That's pretty cool.  You'd think there would be a lot more info on this phenomenon if it was pretty profound.  I suppose I'm assuming it'd be common for rocks changing after being hit by lightning to be known about before modern science, just at visible level.

Best "Other" related topic:  Global Warming
With "Anthropogenic Global Warming", they keep releasing new studies that directly conflict with the studies released 30, 20 or even 1 year ago.  The result of these studies conflicting is the same - Must re-distribute pollution and use less energy/luxury/civilization.   The reasons why those must be reduced are unrelated to the actual studies published, mostly explaining the flaws in drastic predictions which proved not only false, but the exact opposite of what did occur.   The same "solution" is needed to stop the new change,  else we'll all die in 20 years.  Some people still believe it

Archeology is the same, the history is settled, We've been told the entire history and that's just how it is.  Any evidence found to the contrary will be explained away or ignored, since it would interfere with settled science.   Why would Archeology be an essentially closed system of study?   People that decide to be archeologists are idealists talking about what they'd like to do and how to share information to everybody.  Once they become archaeologists, they keep their ideals and promises as well as a run of the mill politician.

There's too much information and it's no longer entirely contained.  I don't know what the "Real Story" is, though I've seen and read enough to have a very good inkling that it isn't what we've been told.

There's a lot out there, just not in video format.  Also not in archeology really.  Mostly mentions of them in archeology, no big write ups.  The majority comes from photos and stories people re-told while on vacation, then looked up what they could find later.  Some of it is on Wikipedia, but since they don't allow personal stories to be shared, it's usually the short name and a photo as a Stub article or merged into some other one that's not in a category like "South American Archeology Sites" and similar.

Even the best photos of the big caves in India are from vacation photo collections people blogged and wrote a bit about, and there's not a lot with them for scale/depth in photo alone.   The Good Bloggers at least wrote enough information with the photos so they can be found with bing (google was better at fuzzy keywords, but I don't use that anymore).

Throw a dart at a map and there's some old archeological stuff related, near or far history, likely even local to you.   Sadly, we only find out about many of these from people saying Aliens and time travel are the reason they exist, and other such things.  Therefore, the videos are great for learning about other existing sites to specifically look at, but the rest of their theories can be tossed out easily.   Many refuse to even watch videos titled with the shocking ancient aliens type titles, and don't know they're missing a lot by ignoring the fluff at 2x+ speed for the nuggets within.

I haven't looked at related videos for a month or two now, and haven't come up with many things in the format people in this thread like (videos).  Some photos with scant info, but forgot where/when, I forgot to post link in this thread, most of it was unrelated to topic, but the site wasn't.   I don't have a browser history, maybe I should ask Google when I saw a neat ancient site in the cartel controlled area of Columbia which was half pilfered but outline and scraps visible.  Would be a great place to dig, but with the way archeologists sort of take over everything and want a sterile and safe area, that won't work in cartel grow areas.

IIRC, there was one video on something like that site already, this was just another.

--ETA:  And, after 41 pages, The consensus of most in this thread, as to the answer to the question in the title, is "We don't know who did it, and we don't know how it was done, but it's apparently different than who we were told did it and how they did it".

Here's a popular longer video on Easter Island.  The other one is them moving a statue.

Seems like a lot of work for an island essentially that ran completely out of resources.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH0sIjAHBVY[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH0sIjAHBVY

You're talking about phase / ø / 𝑖 aka imaginary numbers without the word for concept since it's not really in typical math classes.  𝑖=√-1   The concept is fundamental in pre-calc to all engineering and higher math as a core concept, as well as in video game graphics development, gyroscopes, etc.  It's not just "a geek thing".

Any time 𝑖 is in an equation, there is a difference of angle/rotation involved relative to the basis vector.

Polar to cartesian:

5⦟53.13° = 3+4𝑖   Both are imaginary numbers, one states the angle the object with radius 5 is at, the other puts it as cooardinates on the imaginary rectangular / Cartesian plane.

Easy intro, From Euler's Formula e^𝑖π=-1 to Second video which has multiple dimension operations.  The numerical base system involved wouldn't remove the necessity to additionally state the angle/phase/spatial relationship of the number to another one.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0yfvm0UoU[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_0yfvm0UoU

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvmuCPvRoWQ[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvmuCPvRoWQ

NOTE:  The above may seem off topic, but the mathematical concepts related to these fundamental and now, more complete, math details would have been required to be known for an advanced civilization by a few, maybe with different names and syntax, as the post I quoted.  Imaginary numbers and pi are fundamental for circles, AC power (since power is brought up a lot), detecting direction of a sound by arrival time difference between two ears, waves, natural phenomenon, and a lot more.  Most of it is dusted over in the average math class, the equations and answers are given without the "why" and don't want anybody to understand further, since it would mean teaching above what's required for their grade level standardized test, aka "more un-needed work for teacher".

Old site foun in Siberia.  10,000 yrs or so.

ARF Thread

Actual article:
Researchers discover ancient ‘weapon-making site’ - beside the skeleton of ‘hunted’ woolly mammoth



ARF Thread 2 of Neanderthals gluing tools onto handles with resins.

Archeological chronology doesn't always jive with things seen elsewhere in the world around that same time by large margins.  Cycles.

Stonehenge source found

The rocks making Stonehenge are from a quarry 180 miles away.  The other mounds in UK were generally within 10 miles of the quarry the rock came from.

Things other than Stonehenge in UK

7 Other constructions similar to Stonehenge (worldwide)

We've tossed around ideas in this thread, though so far we've come to the conclusion that we do not know.

They'd go through a whole lot of trees making a log road to roll them over, not to mention manpower for the size of blocks involved, Stonehenge rocks are pretty small chunks compared to the 'megalith' stones from Africa to Iraq and Turkey which were moved greater distances (500 mi+ in one case).

@fyeguy

Please grab photos and post them here!  Close ups of neat stonework and other stuff we don't normally see would be appreciated.  No alien theories needed, I just think it's cool to see that sort of stuff.