User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:07:45 PM EST
[#1]
In 2020, when the only thing standing between Kamala harris’ Or Bernie Sanders and the White House Is Donald trump, I wonder where the chips will fall.
I just watched the video posted in which VDH says “Americans are pragmatists” when the only options are Donald trump or socialism. I won’t pretend to be as well spoken and eloquent as VDH, so watch it yourselves if you want. But: When they walk up to the polls, I wonder if the_gang will vote for trump and America or will they side with socialism the world. We already know they’ve sided with a treasonous coup against a duly elected president. Not just sided, but actively participated in the dissemination of provably false information. Not only did these posters participate in perpetuating what they knew to be untrue (they knew what was in the report, of course... they said so themselves) in order to disrrupt this forum, they aided and abetted an attempt to overthrow a lawfully elected government. If they weren’t actively participating then it would stand to reason that they would be upset with being used like useful_idiots. But they weren’t: even D_O_W said something to the effect of “haha you are all angry because we aren’t upset about the report conclusions.” Now, instead of being upset that they were so notoriously abused by the liberal media, they’ve now hippity hopped in lock step to the next narrative. I_wonder_why_that_is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:08:33 PM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
[Noisily drags chair across cement floor and sits] "particularly weak demographic groups"? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"The Mueller investigation caused the GOP to get their asses kicked in the midterms" should have some empirical data to back it up. Someone go find it. Otherwise why are the same people doubling down and not admitting this was a witch hunt, soft coup attempt right from the very start? Best I've seen shows Democrat voters were more concerned about traditional issues like health care and the economy over the Russia investigation by a substantial margin. Hahaha democrat voters had no idea what the fake news media had been reporting on for the past two years....is that what you're telling us? No doubt they wanted socialism and higher taxes....but they also wanted Trump indicted, impeached and thrown in jail. Health care was a huge issue for many voters - which is why it appears to be pants-on-fire retarded that Trump wants to touch that particular stove again. Naturally if the man that is bad-mouthing your system of beliefs(open borders, socialized medicine and free college) and a tenet of those beliefs is a police state government then you are highly influenced and emboldened by the FBI and DOJ going after the orange bad man. That showed in the midterms. The GOP got their asses kicked in the midterms because their popularity fucking tanked with suburban / exurban voters. Having the top of your ticket held by some guy that's only popular with the "over 55 white male with no college degree" crowd is going to crush you outside of the reddest of red districts. Which is exactly what we saw in 2018. Had nothing to do with policy. Exit polling will certainly show that the media did its job for the 2018 midterms. Compare that exit polling with 2016. He is extremely unpopular with the fake news media and that weighs heavily in the minds of particularly weak demographic groups that aren't listening to/reading some alternative news. "particularly weak demographic groups"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:11:09 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...............and THE INVESTIGATION continues................... What's "curious" is whether or not the site is going to stand by its assertion that since the Mueller report has proven to be anothing burger, it won't allow certain people to continue to promulgate a false agenda here. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Curious. What's "curious" is whether or not the site is going to stand by its assertion that since the Mueller report has proven to be anothing burger, it won't allow certain people to continue to promulgate a false agenda here. Using cryptic twitter innuendo in an obvious attempt to proliferate continued discussion and uncertainty on the status of the Russian investigation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:16:09 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Weak-minded, insecure with their beliefs, selfish and easily manipulated. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"The Mueller investigation caused the GOP to get their asses kicked in the midterms" should have some empirical data to back it up. Someone go find it. Otherwise why are the same people doubling down and not admitting this was a witch hunt, soft coup attempt right from the very start? Best I've seen shows Democrat voters were more concerned about traditional issues like health care and the economy over the Russia investigation by a substantial margin. Hahaha democrat voters had no idea what the fake news media had been reporting on for the past two years....is that what you're telling us? No doubt they wanted socialism and higher taxes....but they also wanted Trump indicted, impeached and thrown in jail. Health care was a huge issue for many voters - which is why it appears to be pants-on-fire retarded that Trump wants to touch that particular stove again. Naturally if the man that is bad-mouthing your system of beliefs(open borders, socialized medicine and free college) and a tenet of those beliefs is a police state government then you are highly influenced and emboldened by the FBI and DOJ going after the orange bad man. That showed in the midterms. The GOP got their asses kicked in the midterms because their popularity fucking tanked with suburban / exurban voters. Having the top of your ticket held by some guy that's only popular with the "over 55 white male with no college degree" crowd is going to crush you outside of the reddest of red districts. Which is exactly what we saw in 2018. Had nothing to do with policy. Exit polling will certainly show that the media did its job for the 2018 midterms. Compare that exit polling with 2016. He is extremely unpopular with the fake news media and that weighs heavily in the minds of particularly weak demographic groups that aren't listening to/reading some alternative news. "particularly weak demographic groups"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:18:51 PM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If that's the case you better find a way to get those people back on your side by 2020... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"The Mueller investigation caused the GOP to get their asses kicked in the midterms" should have some empirical data to back it up. Someone go find it. Otherwise why are the same people doubling down and not admitting this was a witch hunt, soft coup attempt right from the very start? Best I've seen shows Democrat voters were more concerned about traditional issues like health care and the economy over the Russia investigation by a substantial margin. Hahaha democrat voters had no idea what the fake news media had been reporting on for the past two years....is that what you're telling us? No doubt they wanted socialism and higher taxes....but they also wanted Trump indicted, impeached and thrown in jail. Health care was a huge issue for many voters - which is why it appears to be pants-on-fire retarded that Trump wants to touch that particular stove again. Naturally if the man that is bad-mouthing your system of beliefs(open borders, socialized medicine and free college) and a tenet of those beliefs is a police state government then you are highly influenced and emboldened by the FBI and DOJ going after the orange bad man. That showed in the midterms. The GOP got their asses kicked in the midterms because their popularity fucking tanked with suburban / exurban voters. Having the top of your ticket held by some guy that's only popular with the "over 55 white male with no college degree" crowd is going to crush you outside of the reddest of red districts. Which is exactly what we saw in 2018. Had nothing to do with policy. Exit polling will certainly show that the media did its job for the 2018 midterms. Compare that exit polling with 2016. He is extremely unpopular with the fake news media and that weighs heavily in the minds of particularly weak demographic groups that aren't listening to/reading some alternative news. "particularly weak demographic groups"? 
Two can play the manipulative political game. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:20:10 PM EST
[#6]
Should point out that Mueller's Grand Jury being handed off to the DC US Attorney's Office could mean they are continuing with a case that has nothing to do with "collusion". In fact, that's most certainly the case since Mueller's turned in his report.
ETA: In fact - they'd have to keep the GJ active until they resolve the issue with the "mystery corporation". |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:26:51 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In 2020, when the only thing standing between Kamala harris’ Or Bernie Sanders and the White House Is Donald trump, I wonder where the chips will fall. I just watched the video posted in which VDH says “Americans are pragmatists” when the only options are Donald trump or socialism. I won’t pretend to be as well spoken and eloquent as VDH, so watch it yourselves if you want. But: When they walk up to the polls, I wonder if the_gang will vote for trump and America or will they side with socialism the world. We already know they’ve sided with a treasonous coup against a duly elected president. Not just sided, but actively participated in the dissemination of provably false information. Not only did these posters participate in perpetuating what they knew to be untrue (they knew what was in the report, of course... they said so themselves) in order to disrrupt this forum, they aided and abetted an attempt to overthrow a lawfully elected government. If they weren’t actively participating then it would stand to reason that they would be upset with being used like useful_idiots. But they weren’t: even D_O_W said something to the effect of “haha you are all angry because we aren’t upset about the report conclusions.” Now, instead of being upset that they were so notoriously abused by the liberal media, they’ve now hippity hopped in lock step to the next narrative. I_wonder_why_that_is. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:27:35 PM EST
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Already reported. Mods should enforce 40xbs statement or delete his post. Using cryptic twitter innuendo in an obvious attempt to proliferate continued discussion and uncertainty on the status of the Russian investigation. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:29:14 PM EST
[#9]
I see we have gone full Adam Schiff in here.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:29:40 PM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...so he can replace it with his own. The ACA is preventing him from implementing TrumpCare.  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They should love the fact that they didn't vote for Trump or republicans. Why didn't they? His administration is now dropping their defense of obamacare. The ACA is preventing him from implementing TrumpCare. List it out in bullet points... |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:40:53 PM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Does 'Bowski really want to complain about posting on "one topic and obsessively so?" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. Quoted: I'm pulling the wording from the Barr report. How is that "having an agenda to sow dissent and incite anger"? Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:47:06 PM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I see we have gone full Adam Schiff in here. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:47:13 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Should point out that Mueller's Grand Jury being handed off to the DC US Attorney's Office could mean they are continuing with a case that has nothing to do with "collusion". In fact, that's most certainly the case since Mueller's turned in his report. ETA: In fact - they'd have to keep the GJ active until they resolve the issue with the "mystery corporation". |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:50:30 PM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You over estimate the severity of Red Hatted Leftist’s meme effect on me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:50:58 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Plenty of Eric Swalwell all up in this thread. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I see we have gone full Adam Schiff in here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:51:41 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
LOL! Yeah, that’s what you were trying to point out with your twitter quote. Backpedaling isn’t a good look for you. To be honest, neither is “conservative, rational, or non-shill.” Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Should point out that Mueller's Grand Jury being handed off to the DC US Attorney's Office could mean they are continuing with a case that has nothing to do with "collusion". In fact, that's most certainly the case since Mueller's turned in his report. ETA: In fact - they'd have to keep the GJ active until they resolve the issue with the "mystery corporation". You're more than welcome to assume that means whatever you want. I'm telling you it has to do with something other than "collusion". |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:55:11 PM EST
[#17]
Share blue values your account. I’m sure they wouldn’t want it banned either.
It’s totally what you meant. Definitely not an attempt to obfuscate and skirt the rules. That’s why you parroted T_S right after he posted it. Right? Definitely not to create a narrative through repetition. And we certainly won’t see continue to reference that in the near future. You’ve never built an entire narrative off a lie, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 12:58:05 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah, (Edited. Please don't quote CoC violations - kpel308). I post on suppressors, shooting, training, reloading, lots of shit. Let's go to the Pit, see who actually visits this site to post about topics other than Trump. Man up for once in your goddamn life. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. Quoted: I'm pulling the wording from the Barr report. How is that "having an agenda to sow dissent and incite anger"? Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. How do you feel about Trump pushing Red Flag laws? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:00:02 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You seem to get upset and COCky easily. How do you feel about Trump pushing Red Flag laws? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. Quoted: I'm pulling the wording from the Barr report. How is that "having an agenda to sow dissent and incite anger"? Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. How do you feel about Trump pushing Red Flag laws? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:00:17 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Plenty of Eric Swalwell all up in this thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:04:57 PM EST
[#21]
@dstry_of_truth
Please post facts about Trumpcare. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:12:50 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
[Chuckles in IACIS] Go read the GRU indictments and then come back and tell me about all the "no factual basis" you find. Also - the silly layperson theory regarding the DNC servers still doesn't account for Podesta's email breach. Totally different system, different compromise method - same attribution. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The IRA was a bunch of contractors tied to Russian intelligence. The DNC hack was straight-up GRU. Call that whatever you want. The same people who vouched for the piss dossier and ran a coup against a sitting president, tell us that Russia hacked the DNC AND leaked it to wiki leaks. Also it was never a definitive conclusion based on hard facts , just a Russia was probably responsible based on the information they had available. Sorry that's not credible. Especially not when you factor in that a paid for partisan dossier loaded with unverified/false information was created and used by these intelligence officials and agencies. That they vouched for. And used it to spy on the opposition campaign. That they then used to launch a 2 year coup attempt to protect themselves with. Go read the GRU indictments and then come back and tell me about all the "no factual basis" you find. Also - the silly layperson theory regarding the DNC servers still doesn't account for Podesta's email breach. Totally different system, different compromise method - same attribution. Same people making those attributions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:13:55 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Show me the exit polling. Best I've seen shows Democrat voters were more concerned about traditional issues like health care and the economy over the Russia investigation by a substantial margin. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"The Mueller investigation caused the GOP to get their asses kicked in the midterms" should have some empirical data to back it up. Someone go find it. Otherwise why are the same people doubling down and not admitting this was a witch hunt, soft coup attempt right from the very start? Best I've seen shows Democrat voters were more concerned about traditional issues like health care and the economy over the Russia investigation by a substantial margin. Democrats trying to get ahead of the facts coming out about how this was all a witch hunt, that the investigation should have ended sooner, but was continued for political reasons...... That they benefited politicaly from the witch hunt to win elections that they may not have won if this came out before. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:14:23 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah, (Edited - kpel308). I post on suppressors, shooting, training, reloading, lots of shit. Let's go to the Pit, see who actually visits this site to post about topics other than Trump. Man up for once in your goddamn life. This must be another grey area. Niiice. Those don’t cause any issues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:15:43 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Facts" that will never be tried in a court of law? Same people making those attributions. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The IRA was a bunch of contractors tied to Russian intelligence. The DNC hack was straight-up GRU. Call that whatever you want. The same people who vouched for the piss dossier and ran a coup against a sitting president, tell us that Russia hacked the DNC AND leaked it to wiki leaks. Also it was never a definitive conclusion based on hard facts , just a Russia was probably responsible based on the information they had available. Sorry that's not credible. Especially not when you factor in that a paid for partisan dossier loaded with unverified/false information was created and used by these intelligence officials and agencies. That they vouched for. And used it to spy on the opposition campaign. That they then used to launch a 2 year coup attempt to protect themselves with. Go read the GRU indictments and then come back and tell me about all the "no factual basis" you find. Also - the silly layperson theory regarding the DNC servers still doesn't account for Podesta's email breach. Totally different system, different compromise method - same attribution. Same people making those attributions. Ballsy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:19:18 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
@dstry_of_truth Please post facts about Trumpcare. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:23:58 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: There are none because all we have is Rally Rhetoric and tweets at this point. I’m dissapointwd. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:24:19 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You're going to commit a bunch of color-of-law felonies where the only way you'd get away with them is betting that a bunch of Russians never, ever travel outside of Russia? Or that the political situation with Russia never changes? Ballsy. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: The IRA was a bunch of contractors tied to Russian intelligence. The DNC hack was straight-up GRU. Call that whatever you want. The same people who vouched for the piss dossier and ran a coup against a sitting president, tell us that Russia hacked the DNC AND leaked it to wiki leaks. Also it was never a definitive conclusion based on hard facts , just a Russia was probably responsible based on the information they had available. Sorry that's not credible. Especially not when you factor in that a paid for partisan dossier loaded with unverified/false information was created and used by these intelligence officials and agencies. That they vouched for. And used it to spy on the opposition campaign. That they then used to launch a 2 year coup attempt to protect themselves with. Go read the GRU indictments and then come back and tell me about all the "no factual basis" you find. Also - the silly layperson theory regarding the DNC servers still doesn't account for Podesta's email breach. Totally different system, different compromise method - same attribution. Same people making those attributions. Ballsy. That was pretty ballsy too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:25:21 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'd probably edit out the Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. Quoted: I'm pulling the wording from the Barr report. How is that "having an agenda to sow dissent and incite anger"? Quoted: By restating the conclusions of the US government that range from the Barr memo back to the Joint Analysis Report in January 2017? That seems like a stretch. How do you feel about Trump pushing Red Flag laws? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:26:01 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So mods aren’t going to enforce their own rules on coc#7. We’ll just stick to the occasional enforcement of #6. This must be another grey area. Niiice. Those don’t cause any issues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 1:27:36 PM EST
[#31]
CoC #6 and #7, as well as trolling and uncivil behavior.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
