User Panel
Quoted:
LOL, that thing would be more lethal to German pilots than P80s Totes stylish, though; even had a designer flight mask by Hugo Boss View Quote Just like most of these threads that extend the war, and have no agreed upon where everyone was in this hypothetical 1946. I still think the entire war began tremendous folly, and exposing Hitlers madness when he halted steam rolling the BEF at Dunkirk. Then if we could again pontificate about operation sea lion, but Ii enjoy those threads. |
|
Quoted:
I grant you it would be a tough sell after the communists in our government spent the previous 4 years talking up how swell Uncle Joe was. A few movie news reals showing the people being forcedinto trucks to go back to Russia and be killed might do it, but we had fake news back then, too. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Try and explain to the American people, indeed the entire world, how we decided to fight the Soviets in 1945. Stalin had been doing inhumane shit for about as long as he was Stalin. |
|
|
Quoted:
Too bad it didn't go on long enough to defeat the Soviets before they had nukes. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
100+ delivered, 200 more complete and awaiting pick up and final inspections. A few of them saw combat and shot down a handful of Allied planes. The Germans built enormous underground factories for them and were ready to crank them out by the thousands, but they ran out of time. Like somebody said though, lack of pilots made it pointless. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
See the bold? That's the flaw in your plan. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, port cities. U-boat delivers a bomb with a midget sub built around it, or sacrifice the u-boat if necessary. There was a thread the other day about an Italian plan to run a midget sub up into New York harbor so that frogmen could attach limpet mines to shipping. They had the midget subs built and were training, sounds like it had a chance, but it got derailed when the carrier sub was sunk. |
|
|
A B-36 over Europe is likely going to be facing Me-1101s armed with X-4s. That would have been bad for B-36s and the cities they would have fallen upon. This leads to "what would the US have done to protect them?" and I think the answer is would have legitimately tried the FICON concept to at least chase Nazi missile carriers out of range. Also,it would be near certain that the Wasserfall would have come into use and B-36s would not be flying higher than they could.
The B-36 would have significantly changed the war in the Pacific. If the US was backed on a different timeline due to perhaps losses at Midway and Guadalcanal and there not only being no Pacific Fleet left but keeping in the agreement to win in Europe first,who knows what the strategy may have been. Japan may have ended up taking India and then found themselves fighting Russians coming through Iran,all kinds of crazy shit could have happened with another 2 years of war. |
|
Quoted: We start WW3 over truck loads of refugees. Got it. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
What do you think about the JU-390 flight near NYC? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: The amount of ignorance in this country about the Russian Front is staggering. View Quote |
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Germany had nukes in '45 and '46. So to keep the thread going correctly, let's assume no nukes were used so the war can continue with all the new cool toys. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpvAdeAv8KI |
|
Attached File
Attached File Attached File I have nothing contribute to these what-if threads except some potentially cool pics. |
|
Quoted: Probably not. The reason the Montanas were cancelled is that they were too slow (26 knots vs 30+ for all other classes of post 1940-US Battleships) By 1944, the most important surface weapons for daytime fleet defense were the BB's massive #'s of AAA weapons (nighttime, the 16" + Radar were still primary, as nighttime flight operational carrier capability was still in it's infancy.) The US had plenty of 20-ish knot Battleships that were already relegated to nighttime/shore bombardment operations due to the fact they were too slow to operate with carriers. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Germany did not have a production bomber capable of reaching CONUS in operational use - EVER. View Quote The JU-390 was capable of reaching US targets. It never reached regular production but at least two were built and operational and the design was licensed for production in Japan. Germany did have the technical capability to bomb the East Coast. They also had a two stage rocket in development that theoretically could have hit New York and Washington. Given another year or two they may have become a very real threat. This is under the hypothetical scenario that the war was extended because D-Day failed. In reality they never went into production because by the time working prototypes were making their test flights Germany was already fighting a purely defensive war. They ordered a few dozen but the contracts were canceled in the final days of the war as Germany had neither the money or resources to complete them. |
|
|
Quoted: Russia isn't fighting SHIT without food, fuel, av gas, ammunition, trucks, railroad car and locomotives, and 40% of their armored vehicles. All that is coming in via Lend-Lease, and I'm pretty sure if we are fighting them, we aren't still shipping all of that to them. View Quote Once we we shut off the tap Russia had nothing left to fight with while our war machine was still in full stride. Their people were decimated and their nation was in ruins. We could have prevented unimaginable human suffering under the USSR but instead we bent over and let Stalin have his way with Eastern Europe. |
|
Quoted: T20 Garand https://preview.redd.it/nu5qtnevl4e31.png?auto=webp&s=578623703937050c4c4be9b2f5d7da4e0399f525 View Quote |
|
Amerika Bomber - The German Plan to Bomb New York
Amerika Bomber - The German Plan to Bomb New York |
|
Quoted:
Exactly. Once we we shut off the tap Russia had nothing left to fight with while our war machine was still in full stride. Their people were decimated and their nation was in ruins. We could have prevented unimaginable human suffering under the USSR but instead we bent over and let Stalin have his way with Eastern Europe. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
P-80 could outrun, outclimb, outroll, and outturn the 262. It would have been a slaughter. Although the two aircraft never met in combat, they were flown in a comparison test at Wright Field after the war. According to reports from that test, the Me 262 had a speed advantage in a dive, but the P-80 was superior in all other respects. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The most obvious one, nukes. View Quote Russia or GB might have nuked Germany if they accelerated their development or if the US loaned them a nuke as part of an allied war effort. Shit, look at what they did to Dresden... they might as well have nuked it. |
|
Without the atomic bomb? The US invading Japan with thousands of casualties on both sides.
|
|
Quoted: Last time I looked, we had free Pole, Czech, etc. forces fighting alongside of us, but also significant ethnic populations form those areas. Those folks might not be too happy to see their reletives shipped back to be shot. View Quote |
|
Americans tend to believe they defeated Nazi Germany on their own, and forget that 9 out of every 10 casualties in the European theater were on the German-Soviet front View Quote |
|
I getcha...but i am talking rotary and fixed wing. We would have seen it as we know it today.
|
|
|
|
All we have to do is look at Korea, Mig15 was a German WWII design taken right off the blueprints...it killed the Shooting star and any other US jet or propeller fighters. Yes the Mig15 was indeed a German Nazi era fighter design stolen by the Red army and its designers were forced to work as slave labor for Stalin. Look at it's true origins.
In fact all the Soviet cold war jets, missiles and rockets and space technology came from German scientist slaves taken captive in WWII (even Sputnik), same way the US Apollo programs were the same from German scientists. We wouldn't have gone to the moon without them. But when those slave German scientists died in the Soviet Union by the 80's the Russians lost any edge they had. Which is why they once seemed awesome and are now a joke. Hell even Kalashnikov was a thief and a liar...he was the coffee boy for Hugo Schmeisser who again was Nazi slave labor for the Russian...but yeah, Hugo, one of the greatest gun designers of the 20th century had nothing to do with the AK47 even though he "worked" with AK...AK the tractor driver and great Soviet hero of the Motherland....lol. We should call it the "HS47" if we want to be truthful. What did AK design after Hugo's death? nothing new. There you go... Take the WWII slave German scientists away during the cold war and Russia becomes Pakistan in arms and technology. This is why when those captured German scientists died the "Soviet edge" died...fact. |
|
|
Quoted:
No need for all that yanking banking stuff. Just have the B-45s bomb the Me 262 maintenance hangers. View Quote What an odd bomber choice, but I thank you, Did not much about them. In 1947 those cost 1.1 million a piece. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
You're correct on that front but I didn't say they had regular production bombers, just that they had the capability. The JU-390 was capable of reaching US targets. It never reached regular production but at least two were built and operational and the design was licensed for production in Japan. Germany did have the technical capability to bomb the East Coast. They also had a two stage rocket in development that theoretically could have hit New York and Washington. Given another year or two they may have become a very real threat. This is under the hypothetical scenario that the war was extended because D-Day failed. In reality they never went into production because by the time working prototypes were making their test flights Germany was already fighting a purely defensive war. They ordered a few dozen but the contracts were canceled in the final days of the war as Germany had neither the money or resources to complete them. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The US would not have nuked Europe. The US war effort went to great lengths to dehumanize Japanese people/cultures as subhuman vermin. The pacific war effort propaganda and posters were incredibly racial/xenophobic in nature. View Quote The Japanese did things so vile it would make you puke. At least one author writing about their atrocities committed suicide. |
|
Quoted: While this is true, it completely ignores the amount of equipment the Germans had to keep in defense of the Reich...specifically aircraft. I can't remember at what point in 1943, but the Soviets were operating with almost complete air superiority in the East simply because aircraft were dedicated to the defense of Germany against US and British air power. View Quote |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
All we have to do is look at Korea, Mig15 was a German WWII design taken right off the blueprints...it killed the Shooting star and any other US jet or propeller fighters. Yes the Mig15 was indeed a German Nazi era fighter design stolen by the Red army and its designers were forced to work as slave labor for Stalin. Look at it's true origins. View Quote |
|
What did AK design after Hugo's death? nothing new. There you go... View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Two were built, but they were never operational. They could reach Newfoundland, but not New York. Germany did not have the ability to reach the east cost, and if you have evidence otherwise, I would like to see it. View Quote They had a range of 5,000 nautical miles in bomber configuration. They absolutely could have bombed New York, that's not debatable. It may have been a one way trip for the plane with the crew bailing out over the Atlantic to get picked up by U-boats but it was possible. If the Germans managed to build atom bombs (by some accounts they may have but those are unverifiable) then I think they absolutely would have made the trip given enough time. |
|
|
Quoted: Japan earned every bit of it. They did things that horrified dedicated Nazi diplomats sent to them. Things that repelled the architects of the Final Solution. You don't know about it because we wanted the data they generated for our own chem and bio weapon programs, and because we wanted Japan as a bulwark against communism. The Japanese did things so vile it would make you puke. At least one author writing about their atrocities committed suicide. View Quote One a side note both my grandfathers served in WWII. My paternal grandfather was in the army at Normandy on D-Day and my maternal grandfather was a marine who served in the Pacific theater. My paternal grandfather never had a bad thing to say about the Germans (although he hated Italians for some reason I never understood but he served there as well so who knows). Mom's dad hated the Japanese with a fiery passion till the day he died. Never heard many stories from either of them relating to their experiences other than mom's dad stating once or twice that "Japs were some soulless sons of bitches". |
|
|
Quoted: Japan earned every bit of it. They did things that horrified dedicated Nazi diplomats sent to them. Things that repelled the architects of the Final Solution. You don't know about it because we wanted the data they generated for our own chem and bio weapon programs, and because we wanted Japan as a bulwark against communism. The Japanese did things so vile it would make you puke. At least one author writing about their atrocities committed suicide. View Quote I’m just saying, for the most part, the US and GB did not have that same inhumane view of Germany ... the kind needed to say fuck you and drop canned sunshine on cities and give their children’s children cancer. European bombing campaigns in Germany were more often than not limited to strategic areas. The European western front saw a hell of a lot more decorum than the pacific or eastern front. I don’t think Truman drops the bomb on Germany. If it is dropped, its-falling out of Russian bomber bays à la lend lease... because US & GB don’t want the backlash on them for dropping a nuke in Europe. USSR doesn’t care what any non-commies think about them. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Absolutely. And they viewed Americans in the same light we viewed them and their dehumanization of us made their atrocities justified in their eyes. I’m just saying, for the most part, the US and GB did not have that same inhumane view of Germany ... the kind needed to say fuck you and drop canned sunshine on cities and give their children’s children cancer. European bombing campaigns in Germany were more often than not limited to strategic areas. The European western front saw a hell of a lot more decorum than the pacific or eastern front. I don’t think Truman drops the bomb on Germany. If it is dropped, its-falling out of Russian bomber bays à la lend lease... because US & GB don’t want the backlash on them for dropping a nuke in Europe. USSR doesn’t care what any non-commies think about them. View Quote EDIT:SPELL |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.