Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 9/13/2024 12:01:26 AM EDT
[#1]
I don't think I saw anything on the news about the rally today - I wonder if they had anyone turn out..
Link Posted: 9/13/2024 5:45:52 AM EDT
[Last Edit: sbhaven] [#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JeepinMaxx:
I don't think I saw anything on the news about the rally today - I wonder if they had anyone turn out..
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JeepinMaxx:
I don't think I saw anything on the news about the rally today - I wonder if they had anyone turn out..

WTNH has a bit on the rally this morning it includes a little bit of video from the "rally". From the video looks like not many showed up. Protest was likely poorly organized and or people couldn't likely afford to take time off from work to show up during the scheduled protest time. State Senate President Martin Looney (D-District 11) and Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff call the small rally a political stunt and laughably go on to blame Republicans. The state has been Democrat controlled and run for decades and these guys blame this on the Republicans? It feels like the Democrats are just hoping people will sit down, shut up, and take the pain. Wonder if any of this anger by the peasants will be reflected in the Nov. election?

Residents rally against high utility rates outside Capitol

Customers rallied on Thursday outside the Connecticut Capitol to draw attention to their high utility bills.

“We’re mad,” said Cindy Jordan, who organized the protest. “Our electric bills are outrageous. The cost of living in this state has risen to a point where people are angry. I think this was the final nail in the coffin.”

It comes after residents across the state said they’ve seen their electricity bills go up by hundreds, if not thousands over the summer.

Utility customers said one of their major complaints is from the public benefits charges.

The utility companies have said they’re using that extra charge to recover costs from the pandemic and to invest in electric vehicle programs.

“I don’t think it’s fair, because many of us are doing the right thing by paying our bills are we go,” said Elaine Starr, a protestor. “I don’t ask for help, but then I have to take on more jobs and responsibilities to make ends meet.”

On top of that, the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority approved a rate hike for United Illuminating and Eversource customers last month. Eversource said that would add an extra $3 to the average customer’s bill.

Last month, the organizer of a petition calling for the public benefits charge to be removed told News 8 the “insane” bill are more than most people’s mortgages.

“The disconnect between the governor and his citizens is just astronomical…Everyone is very very very upset about it,” Scott Pearson said.

State Senate President Martin Looney (D-District 11) and Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-District 137) said in a joint statement that “The only thing smaller than the turnout for this political stunt is the handful of dollars the Republican bailout of utility companies will save ratepayers.”

“Democrats will do what we always do: roll up our sleeves, govern, and work to make life better for the people we serve,” they wrote.

On Thursday morning, UI spokesperson Sarah Wall Fliotsos shared the following statement with News 8:

“We understand the increased costs of policymakers’ public policy initiatives in the Public Benefits Charge have been difficult for our customers, particularly over the summer due to increased usage in Connecticut’s hottest month on record. But we also know that continuing to defer these costs will only result in higher bills next year, and that ‘kicking the can down the road’ is, in fact, why customers experienced rate shock this summer.

“To mitigate rate shock like this going forward, we urge PURA to return to forward-looking forecasts that stabilized electric bills for decades, and we ask that legislators consider these bill impacts for the programs they may implement during future legislative sessions.”

In a statement to News 8, an Eversource spokesperson said the company is working with the state to provide “rate stability and predictability.”

“While high energy usage was the primary driver of the significantly higher bills customers recently saw, the corresponding rate increase that began July 1 was a result of Connecticut delaying payments on costs that could have been paid more predictably in the past, an effect of kicking the can down the road,” the statement reads. “With milder temperatures and lower humidity over the last several weeks expected to continue, customers can also expect to see a decrease in their electric bills.”
Link Posted: 9/13/2024 8:53:12 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JeepinMaxx:
I don't think I saw anything on the news about the rally today - I wonder if they had anyone turn out..
View Quote




https://www.wfsb.com/2024/09/12/protest-planned-hartford-over-public-benefits-fund-portion-electric-bills/

Everyone there should have been asked if they voted for Lamont and the rest of the demo-commies


Link Posted: 9/13/2024 8:13:24 PM EDT
[#4]
Idiot #1: I have a great idea, let's hold a rally about the public benefit charge on electric bills that everyone is super pissed off about, we'll do it on a mid week workday and have it at 9 am, tens of thousands will show up.

Idiot #2 Brilliant, why didn't I think of that. This will be awesome.
Link Posted: 9/14/2024 5:25:58 AM EDT
[#5]
Yeah that was a poor idea. I do wonder if that was the only time they were given by the powers that be who regulate capital protest permits. Like it was intentional to give them that time slot.

But lets be honest, 10,000 could have showed up and it likely wouldn't make a difference. CT Democrats routinely ignore such protests no matter how large they are when those protests are against their policies and edicts. In case anyone forgets, the politicians ignored the largest CT protest in history over the "temporary" income tax. Back on Oct 5, 1991 some 50,000 to 65,000 protested at the capital over the income tax. Yet here we are some 32 almost 33 years later still paying that "temporary" income tax. Thanks Lowell Weicker.
Link Posted: 9/14/2024 7:26:05 PM EDT
[#6]
Sadly that is true.
Link Posted: 9/19/2024 3:58:49 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Number_Six] [#7]
In a rare moment of cost analysis, Lamant has opted out of the offshore windmill initiative (ctmirror.org).
"Gov. Ned Lamont told The Connecticut Mirror this week that his reason for caution with a new offshore wind commitment is its high cost that would compound existing high electric rates"
The Reddy Kilowatt Theme Song


My Sept 18 bill: 819.00kWh
Supply Transmission Local Delivery Public Benefits
$71.99 $27.85          $75.50          $70.80
Standard Service Rate: 8.995 ¢/kWh,
CONSTELLATION Supplier Rate: 8.790 ¢/kWh Fixed Term: 24 cycles
If you didn't lock in a fixed rate about 2 months ago, the new supplier rate is about 11 ¢/kWh at energizect.com
Link Posted: 9/19/2024 4:40:24 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Number_Six:
In a rare moment of cost analysis, Lamant has opted out of the offshore windmill initiative (ctmirror.org).
"Gov. Ned Lamont told The Connecticut Mirror this week that his reason for caution with a new offshore wind commitment is its high cost that would compound existing high electric rates"
View Quote

Was it really cost or was is politics or was it NIMBY costal folks?
Note what Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport said about half way down the article:

“Does he pivot right after the election? I would hope so, certainly. I urged him to do that,” Steinberg said. “I would have thought perhaps he would have hedged his bets and made a rather small procurement. … I would have expected something.”

So don't screw us now because of the election coming up, but screw us the day after the election.
Link Posted: 9/19/2024 6:58:01 PM EDT
[#9]
I grabbed that same deal from Constellation for 24 months. Rates look higher now.
Link Posted: 10/24/2024 7:16:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: sbhaven] [#10]
68K sign petition asking Gov. Lamont to take action on energy bills

Eversource customers upset about higher electric rates delivered a petition signed by 68,000 people on Thursday to Gov. Ned Lamont.

The petition’s organizer, Scott Pearson, wants the public benefits charges on customers’ bills to be eliminated.

It took more than 1500 pieces of paper to print them all out, something Pearson said he did because it has “a significant impact.”

“The public benefits part of the bill has nothing to do with electricity,” he said.

There was a knock at the door and a little small talk and then the signatures got delivered. Lamont did not come out and meet with the group.

Donnetta Campbell, from Middlebury, signed the petition and showed up with her bill.

“It’s affecting every person in Connecticut — if you have a small business or a senior citizen, or a family just trying to get by,” she said.

In a lengthy, statement, Eversource wrote that the higher bills “pose significant challenges for customers,” and that the company has been advocating for policies that “provide customers with rate stability and predictability.”

“While increased energy usage was the primary driver of the higher bills customers saw this summer – a result of multiple heatwaves and record-breaking temperatures – the corresponding rate increase that began July 1 was due to Connecticut delaying payments on costs that could have been paid on a more timely basis, lowering costs for customers,” the statement reads. “It’s important to note, the Public Benefits portion of the bill, which we don’t control or profit from, is driven by public policy and legally required to be on all customers’ bills. We support the state’s clean energy and decarbonization goals, and many of the programs covered under Public Benefits provide critical value to customers but these initiatives come at a cost. Reasonable and balanced regulatory decisions that align with the state’s goals and allow these programs to be paid in a timely manner are necessary so customers avoid this type of rate shock in the future.”

State Sen. Jeff Gordon (R-District 35) said the public benefits charges need to shift away from customers’ bills.

“Let the legislature decide what to do with public benefit charges — and if we want them, put them in the budget,” he said.

Lamont said there’s some politics at play with the petition dramatically dropped at his front door. He said most of the public benefit charge relates to carbon-free power that the state gets at a good price.

“I want to increase supply of electricity,” he said. “That’s how we bring down rates, and also negotiate gas and nuclear power and for wind power.”

Lamont said he plans to look at the petition to see who signed it.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top