User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 1:26:43 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: The government and MSM are claiming that there was no meaningful fraud in the election, and have failed to prove it. They refuse to even reasonably investigate it, as easily 1/3 of the society would demand. You want those people to believe you that your election and government are legitimate, the burden of proof is on you. Being too incompetent to secure and document elections, is not a lack of proof. It is the most important evidence that is most decisive in the minds of the logical American with classic American values. Believing that the government is presumed competent and doesn't owe answers when questioned is some Soviet bullshit mentality that has absolutely no place in America. How many audits were conducted? How many recounts? How many legal challenges were mounted across how many jurisdictions? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 1:27:31 PM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: This is still just more strawman nonsense. Nobody is defending the virtue, integrity, or righteousness of government. It is simply that if you make a claim, the burden is on you to prove it. Trump claimed the election was stolen from him, yet he failed to prove it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: The key difference between our mentality and view on this topic; is that my view assumes that government is both corrupt and incompetent. This was the view of the founding fathers and the underlying assumption behind our system of government. You, among others, with no proof or evidence, decide that you want to assume that the government, their workers and politicians involved are righteous, honest and competent. This despite a ton of indicators that they are not. Further, you want to afford the government, the same rights as individuals are supposed to receive against the government... The presumption of innocence. I don't recall reading any founding father arguing that government, accused by the people, should be presumed good or innocent or any of that. Rather it's the complete opposite. And despite this massive disagreement that permeates our entire society, it is the government and their lying propagandists who continue to deliberately oppose measures to prevent future occurrences. Why do you think that is? Because they are so honest? Or is voter ID racist? This is still just more strawman nonsense. Nobody is defending the virtue, integrity, or righteousness of government. It is simply that if you make a claim, the burden is on you to prove it. Trump claimed the election was stolen from him, yet he failed to prove it. Thanks for saving me the time so I don't have to respond to that nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 1:29:34 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: The government and MSM are claiming that there was no meaningful fraud in the election, and have failed to prove it. They refuse to even reasonably investigate it, as easily 1/3 of the society would demand. You want those people to believe you that your election and government are legitimate, the burden of proof is on you. Being too incompetent to secure and document elections, is not a lack of proof. It is the most important evidence that is most decisive in the minds of the logical American with classic American values. Believing that the government is presumed competent and doesn't owe answers when questioned is some Soviet bullshit mentality that has absolutely no place in America. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:26:56 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: How many audits were conducted? How many recounts? How many legal challenges were mounted across how many jurisdictions? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: The government and MSM are claiming that there was no meaningful fraud in the election, and have failed to prove it. They refuse to even reasonably investigate it, as easily 1/3 of the society would demand. You want those people to believe you that your election and government are legitimate, the burden of proof is on you. Being too incompetent to secure and document elections, is not a lack of proof. It is the most important evidence that is most decisive in the minds of the logical American with classic American values. Believing that the government is presumed competent and doesn't owe answers when questioned is some Soviet bullshit mentality that has absolutely no place in America. How many audits were conducted? How many recounts? How many legal challenges were mounted across how many jurisdictions? As we've already discussed, anyone who believes that recounts are evidence of anything regarding fraud lack the intelligence to have an adult conversation on this topic. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:30:42 PM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: Thanks for saving me the time so I don't have to respond to that nonsense. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: The key difference between our mentality and view on this topic; is that my view assumes that government is both corrupt and incompetent. This was the view of the founding fathers and the underlying assumption behind our system of government. You, among others, with no proof or evidence, decide that you want to assume that the government, their workers and politicians involved are righteous, honest and competent. This despite a ton of indicators that they are not. Further, you want to afford the government, the same rights as individuals are supposed to receive against the government... The presumption of innocence. I don't recall reading any founding father arguing that government, accused by the people, should be presumed good or innocent or any of that. Rather it's the complete opposite. And despite this massive disagreement that permeates our entire society, it is the government and their lying propagandists who continue to deliberately oppose measures to prevent future occurrences. Why do you think that is? Because they are so honest? Or is voter ID racist? This is still just more strawman nonsense. Nobody is defending the virtue, integrity, or righteousness of government. It is simply that if you make a claim, the burden is on you to prove it. Trump claimed the election was stolen from him, yet he failed to prove it. Thanks for saving me the time so I don't have to respond to that nonsense. Oh look it's another N_T believing that recounts have anything to do with proving or disproving fraud. I'm so shocked to see them parroting easily disproven and illogical MSM propaganda again. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:32:07 PM EST
[#6]
People won’t vote for Trump because he’s not a SNAG. People are more worried about their feelings than the condition the country’s in.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:33:15 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: As we've already discussed, anyone who believes that recounts are evidence of anything regarding fraud lack the intelligence to have an adult conversation on this topic. And yet, you’re arguing that the emotional feelings of 100M Americans somehow is something. lol |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:33:31 PM EST
[#8]
Kamala has 2 holes in her ears for earrings so your point is?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:38:24 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Well you are going to have to have a word with one of your fellow NT comrades about that: Macros73 thread titled "US elections have never been more secure" posting MSM gov propaganda piece Not only is it on ARF, but more importantly, it's a constant stream of government propaganda starting the day after the election with a lot of questionable things reported. Edit this isn't some ancient thread, it's about a month old and still active lol. Are we in agreement that this is a thing yet, or do I need to go find 10 more examples? I'm guessing that they are there. Mostly from names VERY familiar in this thread. ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:41:54 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Arfcom is “riddled with communist.” |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:45:10 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: And yet, you’re arguing that the emotional feelings of 100M Americans somehow is something. lol Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: As we've already discussed, anyone who believes that recounts are evidence of anything regarding fraud lack the intelligence to have an adult conversation on this topic. And yet, you’re arguing that the emotional feelings of 100M Americans somehow is something. lol Just to be clear you are now comparing: 1. The concerns of voter fraud of over 100 million Americans of all types. These concerns are of a highly suspicious election with dozens of irregularities with dubious explanations. In the years since, it's been uncovered that our elections aren't secured or documented enough to really prove or disprove anything. Yet multiple courts in multiple key states have found that what was done in 2020 was illegal and unconstitutional. with 2. You and some people's feelings that a recount somehow has something to do with proving or disproving fraud? You do understand that a recount doesn't prove or disprove any fraud, with the potential exception of a deliberate miscount with no ballots to back it up? Has anyone ever been accused of a deliberate miscount without any ballots? Ballots and Registration are easily defrauded in our current broken system. Recounts are meaningless. Parroting the MSM talking point does nothing but display ignorance. Pretending that everyone who questions these clown ass elections is dumb or a nutter is also ignorant nonsense. Your position is easily revealed as absurd and ignorant. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:50:11 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Just to be clear you are now comparing: 1. The concerns of voter fraud of over 100 million Americans of all types. These concerns are of a highly suspicious election with dozens of irregularities with dubious explanations. In the years since, it's been uncovered that our elections aren't secured or documented enough to really prove or disprove anything. Yet multiple courts in multiple key states have found that what was done in 2020 was illegal and unconstitutional. with 2. You and some people's feelings that a recount somehow has something to do with proving or disproving fraud? You do understand that a recount doesn't prove or disprove any fraud, with the potential exception of a deliberate miscount with no ballots to back it up? Has anyone ever been accused of a deliberate miscount without any ballots? Ballots and Registration are easily defrauded in our current broken system. Recounts are meaningless. Parroting the MSM talking point does nothing but display ignorance. Pretending that everyone who questions these clown ass elections is dumb or a nutter is also ignorant nonsense. Your position is easily revealed as absurd and ignorant. I’m mostly just chuckling at your “lack of intelligence” comment. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 2:54:54 PM EST
[Last Edit: macros73]
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: Well you are going to have to have a word with one of your fellow NT comrades about that: Macros73 thread titled "US elections have never been more secure" posting MSM gov propaganda piece Not only is it on ARF, but more importantly, it's a constant stream of government propaganda starting the day after the election with a lot of questionable things reported. Edit this isn't some ancient thread, it's about a month old and still active lol. Are we in agreement that this is a thing yet, or do I need to go find 10 more examples? I'm guessing that they are there. Mostly from names VERY familiar in this thread. ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Nice when people like Miss Geek take things out of context, isn't it? I posted something relevant to the current discussion on election cybersecurity. The post title, in my OP, clearly stated it was the CISA chief making the statement and the top of the text referenced the source. A_T'ers don't know any other way to try and make their points except to lie and mislead. If their egos are so fragile that posting a news article with clear attribution triggers them, they may want to take a break from ARF. I know, I know. It’s really my fault for not amplifying Russian disinformation and fringe right social media. ETA: from my comments in that thread: “That's key. "Never been more secure" is a meaningless feel-goodism without additional context. Easterly sounds like a classic PHB with that kind of statement. She also qualified it with:…” Context, I know that is a difficult concept for some. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:06:45 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” One person admits to voting for Harris. A handful of others won’t admit it, but they circle their wagons around the one who does. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:19:15 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: One person admits to voting for Harris. A handful of others won’t admit it, but they circle their wagons around the one who does. Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:20:57 PM EST
[Last Edit: macros73]
[#16]
I admire the mental gymnastics our fringe right members go through to scream about a communist threat while supporting the one candidate who has actually expressed a desire and willingness to suspend the Constitution during a temper tantrum.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:21:54 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By eurotrash: One person admits to voting for Harris. A handful of others won’t admit it, but they circle their wagons around the one who does. Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. My favorite part of this specific argument, is that it seems most likely that you are both correct. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:22:52 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: I admire the mental gymnastics our fringe right members go through to scream about a communist threat while supporting the one candidate who has actually expressed a desire and willingness to suspend the Constitution during a temper tantrum. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Arfcom is “riddled with communist.” I admire the mental gymnastics our fringe right members go through to scream about a communist threat while supporting the one candidate who has actually expressed a desire and willingness to suspend the Constitution during a temper tantrum. 
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:25:20 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. I think Binary Land has the same short yellow bus route as Trumplandia. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:25:30 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. I believe you but the hive on the other hand… https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/The-Democrat/5-2746814/?page=3&anc=110447638#i110447638 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:28:56 PM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By eurotrash: One person admits to voting for Harris. A handful of others won’t admit it, but they circle their wagons around the one who does. Did you understand that it’s possible to agree with the person who’s admitted to voting for Harris without actually voting for Harris? Of course you don’t. You’re stuck in binary land. Notice Euro’s focus on what, not why. He can disparage the what: I’m going to vote for Harris. He ignores the reasons: it’s the most I can do peacefully to block Trump from being elected, as I cannot support a traitor. It’s easier to cast me as Communist, and those who agree with some of my points as Communist sympathizers. It’s straight from the Trump campaign handbook in the chapter titled “Red Scare.” |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:29:40 PM EST
[#22]
If you’re a “conservative” anything and you’re not voting for Trump…Fuck you, you’re a commie.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:30:05 PM EST
[Last Edit: Missilegeek]
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: Nice when people like Miss Geek take things out of context, isn't it? I posted something relevant to the current discussion on election cybersecurity. The post title, in my OP, clearly stated it was the CISA chief making the statement and the top of the text referenced the source. A_T'ers don't know any other way to try and make their points except to lie and mislead. If their egos are so fragile that posting a news article with clear attribution triggers them, they may want to take a break from ARF. I know, I know. It’s really my fault for not amplifying Russian disinformation and fringe right social media. ETA: from my comments in that thread: “That's key. "Never been more secure" is a meaningless feel-goodism without additional context. Easterly sounds like a classic PHB with that kind of statement. She also qualified it with:…” Context, I know that is a difficult concept for some. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: Well you are going to have to have a word with one of your fellow NT comrades about that: Macros73 thread titled "US elections have never been more secure" posting MSM gov propaganda piece Not only is it on ARF, but more importantly, it's a constant stream of government propaganda starting the day after the election with a lot of questionable things reported. Edit this isn't some ancient thread, it's about a month old and still active lol. Are we in agreement that this is a thing yet, or do I need to go find 10 more examples? I'm guessing that they are there. Mostly from names VERY familiar in this thread. ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Nice when people like Miss Geek take things out of context, isn't it? I posted something relevant to the current discussion on election cybersecurity. The post title, in my OP, clearly stated it was the CISA chief making the statement and the top of the text referenced the source. A_T'ers don't know any other way to try and make their points except to lie and mislead. If their egos are so fragile that posting a news article with clear attribution triggers them, they may want to take a break from ARF. I know, I know. It’s really my fault for not amplifying Russian disinformation and fringe right social media. ETA: from my comments in that thread: “That's key. "Never been more secure" is a meaningless feel-goodism without additional context. Easterly sounds like a classic PHB with that kind of statement. She also qualified it with:…” Context, I know that is a difficult concept for some. You posted the article as a thread and topic for people to review. In multiple places you state that you did so to troll the so called "never never trumpers." Subsequent posts further show you defending the source. Even in the post you are referring to, you defend the source as credible. Now you are here saying that it was taken out of context? At best, it was taken from the context of your incoherent posts, from your failed thread where you seemingly backtracked a bit after looking like a fool. Do you agree with the source in your own thread or not? Do you not understand how the internet works? Typically when people post something they disagree with, they say something about it in the OP. Not on page 2 after 3 posts defending the source in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:34:32 PM EST
[Last Edit: macros73]
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By esa17: If you’re a “conservative” anything and you’re not voting for Trump…Fuck you, you’re a commie.  |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:40:10 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: Arfcom is “riddled with communist.” Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Arfcom is “riddled with communist.” the web site is actually run out of a north korean server farm with tacit agreement of the CIA, NSA, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, french foreign legion, sabak, the taliban and the daughters of the confederacy. the reasons are so deep and swampy that those who go looking for the real answers never come home one day and no one speaks their name ever again you have been warned |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 3:52:35 PM EST
[Last Edit: eurotrash]
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: Notice Euro’s focus on what, not why. He can disparage the what: I’m going to vote for Harris. He ignores the reasons: it’s the most I can do peacefully to block Trump from being elected, as I cannot support a traitor. It’s easier to cast me as Communist, and those who agree with some of my points as Communist sympathizers. It’s straight from the Trump campaign handbook in the chapter titled “Red Scare.” You’re true to your beliefs. That’s rad. Others hate Trump and justify voting for him under the condition that they slander and mock his supporters at every opportunity. That’s not rad. |
|
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 4:48:46 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: It was over before it began. If Joe could have held in there until after the election he was going to beat Trump a second time. But he was so diminished the optics wouldn’t fit and Trump likely would have won. The Q bros celebrated Joes mental decline thinking Harris would be seen as worse. But democrats have embraced her with open arms. The lady who couldn’t even win her own state and district in the 2020 primary is going to be our president because of the Trump cancer. The Republican Party is dead. Trump killed it… and the Trump fans love it. They think it was the answer lol  |
|
|
OH, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 4:50:02 PM EST
[Last Edit: stug3]
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: The government and MSM are claiming that there was no meaningful fraud in the election, and have failed to prove it. They refuse to even reasonably investigate it, as easily 1/3 of the society would demand. You want those people to believe you that your election and government are legitimate, the burden of proof is on you. Being too incompetent to secure and document elections, is not a lack of proof. It is the most important evidence that is most decisive in the minds of the logical American with classic American values. Believing that the government is presumed competent and doesn't owe answers when questioned is some Soviet bullshit mentality that has absolutely no place in America. No, the burden of proof was on Epstein's fat orange wingman who didnt have shit besides footage of people moving boxes around. what a load of shit. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:01:00 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By esa17: If you’re a “conservative” anything and you’re not voting for Trump…Fuck you, you’re a commie. Wow, you sound intelligent. |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:04:10 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By st0newall: the web site is actually run out of a north korean server farm with tacit agreement of the CIA, NSA, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, french foreign legion, sabak, the taliban and the daughters of the confederacy. the reasons are so deep and swampy that those who go looking for the real answers never come home one day and no one speaks their name ever again you have been warned Now you did it, even more, are going to think the Feds are following them for posting on ARF. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:04:22 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: You posted the article as a thread and topic for people to review. In multiple places you state that you did so to troll the so called "never never trumpers." Subsequent posts further show you defending the source. Even in the post you are referring to, you defend the source as credible. Now you are here saying that it was taken out of context? At best, it was taken from the context of your incoherent posts, from your failed thread where you seemingly backtracked a bit after looking like a fool. Do you agree with the source in your own thread or not? Do you not understand how the internet works? Typically when people post something they disagree with, they say something about it in the OP. Not on page 2 after 3 posts defending the source in the OP. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Originally Posted By macros73: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: Well you are going to have to have a word with one of your fellow NT comrades about that: Macros73 thread titled "US elections have never been more secure" posting MSM gov propaganda piece Not only is it on ARF, but more importantly, it's a constant stream of government propaganda starting the day after the election with a lot of questionable things reported. Edit this isn't some ancient thread, it's about a month old and still active lol. Are we in agreement that this is a thing yet, or do I need to go find 10 more examples? I'm guessing that they are there. Mostly from names VERY familiar in this thread. ONE guy. Figurative language. Do you speak it? It’s like saying “nobody here is voting for Harris.” Yeah we have 1 or 2 people who have said they will. In a field of 250K people.. that’s “no one.” Nice when people like Miss Geek take things out of context, isn't it? I posted something relevant to the current discussion on election cybersecurity. The post title, in my OP, clearly stated it was the CISA chief making the statement and the top of the text referenced the source. A_T'ers don't know any other way to try and make their points except to lie and mislead. If their egos are so fragile that posting a news article with clear attribution triggers them, they may want to take a break from ARF. I know, I know. It’s really my fault for not amplifying Russian disinformation and fringe right social media. ETA: from my comments in that thread: “That's key. "Never been more secure" is a meaningless feel-goodism without additional context. Easterly sounds like a classic PHB with that kind of statement. She also qualified it with:…” Context, I know that is a difficult concept for some. You posted the article as a thread and topic for people to review. In multiple places you state that you did so to troll the so called "never never trumpers." Subsequent posts further show you defending the source. Even in the post you are referring to, you defend the source as credible. Now you are here saying that it was taken out of context? At best, it was taken from the context of your incoherent posts, from your failed thread where you seemingly backtracked a bit after looking like a fool. Do you agree with the source in your own thread or not? Do you not understand how the internet works? Typically when people post something they disagree with, they say something about it in the OP. Not on page 2 after 3 posts defending the source in the OP. You seem to struggle with reading comprehension. I noted that the Never Never Trumpers follow me around. I defended CISA and its mission. It deserves defending. PHB's, not so much. Carry on with your dishonesty. You're going to do it either way. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:10:43 PM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: You seem to struggle with reading comprehension. I noted that the Never Never Trumpers follow me around. I defended CISA and its mission. It deserves defending. PHB's, not so much. Carry on with your dishonesty. You're going to do it either way. Reading comprehension in Trumplandia is not great, that has been displayed many times. But when you think about it, it's not surprising since Dear Leader can barely form a coherent sentence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:16:41 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: Reading comprehension in Trumplandia is not great, that has been displayed many times. But when you think about it, it's not surprising since Dear Leader can barely form a coherent sentence. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Alwaysright: Originally Posted By macros73: You seem to struggle with reading comprehension. I noted that the Never Never Trumpers follow me around. I defended CISA and its mission. It deserves defending. PHB's, not so much. Carry on with your dishonesty. You're going to do it either way. Reading comprehension in Trumplandia is not great, that has been displayed many times. But when you think about it, it's not surprising since Dear Leader can barely form a coherent sentence. To be fair, Trump doesn’t need to form a coherent thought, much less a sentence. All he has to do is screech and point. It worked on Jan 6 and a poor woman suicided by cop in Trump’s name. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:22:30 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: To be fair, Trump doesn’t need to form a coherent thought, much less a sentence. All he has to do is screech and point. It worked on Jan 6 and a poor woman suicided by cop in Trump’s name. The guards of the system are terrified of another J6. I think this is a good thing. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:26:43 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By macros73: To be fair, Trump doesn’t need to form a coherent thought, much less a sentence. All he has to do is screech and point. It worked on Jan 6 and a poor woman suicided by cop in Trump’s name.  Attached File |
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:29:50 PM EST
[Last Edit: Alwaysright]
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: The guards of the system are terrified of another J6. I think this is a good thing. You think they're afraid. They pray the Trump faithful go LARPing again, it will give them even more control of the government for decades to come. It gives them a chance to paint all republicans as dangerous and fringe.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:31:45 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: One person admits to voting for Harris. A handful of others won’t admit it, but they circle their wagons around the one who does. That’s not true. I don’t even remember which one said they were voting for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around anyone. I AM NOT VOTING FOR KAMALA HARRIS. I don’t vote for democrats. I have said that over and over and over. You will never find a post of me supporting, endorsing or voting for any democrat. Never have, never will. The left leaning shit Trump has done is why I bad mouth him. He’s basically Harris lite. Trump likes Abortion. Trump likes red laws. Trump doesn’t like firearms and believes by 2nd amendment includes exceptions. I can go on and on. But those are pretty solid reasons not to like the guy. Conservatives used to be opposed to baby killing in the womb. They used to be pretty adamant about not compromising the 4th and 2nd amendments. Not so much now it seems. We are the party of faggots, abortion and fuck the constitition because the orange man must win. He’s gonna save us from the commies by making us all commies!! Lol |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:33:03 PM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: That’s not true. I don’t even remember which one said they were voting for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around anyone. I AM NOT VOTING FOR KAMALA HARRIS. I don’t vote for democrats. I have said that over and over and over. You will never find a post of me supporting, endorsing or voting for any democrat. Never have, never will. The left leaning shit Trump has done is why I bad mouth him. He’s basically Harris lite. Trump likes Abortion. Trump likes red laws. Trump doesn’t like firearms and believes by 2nd amendment includes exceptions. I can go on and on. But those are pretty solid reasons not to like the guy. Conservatives used to be opposed to baby killing in the womb. They used to be pretty adamant about not compromising the 4th and 2nd amendments. Not so much now it seems. We are the party of faggots, abortion and fuck the constitition because the orange man must win. He’s gonna save us from the commies by making us all commies!! Lol 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:33:44 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By esa17: If you’re a “conservative” anything and you’re not voting for Trump…Fuck you, you’re a commie. lol. Trump is not a conservative. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:33:47 PM EST
[Last Edit: eurotrash]
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: That’s not true. I don’t even remember which one said they were voting for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around anyone. I AM NOT VOTING FOR KAMALA HARRIS. I don’t vote for democrats. I have said that over and over and over. You will never find a post of me supporting, endorsing or voting for any democrat. Never have, never will. The left leaning shit Trump has done is why I bad mouth him. He’s basically Harris lite. Trump likes Abortion. Trump likes red laws. Trump doesn’t like firearms and believes by 2nd amendment includes exceptions. I can go on and on. But those are pretty solid reasons not to like the guy. Conservatives used to be opposed to baby killing in the womb. They used to be pretty adamant about not compromising the 4th and 2nd amendments. Not so much now it seems. We are the party of faggots, abortion and fuck the constitition because the orange man must win. He’s gonna save us from the commies by making us all commies!! Lol Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: That’s not true. I don’t even remember which one said they were voting for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around anyone. I AM NOT VOTING FOR KAMALA HARRIS. I don’t vote for democrats. I have said that over and over and over. You will never find a post of me supporting, endorsing or voting for any democrat. Never have, never will. The left leaning shit Trump has done is why I bad mouth him. He’s basically Harris lite. Trump likes Abortion. Trump likes red laws. Trump doesn’t like firearms and believes by 2nd amendment includes exceptions. I can go on and on. But those are pretty solid reasons not to like the guy. Conservatives used to be opposed to baby killing in the womb. They used to be pretty adamant about not compromising the 4th and 2nd amendments. Not so much now it seems. We are the party of faggots, abortion and fuck the constitition because the orange man must win. He’s gonna save us from the commies by making us all commies!! Lol Originally Posted By Alwaysright: Are you guys kidding? Marcos stated outright several times that he is voting for Harris. I’m not adding value to that statement or calling him out, just clarifying what he said. If I’m wrong, let me know. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:35:42 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RolandofGilead: Add trumps lawyers to that list of people claiming there was no significant fraud. Luckily the gov would never threaten lawyers for trying to prove election fraud. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:36:59 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By st0newall: the web site is actually run out of a north korean server farm with tacit agreement of the CIA, NSA, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, french foreign legion, sabak, the taliban and the daughters of the confederacy. the reasons are so deep and swampy that those who go looking for the real answers never come home one day and no one speaks their name ever again you have been warned Man. I don’t think they would want us talking about that in the open. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:38:21 PM EST
[Last Edit: FreefallRet]
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Johnny666: Kamala has 2 holes in her ears for earrings so your point is? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:39:13 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By st0newall: the web site is actually run out of a north korean server farm with tacit agreement of the CIA, NSA, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, french foreign legion, sabak, the taliban and the daughters of the confederacy. the reasons are so deep and swampy that those who go looking for the real answers never come home one day and no one speaks their name ever again you have been warned Is that you LV?  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:44:26 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By eurotrash: Are you guys kidding? Marcos stated outright several times that he is voting for Harris. I’m not adding value to that statement or calling him out, just clarifying what he said. If I’m wrong, let me know. I couldn’t remember who said they were going to vote for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around him regardless. I am here in this thread because it was a call out and I despise the Trump lies. I like to be the devil’s advocate. When you guys say Trump is the king. I am here to say “fuck the king.” Difference is you hate me and call me names for it. I have no allegiance for any government official. Fuck em all. It’s a great place for us all to disagree. Mods are letting us do it. I like it. |
|
|
|
MN, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:45:47 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Not really. It applies to very few people. It is more of a passive aggressive attempt to slander the over 100 million Americans who believe there was meaningful fraud in 2020; the majority of which don't necessarily believe it was some vast or complicated conspiracy. It seems many people like me, just accept that we will likely never know. We have an insecure system, highly susceptible to fraud, and a corrupt government that refused to do any meaningful investigations. If the same situation existed in Africa, the Middle East, or Eastern Europe, all you NT's would declare that the people falling for and believing the government propaganda are fools. And yet here you are, essentially championing the government propaganda "most secure election in history." LOL Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Originally Posted By GutWrench: Originally Posted By Cja11B2P: I see this sentiment posted a lot. If the government is so incompetent how is it they are able to pull off these incredibly complicated conspiracies without leaving enough traces to be caught. This is a valid question. Not really. It applies to very few people. It is more of a passive aggressive attempt to slander the over 100 million Americans who believe there was meaningful fraud in 2020; the majority of which don't necessarily believe it was some vast or complicated conspiracy. It seems many people like me, just accept that we will likely never know. We have an insecure system, highly susceptible to fraud, and a corrupt government that refused to do any meaningful investigations. If the same situation existed in Africa, the Middle East, or Eastern Europe, all you NT's would declare that the people falling for and believing the government propaganda are fools. And yet here you are, essentially championing the government propaganda "most secure election in history." LOL It’s not slander if those 100 million are wrong. The fact is the biggest threat to our elections are outside actors I.e. Russia peddling misinformation to clearly uninformed and largely unintelligent voters. |
|
|
MN, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:52:50 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: As we've already discussed, anyone who believes that recounts are evidence of anything regarding fraud lack the intelligence to have an adult conversation on this topic. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Originally Posted By Low_Country: Originally Posted By Missilegeek: The government and MSM are claiming that there was no meaningful fraud in the election, and have failed to prove it. They refuse to even reasonably investigate it, as easily 1/3 of the society would demand. You want those people to believe you that your election and government are legitimate, the burden of proof is on you. Being too incompetent to secure and document elections, is not a lack of proof. It is the most important evidence that is most decisive in the minds of the logical American with classic American values. Believing that the government is presumed competent and doesn't owe answers when questioned is some Soviet bullshit mentality that has absolutely no place in America. How many audits were conducted? How many recounts? How many legal challenges were mounted across how many jurisdictions? As we've already discussed, anyone who believes that recounts are evidence of anything regarding fraud lack the intelligence to have an adult conversation on this topic. Jesus Christ. Let’s say someone waves a magic wand and gives YOU absolute control to ‘properly’ investigate the 2020 election. How would you handle it? Use rendition on poll workers, take them to black sites, enhanced interrogation? I swear it’s the pro-Trump crowd who are the ones needing safe spaces to avoid being triggered. |
|
|
MN, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 5:58:00 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Missilegeek: Ballots and Registration are easily defrauded in our current broken system Since it’s so easy why don’t you spend the rest of the day creating say, 100 fake voter registrations. Guess what, it’s not happening because it’s not an easy thing to do. |
|
|
OK, USA
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 6:15:51 PM EST
[Last Edit: Liquid77]
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By GutWrench: That’s not true. I don’t even remember which one said they were voting for Harris. No one has circled any wagons around anyone. I AM NOT VOTING FOR KAMALA HARRIS. I don’t vote for democrats. I have said that over and over and over. You will never find a post of me supporting, endorsing or voting for any democrat. Never have, never will. The left leaning shit Trump has done is why I bad mouth him. He’s basically Harris lite. Trump likes Abortion. Trump likes red laws. Trump doesn’t like firearms and believes by 2nd amendment includes exceptions. I can go on and on. But those are pretty solid reasons not to like the guy. Conservatives used to be opposed to baby killing in the womb. They used to be pretty adamant about not compromising the 4th and 2nd amendments. Not so much now it seems. We are the party of faggots, abortion and fuck the constitition because the orange man must win. He’s gonna save us from the commies by making us all commies!! Lol You gotta get on board with the new Trump conservatives who sit at home waiting for their TrumpBux and want NFA Items banned. RFLs and killing babies is the new platform! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2024 6:55:57 PM EST
[#50]
I see our more principled members are still frothing at the mouth against Trump. Carry on
|
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
