Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 2:34:38 PM EDT
[#1]
After WW1 in the UK they rewarded those who contributed to the war effort with war booty. Depending on contribution, you could receive a rifle, a machine gun or artillery piece.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 2:34:41 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Every word you wrote is bullshit and historically wrong.    

Hitler and Tojo DID declare war against America.   Facts, not feelings.  

Your fictional "armed rifleman behind every blade of grass" was obsolete by WW-I.  Machine guns, Artillery and Poison gas don't care about your fantasies.     By WW-II, your lone rifleman was irrelevant.   Tanks, Heavy bombers and Nukes changed the paradigm.    

We won the war with Factories and Industrialization combined with Logistics.  

An individually armed population is useless against an unrestrained and bloodthirsty ruler.    If those individuals are not capably led, supplied, and acting in unison, they might as well not be armed at all.  

I hate that Willful Ignorance has become something people brag about.
View Quote
Hitler didn't invade Switzerland due to the fact that the vast majority of the adult population was well trained and well-armed. Yes, it helped that there was a national command structure to organize those forces. But Hitler decided the juice wasn't worth the squeeze with Switzerland.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 2:35:36 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The counterpoint to your belief is the Warsaw Ghetto uprising.


If all of Europe would have had the same gun laws as the U.S., Hitler would have had thousands of uprisings.

Look at what just a relatively few people, with a few guns did against the Nazi war machine in Warsaw.


Extend that to the Philippines, etc, and see what a problem Tojo would have had.
View Quote
The Soviets stopped outside of Warsaw to let the Nazis take care of the armed Jews. They at no point wanted to deal with that themselves.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:03:48 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Soviets stopped outside of Warsaw to let the Nazis take care of the armed Jews. They at no point wanted to deal with that themselves.
View Quote


Actually the Jews revolted in 1943.
The revolt in 44 in which you refer were Poles and yes Stalin ordered the army to stand down and watch as 2 Polish SS divisions butchered women and children
The Polish SS colonel in charge bragged to a German Field Marshall about his exploits and was tried and hanged for war crimes, a rare thing then
The regular German army finished the revolt again as Soviets watched Stalin saying the less Poles the better.
When the USAAF showed up to bomb the Germans Soviet AA opened up on them
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:05:06 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Nailed it

Now England is a pussified nation that self castrated themselves..  


More interested in tea and crumpets than freedom.  


SPINELESS BRITS
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
When England was a much better place.


Nailed it

Now England is a pussified nation that self castrated themselves..  


More interested in tea and crumpets than freedom.  


SPINELESS BRITS


I have theory on the Brits. Once they gained mastery of the oceans and set up thier worldwide empire, they proved exceedingly good at control of those interests. Well, for a while. Once that empire started to collapse, that control mindset did not. They've eaten themselves with it now. It really is becoming Orwell's Oceana. Stalinist influence or not.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:08:19 PM EDT
[#6]
Recent upset, activity was shooting?

Most people are denied firearms in Great Britain, while the royals have family meetings where the activity is a shooting party. Story doesn't say if they are doing Trap or Skeet, or released game or just plinking, but does demonstrate that Great Britain is still very much a society where your allowable actions are controlled by your class. Low class people are forbidden to have guns and aren't even allowed to defend themselves while the high class people have shooting parties and military guards.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:41:23 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Wait, wut?  What about all those target shooters who had 303 rifles.  Lithgow even made heavy barrel ones which they fabricated rear aperture sights for.  Because of the lack of optical sights, these were pressed into service as sniper rifles.
View Quote
@Riter, Australia is a confederation of states/territories. Prior to union, they were separate colonies with different gun laws. New South Wales banned handguns and military chamberings after WWI. So much so that a number of wildcat cartridges based off .303 British were developed.  303/22 Sprinter, 303/25, and 303/35. After WWII, it expanded across the country and then subsided to a degree.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:43:04 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Recent upset, activity was shooting?

Most people are denied firearms in Great Britain, while the royals have family meetings where the activity is a shooting party. Story doesn't say if they are doing Trap or Skeet, or released game or just plinking, but does demonstrate that Great Britain is still very much a society where your allowable actions are controlled by your class. Low class people are forbidden to have guns and aren't even allowed to defend themselves while the high class people have shooting parties and military guards.
View Quote
Gun control has always been that, even in the US.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:46:41 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
@Riter, Australia is a confederation of states/territories. Prior to union, they were separate colonies with different gun laws. New South Wales banned handguns and military chamberings after WWI. So much so that a number of wildcat cartridges based off .303 British were developed.  303/22 Sprinter, 303/25, and 303/35. After WWII, it expanded across the country and then subsided to a degree.
View Quote

Thanks for the clarification.  I know some pre WW II "colonies" still had rifle clubs and that the North distrusts the South b/c of the war.  When the threat of Japanese invasion was looming (Japanese were in New Guinea and threatening Port Moresby), those in the North were screaming for troops and guns (most of Austrialian ground forces were in the Middle East or captured in SE Asia).  Seventh Infantry Div. returned from the Western Desert.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 3:47:59 PM EDT
[#10]
W.C. wasn't a pussy ass M.F. like some others that come to mind.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 4:02:41 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Actually, you hit the nail right in the head !

In the old days, firearms were not regulated because only the rich could afford them.

And the rich were not a threat to the establishment !

Post WW1, suddenly you have -

A huge number of trained soldiers returning home.

Those same soldiers struggling to find work.

Those same soldiers seeing the wealthy retain their wealth unaffected by the war.

Those same soldiers reading news in the papers of the Russian revolution.

Those same soldiers having access to a lot of military arms brought back / smuggled out of factories.

Suddenly the Govt decided that firearms had to be regulated.

It was NEVER about public safety. It was revolution prevention.
View Quote

Meanwhile in America, appearing like a specter out of nowhere with little notice and then disappearing like a fart in the wind…

Link Posted: 11/22/2022 4:03:18 PM EDT
[#12]
before England was a bunch of useless pussies.

Actually they already were, but at least he wasn't.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 7:25:05 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Recent upset, activity was shooting?

Most people are denied firearms in Great Britain, while the royals have family meetings where the activity is a shooting party. Story doesn't say if they are doing Trap or Skeet, or released game or just plinking, but does demonstrate that Great Britain is still very much a society where your allowable actions are controlled by your class. Low class people are forbidden to have guns and aren't even allowed to defend themselves while the high class people have shooting parties and military guards.
View Quote


Shotguns are the US equivalent of shall issue - they can only deny if you are a criminal or otherwise prohibited.

Firearms - the applicant has to show good reason ( target shooting or hunting ) and they can deny if you have not satisfied them with that reason.
Link Posted: 11/22/2022 9:21:53 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Shotguns are the US equivalent of shall issue - they can only deny if you are a criminal or otherwise prohibited.

Firearms - the applicant has to show good reason ( target shooting or hunting ) and they can deny if you have not satisfied them with that reason.
View Quote


Thanks for that. I had to delete the answer I wrote earlier this afternoon.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top