Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 456
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:22:05 AM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:




That makes no sense at all.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRG1gSGXkAA_7Pl?format=jpg&name=900x900




That makes no sense at all.


I think everyone is confused, including the guy that made the post.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:24:50 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Prime:
Originally Posted By doc540:

Is this not the SAME DAMN LAUNCH POSITION that's been raining hell on Ukraine??

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQuX9v2WAAAJm6P?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQkJR7KWsAAdZPo?format=jpg&name=large
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQfbN3uWsAAWuC3?format=jpg&name=large

There has to be some way to counter this shit. 🤬
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:36:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: CarmelBytheSea] [#3]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:40:09 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jozsi:
No one said anything about giving up those 4 regions.

and I hope they never give them up.
View Quote

Putin did. Putin said there can be an immediate cease fire if Ukraine withdraws completely from Russia's new territories.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/putin-offers-cease-fire-if-ukraine-exits-russian-claimed-areas-and-drops-nato-bid-kyiv-calls-proposal-absurd

The street interview greatly overstated the case, saying that the war could end in exchange for giving up the four regions Russia claims, when he only offered a ceasefire. I suspect if there were actual negotiations, he might indeed settle on those lines for more than a ceasefire, but the Ukrainians are right: he'll never abide by that. Russia breaks EVERY treaty and commitment.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:42:37 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:


I think everyone is confused, including the guy that made the post.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRG1gSGXkAA_7Pl?format=jpg&name=900x900




That makes no sense at all.


I think everyone is confused, including the guy that made the post.


This might be the source:

https://infolight.in.ua/en/2024/03/01/timely-solutions-ukrainian-defenders-use-armored-vehicles-copied-from-american-models-at-the-front/

Can't say if this is legit. The pictures are not.

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:51:00 AM EDT
[#6]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:52:07 AM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 10:58:09 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 11:08:11 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:


View Quote

Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 11:22:40 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

Speaking of expelled, I think I would have expelled the ambassador for denying that former USSR countries were legally independent and sovereign nations.

'One country two systems' was shown to be a total failure in Hong Kong, as the Beijing regime (let's use their language) denied self-government to Hong Kong, and worse, stripped the people's liberties.

It's past time for free nations to speak of Taiwan in terms not of political status but in terms of conditions for the people. The people of Taiwan enjoy freedom of religion, press, assembly, speech, petition of government, direct election of leaders, independent judiciary, rule of law. Any move to remove these things should be considered intolerable, and any government that threatens to remove these things should be considered illegitimate. Given the example of Hong Kong, Beijing's claims on Taiwan should be rejected. Publicly. What are they going to do about it, stop selling us the manufactured goods their economy depends on? Stop treating the Beijing bullies with kid gloves.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 11:24:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Jaehaerys] [#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By iggy1337:


Russia won't let Odessa go it's pretty tarded to believe any claim they would.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By iggy1337:
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:
Originally Posted By Jozsi:
No one said anything about giving up those 4 regions.

and I hope they never give them up.

Putin did. Putin said there can be an immediate cease fire if Ukraine withdraws completely from Russia's new territories.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/putin-offers-cease-fire-if-ukraine-exits-russian-claimed-areas-and-drops-nato-bid-kyiv-calls-proposal-absurd

The street interview greatly overstated the case, saying that the war could end in exchange for giving up the four regions Russia claims, when he only offered a ceasefire. I suspect if there were actual negotiations, he might indeed settle on those lines for more than a ceasefire, but the Ukrainians are right: he'll never abide by that. Russia breaks EVERY treaty and commitment.


Russia won't let Odessa go it's pretty tarded to believe any claim they would.

Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Odesa are all included in Russian imperial nationalists conceptions of "Novorossiya." This is often forgotten, but there was manufactured unrest in Odesa, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, etc. in 2014. In Odesa, Russia was coordinating with local Russian nationalists, and, should they have been able to get protests off the ground, Russian SOF would've used that as an opportunity to swoop in. In Kharkiv, Russia bussed a ton of agitators across the border to stir up shit (in one hilarious instance, they seized the opera house and claimed to have seized city hall, thus demonstrating that they weren't locals). The Putin regime believed that all it would take was a little push, and that Ukraine's control over all eight oblasts included in "Novorossiya" would disintegrate. That didn't happen, though, because there was never enough popular support for that unrest to really get off the ground anywhere but in the Donbas. Polling from the time indicates that around 30% of the Donbas's population supported separatism, and the next highest support for separatism was 15% in Kharkiv, with it being even lower elsewhere in the east.

The point being, Russia absolutely does want all of Ukraine's eight easternmost Oblasts, which it views as being historical Russian land. If Russia were to get its way, Ukraine's east would be annexed, with any local residents deemed "problematic" getting disappeared. Meanwhile, Ukraine's east-central and west-central would be a quasi-independent rump state with Russian being elevated to a state language, autocephaly removed and the Russian Orthodox Church given free reign, only the Russian version of history being permitted to be taught in school, a limited military heavily integrated with Russia's, etc. Russia would likely encourage Western Ukraine to be annexed by Poland, Hungary, and Romania, as it did in early 2014. Failing that, it might permit far Western Ukraine to go its own way (it's always viewed Western Ukraine as being a hotbed a "Banderite" and "Nazi" ideology and has blamed most of its failures in Ukraine on "Galician nationalists,"), or it might just incorporate it into the aforementioned quasi-independent rump.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 11:40:06 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:

Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."

I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:32:15 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.
View Quote

The only way to have deterred the whole thing was with a show of significant strength, broadcasting to the Kremlin that they would not win. The DC Establishment played to not provoke or escalate, resulting in war and war crimes. Given that Putin's been pushing for this for literally 20 years, it would have taken a LOT to deter the invasion, but dialogue with Russia wasn't going to do it. Quickly ramping up Ukraine's military might have done it. Looking at the forces Putin deployed, it was easy to see that conquering the whole country wasn't on the table; they didn't have the numbers. So training & equipping a new division, augmenting Ukraine's air forces with substantial air defense, added choppers & fighters, might have persuaded the Kremlin that their goal was not attainable with the forces they had.

All pointless speculation, but true deterrence was never even tried. It should have been.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:40:07 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:

Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."
View Quote
Remember when Clinton and Obama said 'well it takes 10 years to get wells to produce oiol so we shouldnt allow drilling?' Same bullshit.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:40:50 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:

The only way to have deterred the whole thing was with a show of significant strength, broadcasting to the Kremlin that they would not win. The DC Establishment played to not provoke or escalate, resulting in war and war crimes. Given that Putin's been pushing for this for literally 20 years, it would have taken a LOT to deter the invasion, but dialogue with Russia wasn't going to do it. Quickly ramping up Ukraine's military might have done it. Looking at the forces Putin deployed, it was easy to see that conquering the whole country wasn't on the table; they didn't have the numbers. So training & equipping a new division, augmenting Ukraine's air forces with substantial air defense, added choppers & fighters, might have persuaded the Kremlin that their goal was not attainable with the forces they had.

All pointless speculation, but true deterrence was never even tried. It should have been.
View Quote
"Peace at all costs"
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:41:02 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:

The only way to have deterred the whole thing was with a show of significant strength, broadcasting to the Kremlin that they would not win. The DC Establishment played to not provoke or escalate, resulting in war and war crimes. Given that Putin's been pushing for this for literally 20 years, it would have taken a LOT to deter the invasion, but dialogue with Russia wasn't going to do it. Quickly ramping up Ukraine's military might have done it. Looking at the forces Putin deployed, it was easy to see that conquering the whole country wasn't on the table; they didn't have the numbers. So training & equipping a new division, augmenting Ukraine's air forces with substantial air defense, added choppers & fighters, might have persuaded the Kremlin that their goal was not attainable with the forces they had.

All pointless speculation, but true deterrence was never even tried. It should have been.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.

The only way to have deterred the whole thing was with a show of significant strength, broadcasting to the Kremlin that they would not win. The DC Establishment played to not provoke or escalate, resulting in war and war crimes. Given that Putin's been pushing for this for literally 20 years, it would have taken a LOT to deter the invasion, but dialogue with Russia wasn't going to do it. Quickly ramping up Ukraine's military might have done it. Looking at the forces Putin deployed, it was easy to see that conquering the whole country wasn't on the table; they didn't have the numbers. So training & equipping a new division, augmenting Ukraine's air forces with substantial air defense, added choppers & fighters, might have persuaded the Kremlin that their goal was not attainable with the forces they had.

All pointless speculation, but true deterrence was never even tried. It should have been.

I definitely agree, but that also would've required Ukrainian political leadership to take the threat seriously, which they largely didn't (local Ukrainian patriots did take the threat seriously, and they are perhaps the largest reason Kyiv didn't fall). Regardless, it's all water under the bridge at this point.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:52:00 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:


This might be the source:

https://infolight.in.ua/en/2024/03/01/timely-solutions-ukrainian-defenders-use-armored-vehicles-copied-from-american-models-at-the-front/

Can't say if this is legit. The pictures are not.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:
Originally Posted By 4xGM300m:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRG1gSGXkAA_7Pl?format=jpg&name=900x900




That makes no sense at all.


I think everyone is confused, including the guy that made the post.


This might be the source:

https://infolight.in.ua/en/2024/03/01/timely-solutions-ukrainian-defenders-use-armored-vehicles-copied-from-american-models-at-the-front/

Can't say if this is legit. The pictures are not.




Thanks for that.  
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 12:58:54 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By CarmelBytheSea:

Humorously enough, Iran state news and Chinacstate news actually do have articles claiming that.

https://en.mehrnews.com/amp/112483/

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/459941/IMG_3356_jpeg-3196419.JPG
View Quote


Interesting.  I have played volleyball with a Russian (some are minorities from Russia, one guy who sometimes comes is Chuvash, some are Ukrainian) church group I go to, all in the Sacramento area, and at quite a few parks we play in, there are a lot of Persian people.  The women almost all if not all wear clothes like they do in Iran, with headscarves and the like.   The last two times, this Iranian kid, who himself has darker skin (a lot of them would be considered white, I would guess some of them have Arabic roots), played with us.  He just showed up one time and asked if he could, and his dad showed up at the end of a game and played with us too.  

All of these people get along just fine in a neighborhood, albeit without mingling too much.  Americans, Russians, Iranians.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 1:00:41 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By doc540:

Is this not the SAME DAMN LAUNCH POSITION that's been raining hell on Ukraine??
View Quote

That place needs an enema badly.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 1:00:43 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AlmightyTallest] [#20]



high-speed ballistic targets like... ATACMS)

Crimean Wind and other UA sources are reporting the possible destruction of a new Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system near the Dzhankoi Air Field in occupied Crimea.

NASA FIRMS thermal imagery shows a fire at the presumed location of the MGM-140 ATACMS M39A1 Block I missile strike which was acquired at 1300 Kyiv Time (1000 UTC) on June 28, 2024 (today).

Possible Geolocation: 45.680718, 34.423126    
View Quote









Link Posted: 6/28/2024 1:17:03 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:





https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



high-speed ballistic targets like... ATACMS)

Crimean Wind and other UA sources are reporting the possible destruction of a new Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system near the Dzhankoi Air Field in occupied Crimea.

NASA FIRMS thermal imagery shows a fire at the presumed location of the MGM-140 ATACMS M39A1 Block I missile strike which was acquired at 1300 Kyiv Time (1000 UTC) on June 28, 2024 (today).

Possible Geolocation: 45.680718, 34.423126    


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900


The M39/A1 is a missile between 36-28 years old (production age). For a system that was invented/designed 40yrs ago.

Lol. Just killed a “bleeding edge” S-500 the first week it arrived.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 1:30:23 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:





https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



high-speed ballistic targets like... ATACMS)

Crimean Wind and other UA sources are reporting the possible destruction of a new Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system near the Dzhankoi Air Field in occupied Crimea.

NASA FIRMS thermal imagery shows a fire at the presumed location of the MGM-140 ATACMS M39A1 Block I missile strike which was acquired at 1300 Kyiv Time (1000 UTC) on June 28, 2024 (today).

Possible Geolocation: 45.680718, 34.423126    


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900

I imagine there are some people in and around DC watching with interest.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 1:48:18 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
/media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/crazykat-330.gif
Originally Posted By Prime:
What the fuck


/media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/crazykat-330.gif


I showed that to Mrs. BGB. Her flinch, and OH FUCK ME! was priceless!
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:25:27 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:I definitely agree, but that also would've required Ukrainian political leadership to take the threat seriously, which they largely didn't (local Ukrainian patriots did take the threat seriously, and they are perhaps the largest reason Kyiv didn't fall). Regardless, it's all water under the bridge at this point.
View Quote

Quite right. I'll add F16s to the things I won't rant on anymore.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:26:38 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:

I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."

I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:29:07 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear:


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear:
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
Originally Posted By Lieh-tzu:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



Somebody serious about countering Russia could have started training Ukrainians on using F16s three whole years ago.

I remember in the early weeks of the 2022 invasion people saying "it takes too long to train people on F16 so it's not worth it."

I get the hesitancy to send systems beyond small arms, ATGMs, and MANPADS in the early weeks of the invasion (let alone before it, when the outcome was viewed as a fait accompli). However, once the Russians withdrew from Kyiv and it became clear that this was going to be a longer war, the west should've started working towards training Ukrainian pilots, providing IFVs and tanks, long range strike capability, etc.


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.



Not from me, I agreed with ya.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:29:43 PM EDT
[#27]
14 minutes ago.

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:32:33 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear:


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.

View Quote




I still am for Fissile material and delivery systems....
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 2:37:32 PM EDT
[#29]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 3:01:49 PM EDT
[#30]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 3:07:49 PM EDT
[Last Edit: CarmelBytheSea] [#31]

Iran's leaders mulling nuclear weapons: NYT Report | Latest English News | WION
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 3:16:03 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 3:19:23 PM EDT
[#33]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 3:19:59 PM EDT
[#34]
China’s Communist Party expels two former Defense Ministers. This is on the grounds of corruption charges, but also for damage to the image of senior officials. It's interesting to ponder whether this is due to actual corruption or just an excuse to get rid of politically unreliable people. In autocracies, nearly everyone is corrupt to one degree or another. It's not a bug; it's a feature. It gives you a built in excuse to purge politically unreliable people whenever the need arises.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:09:30 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear:


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.

View Quote

Yes I also remember those discussions. Lots of bias from the ME comparing some illiterate Afghan goat herder to a UA Mig29 pilot with years of combat experience and multiple engineering degrees. There was also a near total institutional conviction that Russia was undefeatable and at best we will trigger WWIII so why bother. And these are the SME's...:(
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:18:01 PM EDT
[#36]
https://ctc.westpoint.edu/june-2024/

Excerpts relevant to this thread:

Russia and proxies:

According to sources in European security agencies, cited by the Financial Times, Russia has significantly increased influence operations and espionage especially in former Eastern Bloc states but also in Western European countries with limited counterespionage capacity. The FT’s sources warned that Russia was plotting violent acts of sabotage, including bombings, arson attacks, and destruction of infrastructure, all over Europe “directly and via proxies.”
View Quote


The Russian sabotage campaign in Europe has been documented fairly extensively (some in this thread), as have Russian influence campaigns aimed at undermining European democratic institutions. Another component of those campaigns is the European far right and its linkage to entities in Russia that are willing to train and equip their European counterparts. Russian Imperial Legion was implicated in training Swedish neo-Nazis a few years back, who went on to attempt to carry out violent acts back home, if memory serves. New information indicates that Russia is even willing to move beyond proxies and act directly:

While influence operations and sabotage are the most likely threats associated with Russia, support for non-state terrorist networks cannot be ruled out. On June 5, 2024, French media reported that the domestic security services had arrested near Charles de Gaulle airport a 26-year-old Ukrainian-Russian from the Russia-occupied Donbass region who accidently set off an explosive in his hotel room while preparing a bomb suitable for a terror attack. According to a French security source, investigations clearly indicate a Russian operation, with it not being excluded that the plan was to carry out a false flag attack to pin the blame on jihadis given the explosive was of the type often associated with jihadis.
View Quote


Iran and proxies:

Iran seems largely content to attack Israelis directly, though with little to no distinction made in target selection.

Iranian intelligence operatives acting as diplomats have been tied to numerous assassinations or plots to assassinate dissident exiles and plans to attack Israeli targets, including a plot to attack an embassy and kindergarten in Germany also in 2018.
View Quote


Wider implications:

As for larger attacks during high-profile events such as the Paris Olympics, Tehran likely knows any attacks linked to the Iran threat network would crush what remain of Iran-E.U. relations and could decrease European sympathy for Palestinians and increase European sympathy for Israel.
View Quote


Going forward:

If there is a major escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah this summer ahead of or during the Olympics, one concern is that it may change Hezbollah’s calculus when it comes to launching terrorist attacks in Europe, especially against Israeli or Jewish targets.
View Quote



Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:29:25 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Capta:

I imagine there are some people in and around DC watching with interest.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Capta:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



high-speed ballistic targets like... ATACMS)

Crimean Wind and other UA sources are reporting the possible destruction of a new Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system near the Dzhankoi Air Field in occupied Crimea.

NASA FIRMS thermal imagery shows a fire at the presumed location of the MGM-140 ATACMS M39A1 Block I missile strike which was acquired at 1300 Kyiv Time (1000 UTC) on June 28, 2024 (today).

Possible Geolocation: 45.680718, 34.423126    


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900

I imagine there are some people in and around DC watching with interest.

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:30:03 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By BigGrumpyBear:


IIRC the conversations in the earlier days of the other thread, a lot of those folks had spent years training and working with our "allies" in ME countries and considered UA no better, and as such there was no need to do it.

Others, wanted more immediate concerns addressed to stabilize the lines before doing long term stuff.

Some consider RU victory a fait accompli even now.

I suggested giving them the entire A10 fleet along with F16's as it would get it out of US inventory, allowing the USAF to spend the money elsewhere. And second it would give UA a robust plane to attack the front lines.

It was instantly poo poo-ed because the A10 would be a sitting duck to RU ADA. They'll all get shot down, it's to slow, it's to old, and the pilots will get killed, etc, etc, etc...

Never mind it would take months to a year to train them during which the UA would attrit the ADA before the planes were in country like they're doing now. Amazing how that worked.

A lot of people with a bias against the A10 ignored everything after A10 was mentioned in the conversation.

And I'm sure I'll get push back for mentioning it here.

View Quote


The Air Force has been dying to dump the A10's for close to fifteen years now. What better way to send them into retirement than strafing Russians in Ukraine? They were designed to annihilate Russian supply columns and set their tanks and IFV's aflame. Loose the dogs of war!

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:35:15 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JTF:
Originally Posted By Capta:
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:



high-speed ballistic targets like... ATACMS)

Crimean Wind and other UA sources are reporting the possible destruction of a new Russian S-500 Prometheus air defense system near the Dzhankoi Air Field in occupied Crimea.

NASA FIRMS thermal imagery shows a fire at the presumed location of the MGM-140 ATACMS M39A1 Block I missile strike which was acquired at 1300 Kyiv Time (1000 UTC) on June 28, 2024 (today).

Possible Geolocation: 45.680718, 34.423126    


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKfqaYaQAAkXaU?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKgzK-asAAMBqG?format=jpg&name=large



https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKkUakbkAAOccM?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRKqvZZWEAASIf3?format=jpg&name=900x900

I imagine there are some people in and around DC watching with interest.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRLHa80XkAAsuZ3?format=jpg&name=900x900



lol.

Link Posted: 6/28/2024 4:38:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AlmightyTallest] [#40]







Hours later, look at the vehicle shadows.




Link Posted: 6/28/2024 5:06:31 PM EDT
[#41]
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 5:50:33 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Prime:
What the fuck

View Quote


LOL
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 6:17:37 PM EDT
[#43]





amount of the remaining balance will likely be missiles being put on contract for Ukraine with USAI funds.  
View Quote


Note completion date in January 2027.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 6:49:23 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMUAtlXkAADWXH?format=jpg&name=900x900





Note completion date in January 2027.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMJXkNWMAAThwe?format=jpg&name=900x900
View Quote
Lots of FL in that list.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 6:53:01 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMUAtlXkAADWXH?format=jpg&name=900x900





Note completion date in January 2027.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMJXkNWMAAThwe?format=jpg&name=900x900
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AlmightyTallest:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMUAtlXkAADWXH?format=jpg&name=900x900



amount of the remaining balance will likely be missiles being put on contract for Ukraine with USAI funds.  


Note completion date in January 2027.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRMJXkNWMAAThwe?format=jpg&name=900x900

Build another plant and up the order to 8700.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 6:56:49 PM EDT
[#46]
Latest Sreiff Update.  Though I don't always totally agree with everything, his ability to cram a lot of info into a brief, readable product is art! Putin's War week 112
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 7:05:27 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DPeacher:


LOL
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DPeacher:
Originally Posted By Prime:
What the fuck



LOL


It is certainly a great demonstration of why you shouldn't "stunt drive" or lay down/play in the road.  Probably something that should be shown in driver's ED classes.
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 8:00:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: michigan66] [#48]
From the ISW Irab/Middle East Backgrounder of 28 Jun.   Link

Iran and Axis of Resistance
Iran blackmailed and threatened the Iraqi government to secure the relocation of Hamas’ political leadership to Baghdad, according to an unnamed Iraqi politician.  The politician told an independent Iraqi news outlet on June 26 that the decision to allow Hamas to relocate to Iraq “did not take place amicably.”

Unspecified sources told Emirati media on June 24 that the Iraqi federal government approved a Hamas plan in May 2024 to relocate to Baghdad.  Western countries and Qatar have been increasing pressure on Hamas to show greater flexibility in ceasefire negotiations with Israel, which drove Hamas’ desire to relocate from Doha.

The Emirati report followed the opening of a Hamas political office in Baghdad on June 11.  

Members of the Iranian-backed Iraqi militia Kataib Imam Ali visited the office on June 11 and met with a member of Hamas’ Office for Arab and Islamic Relations, Mohammad al Hafi.  Iraqi media reported that members of the Iranian-backed Badr Organization also visited the office.

A Lebanese Hezbollah-affiliated outlet reported on June 28 that Iran has stepped up its training of Iranian-backed Iraqi militants inside Iraq and Iran since the Israel-Hamas war began in October 2023.  Members of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq—a coalition of Iranian-backed Iraqi militias—told al Akhbar that Iran is training militants in 10 training camps across Iraq and inside Iran.

Iranian advisers are training the militants to use “new advanced weapons, rockets, and high-tech drones” from Iran and Russia.


A member of the Iranian-backed Iraqi militia Harakat Hezbollah al Nujaba told al Akhbar that Iranian-backed Iraqi militias would likely “strategically strike” US bases “across the region” if Israel attacks Lebanon.

Iranian-backed Iraqi militia Asaib Ahl al Haq similarly threatened on June 24 to attack US interests in the Middle East if the United States supported a major Israeli offensive into Lebanon.

The European Union Council placed “restrictive measures” on six individuals and three other companies for supporting, facilitating, or enabling Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad activity.
View Quote
Link Posted: 6/28/2024 8:04:59 PM EDT
[#49]
Dnipro hit again.

‼️Already 12 victims in Dnipro.

Six are in the hospital.

Among them is a pregnant woman. Doctors assess her condition as moderate. The patient is provided with all necessary medical assistance.

https://t.me/dnipropetrovskaODA/14092



📹 What does the now destroyed high-rise building in Dnipro look like from the inside
https://t.me/dneproperatyv/102395


Link Posted: 6/28/2024 8:08:35 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Jaehaerys:
https://ctc.westpoint.edu/june-2024/
Iran and proxies:Iran seems largely content to attack Israelis directly, though with little to no distinction made in target selection.
View Quote

Just this year Sweden and France arrested Iranian agents who entered their countries pretending to be Afghan refugees.  The husband-wife team in Sweden had been given a target to attack and were waiting for the orders to proceed.
Page / 456
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top