User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/4/2023 10:21:49 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes, because it was a reconnaissance vehicle, not a tank. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: he army nomenclature was created for some kind of army reason, no doubt. Yes, because it was a reconnaissance vehicle, not a tank. In fairness the M551 was used much like the M24 after 1943 and if the Army chose to call it a Light Tank it wouldn’t be inaccurate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/5/2023 4:02:17 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I still think that the CV90-120T with it's 120mm gun would have been the better choice https://www.defencetalk.com/military/photos/cv90-120-t.23901/full?d=1514056163 Don't know much about that thing. But the CV-90 is a great IFV. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/6/2023 4:04:07 PM EDT
[#3]
When I think of a "light tank".
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
