User Panel
|
They did a great job of setting up a sequel but never followed through.
|
|
|
|
|
One of, at least.
Quoted: The 1982 Thing was a remake itself. Quoted: According to the commentary by Carpenter and Russell they worked for two weeks on how to film that last scene so that there would be debate about who, if anyone, was still human. |
|
|
LOL I saw it at the base theater at Camp Lejeune. When the head turned into a spider and started skittering away, we all went "You gotta be fucking kidding me!" just as the character said it. Man, we laughed our asses off! It was a tight, barebones, flawless movie.
|
|
A must-watch during the winter. Some really intense scenes and Carpenter created such a stark setting with the smaller group. As usual, he has an ambiguous ending making the watcher think and his music is excellent.
The 1950’s original is also fantastic in its own creepy way and with its music. Love watching it. The prequel was better than I thought it would be but really didn’t add anything. With the exception of Escape from LA, everything Carpenter and Russell did together are must-owns for me. Have only seen that once and it was such a letdown. |
|
|
So many great lines, great filmography and the special effects hold up very well. My kids love it and it is a once a year family favorite.
Kurt and Keith are still alive, someone with some good creativity could do a Thing 2 justice....maybe. |
|
"The generator's gone."
"Maybe we can fix it." "It's GONE, MacReady!" |
|
The original version is my favorite “monster movie”
The 1982 version is the only “horror” movie that I’ll watch. What I always liked was it wasn’t so far out there and far fetched that it could almost be real. |
|
Tough call, both are excellent films. I could probably watch BTILC more often though... ETA- this is a good read. First heard about it on arfcom a few years back... https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/ |
|
Quoted: I know you gentlemen have been through a lot, but when you find the time, I'd rather not spend the rest of this winter TIED TO THIS FUCKING COUCH! That movie is the epitome of old school practical special effects View Quote 'Nightmare On Elm Street' (1984) is right up there in that category. |
|
One of my favorite movies. John Carpenter movies are awesome.
|
|
|
Quoted: The sequel (prequel) was forgettable, but not really awful. I saw it, and remember very little of it. Might watch it again some day... View Quote The thing that turned me off was the CG looked bad in the trailer and marketing. I never went to see it because of that. Later on I learned that they originally planned to do practical effects, and actually got pretty far into it, but it got axed due to cost/time. You can find videos on youtube of the animatronics in action. They looked incredible. Unfortunate because the visceral practical effects is what made the original so memorable. Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
They also did nice job with the prequel released in 2011. If you watch The Thing (2011), then The Thing (1982) immediately after, it feels like one movie. The end of the prequel is the beginning of the original movie.
Watch the after credits scene in the prequel. |
|
|
One of my favorite movies ever. Watched it with my 13 yr old son last weekend for his first time. He loved it!!
ETA: Would love to see it on the big screen. |
|
Quoted: Badass hat. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/139619/ffa48c3c2aaa5c718dd75159d4d39c3f_jpg-2551763.JPG View Quote Mongo wore it better. |
|
|
Quoted: Awesome movie! My E&I team watched this in the day room of Cape Lisburne, Alaska during a bad snow blizzard in 1983 - 84 time frame. Cape Lisburne is 200 miles above the Artic circle (Yes, I know the movie takes place at McMurdo Bay in Antartica), but same conditions. The camp had a total of maybe 12 people in it at the time. When the camp was manned by the USAF, it housed between 200 - 300 people. View Quote Yeah, that would've been the perfect environment for viewing. I used to live in Barrow, Dead Horse, Kotz, and Nome. Flew over you guys and Tin City all the time. Always wondered what life was like for you guys down there. Always wondered if you were allowed any scotch for dumping in your computer when it beat you at chess. |
|
Quoted: No, neither of them were. In the video game sequel Childs was found frozen to death where he was at the end of the movie, and McReady was still alive and helps the player at one point. View Quote It's all right there in the video clip. Watch MacReady's breath and then Childs (he has none). Then MacReady hand Childs a bottle, which is the same bottles they had filled with gasoline to use the Molotov cocktails. Childs drinks gas with no effect. Now you'll tell me that the fire was warm enough so Childs breath doesn't fog, but MacReady is the same distance. Close enough to hand him the bottle. I guess MacReady could have been caring another bottle of booze with the same labels around. You know like you do when you're going to kill an alien in the Arctic and then settle down to have a drink as you die. Then there is the music which amps up right after Childs takes a drink and MacReady looks at him and smirks because he knows. Or, the video game. The Thing (10/10) Movie CLIP - Why Don't We Wait Here, See What Happens (1982) HD |
|
Quoted: The thing that turned me off was the CG looked bad in the trailer and marketing. I never went to see it because of that. Later on I learned that they originally planned to do practical effects, and actually got pretty far into it, but it got axed due to cost/time. You can find videos on youtube of the animatronics in action. They looked incredible. Unfortunate because the visceral practical effects is what made the original so memorable. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/285899/the_thing_3_PNG-2552497.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/285899/the_thing_2_PNG-2552498.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/285899/the_thing_1_PNG-2552499.JPG View Quote I liked the 2011 prequel, it had some good moments and if they had gone with practical effects then that would've made the movie much better. The CGI was really sub-par for some reason. |
|
Quoted: It's all right there in the video clip. Watch MacReady's breath and then Childs (he has none). Then MacReady hand Childs a bottle, which is the same bottles they had filled with gasoline to use the Molotov cocktails. Childs drinks gas with no effect. Now you'll tell me that the fire was warm enough so Childs breath doesn't fog, but MacReady is the same distance. Close enough to hand him the bottle. I guess MacReady could have been caring another bottle of booze with the same labels around. You know like you do when you're going to kill an alien in the Arctic and then settle down to have a drink as you die. Then there is the music which amps up right after Childs takes a drink and MacReady looks at him and smirks because he knows. Or, the video game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA4Ozqt7338 View Quote The game is canon as far as I know, bro. Carpenter endorsed it and did cameo voice acting in it as I recall. I am familiar with all the arguments. I am just telling you straight up, the game is as close to a sequel as the movie has, and it seems to have Carpenter's blessing. Will he change his mind later? Who knows. But he pretty much signed on the the video game as 'correct', and neither one of those guys were a thing. |
|
Quoted: The game is canon as far as I know, bro. Carpenter endorsed it and did cameo voice acting in it as I recall. I am familiar with all the arguments. I am just telling you straight up, the game is as close to a sequel as the movie has, and it seems to have Carpenter's blessing. Will he change his mind later? Who knows. But he pretty much signed on the the video game as 'correct', and neither one of those guys were a thing. View Quote Bro, the video doesn't lie. 1982, no plans for a video game. 2002, hey why don't we make a video game. VIDEO GAME TEAM: John, do you want to make more $ selling the rights to your characters for a video game. JOHN: Sure I do. VIDEO GAME TEAM: Ok, but we need a plot and it's going to deviate from your ending slightly. JOHN: No problem, I'll tell the fans what they want to hear and some will believe and some won't. My mailing address is, when you're ready to send the check. |
|
|
Quoted: And the cast of The Thing is 100% male. And not gay. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Be pretty funny if a 40 year old re-run grosses more than Bros. And the cast of The Thing is 100% male. And not gay. Pretty sure 'The Thing' was as the LBGTQ-LMNOP folks would say is "Species Fluid" ... Bigger_Hammer |
|
|
Quoted: Bro, the video doesn't lie. 1982, no plans for a video game. 2002, hey why don't we make a video game. VIDEO GAME TEAM: John, do you want to make more $ selling the rights to your characters for a video game. JOHN: Sure I do. VIDEO GAME TEAM: Ok, but we need a plot and it's going to deviate from your ending slightly. JOHN: No problem, I'll tell the fans what they want to hear and some will believe and some won't. My mailing address is, when you're ready to send the check. View Quote Ok, *plonk*. |
|
Quoted: It's all right there in the video clip. Watch MacReady's breath and then Childs (he has none). Then MacReady hand Childs a bottle, which is the same bottles they had filled with gasoline to use the Molotov cocktails. Childs drinks gas with no effect. Now you'll tell me that the fire was warm enough so Childs breath doesn't fog, but MacReady is the same distance. Close enough to hand him the bottle. I guess MacReady could have been caring another bottle of booze with the same labels around. You know like you do when you're going to kill an alien in the Arctic and then settle down to have a drink as you die. Then there is the music which amps up right after Childs takes a drink and MacReady looks at him and smirks because he knows. Or, the video game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA4Ozqt7338 View Quote Childs does have breath. Look at 1:28 in the video you included. It's there. You're reading as deep into nothing as Kubrick nuts do with The Shining. |
|
Quoted: Childs does have breath. Look at 1:28 in the video you included. It's there. You're reading as deep into nothing as Kubrick nuts do with The Shining. View Quote Why does anyone think that a person that is a Thing wouldn't have breath that you could see in the cold in the first place? Are you suggesting that you could just point a thermometer at people two tell who is a Thing and who is not? You can clearly see Bennings breath before they light him up, but he was not 100% copied. Pretty sure you can see the dogs breath in the beginning, but I need to double check. |
|
Quoted: Why does anyone think that a person that is a Thing wouldn't have breath that you could see in the cold in the first place? Are you suggesting that you could just point a thermometer at people two tell who is a Thing and who is not? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Childs does have breath. Look at 1:28 in the video you included. It's there. You're reading as deep into nothing as Kubrick nuts do with The Shining. Why does anyone think that a person that is a Thing wouldn't have breath that you could see in the cold in the first place? Are you suggesting that you could just point a thermometer at people two tell who is a Thing and who is not? This too is a good point. And likewise, if you were to hand a Thing a bottle of gasoline, why would you think it wouldn't recognize what it is? |
|
Quoted: This too is a good point. And likewise, if you were to hand a Thing a bottle of gasoline, why would you think it wouldn't recognize what it is? View Quote I agree. The Thing seems to be able to copy your memories and such. (they cab speak english, know everyone's names, know to destroy radios and equipment. They should know the difference between liquor and gasoline as well. |
|
|
Quoted: Definitely in my top 3. Would really like to see it on a big screen! View Quote I did. I took two girls with me, we were all in high school together...As popular as this movie is now, we were the only ones in the theatre. ...and honestly, it made it that much freakier. It was a fairly quiet ride back home in the mountains that night. None of us would have admitted it, but we were all creeped out. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.