User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:57:25 AM EDT
[#1]
It's like my finding a meteorite and claiming I shot it from the sky
Russian spin is best spin |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:57:58 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is the average Russian stupid enough to believe this garbage? I mean, some low IQ Americans get suckered in but MOST Russians? Must be all the HIV, vodka, and krokadil coursing thru their veins. Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:58:57 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We should troll our enemies by putting back dated date plates on our missiles before launching-yo, your shit just got pushed in by a missile made back when disco was popular. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
While the Russians are exaggerating, our Cruise missiles are a bit long in the tooth. We could do much more to reduce the radar cross section, and the fact that they are subsonic makes them easier to shoot down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:59:26 AM EDT
[#4]
Former Isis armor:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:59:31 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Then why did Trump say they were new, smart missiles? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:06:01 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They released pictures of the actual parts recovered. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Russians NEVER lie or exaggerate, it's simply not in their character...  Just looks like parts recovered after a missile destroyed its target... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:28:29 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They released pictures of the actual parts recovered. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Russians NEVER lie or exaggerate, it's simply not in their character... It's like the Iranians photoshopping one missile launch into ten missiles launching. Either way, the answer is to just launch an overwhelming number of missiles. In a REAL attack we would whack their radar sites as soon as they go active. They can replenish missiles easily. Radar sites not so much. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:36:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not proof they intercepted anything... Just looks like parts recovered after a missile destroyed its target... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/17973/parts-526223.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:42:43 AM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:48:16 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's like my finding a meteorite and claiming I shot it from the sky Russian spin is best spin Millennials.... 
How does the OP explain the before/after BDA if the Russians shot down the cruise missiles? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:53:44 AM EDT
[#11]
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to.
No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 11:55:50 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryAwesome
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 12:10:34 PM EDT
[#13]
lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 12:17:32 PM EDT
[#14]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 12:27:49 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Neither has my own government Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Russians NEVER lie or exaggerate, it's simply not in their character...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 2:57:43 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There's zero reason that reasonably modern ADA systems wouldn't be able to shoot down 70s era cruise missiles Stinger gunner gets the bcu in place and tries to get a lock and it is gone before he got tone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 3:04:30 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The pigeons  Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 3:18:03 PM EDT
[#19]
Let's see comparison photos of parts from shot down missiles and parts from missiles that hit their target and exploded.
What if the parts are from decoy missiles the ADA shot down while the actual missiles passed by and hit the targets? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 3:41:25 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryI mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 4:09:12 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool video, but doesn't look like that effective a missile strike. I mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 5:00:05 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Russians at least got pictures of rocket fragments. Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is the average Russian stupid enough to believe this garbage? I mean, some low IQ Americans get suckered in but MOST Russians? Must be all the HIV, vodka, and krokadil coursing thru their veins. Imagine how much more stupid a person would have to be, to believe in a chemical attack story from a picture of kids being sprayed with water |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:08:58 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wish you were a Russian troll. That would at least mean you couldn't vote. (Removed -40xb) The truth is out there. Talks about kids and sucking **** in the same sentence "The Truth is out there" Ultra cringy post. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:13:28 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. )
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:27:07 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Thinks voting matters Talks about kids and sucking **** in the same sentence "The Truth is out there" Ultra cringy post. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:35:35 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:37:29 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Cool video, but doesn't look like that effective a missile strike. I mean, you sink boats by making holes that let water in, not air, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:41:52 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To me they look similar to the fragments of passenger jet engines recovered on 9/11. Obviously no exploding warheads involved (except on AM radio and infowars )
https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. )
https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 8:54:21 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you're saying terminal velocity impacts and disintegration of turbine blades look similar? No shit I agree. Both hit their targets. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. )
https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 9:27:29 PM EDT
[#31]
Apparently we went after 10 targets but only hit 3....according to the Russkies.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20168/four-outlandish-russian-ministry-of-defense-claims-about-the-syrian-missile-raid |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:02:45 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To me they look similar to the fragments of passenger jet engines recovered on 9/11. Obviously no exploding warheads involved (except on AM radio and infowars )
https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I believe those compressor cores ARE from Tomahawk missiles. Look hard enough and you'll find one embedded in something after the Tomahawk has hit its target and exploded just like it's supposed to. No such fragments would exist if it was a nuclear armed Tomahawk, of course. But here's the thing: If a Tomahawk were to be shot out of the sky, its engine would likely stop running before it hit the ground. In that case you'd probably find at least a few intact compressor blades on the turbine core. The fact that those are stripped clean of blades tells me that it got FODded to hell and back as it was running at 100 percent when its warhead exploded in contact with its target. Of course I could be wrong but I'd wager I'm not. )
https://preview.ibb.co/gsw4wx/landfillengines_composite_spssz9ja4c8.png 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:32:21 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:37:02 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ok fair enough. There's a certain logic there, though why have a warhead on in the first place? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Possibly they only want to hit the empty containers and reuse the ship itself? After the exercise is over, helo the crew back over, cut up & throw scrap metal overboard, and sail back to port until the next exercise. 
Seriously though, warheads need testing too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2018 10:45:33 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ok fair enough. There's a certain logic there, though why have a warhead on in the first place? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2018 4:51:35 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok fair enough. There's a certain logic there, though why have a warhead on in the first place? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2018 4:53:53 PM EDT
[#37]
Lol
It said evidence on the ground, including missile fragments, holes made by the warheads and damage to the targets, could positively confirm only 25 successful hits, calling the US claim of 105 missiles reaching their targets dubious. 25 hits, fucking bullshit. One video alone from one strike area showed 40+ strikes making it to the ground. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
