User Panel
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: forget desantis, he's a trump supporter. the actual leader of the N_Ts is this guy- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GVs1SUIXoAAKblF?format=jpg&name=small vive la uniparty. View Quote Lol conspiracy dorks and their fantasies… |
|
Not fly enough to be halal....
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: forget desantis, he's a trump supporter. the actual leader of the N_Ts is this guy- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GVs1SUIXoAAKblF?format=jpg&name=small vive la uniparty. View Quote You are projecting again. The people who are not fans of Trump do not need a hero or worship other men. That seems to be more common in Trumplandia. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Alwaysright: You are projecting again. The people who are not fans of Trump do not need a hero or worship other men. That seems to be more common in Trumplandia. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Alwaysright: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: forget desantis, he's a trump supporter. the actual leader of the N_Ts is this guy- https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GVs1SUIXoAAKblF?format=jpg&name=small vive la uniparty. You are projecting again. The people who are not fans of Trump do not need a hero or worship other men. That seems to be more common in Trumplandia. Attached File |
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes sorry trump haters, Beyoncé isn't coming. |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? |
|
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/82163/IMG_0993_png-3303679.JPG View Quote Lifesize anatomically correct ones would sell like hotcakes in Trumplandia. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. View Quote Here’s a TL:DR version: Musk polled Musklandia, which is almost like polling Trumplandia. I wouldn’t bet a plug nickel Trump gets over 49% of the popular vote. |
|
|
Everyone not voting for Trump has 1 thing in common: they are bitter and angry like the crying wojak meme guy!
|
|
|
Almost 90 pages for a rigged election? Damn.
|
|
subversive orchestrator
|
Originally Posted By eurotrash: Everyone not voting for Trump has 1 thing in common: they are bitter and angry like the crying wojak meme guy! View Quote You can keep believing that if it helps you sleep once Trump loses again. Most of us are just embarrassed that half the GOP have turned into the same emotion-driven voters they accuse the Democrats of being. |
|
|
Originally Posted By jwr6: You can keep believing that if it helps you sleep once Trump loses again. Most of us are just embarrassed that half the GOP have turned into the same emotion-driven voters they accuse the Democrats of being. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By eurotrash: Everyone not voting for Trump has 1 thing in common: they are bitter and angry like the crying wojak meme guy! You can keep believing that if it helps you sleep once Trump loses again. Most of us are just embarrassed that half the GOP have turned into the same emotion-driven voters they accuse the Democrats of being. You projecting he’s losing? I’m not even going to pretend it’s not 50/50 right now. Talk about emotion driven… |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By eurotrash: You projecting he’s losing? I’m not even going to pretend it’s not 50/50 right now. Talk about emotion driven… View Quote Talk about emotion-driven? Trump hasn’t given ONE speech on the issues, the ONLY thing he can win on. Soon as I get odds I’m betting a wad the Trump/Vance ticket loses every swing state except Georgia and another wad that they lose Georgia, too. As I’ve said, if Trump could run on issues it would be a no-brainer, but he can’t. He’s emotionally incapable. He’s going to get baited like a fish during the debate, made to look like “old man yelling at clouds” to the remainder of soft/undecided voters. |
|
|
Originally Posted By jwr6: Talk about emotion-driven? Trump hasn’t given ONE speech on the issues, the ONLY thing he can win on. Soon as I get odds I’m betting a wad the Trump/Vance ticket loses every swing state except Georgia and another wad that they lose Georgia, too. As I’ve said, if Trump could run on issues it would be a no-brainer, but he can’t. He’s emotionally incapable. He’s going to get baited like a fish during the debate, made to look like “old man yelling at clouds” to the remainder of soft/undecided voters. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By eurotrash: You projecting he’s losing? I’m not even going to pretend it’s not 50/50 right now. Talk about emotion driven… Talk about emotion-driven? Trump hasn’t given ONE speech on the issues, the ONLY thing he can win on. Soon as I get odds I’m betting a wad the Trump/Vance ticket loses every swing state except Georgia and another wad that they lose Georgia, too. As I’ve said, if Trump could run on issues it would be a no-brainer, but he can’t. He’s emotionally incapable. He’s going to get baited like a fish during the debate, made to look like “old man yelling at clouds” to the remainder of soft/undecided voters. Only a person with mashed potatoes for brains is undecided at this point. |
|
|
Originally Posted By mgwantob: Only a person with mashed potatoes for brains is undecided at this point. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mgwantob: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By eurotrash: You projecting he’s losing? I’m not even going to pretend it’s not 50/50 right now. Talk about emotion driven… Talk about emotion-driven? Trump hasn’t given ONE speech on the issues, the ONLY thing he can win on. Soon as I get odds I’m betting a wad the Trump/Vance ticket loses every swing state except Georgia and another wad that they lose Georgia, too. As I’ve said, if Trump could run on issues it would be a no-brainer, but he can’t. He’s emotionally incapable. He’s going to get baited like a fish during the debate, made to look like “old man yelling at clouds” to the remainder of soft/undecided voters. Only a person with mashed potatoes for brains is undecided at this point. If that’s a true statement, Trumps campaign is done. His only hope was pulling undecided voters into his camp via inflation and immigration. He’s not pulling anyone away from Harris. |
|
|
|
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
|
Originally Posted By 9divdoc: Running and winning are not all it takes to actually get sworn in... imo View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 9divdoc: Originally Posted By CTM1: Is she really running? Running and winning are not all it takes to actually get sworn in... imo This is true. You have to hope that some sick, demented narccisist doesn't incite a riot to stop the counting of the electoral vote. On reflection, it’s more likely to happen given that Trump has had four years to brainwash his acolytes into believing a Trump loss means the vote was “stolen again he had 95% polling” and “the end of America.” I think Congress will be better protected now that’s been demonstrated what an autocrat and his useful idiots are willing to do. |
|
|
HOLY SHIT. 59 posts during a 37min speech.
Even for a Gen Zer, that’s just God Damn Retarded |
|
|
Originally Posted By KZ45: HOLY SHIT. 59 posts during a 37min speech. Even for a Gen Zer, that’s just God Damn Retarded View Quote Attached File |
|
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. prove it wrong |
|
|
Originally Posted By macros73: This is true. You have to hope that some sick, demented narccisist doesn't incite a riot to stop the counting of the electoral vote. On reflection, it’s more likely to happen given that Trump has had four years to brainwash his acolytes into believing a Trump loss means the vote was “stolen again he had 95% polling” and “the end of America.” I think Congress will be better protected now that’s been demonstrated what an autocrat and his useful idiots are willing to do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By macros73: Originally Posted By 9divdoc: Originally Posted By CTM1: Is she really running? Running and winning are not all it takes to actually get sworn in... imo This is true. You have to hope that some sick, demented narccisist doesn't incite a riot to stop the counting of the electoral vote. On reflection, it’s more likely to happen given that Trump has had four years to brainwash his acolytes into believing a Trump loss means the vote was “stolen again he had 95% polling” and “the end of America.” I think Congress will be better protected now that’s been demonstrated what an autocrat and his useful idiots are willing to do. most secure election. insurrection. but N_Ts are totally different from the rest of the trump haters. |
|
|
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
|
|
Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: prove it wrong Whoosh Or is that the sound of something going over someone's head? Either way you'd be correct because both would be accurate in this case. |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: prove it wrong View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. prove it wrong Holy shit. Literally use any other poll, and it will show that what you cite is wrong. Do you not agree that statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? |
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: most secure election. insurrection. but N_Ts are totally different from the rest of the trump haters. View Quote So it’s secure now? It will be a straight up old school solid election come November. When Trump loses in November. You will be able to confidently come back to arfcom and say “well we tried, Trump just couldn’t pull it off.” What’s Q++’s plan to save the world if Trump can’t convince enough people to vote for him? That’s if it’s a fair election and all. |
|
Gonads & Strife
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: So it's secure now? It will be a straight up old school solid election come November. When Trump loses in November. You will be able to confidently come back to arfcom and say "well we tried, Trump just couldn't pull it off." What's Q++'s plan to save the world if Trump can't convince enough people to vote for him? That's if it's a fair election and all. View Quote It's Schrodinger's election. Both secure and not secure until we know the results. |
|
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Holy shit. Literally use any other poll, and it will show that what you cite is wrong. Do you not agree that statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. prove it wrong Holy shit. Literally use any other poll, and it will show that what you cite is wrong. Do you not agree that statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? pick one that shows sound statistics and is done in a scientific fashion. |
|
|
Originally Posted By GutWrench: So it’s secure now? It will be a straight up old school solid election come November. When Trump loses in November. You will be able to confidently come back to arfcom and say “well we tried, Trump just couldn’t pull it off.” What’s Q++’s plan to save the world if Trump can’t convince enough people to vote for him? That’s if it’s a fair election and all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By GutWrench: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: most secure election. insurrection. but N_Ts are totally different from the rest of the trump haters. So it’s secure now? It will be a straight up old school solid election come November. When Trump loses in November. You will be able to confidently come back to arfcom and say “well we tried, Trump just couldn’t pull it off.” What’s Q++’s plan to save the world if Trump can’t convince enough people to vote for him? That’s if it’s a fair election and all. it wasn't secure in 16, we didn't bitch out and quit before it even happened then. |
|
|
|
|
a real leader talking about a real general and saying some really interesting things.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: pick one that shows sound statistics and is done in a scientific fashion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. prove it wrong Holy shit. Literally use any other poll, and it will show that what you cite is wrong. Do you not agree that statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? pick one that shows sound statistics and is done in a scientific fashion. Answer the question. Should statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Answer the question. Should statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: Originally Posted By jwr6: Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: i guess if you don't recognize elon musk's poll that's been posted here 170 times in the last day then getting you to understand the realities of the world is an exercise in futility. go with what you know, trump hater. https://media.tenor.com/aOmnfTv9evgAAAAM/tutter-bear.gif Elon Musk’s audience is not a representative sample. Almost as bad as polling GD. Like I said, I don’t think that meme means what you think it means. then you show me polling with a representative sample that refutes the percentages, with even a fraction of the size. Your ignorance of basic statistics is truly astounding. No such poll exists because it is not feasible to do so scientifically. How does a poll ensure that it is a representative sample of the United States? so like an N_T you're mad about something that overwhelmingly gets the job done but not perfectly or in the manner you want it to get done. an N_T or a crazy chick. You didn't answer my question. It does not "get the job done", and is critically flawed. This is like claiming the Globetrotters are the best basketball team of all time based upon their win ratio. So, do you know how statistics work, and how to conduct a poll that approaches accuracy? you should probably explain it to me before you start smacking yourself in the head and counting the toothpicks. Any poll that is intending on being accurate must have three elements: 1.) have the participants be randomly selected, 2.) have the respondents be within the defined population you are intending on finding out information on, and 3.) have a sufficient number of participants. The poll on Twitter does not meet the first two requirements, and is therefore going to be essentially useless in determining how the US electorate feels about the election. The population is messed up since people not in the US electorate can respond to the Twitter poll, and the population is only people who are active on Twitter which is not indicative of the US electorate. Not having random respondents is going to introduce a severe bias in who responds, and again will mean that the poll will not correlate to how the US electorate feels since these are only people who feel passionately enough to post their opinion in Twitter. The poll you posted is a convenience poll, and in no way shape or form does it have any scientific merit, nor does it have any accuracy. It's complete bullshit from a mathematical perspective. prove it wrong Holy shit. Literally use any other poll, and it will show that what you cite is wrong. Do you not agree that statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? pick one that shows sound statistics and is done in a scientific fashion. Answer the question. Should statistics should be done in a scientific fashion? are you saying that i'm a science denier? |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By iveseenalittleontv: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/258158/IMG_0969_jpeg-3304221.JPG View Quote RFK jr. That's too much tard for one picture. Not surprising from a Q guy. You guys thought JFKjr was coming back to save you. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RolandofGilead: It's Schrodinger's election. Both secure and not secure until we know the results. View Quote Attached File |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.