User Panel
Would be great to put the $23-$24 trading range permanently in the rear view mirror.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By bayoushooter: Smokey's 1200 hours update: https://i.imgur.com/cbvkt9Z.jpg 3.77 million returned. ETA: then he added this View Quote Would ne nice if they GTFO completely, but I don't see that happening. |
|
q3131: I can enjoy necrobeastialexhibitionism as much as the next guy, but homonecrobestailexhibitionism is just plain sick.
Tomislav:If you truly love something, you need to shoot it, then set it on fire. (And then post pics!) كا |
Originally Posted By bayoushooter: Smokey's 1200 hours update: https://i.imgur.com/cbvkt9Z.jpg 3.77 million returned. ETA: then he added this View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bayoushooter: Smokey's 1200 hours update: https://i.imgur.com/cbvkt9Z.jpg 3.77 million returned. ETA: then he added this 4.66 million now. Hold! Interesting. Makes me wonder if someone got tipped off about something. |
|
|
Assuming mvis is victorious over the shorts, and the dust settles... is it public knowledge how much of a loss the shorts take or would it just be speculation?
Would be icing on the cake if mvis goes to Uranus and brings down a few shitty hedge funds along the way |
|
|
When I finally do end up selling down the road, can I take all that money and park it in a ETF for a year to avoid STCG tax?
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By apexcrusade: Would be great to put the $23-$24 trading range permanently in the rear view mirror. View Quote Attached File |
|
|
|
q3131: I can enjoy necrobeastialexhibitionism as much as the next guy, but homonecrobestailexhibitionism is just plain sick.
Tomislav:If you truly love something, you need to shoot it, then set it on fire. (And then post pics!) كا |
|
Sliding back a bit.
Must be them bull titties. |
|
|
Originally Posted By apexcrusade: I do keep an eye on the amount shown under 'available funds for trading', sometimes but I've never noticed any day trading complications. I also have TDAmeritrade and think their platform is awesome. I have 2 cash accounts, my ROTH and my wife's IRA there, all linked together so maybe they give me a pass. View Quote There should not be any pass. The 25k limit for 3 day trades had been around for a long time. It is not something a broker has leniency in enforcing. It is SEC/FINRA. Every single broker will limit your account if under 25k and being flagged as PDT. And that should/would be enforced per account. ETA- For clarification the link is simply for convenience from the broker to you. If there is a separate account number then they will all be treated as such, separate accounts and all subject to the 25k rule. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By FannyPackZach: When I finally do end up selling down the road, can I take all that money and park it in a ETF for a year to avoid STCG tax? View Quote No, there is no timeframe in between trades to float money to another investment or trade. Once the transaction is completed it is taxable if it is in a cash account (non ira) |
|
|
|
When the Tide is out you can see who swims naked
AZ, USA
|
|
- Official ARFCOM Nickname: Hardware
- Originally Posted By elcope: Er ist ein Bier leener "It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice" H.P. Baxxter |
Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors.
Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of generating. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They’ve determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can’t be processed efficiently or isn’t necessary. More bullish is that they’re already spec’ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. |
|
|
Originally Posted By TheTech-1: No, there is no timeframe in between trades to float money to another investment or trade. Once the transaction is completed it is taxable if it is in a cash account (non ira) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TheTech-1: Originally Posted By FannyPackZach: When I finally do end up selling down the road, can I take all that money and park it in a ETF for a year to avoid STCG tax? No, there is no timeframe in between trades to float money to another investment or trade. Once the transaction is completed it is taxable if it is in a cash account (non ira) |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They've determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can't be processed efficiently or isn't necessary. More bullish is that they're already spec'ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They've determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can't be processed efficiently or isn't necessary. More bullish is that they're already spec'ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. View Quote Very cool. I just bought a bunch more at 23 |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of generating. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." View Quote Agreed. There's something happening here. This is the biggest announcement in the history of the company and we are seeing little price action. ETA: On record volume |
|
“Let’s avoid any plant based ass rapery.” - Aimless
"Enough about self-defense, you need to learn self-offense." - Sensei |
Originally Posted By RatherBeLifting: Agreed. There's something happening here. This is the biggest announcement in the history of the company and we are seeing little price action. ETA: On record volume View Quote Don't forget that we were at ~$10 recently. There are a LOT of shorts covering, some new ones getting in and likely a metric crap ton of profit taking from the ~$10 guys that missed the Monday spike. |
|
Nothing to see_here folks, move along.
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of generating. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They've determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can't be processed efficiently or isn't necessary. More bullish is that they're already spec'ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of generating. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They’ve determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can’t be processed efficiently or isn’t necessary. More bullish is that they’re already spec’ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. View Quote This makes me even more interested to hear what Ford has to say on its EC this afternoon. Ford has promised a launch of an autonomous vehicle in 2022, using a combination of cameras and Lidar. They also dumped Velodyne back in February. Hmmmm. |
|
|
Inky who rides a Harley--- and has a Job. Da--fuk
TN, USA
|
No life changing money for me.. but I would like to be able to knock a decent chunk outta some debt... We need 100 a share damnit lol
|
|
Haha, just messing with you on the phrasing. Wouldn't be at all surprised to see the price stick right around $23.50 going into the EC. Looking at the range yesterday and today, it's basically $19 - $28 so $23.50 is exactly in the middle of the extremes.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RatherBeLifting: Agreed. There's something happening here. This is the biggest announcement in the history of the company and we are seeing little price action. ETA: On record volume View Quote Smokey's updates are a good indicator, millions of shares borrow/return/repeat. |
|
q3131: I can enjoy necrobeastialexhibitionism as much as the next guy, but homonecrobestailexhibitionism is just plain sick.
Tomislav:If you truly love something, you need to shoot it, then set it on fire. (And then post pics!) كا |
Originally Posted By slabertooch: I think this is where some of Nvidia's tech can come into play. View Quote Yes x 100. GPUs are off the hook and the preferred hardware to mine crypto. SoC, system on a Chip is going to shock the world. Edge computing partnership w/Cloudfare. If MVIS just gets the whiff of a partnership w/NVIDIA we're gonna light the 2nd stage rockets |
|
If a Crocodile could reach Uranus, would he lick it?
|
Originally Posted By dbrowne1: This makes me even more interested to hear what Ford has to say on its EC this afternoon. Ford has promised a launch of an autonomous vehicle in 2022, using a combination of cameras and Lidar. They also dumped Velodyne back in February. Hmmmm. View Quote I'm leaning that way as well. Judy Curran and Seval Oz's experience is so absolutely...pointed, it's hard to believe this isn't a deal that's been in gestation for weeks, if not months. There are still plenty of potential dance partners, which is where MVIS' little turn to "evaluating strategic options" came from, but suddenly I'm having another of those small moments of clarity that settle my rustled jimmies and tell me this is much less random and chaotic than it appears... and very much unfolding by design. |
|
|
This country is too weak to address the crying Karens and Snowflakes, much less take on legitimate white collar crime and the theft of a nation...
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. View Quote Can you explain what is going on, I'd love to understand it better. |
|
|
Question for you guys regard Roth and making contribution withdrawals.
I put $3,000 into my Roth, and invest $1500 into A, and $1500 into B. A doesn't move and is still worth $1500. B however doubles in value and is now worth $3000. I sell B. Can I withdraw that $3,000 and leave A alone? Or do I have to withdraw "the same" dollars for it to count as a contribution withdrawal? |
|
https://www.saf.org/
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/ |
Originally Posted By Total53: Yes x 100. GPUs are off the hook and the preferred hardware to mine crypto. SoC, system on a Chip is going to shock the world. Edge computing partnership w/Cloudfare. If MVIS just gets the whiff of a partnership w/NVIDIA we're gonna light the 2nd stage rockets View Quote Im telling you these two would pair very well. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Kuraki: Question for you guys regard Roth and making contribution withdrawals. I put $3,000 into my Roth, and invest $1500 into A, and $1500 into B. A doesn't move and is still worth $1500. B however doubles in value and is now worth $3000. I sell B. Can I withdraw that $3,000 and leave A alone? Or do I have to withdraw "the same" dollars for it to count as a contribution withdrawal? View Quote With a Roth you can always withdraw your contribution amount tax/penalty free. The moment you touch earnings is where you run into issues. When you make a withdraw from a Roth, the first dollars out are contribution dollars. You can find your contribution amounts on tax form 5498 for each year you make a contribution if you need to go back and look. So, in your example, if you put in 3k and withdraw 3k, you're good. The contribution and the distribution will be reported (5498 and 1099 respectively), but when you file your taxes you can indicate the distribution as removal of a contribution. There may be other items at play, so talk to a tax advisor about your specific situation, and don't trust some rando on the internet. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Kuraki: Question for you guys regard Roth and making contribution withdrawals. I put $3,000 into my Roth, and invest $1500 into A, and $1500 into B. A doesn't move and is still worth $1500. B however doubles in value and is now worth $3000. I sell B. Can I withdraw that $3,000 and leave A alone? Or do I have to withdraw "the same" dollars for it to count as a contribution withdrawal? View Quote I have no idea, but it has to be fungible. Or you could sell A, withdraw original $, buy back A in 3 seconds. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Kuraki: Question for you guys regard Roth and making contribution withdrawals. I put $3,000 into my Roth, and invest $1500 into A, and $1500 into B. A doesn't move and is still worth $1500. B however doubles in value and is now worth $3000. I sell B. Can I withdraw that $3,000 and leave A alone? Or do I have to withdraw "the same" dollars for it to count as a contribution withdrawal? View Quote Roth contributions can be taken out at any time tax free as tax free dollars went in. So if you contributed $3000 you can withdraw $3000 anytime you want, penalty free |
|
"Problem in Venezuela is not that socialism has been poorly implemented, but that socialism has been faithfully implemented."
|
Originally Posted By cmsnare: With a Roth you can always withdraw your contribution amount tax/penalty free. The moment you touch earnings is where you run into issues. When you make a withdraw from a Roth, the first dollars out are contribution dollars. You can find your contribution amounts on tax form 5498 for each year you make a contribution if you need to go back and look. So, in your example, if you put in 3k and withdraw 3k, you're good. The contribution and the distribution will be reported (5498 and 1099 respectively), but when you file your taxes you can indicate the distribution as removal of a contribution. There may be other items at play, so talk to a tax advisor about your specific situation, and don't trust some rando on the internet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By cmsnare: Originally Posted By Kuraki: Question for you guys regard Roth and making contribution withdrawals. I put $3,000 into my Roth, and invest $1500 into A, and $1500 into B. A doesn't move and is still worth $1500. B however doubles in value and is now worth $3000. I sell B. Can I withdraw that $3,000 and leave A alone? Or do I have to withdraw "the same" dollars for it to count as a contribution withdrawal? With a Roth you can always withdraw your contribution amount tax/penalty free. The moment you touch earnings is where you run into issues. When you make a withdraw from a Roth, the first dollars out are contribution dollars. You can find your contribution amounts on tax form 5498 for each year you make a contribution if you need to go back and look. So, in your example, if you put in 3k and withdraw 3k, you're good. The contribution and the distribution will be reported (5498 and 1099 respectively), but when you file your taxes you can indicate the distribution as removal of a contribution. There may be other items at play, so talk to a tax advisor about your specific situation, and don't trust some rando on the internet. I think there is a clause about taking it out before its seasoned. I think you have to wait 5 yrs. Caused me some hassle last year as I didn't know. There may be some exceptions but you may want to check into that. |
|
|
Originally Posted By wyomingnick: Can you explain what is going on, I'd love to understand it better. View Quote Sound about right? |
|
|
Originally Posted By rustyboy: I have no idea, but it has to be fungible. Or you could sell A, withdraw original $, buy back A in 3 seconds. View Quote Fungible means that you can swap pieces/units without any loss - they're interchangeable. So, if I owe you $20, you I could pay you with a a $20, 2x $10, 4x $5s etc - you don't really care, you got your $20 back. That's fungibility. The IRS only cares about money into and out of IRAs - that's whats reported. If you put in $5k and take $5k out, that's what they'll see. The fact that you turned your $5k in to $1m in the account in the mean time doesn't matter to the IRS until you start to withdraw it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By wyomingnick: I think there is a clause about taking it out before its seasoned. I think you have to wait 5 yrs. Caused me some hassle last year as I didn't know. There may be some exceptions but you may want to check into that. View Quote There are 5 year seasoning rules on Roths, but they have to do with removal of earnings, conversion funds (funds moved over from a traditional IRA or 401k), or inherited Roths. If the account owner made a cash contribution, it can be withdrawn at any time without tax or penalty. Thanks for pointing these out though - as I said in my original post, there may be other factors at play, so a discussion with a tax advisor (which I am not), is advised. |
|
|
|
|
If a Crocodile could reach Uranus, would he lick it?
|
"I'm like some kind of evil retard Santa Claus that makes you buy your own toys." -beitodesstrafe
"I keep hearing 'must have a dialogue,' but I keep being told to shut up when I speak." -Sand_Pirate |
Originally Posted By TheTech-1: Im telling you these two would pair very well. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By TheTech-1: Originally Posted By Total53: Yes x 100. GPUs are off the hook and the preferred hardware to mine crypto. SoC, system on a Chip is going to shock the world. Edge computing partnership w/Cloudfare. If MVIS just gets the whiff of a partnership w/NVIDIA we're gonna light the 2nd stage rockets Im telling you these two would pair very well. I would like to see it. LiDAR (and other sensors) for swarm autonomy (like cars and smart streets) needs both low latency and high computation for the fusion needed to overcome local blind spots, realtime QC, and swarm-sourced data product generation. Network/edge embedded computation efficiencies are one side of the coin: the other is protocol and telemetry (which is a totally different problem). The second that we start playing with computer vision from more than just a single vehicle source, it gets really complicated. But that is where the cutting edge is right now for all things computer vision and sensor fusion. I'm playing with some rotating LiDAR and Nvidia Jetson at the edge in a distributed sensing research project. Not trying to overcome the latency issues yet, but serious teams elsewhere have to be a lot farther down that road. |
|
COVID v. unstable society: Which impacts your quality of life?
"The liberties protected by the Constitution are not fair-weather freedoms - in place when times are good but able to be cast aside in times of trouble" -Judge Stickman |
Originally Posted By goodasgone81: Assuming mvis is victorious over the shorts, and the dust settles... is it public knowledge how much of a loss the shorts take or would it just be speculation? Would be icing on the cake if mvis goes to Uranus and brings down a few shitty hedge funds along the way View Quote Anyone shorting MVIS at this point is taking a massive risk. I don't see how it's worth the potential reward. |
|
"I'm like some kind of evil retard Santa Claus that makes you buy your own toys." -beitodesstrafe
"I keep hearing 'must have a dialogue,' but I keep being told to shut up when I speak." -Sand_Pirate |
Originally Posted By Admiral_Crunch: Anyone shorting MVIS at this point is taking a massive risk. I don't see how it's worth the potential reward. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Admiral_Crunch: Originally Posted By goodasgone81: Assuming mvis is victorious over the shorts, and the dust settles... is it public knowledge how much of a loss the shorts take or would it just be speculation? Would be icing on the cake if mvis goes to Uranus and brings down a few shitty hedge funds along the way Anyone shorting MVIS at this point is taking a massive risk. I don't see how it's worth the potential reward. Well, when you front run sales and control the market, it minimizes that risk. |
|
“Let’s avoid any plant based ass rapery.” - Aimless
"Enough about self-defense, you need to learn self-offense." - Sensei |
Originally Posted By Bthorn: Let me try. Shorts saw the microvision run up without supporting news, so the flanks looked vulnerable. They attacked yesterday, had great results, and decided for another round this morning. Right before open, PR was released about their new Lidar. People started buying. Hedge funds decided they weren't going to allow us peons to gain any ground off the good news and they doubled down, got more ammo, and held the surge back with millions in short sales. Sound about right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Bthorn: Originally Posted By wyomingnick: Can you explain what is going on, I'd love to understand it better. Sound about right? Makes sense. What do you mean more ammo, just spend more money ? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Osprey61: Can't watch the price action, it's just makes me angry at what this country has become. This is bald-faced manipulation, and I don't care how you rationalize it, we've become too weak to address the problem...or we have a very serious problem with a casino-mentality about the market developing in our younger investors. Anyway...important stuff. Good conversation about the resolution point cloud coming in well under what we know the Lidar is capable of generating. It caught some people off guard this morning, but I'd forgotten Sumit had already talked it. The take-away is fairly profound. "...the highest resolution point cloud at 10.8 million points per second while operating at 30 hertz ..." Some people already mentioned that earlier a point cloud of approx 20m points per second was communicated. But: In the previous CC Summit told that they lowered the framerate to reduce necessary computing power and to make it more easy to syncronize our lidar with existing camera sensors. So, earlier, our scan rate had higher FPS. So, if we double the framerate from 30Hz to 60Hz, the total amount of collected points per second would also double. Approx 21,6 million points. I understand that the lower point cloud per second is not because of a restriction of OUR Lidar but rather that it has been tuned down to a 30Hz-10.8M points per sec to make it easier to be implemented with existing hardware today on the market... - and - They've determined on their own or received feedback that the added data either can't be processed efficiently or isn't necessary. More bullish is that they're already spec'ing based on partnership/acquisition request/feedback. Consensus among the LTLs and SMEs is the actual Lidar was completed - and been in the hands of the interested parties - for several weeks now. I do know they told Sumit way back that the base figures met all requirements, and not to waste time over-developing the unit...but for us, it's an incredible portend to understand we de-tuned the Lidar to meet current requirements, which means we can over-clock (I think that's an applicable term) at will when Elon has the computing platform to handle the data generated. That's huge when the closest competitors can't even match the reduced output. View Quote That is great to hear. Thanks again for the hundredth time for the continued great info. |
|
"I'm like some kind of evil retard Santa Claus that makes you buy your own toys." -beitodesstrafe
"I keep hearing 'must have a dialogue,' but I keep being told to shut up when I speak." -Sand_Pirate |
"I'm like some kind of evil retard Santa Claus that makes you buy your own toys." -beitodesstrafe
"I keep hearing 'must have a dialogue,' but I keep being told to shut up when I speak." -Sand_Pirate |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.