache (if we go out, they will demolish Assad, I don't know who came up with the "Ukrainian Blitzkrieg". If we were given real introductory information, we would at least indicate that the original plan is controversial, that we need to double-check a lot. A lot of things. Now we got into the shit somewhere up to the neck. And it is not clear what to do. "Denazification" and "demilitarization" are not analytical categories, because they do not have clearly defined parameters by which one can determine the level of accomplishment or non-completion of the task. Now it remains to be seen that some fucking adviser will convince the top to start a conflict with Europe demanding to reduce some sanctions. Or reduce, or war. What if they refuse? Now I do not rule out that then we will be drawn into a real international conflict, like Hitler in 1939. And then our Z will be compared to us with a swastika. Is there a possibility of a local nuclear strike? Yes. Not for military purposes (it will not give anything - this is a defense breakthrough weapon), but with the aim of intimidating others. At the same time, the soil is being prepared to turn everything to Ukraine - Naryshkin and his SVR are now digging the earth to prove that they secretly created nuclear weapons there. Damn, they are now hammering on what we have long studied and dismantled: you can't draw evidence here on your knee, and the presence of specialists and uranium (Ukraine has a lot of depleted isotope 23:cool: - this is about nothing You can't't't Do you know what will happen next week? Well, even after two. Now it will cover us so much that we will start to miss the hungry 90s. While the auction was closed, Nabiullina seemed to be taking normal steps - but this is all like plugging a hole in a dam with a finger. It will still break through, and even stronger. Nothing will be decided in 3, 5, or 10 days. Kadyrov beats his hoof for a reason - they have their own adventures there. He created for himself the image of the most influential and invincible. And if it falls once, it will be taken down by its own people. He will no longer be the owner of the winning teip. We go further. Syria. "The guys will hold out, everything will be over in Ukraine - and there in Syria we will again strengthen everything in positions." And now, at any moment, they can wait there for the contingent to run out of resources - and such a heat will set in ... Turkey blocks the straits - to transport supplies there by planes, it's like heating an oven with money. Notice that all this is happening at the same time, we don't even have time to bring everything into one heap. We have a situation like in Germany in the 43-44th. At the start right away. Sometimes I am already lost from this overwork, sometimes it seems that everything was a dream and it was a dream, that everything is as before. In prisons, by the way, it will be worse. Now the nuts will begin to tighten so that to the bloody ichor. everywhere. To be honest, purely technically, this remains the only chance to keep the situation - we are already in the mode of total mobilization. But you can't stay in such a regime for a long time, and we have ambiguity with the timing and it will only get worse for now. From mobilization, management always goes astray. Yes, and imagine: you can run a hundred meters in a snatch, but it's bad to go to a marathon distance and give a jerk with all your might. Here we rushed with the Ukrainian question, as if we were running a hundred meters, and fit into a cross-country marathon. And that's what I'm talking about very, very briefly. From the cynical, I will only add that I do not believe that VV Putin will press the red button to destroy the whole world. Firstly, there is more than one person making a decision, at least someone will jump off. And there are a lot of people there - there is no "one-man red button". Secondly, there are some doubts that everything is functioning successfully there. Experience shows that the greater the transparency and control, the easier it is to identify shortcomings. And where it is not clear who controls and how, but always bravura reports - everything is always wrong there. I'm not sure if the red button system works as advertised. In addition, the plutonium charge must be changed every 10 years. Thirdly, and this is the most vile and sad thing, I personally do not believe in the readiness to sacrifice oneself of a person who does not let the members of the Federation Council, but his closest representatives and ministers, come close to him. For fear of the coronavirus or an attack, it doesn't matter. If you are afraid to let the most trusted people near you, then how will you dare to destroy yourself and your loved ones, inclusive? If anything - ask, but I can not answer for several days. We are in rush mode, and there are more and more tasks. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Blue_Devil_JD: That hasnt been updated in a while right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Blue_Devil_JD: Originally Posted By martin248: This site is certainly an UNDER estimate, but it's a tally of the confirmed losses, including only things with photographic proof: https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html?m=1 It's actually bad news for UKR, as while destroying 2-3 Russian vehicles for every 1 they lose is excellent performance, Russia's numerical advantage is larger than that. That hasnt been updated in a while right? The page date at the top is a few days ago but if you click through the photos the most recent ones are from yesterday so it's being updated |
|
|
Originally Posted By ludder093: What do we have here?
View Quote That is supposed to and entire army being pulled in from the other side of russia... Like 5 thousand miles away. |
|
|
|
|
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS Fact is stranger than fiction -Mark Twain |
Originally Posted By ludder093:
View Quote that's a few days old. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey: that's a few days old. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Chokey: Originally Posted By ludder093:
that's a few days old. |
|
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS Fact is stranger than fiction -Mark Twain |
Originally Posted By BlueSetter: First, F Austin! He couldn’t be more wrong or any weaker. NATO is the problem not the solution. For Ukraine’s neighboring countries, this invasion absolutely warrants a military response. That is indisputable. Suggesting that membership in a defense alliance precludes them from taking defensive measures is illogical. If Russia is a threat to Poland or the Baltic’s or any others and is waging war on a bordering country, there is no other appropriate response. Under what circumstances would we allow the invasion of a country that shares our borders by an adversary or enemy? We need another Gipper, ASAP. View Quote Originally Posted By BlueSetter: They’ve not been given any other option but to surrender. Of course they’re fighting at all costs for what is theirs. If they weren’t willing to fight, I’d never suggest anyone else should. EU absolutely created the circumstances that lead to this invasion. They absolutely should intervene with force. View Quote You don't get it. Before August of 1945, the powers of the world went to war against each other regularly. The British Empire vs the French vs the Spanish vs the Russians vs the Japanese... they all duked it out constantly. After "the war to end all wars" ended on November 11, 1918, the world made it a whopping 20 years and 9 months before an even bigger war kicked off. It has been 76 years and 5 months since that war ended, and the major powers of the world have yet to go to war against each other since, and it isn't due to a lack of hate or motivation. What's the reason? Nuclear weapons. Nuclear powers going to direct war against each other is a no win scenario, and nobody is willing to risk that escalation. Proxy wars are the global norm, and they have been since the start of the Korean War in June of 1950. This is how the powers of the world fight now. Regardless of how you or anyone else feels about it, it's how the world works. The Ukrainians are fighting their asses off, but they aren't holding the line without help. Intel and lethal aid supplied by NATO is making the difference. Russia is burning resources at a rate that could break them as a nation. Again, this is how wars are fought now. |
|
"I haven't met one burnt end or rib that I haven't liked." -Andy Reid
"Sporterizing: The art of spending $700 on a $300 gun to make it worth $200." -GTwannabe |
Originally Posted By 4thbreak: Those sleep deprivation drugs make them do some crazy things. Weren't some of the german troops in WWII taking some drug cocktails before they went into battle? Or I guess the Russians could just be that dumb. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 4thbreak: Originally Posted By M-1975:
Adderall, Germans invented Methamphetamines to create super soldiers. It works for a few days, then they get irritable and stab each other for farting in the tank. |
|
|
Originally Posted By trapsh00ter99: I was told armor is what is needed. Even steel coated plates and cheap carriers better than nothing. View Quote That's what I'm hearing locally but I'm trying to play catchup. I'm concerned ITAR will get in the way but there is immediate need & requests for medical aid in Kiev. I'm working with a team here who's reaching out to various regions to get them assistance, instead of staying in one place, so I'm hoping I can get something going on this forum to help. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Tboy: That's what I'm hearing locally but I'm trying to play catchup. I'm concerned ITAR will get in the way but there is immediate need & requests for medical aid in Kiev. I'm working with a team here who's reaching out to various regions to get them assistance, instead of staying in one place, so I'm hoping I can get something going on this forum to help. View Quote Glad your alright stay safe out there. |
|
"Both parties are nothing more than left and right butt cheeks on the same big .gov ass." -Kevv
|
[b]Originally Posted By Blue_Devil_JD:
People keep saying this, regroup with what. What money? Do people think equipment is so easily procured for Russia? They are not able to just get more good soldier (lol) or top equipment (lol). They already barely had any, and now its all blown to shit. View Quote 2800 active tanks and 16,000 reserve. 5,160 active infantry fighting vehicles and 19,000 reserve. 6,100 APC and 18,000 reserve 1,610 self-propelled artillery and 4,000 reserve 2,531 SAM systems and 1,352 rocket artillery. That's over 72,000 vehicles. And Ukraine has knocked out a few hundred? Let's say 2/3 of them are in such poor condition they can't be used. Can Ukraine keep wrecking enough vehicles to hold off 10,000 ground vehicles? That's a heavy load. To repeat Stalin, quantity has a quality all its own. Let's also concede that 90% of Russian soldiers suck. 1,000,000 active and 2,000,000 reserve. Killing 10,000 a week isn't going to save Ukraine. Again, I'm not saying Ukraine can't win, or establish a draw. But they have a staggering challenge. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By ludder093:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FM_PJacXoAE7Fxq?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Over 9,000 dead russian troops. Russia has over 800,000 troops. |
|
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS
|
Originally Posted By BerettaGuy: That is so incredibly awesome! I have that painting hanging in my office! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BerettaGuy: Originally Posted By Third_Rail: Originally Posted By aswrg7:
Absolutely fantastic! https://i.imgur.com/vwxjVJL.jpg That is so incredibly awesome! I have that painting hanging in my office! Okay, I'll be the one to ask... What is that painting of? |
|
|
Originally Posted By anono: Seeing three tankers in the air flying patterns on the Western border along with a Global hawk. To me that indicates we have some fighters with the transponders turned off flying over there. Any other ideas why you would keep tankers in the air other than that? View Quote Every time I saw 3 tankers flying together, a couple of B-52’s were heading to the area |
|
|
Originally Posted By FrankyRay: Okay, I'll be the one to ask... What is that painting of? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By FrankyRay: Originally Posted By BerettaGuy: Originally Posted By Third_Rail: Originally Posted By aswrg7:
Absolutely fantastic! https://i.imgur.com/vwxjVJL.jpg That is so incredibly awesome! I have that painting hanging in my office! Okay, I'll be the one to ask... What is that painting of? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reply_of_the_Zaporozhian_Cossacks |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.