User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:50:32 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: “None needed…. It’s just obvious man. WAKE UP.” Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: So there’s no evidence of defamation? It’s a simple yes/no question. “None needed…. It’s just obvious man. WAKE UP.” Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:50:57 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: xxIDontOwnAnyFirearmsxx and nu3gawhat assure us that such a conspiracy exists. Much of what we have seen since 2016 doesn't require conspiracy. There is some level of conspiracy, but in many cases leftists get the tribal gist and go along with the tribe. Much like with, say, government using Twitter to censor. we now know there was actual conspiracy due to the Twitter files, but lots of people (including here) supported the censorship. "Their company their rules", despite the fact they rely on being a platform not editor. The overt censorship was clear but defended in various ways by those who approve of censorship but won't admit it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:51:46 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: “I just know it.”  "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump"  Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. Yes, there is plenty of evidence to suggest they're conspiring to get rid of Trump. That's been the plot since 2016. Btw, I'm not including Trump's counsel. Carroll's counsel is on the list, however. You dont have to say that's the goal. I understand it's hard to admit but you can just let it out here, if you want. Following the law is not the aim here. We just want to get rid of Trump. Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:52:03 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Much of what we have seen since 2016 doesn't require conspiracy. There is some level of conspiracy, but in many cases leftists get the tribal gist and go along with the tribe. Much like with, say, government using Twitter to censor. we now know there was actual conspiracy due to the Twitter files, but lots of people (including here) supported the censorship. "Their company their rules", despite the fact they rely on being a platform not editor. The overt censorship was clear but defended in various ways by those who approve of censorship but won't admit it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: xxIDontOwnAnyFirearmsxx and nu3gawhat assure us that such a conspiracy exists. Much of what we have seen since 2016 doesn't require conspiracy. There is some level of conspiracy, but in many cases leftists get the tribal gist and go along with the tribe. Much like with, say, government using Twitter to censor. we now know there was actual conspiracy due to the Twitter files, but lots of people (including here) supported the censorship. "Their company their rules", despite the fact they rely on being a platform not editor. The overt censorship was clear but defended in various ways by those who approve of censorship but won't admit it. To “fix” this trial would require a lot of folks to act together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:53:16 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: “I just know it.” "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. Yes, there is plenty of evidence to suggest they're conspiring to get rid of Trump. That's been the plot since 2016. Btw, I'm not including Trump's counsel. Carroll's counsel is on the list, however. You dont have to say that's the goal. I understand it's hard to admit but you can just let it out here, if you want. Following the law is not the aim here. We just want to get rid of Trump. Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Then it should be really easy for someone of your vast intellect to produce this evidence. It is, as you say, “in your face”. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:56:57 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: xxIDontOwnAnyFirearmsxx and nu3gawhat assure us that such a conspiracy exists. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. It doesn't take any such conspiracy. xxIDontOwnAnyFirearmsxx and nu3gawhat assure us that such a conspiracy exists. I never mentioned a conspiracy, as in people conspiring behind closed doors(while I don't have evidence of that, I also don't have investigative authority to find out). There is, however, a cult of people trying to destroy Trump all over the country in positions of authority, throughout the media and in small and big towns. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:57:31 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You were on the jury? I've read her version of events. I've watched her "rape fantasy" interview (which wasn't allowed at trial). I've seen her picture in the "rape dress" on the cover of magazines. It's clear bullshit. You are engaging in a form of appeal to authority. The facts don't support your argument (because you really have none), and so you are appealing to corrupt court proceedings as a form of authority. Thinking people realize it's a garbage argument, but it's what you got. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:57:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I never mentioned a conspiracy, as in people conspiring behind closed doors(while I don't have evidence of that, I also don't have investigative authority to find out). There is, however, a cult of people trying to destroy Trump all over the country in positions of authority, throughout the media and in small and big towns. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. It doesn't take any such conspiracy. xxIDontOwnAnyFirearmsxx and nu3gawhat assure us that such a conspiracy exists. I never mentioned a conspiracy, as in people conspiring behind closed doors(while I don't have evidence of that, I also don't have investigative authority to find out). There is, however, a cult of people trying to destroy Trump all over the country in positions of authority, throughout the media and in small and big towns. That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:58:13 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So there’s no evidence of defamation? It’s a simple yes/no question. Yes, there is clear evidence Carrol defamed Trump with fake rape charges. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:58:49 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So there’s no evidence of defamation? It’s a simple yes/no question. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. They, like you, were programmed by media over years to hate Trump. The grounds of all this is lies being told by a crazy woman. There's no evidence. The story doesn't ad up. The damages against Trump were levied against a man innocent of the sexual assault claims defending himself from defamation. But your TDS limits your cognitive function. So there’s no evidence of defamation? It’s a simple yes/no question. Defense against defamation is evidence of defamation? Yes or no? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 1:59:42 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:01:02 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:03:28 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? Defaming her for making fake rape claims? She defamed him. You’re dodging again. Answer the question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:04:32 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:04:49 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? You'd think it would be easy to answer. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:06:03 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: To “fix” this trial would require a lot of folks to act together. Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:06:39 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've read her version of events. I've watched her "rape fantasy" interview (which wasn't allowed at trial). I've seen her picture in the "rape dress" on the cover of magazines. It's clear bullshit. You are engaging in a form of appeal to authority. The facts don't support your argument (because you really have none), and so you are appealing to corrupt court proceedings as a form of authority. Thinking people realize it's a garbage argument, but it's what you got. So, that's a "no?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:08:27 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: To “fix” this trial would require a lot of folks to act together. Leftist media and deep state actors have been setting up TDS for years. Years of propaganda. Ironic how they try to make a big deal of Russian election influence. The biggest influence is by our own lying government. FBI actually lying to get FISA warrants to spy on Trump, and engaging in info campaign after info campaign. Even the indictments of Russian entities was used by the Mueller investigation as a info campaign to reinforce the Russia collusion narrative. The amount of propaganda is massive and everyone with TDS has been infected with it. Those infected can't think clearly, don't know which way is up. Look, you’re dodging the question AGAIN. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:10:30 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Then it should be really easy for someone of your vast intellect to produce this evidence. It is, as you say, “in your face”. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: “I just know it.” "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. Yes, there is plenty of evidence to suggest they're conspiring to get rid of Trump. That's been the plot since 2016. Btw, I'm not including Trump's counsel. Carroll's counsel is on the list, however. You dont have to say that's the goal. I understand it's hard to admit but you can just let it out here, if you want. Following the law is not the aim here. We just want to get rid of Trump. Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Then it should be really easy for someone of your vast intellect to produce this evidence. It is, as you say, “in your face”. Let me just dig up the past 5 years for you of all the anti-Trump articles and media hits of people accusing Trump of endless BS to get him removed or force him to resign..... I don't have to do that, everyone knows. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:10:33 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. I've answered, but you will ignore it. On conspiracy, yes, we know for a fact that multiple conspiracies against Trump have been in play. But big picture there are many (like you) infected with TDS, who will then act along with their programming without need for a specific conspiracy for a given action. Basically, massive info campaigns and gaslighting used to program the "useful" idiots. Hence when in a jury they are going to rule guilty for anything they associate with Trump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:11:05 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You'd think it would be easy to answer. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Answer the question- is there evidence of defamation in this case? Yes, no, or “I don’t know”? You'd think it would be easy to answer. I wasn’t in the courtroom or on the jury. I honestly don’t know- but the most vocal Trumpers in the thread now say there was no conspiracy… so what’s the issue? Unanimous verdict, no conspiracy (by the most extreme of Trump supporters’ analysis). |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:11:16 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Look, you’re dodging the question AGAIN. You are dodging the answer. Of course. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:11:57 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wasn’t in the courtroom or on the jury. I honestly don’t know- but the most vocal Trumpers in the thread now say there was no conspiracy… so what’s the issue? Unanimous verdict, no conspiracy (by the most extreme of Trump supporters’ analysis). Disingenuous. Of course. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:12:08 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Let me just dig up the past 5 years for you of all the anti-Trump articles and media hits of people accusing Trump of endless BS to get him removed or force him to resign..... I don't have to do that, everyone knows. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: “I just know it.” "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. Yes, there is plenty of evidence to suggest they're conspiring to get rid of Trump. That's been the plot since 2016. Btw, I'm not including Trump's counsel. Carroll's counsel is on the list, however. You dont have to say that's the goal. I understand it's hard to admit but you can just let it out here, if you want. Following the law is not the aim here. We just want to get rid of Trump. Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Then it should be really easy for someone of your vast intellect to produce this evidence. It is, as you say, “in your face”. Let me just dig up the past 5 years for you of all the anti-Trump articles and media hits of people accusing Trump of endless BS to get him removed or force him to resign..... I don't have to do that, everyone knows. Liking or disliking an opponent doesn’t tell me anything. You said that evidence of conspiracy was “in my face”. Show me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:12:32 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wasn’t in the courtroom or on the jury. I honestly don’t know- but the most vocal Trumpers in the thread now say there was no conspiracy… so what’s the issue? Unanimous verdict, no conspiracy (by the most extreme of Trump supporters’ analysis). Neither was I. Many here apparently were, though. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:13:02 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So, that's a "no?" There was no rape, the defamation was by Carrol against Trump. The facts make that clear. TDS scrambled your mind. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:14:27 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Neither was I. Many here apparently were, though. Appeal to authority. Fake authority since it is a corrupt court. Appeal to fake authority is all you got. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:14:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There was no rape, the defamation was by Carrol against Trump. The facts make that clear. TDS scrambled your mind. So, that's a "no?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:14:37 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Disingenuous. Of course. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I wasn’t in the courtroom or on the jury. I honestly don’t know- but the most vocal Trumpers in the thread now say there was no conspiracy… so what’s the issue? Unanimous verdict, no conspiracy (by the most extreme of Trump supporters’ analysis). Disingenuous. Of course. There was conspiracy, then there wasn’t, now there’s conspiracy again. You dodged the question as to whether there was evidence of defamation… and I’m disingenuous? ROFL. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:14:45 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's winning alright. Another one of Trump's people has flipped. A Mar-a-Lago worker and witness in the classified documents case has flipped on Trump and now won't be prosecuted Mar-a-Lago tech worker cut deal to aid government in Trump classified papers case, defense lawyer says  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhGpBXrgXe4Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I wonder if Trump is tired of winning yet? A Mar-a-Lago worker and witness in the classified documents case has flipped on Trump and now won't be prosecuted Mar-a-Lago tech worker cut deal to aid government in Trump classified papers case, defense lawyer says https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhGpBXrgXe4That’s called the art of the deal! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:15:02 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Appeal to authority. Fake authority since it is a corrupt court. PROVE IT. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:23:22 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:27:02 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Liking or disliking an opponent doesn’t tell me anything. You said that evidence of conspiracy was “in my face”. Show me. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: “I just know it.” "I just know this judge, jury, Caroll and lawyers are telling the truth about Trump" Nobody has said that. More accurately- There is no evidence to suggest that the judge, Carroll, Trump’s counsel, and every possible jury member are all conspiring to achieve a unanimous ruling. Yes, there is plenty of evidence to suggest they're conspiring to get rid of Trump. That's been the plot since 2016. Btw, I'm not including Trump's counsel. Carroll's counsel is on the list, however. You dont have to say that's the goal. I understand it's hard to admit but you can just let it out here, if you want. Following the law is not the aim here. We just want to get rid of Trump. Whether or not they like Trump is irrelevant. Do you have evidence that those parties conspired to achieve this unanimous verdict? If so, you’re about to be rich and famous. If you’re talking out your ass, then you’re going to be laughed at. Hint: “I just know” is meaningless. It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Then it should be really easy for someone of your vast intellect to produce this evidence. It is, as you say, “in your face”. Let me just dig up the past 5 years for you of all the anti-Trump articles and media hits of people accusing Trump of endless BS to get him removed or force him to resign..... I don't have to do that, everyone knows. Liking or disliking an opponent doesn’t tell me anything. You said that evidence of conspiracy was “in my face”. Show me. High elected officials all over the country were trying to get him removed from office or force him to resign since 2016 with no evidence of wrongdoing. That goes far beyond liking or disliking him. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:29:45 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. Now that we’re back to conspiracy again, you should collect the evidence and present it - fame and fortune could be yours. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:32:50 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: PROVE IT. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Appeal to authority. Fake authority since it is a corrupt court. PROVE IT. Prove it isn’t. When it comes to Trump, no evidence is necessary to fabricate a crime. He answers a phone call, "he must be talking to Putin". That is what we're dealing with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:35:09 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Prove it isn’t. When it comes to Trump, no evidence is necessary to fabricate a crime. He answers a phone call, "he must be talking to Putin". That is what we're dealing with. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Appeal to authority. Fake authority since it is a corrupt court. PROVE IT. Prove it isn’t. When it comes to Trump, no evidence is necessary to fabricate a crime. He answers a phone call, "he must be talking to Putin". That is what we're dealing with. Meaningless appeal to prove a negative. You made the assertion, now try to back it up. Stories without evidence are just stories - but that’s never mattered to you, has it? Stay on target, don’t meander off into the weeds with some distraction - make a claim, back it with evidence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:36:30 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Now that we’re back to conspiracy again, you should collect the evidence and present it - fame and fortune could be yours. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. Now that we’re back to conspiracy again, you should collect the evidence and present it - fame and fortune could be yours. That's all i have in this conspiracy case, although I'm sure there's more if you give me a badge, ( I already have a gun) and orders to go find it. You don't want me to find it though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:37:49 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's all i have in this conspiracy case, although I'm sure there's more if you give me a badge, ( I already have a gun) and orders to go find it. You don't want me to find it though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. Now that we’re back to conspiracy again, you should collect the evidence and present it - fame and fortune could be yours. That's all i have in this conspiracy case, although I'm sure there's more if you give me a badge, ( I already have a gun) and orders to go find it. You don't want me to find it though. It’s all right in your face- you said so. I’d love for you to find it. It’d be a blast. Wild claims based on feels won’t cut it, though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:38:15 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, as long as the democrats are going after Trump and his inner circle, they are not going after you and I. Sure, thats coming, but at least we get some breathing room. It’s not just the Democrats. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:39:20 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Meaningless appeal to prove a negative. You made the assertion, now try to back it up. Stories without evidence are just stories - but that’s never mattered to you, has it? Stay on target, don’t meander off into the weeds with some distraction - make a claim, back it with evidence. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Appeal to authority. Fake authority since it is a corrupt court. PROVE IT. Prove it isn’t. When it comes to Trump, no evidence is necessary to fabricate a crime. He answers a phone call, "he must be talking to Putin". That is what we're dealing with. Meaningless appeal to prove a negative. You made the assertion, now try to back it up. Stories without evidence are just stories - but that’s never mattered to you, has it? Stay on target, don’t meander off into the weeds with some distraction - make a claim, back it with evidence. Your quest for proof awaits you cowboy. Jump on your horse and find it for yourself. I guarantee you it exist but the closer you get, you will find yourself in Trump's shoes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 2:46:11 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It’s all right in your face- you said so. I’d love for you to find it. It’d be a blast. Wild claims based on feels won’t cut it, though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That sounds a lot like a conspiracy… No, it isn't. If you weren't TDS addled you might even see it yourself. So wait- there’s no conspiracy against Trump now? You folks are all over the place. Your gymnastics to not answer sounds like an answer. There most certainly was a conspiracy against Trump in the FBI. I think there is one ongoing right now. One of the attorney in the DOJ involved in investigating Trump was dispatched to the NY DA's office to continue that for Alvin Bragg allegedly. Do you want the attorney's name? Also, this hasn't been investigated for obvious reasons, they're trying to get rid of Trump, not exonerate him. Now that we’re back to conspiracy again, you should collect the evidence and present it - fame and fortune could be yours. That's all i have in this conspiracy case, although I'm sure there's more if you give me a badge, ( I already have a gun) and orders to go find it. You don't want me to find it though. It’s all right in your face- you said so. I’d love for you to find it. It’d be a blast. Wild claims based on feels won’t cut it, though. Don't worry - Donald J. Trump himself promised us all IRRUTABLE EVIDENCE of the Georgia Voter Fraud in 2020... Which we were supposed to get back in August... Which Trump said he wouldn't release because his Attorneys told him not too. I'm sure Trumps attorneys are also telling Trump not to take the stand ... but yet...  Trump is the only person on the planet who can repeatedly stomp all over his own dick - using just his jawbone. Bigger_Hammer 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 3:30:33 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It isn't just that they dislike Trump, that would be irrelevant. They also want to see him fail and dropout of the race, spectacularly so. Am I right? I see this all over tv and the internet. The evidence is right there, in your face. I don't just know....everyone knows. Absolutely! I despise Trump because I think he's a terrible candidate, he has done more (and will do much more in the future) to sink conservative causes around the country than any liberal Democrat ever could, and he's an awful human being to boot. Even when I voted for him in both Presidential elections, I was not happy doing so. Since the 2020 election, I have come to realize that the devastation he has caused to principled conservatism is almost insurmountable. With that in mind, I pray that he drops out of the race so that conservatives can start dealing with the cancer that is Trumpism. The cult of personality he has inculcated among his followers disgusts me, as I see it repulsive to worship any slimy politician to such a degree. I would happily vote for ANY of the Republican candidates over Trump 1000 times over. Hope that clears things up for you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 3:33:19 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your quest for proof awaits you cowboy. Jump on your horse and find it for yourself. I guarantee you it exist but the closer you get, you will find yourself in Trump's shoes.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 3:36:23 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Prove it isn’t. That isn’t how it works. You’re making the assertion in the affirmative. The burden of proof is on YOU, not on me to prove a negative. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 3:45:16 PM EDT
[#45]
Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is.
As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 4:01:11 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There was conspiracy, then there wasn’t, now there’s conspiracy again. You dodged the question as to whether there was evidence of defamation… and I’m disingenuous? ROFL. Yes. Yes you are. There has been obvious conspiracy against Trump, but not all actions that resulted are directly conspiracy. The action by the legislature to temporary suspend the law that would have prevented the charges was probably conspiracy. The jury mostly was just sheep infected with TDS mostly resulting from the repeated information operations the government and media created. The judge may or may not have conspired. We know a certain level of conspiracy has been going on, and the real level is greater than that, but it isn't necessary that all actors involved conspired. Many simply know what is wanted of them, and do it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 4:09:56 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face.   She was okay looking back in the 20th century. Trump banged that hog Stormy Daniels when he was married to Ivanka. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 4:18:09 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes. Yes you are. There has been obvious conspiracy against Trump, but not all actions that resulted are directly conspiracy. The action by the legislature to temporary suspend the law that would have prevented the charges was probably conspiracy. The jury mostly was just sheep infected with TDS mostly resulting from the repeated information operations the government and media created. The judge may or may not have conspired. We know a certain level of conspiracy has been going on, and the real level is greater than that, but it isn't necessary that all actors involved conspired. Many simply know what is wanted of them, and do it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: There was conspiracy, then there wasn’t, now there’s conspiracy again. You dodged the question as to whether there was evidence of defamation… and I’m disingenuous? ROFL. Yes. Yes you are. There has been obvious conspiracy against Trump, but not all actions that resulted are directly conspiracy. The action by the legislature to temporary suspend the law that would have prevented the charges was probably conspiracy. The jury mostly was just sheep infected with TDS mostly resulting from the repeated information operations the government and media created. The judge may or may not have conspired. We know a certain level of conspiracy has been going on, and the real level is greater than that, but it isn't necessary that all actors involved conspired. Many simply know what is wanted of them, and do it. So the results of a conspiracy aren’t conspiracy? What kind of mushmouthed weaselspeak is this? Do you even read this stuff after you type it? Everybody who doesn’t agree with me is a sheep with TDS? That’s not a very convincing argument. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 4:20:38 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Imagine a world where's it's defamation/slander to call your accuser a liar or "crazy" - which that bitch obviously is. As though it's believable that a man who, at the time, was fucking the most beautiful women in the world, would give her even a second glance. It's absurd on its face. Trump would never cheat on his wife… No, wait…. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2023 4:21:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes. Yes you are. There has been obvious conspiracy against Trump, but not all actions that resulted are directly conspiracy. The action by the legislature to temporary suspend the law that would have prevented the charges was probably conspiracy. The jury mostly was just sheep infected with TDS mostly resulting from the repeated information operations the government and media created. The judge may or may not have conspired. We know a certain level of conspiracy has been going on, and the real level is greater than that, but it isn't necessary that all actors involved conspired. Many simply know what is wanted of them, and do it.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
