User Panel
Quoted:
But it's also how a man looks at that 10000 guys statement. If the woman is decent looking everyone of those 10000 want her. Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. |
|
Quoted:
It may have been that way before cellphones, or it seemed that way Men can initiate contact but it’s the woman that starts the pursuit once the ball starts rolling With cellphones that pursuit is on steroids View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Men can initiate contact but it’s the woman that starts the pursuit once the ball starts rolling With cellphones that pursuit is on steroids That's just "game" aka not coming across as and/or not being desperate. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Its.. odd. |
|
Quoted:
Want to fuck her yes, want her no... Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. But meeting through IRL hobbies/interests is golden. Someday imma find bae shooting her AR at the range. Right? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Its.. odd. BUT North American culture seems to condition women to not approach men (directly) (IRL). |
|
Quoted:
Nah, it mostly still is IMO. That's just "game" aka not coming across as and/or not being desperate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Men can initiate contact but it’s the woman that starts the pursuit once the ball starts rolling With cellphones that pursuit is on steroids That's just "game" aka not coming across as and/or not being desperate. I have maybe a 5% success rate |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Flip the script, dudes buy women drinks all the time. If done in a fun/playful manner (while shittalking about guys who buy women drinks and then expect something more than just having spent money) it can work. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don’t respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc |
|
Quoted:
I am not as good looking as you or wealthy I have maybe a 5% success rate View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Men can initiate contact but it’s the woman that starts the pursuit once the ball starts rolling With cellphones that pursuit is on steroids That's just "game" aka not coming across as and/or not being desperate. I have maybe a 5% success rate I'm neither. I have acne scarring and other facial scars. Apparently my eyes are "mean". Can't smile and show my teeth without looking like a grimacing chimp. |
|
Quoted:
Women are out and about in packs from Thursday thru Sunday, in the third world maybe Monday is the only off day Women don’t respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as ‘below average’. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don’t respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. |
|
Quoted:
Online enables window shopping, there's always someone "better" (seemingly, and unobtainable). It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. |
|
Quoted:
Unless you are in the 20% of men there's no real future in online. The messages will come in everyday and if she checks her messages it's only a matter of time until she fo's. Best case you got a few months fling. If you get her offline ASAP and she actually deletes her account you may get 6 months or a year before the wheels come off it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. The number of openly single and available women in Miami is staggering Relationships are tougher in Miami than overseas, a woman in Miami will send you to hell quick If it does not tire you out you can go to town in a month overseas, some of you younger guys can sample more than me |
|
Quoted:
Unless you are in the 20% of men there's no real future in online. The messages will come in everyday and if she checks her messages it's only a matter of time until she fo's. Best case you got a few months fling. If you get her offline ASAP and she actually deletes her account you may get 6 months or a year before the wheels come off it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. Gotta be able to flex hard, metaphorically, to be noticed. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I took 2 days to think about his statement Not bizarre, he is on point Borderline is the perfect word here On the fence The question men ALWAYS ask Why can’t women say what they mean? Women will not state their true intentions Women have to continue with the facade If they told the truth it would hurt everybody with women being hurt the most He does not need my help, I am not on either one of your sides here, not you, not him His use of the word borderline is perfect I say what I got to say He, I and you https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/371244/englishmf-627277.gif Way to deflect Try looking at the username next time. |
|
Quoted:
Not sure what I'm deflecting, like you I'm on neither side here. Try looking at the username next time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I took 2 days to think about his statement Not bizarre, he is on point Borderline is the perfect word here On the fence The question men ALWAYS ask Why can’t women say what they mean? Women will not state their true intentions Women have to continue with the facade If they told the truth it would hurt everybody with women being hurt the most He does not need my help, I am not on either one of your sides here, not you, not him His use of the word borderline is perfect I say what I got to say He, I and you https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/371244/englishmf-627277.gif Way to deflect Try looking at the username next time. |
|
Quoted:
What username? Women do what you do, look at grammar instead of what is the content, I don’t know if you are a woman or not View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I took 2 days to think about his statement Not bizarre, he is on point Borderline is the perfect word here On the fence The question men ALWAYS ask Why can’t women say what they mean? Women will not state their true intentions Women have to continue with the facade If they told the truth it would hurt everybody with women being hurt the most He does not need my help, I am not on either one of your sides here, not you, not him His use of the word borderline is perfect I say what I got to say He, I and you https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/371244/englishmf-627277.gif Way to deflect Try looking at the username next time. He's alright Having a hard time over the fact that his argueship ended so suddenly He's an okay guy, fog of war and all that |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. |
|
Quoted:
I know a woman who was widowed due to a car accident when she was 5 months pregnant. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol. Single parent with a kid here. We’re basically kryptonite in the dating world. I’ve accepted it. She needs to, as well. |
|
Quoted:
Find one that will stay offline/ no FB hijinks, who believes you're the guy. If you got the skills, and can sell it maybe. But for most guys a few years is probably the best they'll do. If you can duplicate your successes maybe that works also, who knows. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. You can’t control people If you like someone let them do what they want How can you be happy controlling another person? |
|
Quoted:
How can you be happy controlling another person? View Quote Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you’re going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. |
|
Quoted:
First, you strip them down and tie them to the bed. Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you’re going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How can you be happy controlling another person? Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you’re going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
How can you be happy controlling another person? Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you’re going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. |
|
Quoted:
Find one that will stay offline/ no FB hijinks, who believes you're the guy. If you got the skills, and can sell it maybe. But for most guys a few years is probably the best they'll do. If you can duplicate your successes maybe that works also, who knows. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you don't mean picky why not just say selective? I've heard so many doozies on these threads I take everyone at what they say. Not hard to believe when a woman says she wants to be picky. Why would anyone have a hard time believing that? If anything I'd say that's standard now. OKcupid poll claims 80% of men are rated below average attractiveness. How is that not indicative of mass pickiness? https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/ "Women, on the other hand, are harsh with their ratings. According to the study, they rate a whopping 80% of men on the site as 'below average'. My first guess was that there was an issue with self-selection here (i.e. unattractive men congregate on the site for whatever reason). But the study includes photos of four pretty normal looking guys who were all rated to be unattractive. And perhaps more telling: women don't seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they've just deemed unattractive." From another VooDoo3dfx post, there was a video of what women want video. The basics of facial attractiveness is that more women rate guys with chiseled looks as more attractive. So getting fatter lowers a guy's facial attractiveness... and we're becoming a nation of soft bodies. Take Chris Pratt for instance. Now I imagine most gals found him an attractive dude before, but now that he got himself in shape he's one of Hollywood's top stars and I'm sure women find more attractive. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/7a/d7/787ad78e9bf062d9e35f733b24483009.jpg Guys would have to be billionaires, captains of industries, celebrities, Emirates princes to even get close to those numbers. These guys will sure be picky. Remember the rotation Tiger Woods had? Have you ever had a 100% batting average when talking to women? Of course not . Which 1000 guys statement? Lol, of course not. I'm more successful offline than online. And I'm a cringy retard It's easier to window shop online. (that might factor into 80% of men being considered "bellow average") Body language and demeanor matter, the tech "gods" of Silicon Valley can't change that and online dating can't communicate that. Women don't respect men online Those are the guys buying dinners, plastic surgeries, money for their kids, etc It's easier to see a '10' (appearance-wise) online than it is IRL. |
|
Quoted: Yeah, that’s a bizarre conclusion you came to. View Quote They use terms like good to describe women who wait for commitment to have sex (for manipulative reasons) which implies that women who have non conditional sex are therefore somehow bad. |
|
Quoted: Premarital sex is all risk and no benefit to the female - or the male, for that matter. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Some women here consistency imply that men are deceptive, women are easily fooled and sex isn't something women can simply enjoy for its own merits. They use terms like good to describe women who wait for commitment to have sex (for manipulative reasons) which implies that women who have non conditional sex are therefore somehow bad. View Quote |
|
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's.
Women’s desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app — 18 — and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 |
|
Quoted:
First, you strip them down and tie them to the bed. Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you're going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How can you be happy controlling another person? Then comes the blindfold. For starters, you're going to need a ping pong paddle.... Do you own a choke chain? Not one of those big link kinds, too pinchy. You need one of the serpentine link versions. |
|
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women's desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app 18 and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women's desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app 18 and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 I will be accused of bragging You have not even started yet |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women's desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app 18 and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 |
|
Quoted: I am finding that out myself. View Quote I'm not photogenic and seem to always have one eye closed or some shit whenever I try to take pics which leads to lame profile pics. Which in dating apps/sites is 100% of what girls grade guys on. But (forgive me if this is cringe af) in person I'm funny and charming af. Few years ago I never woulda expected that I'd do so much better in person than online. I'm actually looking for a second job right now just to meet girls lol. Not that I'm looking to get fired if shit goes south, but if I make friends with my female coworkers, they can then be a source of referrals to their friends that I dont work with. Or thats the game plan anyways haha |
|
Quoted: I rost I'm neither. I have acne scarring and other facial scars. Apparently my eyes are "mean". Can't smile and show my teeth without looking like a grimacing chimp. View Quote I haven't let my old acne scars shut me down. But it def helps if you workout, dress nice (and look good in what you wear), know how to make girls laugh and feel comfortable, also know when to be a bit of a jerk and tease (cuz thats how proper flirting is done), have confidence in yourself, and have $$$ lol. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women's desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app 18 and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 |
|
Quoted:
56, bald and ugly and the dating life is quite good. There are a LOT of gals out there just looking for a decent nice single guy. The gal I'm dating now is good looking, in shape and financially fine. The last thing I mentioned is where dating when you are older starts to fall apart because the percentage of females with finance issues is high. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women's desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app 18 and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 |
|
Divorced single moms
I got your laundry list ...how about u button it and make me a sammich and maybe I'll let u babysit my house for me while I bring home my paycheck |
|
|
My personal impression is that for meaningful dating, apps aren't ideal.
I've had poor results from using a dating app in spite of it being touted as the best for this area. When I meet people in person then I get a lot more positive results where women follow up with me to keep in contact. |
|
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women’s desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app — 18 — and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women’s desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app — 18 — and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy I thought I had it all: three beautiful kids, a CEO husband who took care of those beautiful kids when I traveled to East Africa to run a nonprofit, a big house in an affluent suburb in Silicon Valley, a vacation house at the lake. But little did I know what was going on behind my back or how radically my life would change when I discovered my husband’s secret.
My numbness gave way to a variety of other emotions: anger, disgust, shame. I called my husband and told him what I had found. “How could you do this?” I demanded. “How could you take another woman to that hotel that we had stayed in together? And why did you do this?” He didn’t answer my questions. He just told me it felt good to be appreciated by these women and claimed I had brought this on myself. Then he rubbed my face deeper in his cruelty by adding, “And I took her there because it’s a great hotel.” |
|
Quoted:
Check out this lollercoaster HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Turns out I'm wrong about women peaking in their early 20's and guys peaking in their 30's. Women’s desirability peaked at the youngest age possible to join the dating app — 18 — and declined until age 60. Men's desirability increased until 50. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2018/08/08/online-dating-study-quantifies-whats-out-of-your-league/?utm_term=.248972543186 HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy I thought I had it all: three beautiful kids, a CEO husband who took care of those beautiful kids when I traveled to East Africa to run a nonprofit, a big house in an affluent suburb in Silicon Valley, a vacation house at the lake. But little did I know what was going on behind my back or how radically my life would change when I discovered my husband’s secret.
My numbness gave way to a variety of other emotions: anger, disgust, shame. I called my husband and told him what I had found. “How could you do this?” I demanded. “How could you take another woman to that hotel that we had stayed in together? And why did you do this?” He didn’t answer my questions. He just told me it felt good to be appreciated by these women and claimed I had brought this on myself. Then he rubbed my face deeper in his cruelty by adding, “And I took her there because it’s a great hotel.” Hubby was a dick tho. |
|
|
Quoted: Ouch. Hubby was a dick tho. View Quote Im not sure how or why she thought it was a good idea to leave her family to go play queen of refugees in E. Africa. Interestingly, husband appeared to be non-apologetic and likely knew his value was much higher than hers. If she had kept in shape and stuck around to raise her kids I wonder if she would be where she is now. ETA: Comments are spicy, she is getting torn up |
|
Quoted: Check out this lollercoaster HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy View Quote |
|
Quoted:
What kind of wife and mother leaves her family for extended periods of time to play the hero role in Africa? Not saying it is right for her husband to seek the affection of nubile golddiggers half the age of his wife but in this case I can certainly understand the frustration that would lead to that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Check out this lollercoaster HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy We're only hearing one side of the story. Most couples are willing to accept aging is not pretty, but her taking off and leaving him with the kids, doing the cooking when she doesn't have a job...those things point to the fact she's a bit on the selfish side and thinks he should love her because she's there and she doesn't have to contribute. He obviously had some money so I'm guessing he didn't want to lose the kids...but who knows. |
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah but if he's not getting what he wants at home, the nubile gold diggers are likely a safe choice as they're less likely to go all fatal attraction on him. We're only hearing one side of the story. Most couples are willing to accept aging is not pretty, but her taking off and leaving him with the kids, doing the cooking when she doesn't have a job...those things point to the fact she's a bit on the selfish side and thinks he should love her because she's there and she doesn't have to contribute. He obviously had some money so I'm guessing he didn't want to lose the kids...but who knows. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Check out this lollercoaster HuffPo: After 20 Years Of Marriage, I Discovered My Husband Was A Sugar Daddy We're only hearing one side of the story. Most couples are willing to accept aging is not pretty, but her taking off and leaving him with the kids, doing the cooking when she doesn't have a job...those things point to the fact she's a bit on the selfish side and thinks he should love her because she's there and she doesn't have to contribute. He obviously had some money so I'm guessing he didn't want to lose the kids...but who knows. |
|
Quoted:
What kind of wife and mother leaves her family for extended periods of time to play the hero role in Africa? View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.