Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:10:29 PM EDT
[#1]
Noah must have had a bigger ark than previously thought.
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:11:35 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:



There was the rare Lickalottapuss



And the less rare Megasoreass...
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:12:01 PM EDT
[#3]
My theory is that a fully grown T-rex, based on their typical growth curve, would be 13,000 feet tall, and could carry up to 200 Messiahs.

This is still speculative until a fossilized specimen of this size is found.
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:16:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Haven’t read through the posts. Does the study have an MS Paint diagram?
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:24:33 PM EDT
[#5]
I believe this model to also be accurate

Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:25:10 PM EDT
[#6]
Dinosaurs freak me out.
Link Posted: 11/18/2022 6:27:15 PM EDT
[#7]
Once we manage to clone them and start raising them as livestock - I wonder how large a T-Rex capon/hokie will get.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:40:49 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:54:40 AM EDT
[#9]

There's no proof dinosaurs existed .

Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:55:16 AM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:56:11 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
linky  

The King of the Dinosaurs just got even BIGGER: T.rex was 70% larger than previously thought and could weigh up to 33,000lbs, study claims
Researchers built a model that predicts the typical growth curve of a T. rex
They used this to determine the maximum body size of the dinosaur
This is 33,000 pounds (15,000 kg) - over the weight of a double-decker bus
They warn it is still speculative until a fossilised specimen of this size is found




https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/525420/Screenshot_20221118-131106_Chrome-2604837.jpg

That's what Denise Richards said.  

Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:58:11 AM EDT
[#12]
When you make up Psuedoscience, anything is possible. It keeps changing but no one calls them out on their BS. You know what doesn't keep changing? The Bible.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 1:59:27 AM EDT
[#13]
Guessing it still would taste like chicken
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:04:35 AM EDT
[#14]
LOL. Ain't scientists great? Make shit up and declare it "science". And then mock people of faith for believing in spaghetti monsters. That's great stuff.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:10:21 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


I'll see your gif and raise you a clip from one of my favorite cheesy movies as a kid (still love it!)...

Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:12:38 AM EDT
[#16]
It was speculated some dinos had near indeterminate growth but that whole eating enough prey to keep a 30k lb lizard going would probably get a lot of them if shit got lean.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:16:04 AM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:17:05 AM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

There’s a theory they were mostly scavengers.
Clearly the legs look designed for speed and hunting.
I would be interested in what was there required food range in square miles.
Did they just wander around and eat or did they establish a home base with hunting grounds and mark their turf?
View Quote

Id think something close to a crocodile. With or without water, ambush were the prey has to go.

It would also make a lot of sense if they were more aquatically oriented considering the mass and bipedal locomotion
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:20:02 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It was speculated some dinos had near indeterminate growth but that whole eating enough prey to keep a 30k lb lizard going would probably get a lot of them if shit got lean.
View Quote


They had lots of time to hunt/forage, since their arms were too short to pleasure themselves.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:20:48 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History


Was on a TV channel tonight. Mmmm... Naomi Watts.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 2:32:26 AM EDT
[#21]
Trust the science (TM)
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 3:48:24 AM EDT
[#22]
Your move, Giganotosaurus.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 3:53:08 AM EDT
[#23]
Not 32 thousand or 34 thousand?
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 4:01:03 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


There's no proof dinosaurs existed .

View Quote



That's like your opinion, man.

And it's wrong.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 5:42:29 AM EDT
[#25]
I doubt a bipedal dino would ever get that large.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:05:45 AM EDT
[#26]
My computer model says they are actually 87% larger than perviously thought. I'll take me government cash now
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:10:08 AM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
BS

that is reaching the capacity of bones to carry weight.

Other dinos bigger than the TRex walked on 4 legs.
View Quote


Like bones of brass or iron?
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:11:16 AM EDT
[#28]
The article I read also said that it is believed more than 2.8 billion T-Rexs’ roamed the Earth over the millenia.

Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:49:27 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I guess the skeletons we have found are not definitive. Physical evidence lies. Damn it all!
View Quote




I was thinking I was the only one who had been to a museum and seen actual complete T-Rex skeletons.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:51:50 AM EDT
[#30]
Fake news.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 6:55:02 AM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That’s nothing.  I have a computer-generated image showing they were even bigger than that, and had heretofore unsuspected powers as well:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bOctYfk642U/maxresdefault.jpg
View Quote


That's the BBQ King Edition.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 7:45:14 AM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Red bold parts above essentially call B.S. on their own report.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
linky  

The King of the Dinosaurs just got even BIGGER: T.rex was 70% larger than previously thought and could weigh up to 33,000lbs, study claims
Researchers built a model that predicts
the typical growth curve of a T. rex
They used this to determine the maximum body size of the dinosaur
This is 33,000 pounds (15,000 kg) - over the weight of a double-decker bus
They warn it is still speculative until a fossilised specimen of this size is found


Red bold parts above essentially call B.S. on their own report.


Sounds like they want more funding.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 8:19:02 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




I was thinking I was the only one who had been to a museum and seen actual complete T-Rex skeletons.
View Quote


Uh-huh.
The idea was to lie that the individual specimens that have been found are not the size that they are.
Thank god a couple of smart people like you know better and caught them at it.
/sarc

32 adult t-rex specimens exist.
probably over a billion individuals existed
chanced the biggest was fossilized - approximately zero

gd thinks running some math on how big the biggest individual may have been is somehow a terrible conspiracy
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 8:26:46 AM EDT
[#34]
This might just be science journalism at work. Having seen how my own reasearch was misinterpreted in the press I'm not sure I'm going to jump to condeming the study.

I'm not sure what percentile the journalist is using but she says a 33,000 lb TRex would br like a 6'9" human that's a big clue.  The 99th percentile height for a male human world wide is 6'3.6".  The article seems to be talking about the equivalent of a 5 or 6 sigma TRex which is not very interesting.

Mike
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 8:37:04 AM EDT
[#35]
Hmm well the fossil record, being what it is, represents something other than what the animal looked like. You can “kind of” guess the normal size for the animal based on how many specimens have been found. Of course the more animals you find the better guess on its looks.
Thirty two isn’t a whole hell of a lot to go on and you are basically only getting fossils from areas that had the conditions to fossilize the animal in the first place.
Of the thirty two found they do come in various sizes some smaller (Nanotyrannus) but it’s an ongoing debate of if some of these are young Trex or a different animal all together.
Long story short since most of the animals found are in the same size “area” it would be a good guess that it’s the average size of the animal.
One thing we can all agree on though. Allosaurus was way cooler!
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 8:46:03 AM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
BS

that is reaching the capacity of bones to carry weight.

Other dinos bigger than the TRex walked on 4 legs.
View Quote

Yeah this was my first thought, I know the atmospheric conditions were way different and supposedly super oxygenated which allowed stuff to grow bigger than now, but I assumed bone density/weight limits would be similar given Earth's gravity would probably have been the same.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 9:05:25 AM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They had lots of time to hunt/forage, since their arms were too short to pleasure themselves.
View Quote

I think I have dined with T. Rex before. Their arms were too short to reach the check.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 9:12:43 AM EDT
[#38]
I think they are saying the older T-Rex's had dad bodies.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 9:28:11 AM EDT
[#39]
So they put the bones together wrong?
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 9:44:17 AM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

There’s a theory they were mostly scavengers.
Clearly the legs look designed for speed and hunting.
I would be interested in what was there required food range in square miles.
Did they just wander around and eat or did they establish a home base with hunting grounds and mark their turf?
View Quote


The scavenger theory might also make sense with iirc the skin imprints that exist of them being without feathers.

On the other hand, there's another theory from the late 90s [Hans Gruber voice] I read about it in Science News[/Gruber voice] that tyrannosaurs and other larger predators like them would still be insufficiently powerful to take down big saurupods...unless they worked in packs.

It's really easy to hypothesize that deinonochus and other mansized predators would to take down medium sized prey because it's consistent with wolves and elk.  It's another to start saying big predatory theropods were going around like lions.  And because it's another radical change in how we view these animals (like the resistance to the meteor impact theory or feathers, etc), I don't remember how much traction it gained.

It's also terrifying.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 10:13:46 AM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That study is horse shit of the stupidest kind.
View Quote

It's SCIENCE bro!
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 11:02:57 AM EDT
[#42]
Godzilla Blue Oyster Cult Music Video HD


Attachment Attached File

Link Posted: 11/19/2022 12:07:30 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Nothing less than the .577 Tyrannosaur will do
View Quote


6.5 FistofGod-more is the only choice.




Link Posted: 11/19/2022 12:13:48 PM EDT
[#44]
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 12:45:45 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


6.5 FistofGod-more is the only choice.




View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Nothing less than the .577 Tyrannosaur will do


6.5 FistofGod-more is the only choice.







LAW.
Link Posted: 11/19/2022 3:56:50 PM EDT
[#46]

Picture a 12’ tall, 42’ long chicken.  


Now that’s terrifying.
Link Posted: 12/4/2022 5:26:35 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Picture a 12’ tall, 42’ long chicken.  


Now that’s terrifying.
View Quote

Doubtful
Link Posted: 12/4/2022 5:27:34 AM EDT
[#48]
Link Posted: 12/4/2022 6:31:58 AM EDT
[#49]
*doubt
Link Posted: 12/4/2022 6:35:18 AM EDT
[#50]
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top