User Panel
Quoted:
No, that is her sacrifice, not her contribution. You can sacrifice everything and still contribute nothing. She was rewarded for that sacrifice with 4 children and a life of luxury while married to their father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If she sacrificed her career to enable his, then her contribution is her entire potential career over decades, She was rewarded for that sacrifice with 4 children and a life of luxury while married to their father. I've met almosty no women who can see it. It's like they're wired to justify the theft and the mooching. Almost like logic isn't their strong suit or something. Almost. |
|
'I want to smell you, I want to breathe you in': Jeff Bezos' steamy text messages to married TV anchor he was 'having an affair with' which date back to April - nine months before he announced split from his wife of 25 years
Sanchez was voted 'Biggest Flirt' by her classmates at Del Norte High School (Sanchez in left in 1987) There was no sign of Sanchez at her Beverly Hills home on Wednesday as Bezos' divorce was announced The Enquirer says it trailed Bezos and Sanchez for four months in what it calls the 'largest investigation' in the magazine's history, with its photographer catching the lovebirds 'doing the dirty on their spouses'. However they say they have evidence of the affair staring several months before their investigation began. They say they followed Bezos and Sanchez 'across five states and 40,000 miles, tailed them in private jets, swanky limos, helicopter rides, romantic hikes, five-star hotel hideaways, intimate dinner dates and 'quality time' in hidden love nests.' The magazine also claim they once met up at the same hotel in Boston, Massachusetts where the Bezos family stayed when they visited their son at MIT for Parents' Day. More |
|
Quoted:
Did you like giving up your stuff when she cheated on you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. so lets be fair on her lost potential earnings.. so..lets assume she would be at the top of her game and could've brought in 250k per year x 25 years = $6.25 million and to be fair lets pre-fund her retirement = $100 million and lets add some just for shits and giggles = $100 million sooo $250 million should cover everything she "could " have potentiality earned and saved right? and give her a bonus for sticking by him through thick and thin would that be fair? ps. Im not in anyway directing this at you. just curious of your opinion |
|
Quoted:
No, that is her sacrifice, not her contribution. You can sacrifice everything and still contribute nothing. She was rewarded for that sacrifice with 4 children and a life of luxury while married to their father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If she sacrificed her career to enable his, then her contribution is her entire potential career over decades, She was rewarded for that sacrifice with 4 children and a life of luxury while married to their father. |
|
Quoted:
To anyone that is smack talking his wife- I would bet good money that right now, deep down, she would have preferred a middle class life and got to keep her marriage and family intact over being a billionaire View Quote Unless you're low key trying to get some internet poon from the screech patrol. But why? |
|
Quoted:
Her career would have earned 0.00000000000000000000001 of the incredibly luxurious lifestyle he has provided her. He. Provided. Her. She could have done NOTHING to even come close. I've met almosty no women who can see it. It's like they're wired to justify the theft and the mooching. Almost like logic isn't their strong suit or something. Almost. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If she sacrificed her career to enable his, then her contribution is her entire potential career over decades, She was rewarded for that sacrifice with 4 children and a life of luxury while married to their father. I've met almosty no women who can see it. It's like they're wired to justify the theft and the mooching. Almost like logic isn't their strong suit or something. Almost. |
|
Quoted:
No. Because it was MY stuff. I’m the one who earned it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. so lets be fair on her lost potential earnings.. so..lets assume she would be at the top of her game and could've brought in 250k per year x 25 years = $6.25 million and to be fair lets pre-fund her retirement = $100 million and lets add some just for shits and giggles = $100 million sooo $250 million should cover everything she "could " have potentiality earned and saved right? and give her a bonus for sticking by him through thick and thin would that be fair? ps. Im not in anyway directing this at you. just curious of your opinion |
|
Quoted:
But you agreed via marriage to share it with an equal partner. That’s how that works. What’s yours was hers and what’s hers was yours. So it was her stuff too, as you agree upon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. so lets be fair on her lost potential earnings.. so..lets assume she would be at the top of her game and could've brought in 250k per year x 25 years = $6.25 million and to be fair lets pre-fund her retirement = $100 million and lets add some just for shits and giggles = $100 million sooo $250 million should cover everything she "could " have potentiality earned and saved right? and give her a bonus for sticking by him through thick and thin would that be fair? ps. Im not in anyway directing this at you. just curious of your opinion |
|
Didn't realize Cobra-ak had like six alternate accounts, here
|
|
StevenH, what is it you often say are a woman’s most valuable assets?
|
|
Quoted:
'I want to smell you, I want to breathe you in': Jeff Bezos' steamy text messages to married TV anchor he was 'having an affair with' which date back to April - nine months before he announced split from his wife of 25 years https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/14/8360968-6577797-image-a-35_1547132140759.jpghttps://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/14/8360972-6577797-image-m-34_1547132135152.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/13/8357584-6575213-image-a-17_1547126069881.jpg Sanchez was voted 'Biggest Flirt' by her classmates at Del Norte High School (Sanchez in left in 1987) https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/17/8368380-6577797-image-a-21_1547141099103.jpg There was no sign of Sanchez at her Beverly Hills home on Wednesday as Bezos' divorce was announced The Enquirer says it trailed Bezos and Sanchez for four months in what it calls the 'largest investigation' in the magazine's history, with its photographer catching the lovebirds 'doing the dirty on their spouses'. However they say they have evidence of the affair staring several months before their investigation began. They say they followed Bezos and Sanchez 'across five states and 40,000 miles, tailed them in private jets, swanky limos, helicopter rides, romantic hikes, five-star hotel hideaways, intimate dinner dates and 'quality time' in hidden love nests.' The magazine also claim they once met up at the same hotel in Boston, Massachusetts where the Bezos family stayed when they visited their son at MIT for Parents' Day. More View Quote Patrolled [ ] Not Patrolled [ X ] Attached File |
|
Quoted:
I'll bet there's a fair amount of truth in your post. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
StevenH, what is it you often say are a woman’s most valuable assets? View Quote The reward for being a stay at home spouse should be room and board. It's essentially an early retirement. Get to sit on your ass and have everything provided for you. it should not come with cash and prizes when the relationship ends. Get a job, you go girl. You don't need a man (or his money). ETA: prior to feminist society, a woman's parents would pay a man to marry her because they realized the financial burden he was taking on to provide for her. Now society expects him to provide for her without compensation and not only continue after the marriage fails, but to reward her with far more than needed to survive. |
|
Reminds me of that saying that’s usually written on a bar men’s bathroom wall. “You May think she’s a peach, but there’s another man who’s sick of her shit”
|
|
Quoted:
I understand that our feminist society sees it that way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. so lets be fair on her lost potential earnings.. so..lets assume she would be at the top of her game and could've brought in 250k per year x 25 years = $6.25 million and to be fair lets pre-fund her retirement = $100 million and lets add some just for shits and giggles = $100 million sooo $250 million should cover everything she "could " have potentiality earned and saved right? and give her a bonus for sticking by him through thick and thin would that be fair? ps. Im not in anyway directing this at you. just curious of your opinion In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? |
|
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? View Quote Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. |
|
Quoted:
Youth (beauty). The reward for being a stay at home spouse should be room and board. It's essentially an early retirement. Get to sit on your ass and have everything provided for you. it should not come with cash and prizes when the relationship ends. Get a job, you go girl. You don't need a man (or his money). ETA: prior to feminist society, a woman's parents would pay a man to marry her because they realized the financial burden he was taking on to provide for her. Now society expects him to provide for her without compensation and not only continue after the marriage fails, but to reward her with far more than needed to survive. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
StevenH, what is it you often say are a woman’s most valuable assets? The reward for being a stay at home spouse should be room and board. It's essentially an early retirement. Get to sit on your ass and have everything provided for you. it should not come with cash and prizes when the relationship ends. Get a job, you go girl. You don't need a man (or his money). ETA: prior to feminist society, a woman's parents would pay a man to marry her because they realized the financial burden he was taking on to provide for her. Now society expects him to provide for her without compensation and not only continue after the marriage fails, but to reward her with far more than needed to survive. I guarantee you she did far more than sit on her ass. |
|
Don't care.....Let the American Oligarchs see how most men with two nickles to rub together has to give one of them and then some (in alimony and/or child support) to a ex.
LOL.....Saving all that money by fucking over his employees did not work out the way he thought. He's the one about to get bent-over. I saw that after she takes him to the cleaners she will be the richest woman in the world (69 B) because they filed in a 50/50 state. |
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/QBrExfC.jpg https://insdrcdn.com/media/articles/e/e7/bf5507e7e__600x315__q85_08021081188.jpg https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-KnA24R0YNlY/WXbgK4tRlNI/AAAAAAAADkU/H1NhypkoiskUSpLHIUtyTLMsRN-VcHlzACLcBGAs/s1600/jeff-bezos-mackenzie.jpg looks like she is several inches taller than he is View Quote Yes, yes money and all I know changes the dynamics but she’s not bad of a catch. |
|
Quoted:
And there’s the crux of your argument. You compare all stay at home spouses to your spouse and assume they are all the same. They aren’t. Once you get over that idea and realize that many stay at home spouses work very hard and have extensive obligations that assist their spouse in his or her career advancement, you may begin to get over your resentment. I guarantee you she did far more than sit on her ass. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
No such contract exists though. I agree it would be a great idea to negotiate such things in advance of getting married rather than assuming them. Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm all for evaluating actual contributions and making sure they are properly compensated. I'm opposed to the default idea that simply because you got married you are entitled to half. Ex wives should not be parasites leeching of a male host. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And there’s the crux of your argument. You compare all stay at home spouses to your spouse and assume they are all the same. They aren’t. Once you get over that idea and realize that many stay at home spouses work very hard and have extensive obligations that assist their spouse in his or her career advancement, you may begin to get over your resentment. I guarantee you she did far more than sit on her ass. No fault shouldn’t exist in situations like this. This is an at fault case if there ever was one. What should the penalty be for an at fault divorce? What should a cheating spouse be able to leave the marriage with? |
|
Anybody that believes that the assets isn’t gonna be slit in half is as delusional as a liberal thinking socialism is a utopia. Women breadwinners get treated the same way. I know women that have lost their houses to guys that made less money than them in the relationship.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: How did she help? Was Amazon her idea? It's impossible to quantify what she MIGHT have done on her own, just like it's impossible to say what his life would have been like without her. Do you think he would have raised four children on his own while building amazon? And I'm sure he provided all of those to do the actual work for her anyway. From the money earned. At his business. Which she may have had a tiny part in building. If men want to continue having women support them and maintain a traditional feminine role, they need to accept and uphold their end of the agreement. And that doesn’t involve trading in and leaving the first wife (who gave what some men argue are her most valuable assets, her youth and fertility) with little to nothing to show for it. Its hardly what I call "sacrificing". Sacrificing possibly leads to resentment. I think whe will be fine. |
|
Quoted:
I concur. No fault shouldn’t exist in situations like this. This is an at fault case if there ever was one. What should the penalty be for an at fault divorce? What should a cheating spouse be able to leave the marriage with? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Don't care.....Let the American Oligarchs see how most men with two nickles to rub together has to give one of them and then some (in alimony and/or child support) to a ex. LOL.....Saving all that money by fucking over his employees did not work out the way he thought. He's the one about to get bent-over. I saw that after she takes him to the cleaners she will be the richest woman in the world (69 B) because they filed in a 50/50 state. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
But looking at basic contract law takes all the feels out of it. The contract is the marriage license. The breach of contract is the divorce. The penalty for breach of contract is specified. Simple as that. Not feminist at all. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. |
|
Quoted:
And now she gets money into the billions, and being able to support herself quite well. I think whe will be fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: How did she help? Was Amazon her idea? It's impossible to quantify what she MIGHT have done on her own, just like it's impossible to say what his life would have been like without her. Do you think he would have raised four children on his own while building amazon? And I'm sure he provided all of those to do the actual work for her anyway. From the money earned. At his business. Which she may have had a tiny part in building. If men want to continue having women support them and maintain a traditional feminine role, they need to accept and uphold their end of the agreement. And that doesn’t involve trading in and leaving the first wife (who gave what some men argue are her most valuable assets, her youth and fertility) with little to nothing to show for it. Its hardly what I call "sacrificing". Sacrificing possibly leads to resentment. I think whe will be fine. |
|
Quoted:
Everything he or she earned. Nothing the other half did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I concur. No fault shouldn’t exist in situations like this. This is an at fault case if there ever was one. What should the penalty be for an at fault divorce? What should a cheating spouse be able to leave the marriage with? |
|
Quoted:
Anybody that believes that the assets isn’t gonna be slit in half is as delusional as a liberal thinking socialism is a utopia. Women breadwinners get treated the same way. I know women that have lost their houses to guys that made less money than them in the relationship. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
If she had an affair, she would be getting the exact same amount as she is now. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. ETA: and has she been the top earner, he’d still be getting half. |
|
Quoted: Eww, no. This latest model is a definite downgrade. Keep in mind those pics from the DailyFail posted above are from more than a decade ago. She's butchered her face with fillers and plastic surgery since then: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/16/8333858-6577797-Sanchez_far_left_was_spotted_alongside_Bezos_at_Amazon_s_Golden_-a-13_1547137960390.jpg She's got some big fake knockers, which is cool I guess. Mackenzie Bezos has definitely had some work done as well, but she kept it much more restrained and tasteful. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I understand that our feminist society sees it that way. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It’s not a sacrifice to stay home with the kids. It’s sacrificing the ability to provide for themselves. In order to stay home, a parent is obligated to rely on someone else to provide. If that provider stops providing, the person staying at home is starting at square one, like a person right out of high school or college. Those years could have been spent growing the career and advancing, but were agreed upon to be spent otherwise. If the provider decides to end the agreement, the provider should be responsible for that lost potential. so lets be fair on her lost potential earnings.. so..lets assume she would be at the top of her game and could've brought in 250k per year x 25 years = $6.25 million and to be fair lets pre-fund her retirement = $100 million and lets add some just for shits and giggles = $100 million sooo $250 million should cover everything she "could " have potentiality earned and saved right? and give her a bonus for sticking by him through thick and thin would that be fair? ps. Im not in anyway directing this at you. just curious of your opinion |
|
Quoted:
That, I would not agree with. ETA: and has she been the top earner, he’d still be getting half. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. ETA: and has she been the top earner, he’d still be getting half. If she cheated, the payout would be no different. |
|
Dealing with ex's can be a pain in the butt. I imagine dealing with an ex that is worth billions would be a royal pain in the butt.
|
|
Quoted:
Not agree with what part? If she cheated, the payout would be no different. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. ETA: and has she been the top earner, he’d still be getting half. If she cheated, the payout would be no different. |
|
Quoted: Eww, no. This latest model is a definite downgrade. Keep in mind those pics from the DailyFail posted above are from more than a decade ago. She's butchered her face with fillers and plastic surgery since then: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/16/8333858-6577797-Sanchez_far_left_was_spotted_alongside_Bezos_at_Amazon_s_Golden_-a-13_1547137960390.jpg She's got some big fake knockers, which is cool I guess. Mackenzie Bezos has definitely had some work done as well, but she kept it much more restrained and tasteful. View Quote |
|
Quoted: She has improved by using the money he provided. Her left her better than he found her. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Eww, no. This latest model is a definite downgrade. Keep in mind those pics from the DailyFail posted above are from more than a decade ago. She's butchered her face with fillers and plastic surgery since then: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/16/8333858-6577797-Sanchez_far_left_was_spotted_alongside_Bezos_at_Amazon_s_Golden_-a-13_1547137960390.jpg She's got some big fake knockers, which is cool I guess. Mackenzie Bezos has definitely had some work done as well, but she kept it much more restrained and tasteful. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
trade up imo. /shrug https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/10/16/8333858-6577797-Sanchez_far_left_was_spotted_alongside_Bezos_at_Amazon_s_Golden_-a-13_1547137960390.jpg She's got some big fake knockers, which is cool I guess. Mackenzie Bezos has definitely had some work done as well, but she kept it much more restrained and tasteful. His wife has horse teeth. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I know it’s the law in that state, but I don’t agree that the law is right in that circumstance. If the stay at home steps out, they are actively walking away from that lifestyle, not being kicked out the door into the gutter. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Take it back to straight contract law, no feels attached. In a contract, terms are agreed upon with a specified penalty for breach of contract. Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. The specified penalty for breach of (marital) contract (aka divorce) in California is an equal division of assets. Who breached the contract and thus incurred the specified penalty for breach of contract? Every woman has a different idea of what "wife" means and requires. Do not pretend everyone getting married believes the same things you do. Funny how the breach of the "contract " is lucrative to one side. ETA: and has she been the top earner, he’d still be getting half. If she cheated, the payout would be no different. |
|
Quoted:
He survived a helicopter crash a few years ago. It left him brain damaged and turned him into a raging liberal. Should have been riding in a Robinson. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.