User Panel
|
|
Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. View Quote This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 |
|
damage control b/c of hunter biden
give it a year and they'll be grifting money off this sucker also Office of Race Relations next friday |
|
Quoted: Joke is on him. I'm gonna take Arfcom's advise and move to a free state. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: Liberals and Leftists support gun control for different reasons. Liberals support it due to political correctness. Leftists support it because they want control. The vast and overwhelming majority of the law abiding gun owners in America are white. The vast and overwhelming majority of the violent criminals in America are black or Hispanic. The Dems' solution to curbing the violence perpetrated overwhelmingly by black and Hispanic criminals, is to enact gun control measures that will make it more difficult for law-abiding white people to own guns. Makes no sense, right? Well... it makes no sense if the goal is to reduce violent crime. If you're a liberal, it makes sense, because it avoids addressing the politically incorrect realities of violence and crime in America. If you're a Leftist, it makes sense because it disarms the law-abiding, which is what you really want. View Quote Attached File |
|
|
Hope its as much of a paper tiger as Trump's Second Amendment Coalition
|
|
Citizens and elected servants of the people boldly working against the constitution in every way but the correct way.
Can someone explain why this isn't treasnous, or at a minimum against the law? |
|
Quoted: This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 View Quote This. |
|
Quoted: Don't fool yourself because they do not fucking care. Never Trumpers are pos Democratic Socialist voters who helped get that senile sorry sack shit elected View Quote Tragically, this. They only thing they have is their stupid "but he banned muh bumpstocks!" idiocy. Traitors, every one. |
|
Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. View Quote Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. |
|
|
Quoted: I hate giving Brownells money, but that note feature sure comes in handy View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. I hate giving Brownells money, but that note feature sure comes in handy |
|
Quoted: This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 View Quote It's a troll account man, he's literally parroting Obama's gaslighting. |
|
Quoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. Attached File |
|
Quoted: Which President decided to end Run around Congress & do "Gun Control All By Myself Because I'm Not Afraid of the NRA"? https://i.imgur.com/hhMKS0f.jpg Which was actually a much worse of a back stab & betrayal. Mitch McConnell would never have let ANY gun control bill move forward in the Senate. But Trumpy Bear just had to show "He's the Star of the Show" and shove Gun Control by Executive Order (Giving BATFE free reign to change or interpret legal items to instantly become "naughty no-no's" & get "Insta-Felon" charges on their owners. Trump on his Bumpstock ban At 2:12 (but watch from the beginning to see Trump personally advocate his direct support for Red Flag Laws, Raising the Purchase Age & other 2nd Amendment Restrictions ... while sitting next to Diane F'ing Fiendswine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eoCS-QxuCc I'd rather face a known sworn enemy ahead of me, then be backstabbed by a traitor like Trump. https://i.imgur.com/oTEshxc.jpg Fuck Joe Biden & Every Democrat - but the same to "Republicans" who support Gun Control too! Bigger_Hammer View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: We know the things that Trump said he’d like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren’t fanatics defending Biden’s gun control actions here. Quoted: Nothing got passed. An executive order got issued to change a rule. There wasn’t any change in any law and the rule change violated existing law. It’s just nobody has argued it correctly in court yet. The DOJ won’t even press charges relating to the rule because they know they’ll get their ass handed to them in court. Which President decided to end Run around Congress & do "Gun Control All By Myself Because I'm Not Afraid of the NRA"? https://i.imgur.com/hhMKS0f.jpg Which was actually a much worse of a back stab & betrayal. Mitch McConnell would never have let ANY gun control bill move forward in the Senate. But Trumpy Bear just had to show "He's the Star of the Show" and shove Gun Control by Executive Order (Giving BATFE free reign to change or interpret legal items to instantly become "naughty no-no's" & get "Insta-Felon" charges on their owners. Trump on his Bumpstock ban At 2:12 (but watch from the beginning to see Trump personally advocate his direct support for Red Flag Laws, Raising the Purchase Age & other 2nd Amendment Restrictions ... while sitting next to Diane F'ing Fiendswine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eoCS-QxuCc I'd rather face a known sworn enemy ahead of me, then be backstabbed by a traitor like Trump. https://i.imgur.com/oTEshxc.jpg Fuck Joe Biden & Every Democrat - but the same to "Republicans" who support Gun Control too! Bigger_Hammer Attached File |
|
|
Quoted: Wasn't a BC required for ammo purchases in CA (and then later got stomped)? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: Tragically, this. They only thing they have is their stupid "but he banned muh bumpstocks!" idiocy. Traitors, every one. View Quote “We”(we being pro-2A) have a lot more than bump stocks to make our case. The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. |
|
Quoted: We know the things that Trump said he'd like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren't fanatics defending Biden's gun control actions here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Y'all can wave the "Trump bumpstock" banner all you want. Nobody can know what would have happened under a 2nd term, but you can SEE what's happening in Biden's first. I would have MUCH rather had a 2nd Trump term than all this bullshit. We know the things that Trump said he'd like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren't fanatics defending Biden's gun control actions here. Fuckin' ridiculous. |
|
Obama's stooge can fuck off along with his new office the Marxists are creating.
First of all, show me a violent gun, because as far as I know guns can't be violent but what the fuck do I know. If the purpose is to mitigate violent criminals and mental illness which is the actual issue, that would be worthwhile. But we all know that will never happen. FJB |
|
Quoted: A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. View Quote On top of money laundering and grifting, here's the icing on the cake. Directly counter organizations that need funding, like FPC, GOA with an Executive level department with it's own money printer. But it's not like the .gov couldn't do that anyway. A streamlined way to direct funds and propaganda. Directly demonize firearms ownership and use. "Gun training? People stockpiling and making ammo? Threats to democracy. Shooting sports? Nutcases. Having kids involved with guns? Brainwashing indoctrination. Children need to be in their mandatory LGBTBBQWTF classes. If you know these people, contact the Office of |
|
Quoted: The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. View Quote I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? |
|
Quoted: I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. View Quote Trump isn’t a Republican. So, my assumption is that you’re gonna pick from two Democrats if he’s the nominee. Voting for a Dem while claiming to be conservative? Seems pretty traitor-ish to me. |
|
Quoted: Trump isn’t a Republican. So, my assumption is that you’re gonna pick from two Democrats if he’s the nominee. Voting for a Dem while claiming to be conservative? Seems pretty traitor-ish to me. View Quote Wow. So the R next to Trump's name in 2020 was a misprint??? I've never voted for a Dem. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing the letters, not me. |
|
Quoted: I've never voted for a Dem. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing the parties, not me. View Quote If you voted for Trump, you did. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing between a Republican and a RINO, not me. (Nice edit, again learn what a RINO is) |
|
Quoted: If you voted for Trump, you did. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing between a Republican and a RINO, not me. View Quote Have fun voting for Biden again, and destroying our country. And yes, if you did anything except pull the R lever, you put Biden in power. Liberals... |
|
|
Quoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. No, no I didn’t. Your baseless bitch-ass attempt to put words in my mouth is nothing but a weak-dick strawman smear because you have NOTHING. @Kent |
|
View Quote Now that was funny, I don’t care who you are. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. steerage or boiler gang ? |
|
Quoted: I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. I voted for Trump twice. And I don’t even have a single bumpstock. |
|
I hope the Trump Cult is happy since he is expanding on the Bump Stock Ban which was also an EO.
|
|
Quoted: Don't fool yourself because they do not fucking care. Never Trumpers are pos Democratic Socialist voters who helped get that senile sorry sack shit elected View Quote The cultists say I’m a never trumper because I stand with Ron this time. But I voted for Trump in 2020 and would vote Trump again if he wins the nomination. How does that make me responsible for Biden? |
|
Quoted: We better hold onto the House or Senate. These guys are going to ban new production of AR15 lowers and uppers and magazines as soon as they get the votes View Quote This where all the energy needs to be focused. Because at the end of the day it won’t matter who is POTUS. All this arguing over Trump/DeSantis is meaningless. Less than meaningless really. |
|
Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff.....No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: No, no I didn’t. Your baseless bitch-ass attempt to put words in my mouth is nothing but a weak-dick strawman smear because you have NOTHING. @Kent View Quote Attached File |
|
|
|
Quoted: I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? It’s likely that the “Republican” candidate you support is a big fan of gun control, just like Brandon (this is thoroughly documented). He supports other “progressive” values… yet he’s being pushed by a weird cult that claims he’s our only chance. Note that that same person has spent most of his career fighting conservatives (liberals, not so much). They’ve burned the party that opposes the democrats to the ground and replaced it with nothing. You think I should support them? The sooner that cult dies, the better. Ask yourself this- what conservative’s fight is more successful as a result of Trump (hint- the answer is “none of them”). |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.