Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 783
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:00:16 PM EDT
[#1]
Dershowitz files defamation suit against Boies, alleging extortion

Attorney Alan Dershowitz filed a defamation countersuit against fellow lawyer David Boies, claiming Boies, his law firm and Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre attempted to extort money from rich and powerful men for private settlements.

The suit, filed in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan, alleges intentional infliction of emotional distress and extortion.

It names billionaire Leslie Wexner as one of the alleged extortion targets.

This lawsuit comes in response to Boies’s suit against Dershowitz that was filed in November and accused the attorney of disparaging Boies’s law firm, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, by calling it “the law firm of extortion, subornation of perjury and other crimes” in a Washington Post interview, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Dershowitz alleges in the countersuit that Boies’s firm said it would reveal allegations against Wexner, the CEO of Victoria's Secret’s parent company, if the company didn’t provide a settlement. Epstein was Wexner’s money manager. Wexner declined to comment to the Journal, reiterating that he wasn’t aware of Epstein’s criminal behavior.

Dershowitz’s suit also follows from Giuffre's allegations that he assaulted her as a teenager when Epstein recruited her for his sex trafficking scheme. The attorney, who argued against President Trump’s removal in the Senate, has denied those accusations, calling Giuffre a “certified, complete, total liar.”

Guiffre filed a defamation suit against Dershowitz in April because of these comments. Boies represented her for the case until a judge ruled he and his partners needed to be taken off the case due to their expected testimony, according to the Journal.

Dershowitz told The Hill that he is looking forward to putting Boise on trial “for the role he played in the false accusation against me.”

"I'm also looking forward to putting his entire history of questionable legal ethics on trial and his pattern of practicing law," he said.

"He said on tape that he knew his client was 'wrong ... simply wrong' in accusing me, and yet even after saying that, he submitted false affidavits from her," he added.

Boies did not immediately return a request for comment.

Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in August after being held on sex crimes charges. New York City officials ruled his death a suicide. Dershowitz helped Epstein obtain an 18-month sentence in 2008.
View Quote
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/482616-dershowitz-files-defamation-suit-against-boies-alleging-extortion
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:03:13 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:03:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Nailed it, except Stone not Manafort in this case
View Quote
And right on cue, here comes the outrage from none other than Madam Secretary herself.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:07:08 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
And right on cue, here comes the outrage from none other than Madam Secretary herself.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/61337/1581468104742_png-1272874.JPG
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Nailed it, except Stone not Manafort in this case
And right on cue, here comes the outrage from none other than Madam Secretary herself.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/61337/1581468104742_png-1272874.JPG
Lawfareblog ought to be on fire with outrage tomorrow.

Just checked:

Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:07:23 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

This is ARFCOM... GET BOTH!!!

Edit:

What would happen if the team going after Stone became “the hunted”? Since they are currently involved in a prosecution, what would the optics look like if Barr went after them before they concluded? I would think if white hats were doing it “by the book” they wouldn’t interfere... Yet.
View Quote
Attachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:09:06 PM EDT
[#6]
Regarding Jessie-Liu - something I didnt realize:
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:15:18 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Regarding Jessie-Liu - something I didnt realize:
View Quote
strategery?
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:17:03 PM EDT
[#8]
Think BO >>> WEISSMANN 'regular updates' re: Steele [Firewall][Mueller]

Q 2107

!!mG7VJxZNCI

7 Sep 2018 - 12:56:50 PM

DlA_GOnUUAIsFj6.jpg

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/08/02/nunes_carter_page_fisa_redacted_to_hide_part_steele_dossier_played_cover_intel_agencies.html??

Re_review important.

Who signed?

Who signed pg 380?

Who signed pg 389?

Who signed pg 390?

Who signed pg 391?

Who signed pg 392?

Pg 389 - Andrew McCabe

Pg 391 - Rod Rosenstein

Pg 271 - Dana Boente

Pg 269 - James Comey

Pg [    ] - Sally Yates

'KNOWINGLY' used FALSE intelligence?

Think HRC [paid for] FAKE DOSSIER [bulk].

Think Steele > BO [post FBI firing] intel collection.

Think DOJ/FBI classified leaks to FAKE NEWS > insert into FISA app in effort to provide 'new sources'.

Think PDB placement by BRENNAN to AUTHENTICATE source as credible.

Think BO >>> WEISSMANN 'regular updates' re: Steele [Firewall][Mueller]

………………….

"I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing information regarding Carter W. Page is TRUE and CORRECT."

https://vault.fbi.gov/d1-release/d1-release/view??

Q
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:18:09 PM EDT
[#9]
Jessie Liuooser
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:18:11 PM EDT
[#10]
Trump is TOTAL WAR right now...

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:20:53 PM EDT
[#11]
Attachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
I hope he's getting eternally buttfucked by Satan's flaming spiked pecker.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:21:24 PM EDT
[#12]
Isn't the anonymous question about the White House insider who wrote the book.

It's not about Q
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:23:48 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
So there you have it.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:25:10 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Did they say “Q” before “anonymous”?
View Quote
Sounded like “Cue-non-na-muss” to me. So yes, I think the Q was there.

EDIT: nope, second video is better. Definitely “anonymous”.  False alarm.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:26:14 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I don't think so.  I think the reference is to the anonymous that wrote a book.
View Quote
Ahhhhh, that makes more sense. (The anonymous that wrote the NYT op-ed is who I think they are referring to)
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:26:47 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Isn't the anonymous question about the White House insider who wrote the book.

It's not about Q
View Quote
Yes, but watch the video I posted. It came out of the blue with ambiguous structure. I believe it was crafted that way to allow the reporter to spin the answer. Trump didn’t bite.

Re-read:

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:36:49 PM EDT
[#17]
But... but... Nothing is happening...

Tracy Beanz:

“Just today we had:
1. A ridiculous sentencing memo in the Stone case filed and then publicly condemned and resubmitted
2. ALL FOUR prosecutors resign in the case
3. Jesse Liu, the former US Attorney for DC who was moving to a different position removed from consideration
4. A presser where the FBI confirmed an open and ongoing investigation into Ukraine
5. Barr suing sanctuary cities
6. A 6 count indictment against Juicy Smoliette
7. Biden leaving NH early because he sucks so bad
8. Bloomberg fall from his very low height enhancer with a hit on comments he made about "Stop and Frisk:" from his own party
9. A revelation that JAMES CLAPPER leaked the dossier "salacious" allegations etc to CNN
10. Robert O’Brien says the NSC will be down between 115 to 120 staffers by the end of this week.
11. Andrew Yang and his Gang - OUT”
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:38:14 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
AG Sessions announced he now had 27 open leak investigations on 14 Nov 2017. Coincidentally when did Q start posting? We know that Eric Ciamarella (pronounced "Charmarella" ? Charlie ?) was removed from the NSC and sent back to CIA due to leaking. That was done well before the Vindman to WB episode.

I'm starting to question if some known leakers were left in place and VERY closely monitored. The original plan may have been to pursue them after the Russia thing was settled, but the D's immediately started in on peach mints. If you (as POTUS, AG, & NSA) could, legally as NS issue, monitor the leaking, lying, and tall tale spinning by reversing the spying back onto the bad actors, would you?

Just thinking to myself. Guess we'll know soon enough.
View Quote
FISA goes both ways.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:42:11 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:47:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:47:39 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 10:55:38 PM EDT
[#24]
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:09:05 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Corey Feldman plans a one time livestream movie where he will name the Hollywood pedos who raped him and Corey Haim.

https://movieweb.com/rape-of-2-coreys-documentary-feldman-explains-single-showing/
View Quote
Feldman is such a scumbag that it looks like he is going for a max pay day + setting people to sue after the bootleg.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:14:15 PM EDT
[#26]
Attachment Attached File


bwahahahahahahahahahahahahah

fuck that gun grabber fuckAttachment Attached File
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:25:00 PM EDT
[#27]
Attachment Attached File


it's almost like potus has

leverage............................
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:28:44 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Lolz.  Soon.  

I'll be honest. I know the left literally attempted a coup on the presidency.  But, if no one is prosecuted before the election, I will not vote in this election.
View Quote
That'll show 'em!  LOL
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:30:06 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
In other news...

Four Texans, One New Yorker Arrested for Conspiracy to Sell Sanctioned Iranian Oil to Refinery in China for Huge Profit

he Department of Justice today announced that the following defendants were arrested and charged by Complaint on charges of conspiracy and violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) based on their attempt to transact in sanctioned Iranian oil:

Nicholas Hovan, 33, of New York, NY;
Zhenyu Wang, a/k/a “Bill Wang,” 39, of Dallas, TX;
Robert Thwaites, 30, of Dallas, TX;
Nicholas James Fuchs, 26, of Dallas, TX; and
Daniel Ray Lane, 38, of McKinney, TX.

The defendants are each charged with one count of conspiracy and one count of violating IEEPA, based on allegations that from July 2019 to February 2020 they conspired in Philadelphia and elsewhere to arrange for the purchase of oil from the Islamic Republic of Iran, in violation of United States economic sanctions imposed on Iran, for sale to a refinery in China.

The Complaint alleges that defendants Nicholas Hovan, James Fuchs, Robert Thwaites, and Daniel Ray Lane arranged to purchase the oil and sell it to a refinery in China represented by defendant Zhenyu Wang, a/k/a “Bill Wang.”

According to the Complaint, defendant Lane offered to further the conspiracy by laundering money through his company, STACK Royalties.  The charges further allege that the defendants agreed to use a Polish shell corporation as a straw seller of the illicit oil, and that they planned two shipments of oil per month going forward, all for great profit.  In addition, the charges allege that defendants Fuchs and Thwaites agreed to apply for foreign passports in order to set up offshore accounts that would not be reported to U.S. authorities.

“With the goal of illegally enriching themselves, the defendants conspired for over eight months to devise a scheme to violate U.S. sanctions imposed on Iran, particularly the ban on foreign oil sales,” said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers.  “The sale of oil is the lifeblood of the Iranian economy.  At the same time the United States was increasing its sanctions in order to pressure Iran to stop its malign activities, these defendants put greed ahead of country.  I commend the efforts of the agents and prosecutors who investigated and uncovered this brazen evasion of U.S. law.”

“The defendants in this case allegedly committed serious federal crimes that flew in direct contradiction to the United States’ national security interests,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain for the Eastern District of Pennsylvannia.  “By devising a scheme to purchase oil from Iran, conceal its origins via a refinery in China and make tremendous profits, the defendants were also directly financially benefitting the nation of Iran in its quest to become a nuclear power, thus jeopardizing the safety and security of the United States and our allies.  These five defendants will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law in order to send the message that this type of subversion of U.S. policy and law will not be tolerated.”

If convicted, the defendants each face a maximum possible sentence of 25 years’ incarceration, as well as a maximum possible fine of $1.25 million.

The case was investigated by the FBI and is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Michael Rinaldi and First Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams, in partnership with Trial Attorney David Recker of the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, Counterintelligence and Export Control Section.

An indictment, information, or criminal complaint is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
View Quote
They're getting off easy.  They offered aid and comfort to an enemy of the USofA.  They could be facing a long walk and a short rope instead of fines and 25 years.
Link Posted: 2/11/2020 11:38:02 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
That is a big big big boom!!!  Well maybe not
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 12:42:08 AM EDT
[#32]
In other news, in VZ it appears that people are still enjoying their Govt cheese.

ANGRY, VIOLENT SOCIALISTS With Weapons Beat President Guaid On His Return to Venezuela (VIDEO)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...dent-guaido-on-his-return-to-venezuela-video/
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 1:14:18 AM EDT
[#33]
I’m sure this has been covered but here go again....

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 1:50:40 AM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
From link.

OPPORTUNITY – Ms. Jessie Liu is scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am.  Ms. Liu will be under oath.  If any Senator on that committee is brave enough, they would ask:

? Did the DOJ or FBI have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the Carter Page FISA application to the media?
We know the honest answer is yes.

The next follow up:

? Why was James Wolfe not prosecuted for that leak of classified information?
And then things would get really interesting… Consider the ramifications.

An honest answer would prove the media lied for 18 months about the content of the FISA application. They’ve had it since March 2017. That’s how the New York Times knew to FOIA it. That’s why the New York Times filed the FOIA, to use it more openly.

An honest answer would prove the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity in the coup effort.

An honest answer would explain why the SSCI would only approve of nominees who would not expose their activity. Remember, the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, etc. all require confirmation from the SSCI (including Chair and Vice-Chair); and the answer would highlight SSCI members were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.

An honest answer would explain how Vice-Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced. Mark Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe…. and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.

An honest answer would also explain why former DOJ-NSD lawyer Michael Atkinson was recommended to become Intelligence Community Inspector General…. And why the SSCI approved. An honest answer would explain why ICIG Atkinson participated in the second soft-coup effort via the “whistle-blower.”

An honest answer would explain the unique nature of all the interests in/around Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House intel committee, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD… Almost everything reconciles within the sunlight of an honest answer.

An honest answer would highlight several members of the 2016 U.S intel community oversight known as the “gang of eight” were participating in a covert effort against candidate Trump; and how some of the current Go8 members have legal exposure.

The ramifications are far reaching:

Who was Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront in their decision to allow such a weak plea contrast against such severe criminal conduct?
Is it even possible for the United States Dept. of Justice to conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conspiring with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo, CNN and more) survive exposure within that same trial.  The media caught participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?
The downstream consequences are quite dramatic. The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp.
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:08:17 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Regarding Jessie-Liu - something I didnt realize:
View Quote
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1227384228175917057.html
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:16:17 AM EDT
[#36]
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:30:06 AM EDT
[#37]
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:32:24 AM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
From link.

OPPORTUNITY – Ms. Jessie Liu is scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am.  Ms. Liu will be under oath.  If any Senator on that committee is brave enough, they would ask:

? Did the DOJ or FBI have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the Carter Page FISA application to the media?
We know the honest answer is yes.

The next follow up:

? Why was James Wolfe not prosecuted for that leak of classified information?
And then things would get really interesting… Consider the ramifications.

An honest answer would prove the media lied for 18 months about the content of the FISA application. They’ve had it since March 2017. That’s how the New York Times knew to FOIA it. That’s why the New York Times filed the FOIA, to use it more openly.

An honest answer would prove the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity in the coup effort.

An honest answer would explain why the SSCI would only approve of nominees who would not expose their activity. Remember, the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, etc. all require confirmation from the SSCI (including Chair and Vice-Chair); and the answer would highlight SSCI members were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.

An honest answer would explain how Vice-Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced. Mark Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe…. and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.

An honest answer would also explain why former DOJ-NSD lawyer Michael Atkinson was recommended to become Intelligence Community Inspector General…. And why the SSCI approved. An honest answer would explain why ICIG Atkinson participated in the second soft-coup effort via the “whistle-blower.”

An honest answer would explain the unique nature of all the interests in/around Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House intel committee, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD… Almost everything reconciles within the sunlight of an honest answer.

An honest answer would highlight several members of the 2016 U.S intel community oversight known as the “gang of eight” were participating in a covert effort against candidate Trump; and how some of the current Go8 members have legal exposure.

The ramifications are far reaching:

Who was Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront in their decision to allow such a weak plea contrast against such severe criminal conduct?
Is it even possible for the United States Dept. of Justice to conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conspiring with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo, CNN and more) survive exposure within that same trial.  The media caught participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?
The downstream consequences are quite dramatic. The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
From link.

OPPORTUNITY – Ms. Jessie Liu is scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am.  Ms. Liu will be under oath.  If any Senator on that committee is brave enough, they would ask:

? Did the DOJ or FBI have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the Carter Page FISA application to the media?
We know the honest answer is yes.

The next follow up:

? Why was James Wolfe not prosecuted for that leak of classified information?
And then things would get really interesting… Consider the ramifications.

An honest answer would prove the media lied for 18 months about the content of the FISA application. They’ve had it since March 2017. That’s how the New York Times knew to FOIA it. That’s why the New York Times filed the FOIA, to use it more openly.

An honest answer would prove the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity in the coup effort.

An honest answer would explain why the SSCI would only approve of nominees who would not expose their activity. Remember, the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, etc. all require confirmation from the SSCI (including Chair and Vice-Chair); and the answer would highlight SSCI members were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.

An honest answer would explain how Vice-Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced. Mark Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe…. and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.

An honest answer would also explain why former DOJ-NSD lawyer Michael Atkinson was recommended to become Intelligence Community Inspector General…. And why the SSCI approved. An honest answer would explain why ICIG Atkinson participated in the second soft-coup effort via the “whistle-blower.”

An honest answer would explain the unique nature of all the interests in/around Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House intel committee, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD… Almost everything reconciles within the sunlight of an honest answer.

An honest answer would highlight several members of the 2016 U.S intel community oversight known as the “gang of eight” were participating in a covert effort against candidate Trump; and how some of the current Go8 members have legal exposure.

The ramifications are far reaching:

Who was Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront in their decision to allow such a weak plea contrast against such severe criminal conduct?
Is it even possible for the United States Dept. of Justice to conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conspiring with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo, CNN and more) survive exposure within that same trial.  The media caught participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?
The downstream consequences are quite dramatic. The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp.
I'd like to know the answers to those questions.
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:33:13 AM EDT
[#39]
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:36:11 AM EDT
[#40]


Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:41:14 AM EDT
[#41]
 must clicky for short vid.

Link Posted: 2/12/2020 2:48:04 AM EDT
[#42]
This is pure insanity and why we are where we are today

ETA this post makes me wonder if they have set traps this year to catch voter fraud red handed?

Link Posted: 2/12/2020 3:23:37 AM EDT
[#43]
This one is from the Manhattan DA's office prosecuting sex crimes (was on the Weinstein trial) and resigned Friday.

Link Posted: 2/12/2020 5:04:31 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Lolz.  Soon.  

I'll be honest. I know the left literally attempted a coup on the presidency.  But, if no one is prosecuted before the election, I will not vote in this election.
View Quote
We put Trump in office to do a job.  He's doing it.  But you want to grab the yoke from your commercial pilot because you think you can do better, and you'll crash the whole damned thing and kill everyone before you admit your wrong.  Quit trying to joggle the man's elbow while he's flying.
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 5:18:02 AM EDT
[#45]
Weird FYI:

President Trump's father, Fred Trump's middle name was "Christ"
Fred Trump (DJT's paternal grandmother) mother's maiden name was Christ
DJT's paternal great grandfather's first name was Christian

Doing research on something else, just found this interesting.
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 7:18:53 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Two things:

1. If the Ryan email chain is legit, was it illegal according to the letter of the law? I know Ds+GOPe were freakin’ out that Trump might mess up their diamond encrusted play pen, but was it an illegal act?

2. If Ryan were to get perp walked (1st), don’t you think it would give the stealth never-Trumpers the final impetus necessary to impeach and remove (fast enough to make you head spin)? The last thing Trump needs is a bi-partisan attack against him.

Remember.... It was reported that if a secret impeachment vote were possible, Trump would already to gone.
View Quote
The last point is Unthinkable.
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 7:39:08 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We put Trump in office to do a job.  He's doing it.  But you want to grab the yoke from your commercial pilot because you think you can do better, and you'll crash the whole damned thing and kill everyone before you admit your wrong.  Quit trying to joggle the man's elbow while he's flying.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Lolz.  Soon.  

I'll be honest. I know the left literally attempted a coup on the presidency.  But, if no one is prosecuted before the election, I will not vote in this election.
We put Trump in office to do a job.  He's doing it.  But you want to grab the yoke from your commercial pilot because you think you can do better, and you'll crash the whole damned thing and kill everyone before you admit your wrong.  Quit trying to joggle the man's elbow while he's flying.
Have you ever noticed the number of people who become lost and ask for directions, then argue with you when you give them directions?

Or have something fucked up and ask for help, then try to tell you how to fix it when you come to their aid?
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 7:40:23 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Would have much greater significance if the question was "Do you know who Q is?"

The question still hasn't been asked.
View Quote
IIRC, it was.

Answer -"When you find out, let me know"
Link Posted: 2/12/2020 7:56:46 AM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Lolz.  Soon.  

I'll be honest. I know the left literally attempted a coup on the presidency.  But, if no one is prosecuted before the election, I will not vote in this election.
View Quote
Where's my tiny violin, I know it's here someplace...

Link Posted: 2/12/2020 8:00:01 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

strategery?
View Quote
tactics.

T's a Master.
Page / 783
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top