User Panel
Quoted: There was a guy trying to qualify long distance with a brand new Springfield in 6.5 creedmoor, north of 8 rounds it started to have an occasional hangfire. At the 14 round count, every other round was a hangfire. Sadly he couldn't qualify that day. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A Springfield M1A was my first centerfire rifle. It didn't always go bang when I pulled the trigger nor leave any indication of a light strike on the primer I sold it. There was a guy trying to qualify long distance with a brand new Springfield in 6.5 creedmoor, north of 8 rounds it started to have an occasional hangfire. At the 14 round count, every other round was a hangfire. Sadly he couldn't qualify that day. It would only shoot 1 round at a time and wouldn't cycle during my first range trip. Turns out I had the valve closed For reference the valve is there for using it with a launcher, like grenades or when throwing lines between ships: Attached File |
|
Quoted: Eight bazillion high power shooters ran M1A's for YEARS in competition and did not suffer cracking receivers. M1A receivers are investment cast versus the forged ones used on the m14, but they are not prone to cracking because of that. I don't know where some of you guys get your information. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: A guy I knew in the Army bought an M1A Scout and put an MRO on it. He shot nice, 2-3" groups at 100 yards with it. I haven't heard anything bad about the Springfields, except I think there were issues with receivers cracking. I haven't known anyone who had an issue with them, personally. Eight bazillion high power shooters ran M1A's for YEARS in competition and did not suffer cracking receivers. M1A receivers are investment cast versus the forged ones used on the m14, but they are not prone to cracking because of that. I don't know where some of you guys get your information. |
|
FWIW, Retired MGySgt Gus Fisher stated over on the M14 forum that a USGI M14 receiver would last between 400,000-450,000 rds, depending on the manufacturer (he said TRWs last longer than the others).
As for the cast vs. forged debate; I think he said a cast SA,Inc receiver would go for about 250,000 rds before shitting the bed. That’s a lot of barrel changes. Since I don’t foresee spending a quarter of a million dollars on shooting ammo through any of my rifles, I think I’m ok with a quality cast M14-type receiver like Fulton or SA,Inc., even though I don’t currently own anything but forged. An older 1980s M1A with USGI parts is in my future just to have one. |
|
Quoted: I went with a Socom16, replaced a few internals with USGI, and then a more classic look. USGI stock, fake selector to fill the hole, NM rear sight, NM front sight with base designed for the SOCOM for proper height. And the cheapest upgrade ever: a rubber pipe stem protector for the charging handle. Some have edges that just don't want to go away. A buck later and no need for caution racking the action. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010744_jpg-3213297.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010746_jpg-3213298.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010745_jpg-3213299.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010747_jpg-3213300.JPG View Quote That’s pretty cool. Almost makes me want another M1a. It does look like it lightened up the front end a lot, I just wish it was easier to put a dot on without either a scout mount I don’t like or the big ARMS 18 receiver mounts. Kick ass project just the same. |
|
I need to get a nice walnut stock for mine. It currently has the black synthetic stock that I don't like the looks of.
|
|
Quoted: FWIW, Retired MGySgt Gus Fisher stated over on the M14 forum that a USGI M14 receiver would last between 400,000-450,000 rds, depending on the manufacturer (he said TRWs last longer than the others). As for the cast vs. forged debate; I think he said a cast SA,Inc receiver would go for about 250,000 rds before shitting the bed. That’s a lot of barrel changes. Since I don’t foresee spending a quarter of a million dollars on shooting ammo through any of my rifles, I think I’m ok with a quality cast M14-type receiver like Fulton or SA,Inc., even though I don’t currently own anything but forged. An older 1980s M1A with USGI parts is in my future just to have one. View Quote Those numbers from Gus seem to coincide with what I remember him saying. He was a treasure on the other forum. Sorry he stopped posting. Hope he is doing ok. I also remember him saying they got the M14 competition rifles of the day down to an acceptance standard of a 10 shot group into 2.5” at 300 yards. This was of course done in a machine rest to eliminate variables. |
|
I used to dismiss the M1A as a poor Garand and outclassed by more "modern .308's". then a friend got a Scout for cheap in an estate sale a few months ago and a mixed box of 150 random .308 ammo that "Let's just burn up".
By the end of that day - not going to lie, kind of completely love the M1A Scout. Very pleasant gun to shoot, and damned accurate. It's a pretty great gun that holds its own very nicely. I like it better than most AR10's -( though the SFAR has very much caught my eye) |
|
I have a full size loaded M1A with walnut stock. It is a sweet shooter. I still like my Garands better though.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: …and just like that, M1As became cool again… Cool people always knew it was cool. Yep. And his is actually more bubbafied than mine. Mine rocks the same treeline usgi stock with fa cutout, Bassett mount with t2 and 6x magnifier. No ir or flashlight though. |
|
Quoted: I've shot them both. I'll take an M1A Scout over a SCAR all day long. Be aware, I'm not talking an M1A. I'm talking the M1A Scout - it just handles and runs much more pleasant. I don't like the look, but love the gun. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Lol no thanks. The SCAR exists. I've shot them both. I'll take an M1A Scout over a SCAR all day long. Be aware, I'm not talking an M1A. I'm talking the M1A Scout - it just handles and runs much more pleasant. I don't like the look, but love the gun. You’re probably talking to a wall. I’d be willing to bet he has experience with neither. |
|
Quoted: You’re probably talking to a wall. I’d be willing to bet he has experience with neither. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Lol no thanks. The SCAR exists. I've shot them both. I'll take an M1A Scout over a SCAR all day long. Be aware, I'm not talking an M1A. I'm talking the M1A Scout - it just handles and runs much more pleasant. I don't like the look, but love the gun. You’re probably talking to a wall. I’d be willing to bet he has experience with neither. His screen name DOES check out though. |
|
Quoted: His screen name DOES check out though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Lol no thanks. The SCAR exists. I've shot them both. I'll take an M1A Scout over a SCAR all day long. Be aware, I'm not talking an M1A. I'm talking the M1A Scout - it just handles and runs much more pleasant. I don't like the look, but love the gun. You’re probably talking to a wall. I’d be willing to bet he has experience with neither. His screen name DOES check out though. For sure. Not because of this thread but because of others. I’d be willing to buy him a one way ticket back home if he will renounce his American citizenship. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Objectively better in every way but the M1A is pretty cool, possibly the coolest of the Cold War era battle rifles. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Lol no thanks. The SCAR exists. Objectively better in every way but the M1A is pretty cool, possibly the coolest of the Cold War era battle rifles. One would hope things improved over 50 years later. But don’t think the M14 for all its decrepit features doesn’t still work and work very well in the hands of someone that understands the rifle. They did and they still do. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Things weight a ton, no thanks. https://c.tenor.com/0i4CqiRKlWEAAAAC/grow-stronger.gif |
|
|
|
Quoted: Taking weight off the weapon means being able to carry more ammo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Things weight a ton, no thanks. https://c.tenor.com/0i4CqiRKlWEAAAAC/grow-stronger.gif I’m sorry, can you write this in English? I don’t speak soy boy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Yep. And his is actually more bubbafied than mine. Mine rocks the same treeline usgi stock with fa cutout, Bassett mount with t2 and 6x magnifier. No ir or flashlight though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: …and just like that, M1As became cool again… Cool people always knew it was cool. Yep. And his is actually more bubbafied than mine. Mine rocks the same treeline usgi stock with fa cutout, Bassett mount with t2 and 6x magnifier. No ir or flashlight though. What magnifier are you using, any issues with eye relief? Do you use a cheekrest? |
|
|
|
Quoted: …and just like that, M1As became cool again… View Quote Always were. (I was too lazy to look up the astronaut meme) Attached File |
|
....and so long as everyone else is showing theirs off....
Attached File Early 90's vintage. TRW bolt and op-rod. Stainless Douglas medium contour bbl. ART II optic on a Bassett mount. Old and outdated.... But then, so am I |
|
Y'all need to get rid of those ugly Springfield muzzle brakes and get the Smith USCG brake.
|
|
Quoted: The vltor? I was just looking last night. Couple places still have it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Good luck finding that fucking rail. The vltor? I was just looking last night. Couple places still have it. I'm functionality retarded, I'll look again. I've been striking out all over. |
|
Quoted: Always were. (I was too lazy to look up the astronaut meme) https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/505993/IMG_20200401_112934460_jpg-3213481.JPG View Quote Sir I don’t know how to say this, but I want to stare and handle your wood. That stock is incredible. |
|
I JUST bought a scout. Now, I will have to go back and watch the video...
|
|
Quoted: Y'all need to get rid of those ugly Springfield muzzle brakes and get the Smith USCG brake. View Quote I've always preferred the GI flash hidden with the bayo lug - but the Smith Brake is nice Attached File |
|
I thought about getting a barreled action from LRB and putting one of these together
Then I asked myself, why? I love my .308 AR’s, if I had a M14 I’d probably never shoot it |
|
Quoted: Gordy's gone, man. I'll be outside. Good luck. View Quote Black Hawk Down M14 |
|
Quoted: Y'all need to get rid of those ugly Springfield muzzle brakes and get a suppressor. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: I went with a Socom16, replaced a few internals with USGI, and then a more classic look. USGI stock, fake selector to fill the hole, NM rear sight, NM front sight with base designed for the SOCOM for proper height. And the cheapest upgrade ever: a rubber pipe stem protector for the charging handle. Some have edges that just don't want to go away. A buck later and no need for caution racking the action. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010744_jpg-3213297.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010746_jpg-3213298.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010745_jpg-3213299.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/38726/1000010747_jpg-3213300.JPG View Quote That's a nice rifle. |
|
Quoted: Always were. (I was too lazy to look up the astronaut meme) https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/505993/IMG_20200401_112934460_jpg-3213481.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: …and just like that, M1As became cool again… Always were. (I was too lazy to look up the astronaut meme) https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/505993/IMG_20200401_112934460_jpg-3213481.JPG You bought truck nuts for your gun? WTF? |
|
|
|
God damnit I was going to sell mine.
Now I bought another aimpoint pro and stock pack for it. Maybe replace the gas block with a threaded version and put a can on it before the days over. Thanks alot. |
|
Quoted: Taking weight off the weapon means being able to carry more ammo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Things weight a ton, no thanks. https://c.tenor.com/0i4CqiRKlWEAAAAC/grow-stronger.gif If you're fighting in a modern military unit with current tactics than that's a good point. Relying on capacity as a civilian is less important than accuracy and putting down threats |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: M1 Garands (USGIs, not the S.A.-made M1s) have forged receivers. There is a reason. They crack sometimes too. Attached File |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.