User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 1:10:26 PM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/will-kennedys-retirement-help-republicans-at-the-midterms/ Supreme Court nominations are not always cakewalks, however, as cases such as Harriet Miers and Robert Bork (and Clarence Thomas) attest. There are several potential risks to Trump and Republicans: Trump could nominate a relatively moderate justice, in an effort to keep Collins and Alaska's Lisa Murkowski on board and to put maximum pressure on red-state Democrats, but then face a backlash from conservatives. Trump could nominate someone very conservative, but at the price of actually putting votes such as Collins's and Murkowski's at risk and of turning off swing voters. Trump could nominate someone who had vetting issues, or someone who triggered a debate about qualifications, or someone who was seen as too much of a political crony. Historically, these sorts of justices have had trouble getting confirmed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 1:26:08 PM EST
[#2]
I love CT.
No homo |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 1:36:35 PM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nate Silver is a stupid fucking retard and wrong about EVERYTHING. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/will-kennedys-retirement-help-republicans-at-the-midterms/ Supreme Court nominations are not always cakewalks, however, as cases such as Harriet Miers and Robert Bork (and Clarence Thomas) attest. There are several potential risks to Trump and Republicans: Trump could nominate a relatively moderate justice, in an effort to keep Collins and Alaska's Lisa Murkowski on board and to put maximum pressure on red-state Democrats, but then face a backlash from conservatives. Trump could nominate someone very conservative, but at the price of actually putting votes such as Collins's and Murkowski's at risk and of turning off swing voters. Trump could nominate someone who had vetting issues, or someone who triggered a debate about qualifications, or someone who was seen as too much of a political crony. Historically, these sorts of justices have had trouble getting confirmed. If you haven’t noticed, Mitch is pissed Harry Reid changed the rules in the senate. So he fucked them two ways: 1) he used The Biden Rule to fuck the democrats of Garland 2) he used Reid’s new rule to fuck them on Gorsuch Mitch is actually good for SCOTUS nominees. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 1:52:29 PM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can Thomas retire? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 2:18:08 PM EST
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 2:21:22 PM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
MAGA!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 2:22:40 PM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm not tired of winning |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 2:48:23 PM EST
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 3:02:48 PM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I dream of a US with no NFA... How about no pre 86 post 86 bullshit and streamline the process. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 3:09:04 PM EST
[#10]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 3:09:35 PM EST
[#11]
Do I have time to rub one out before a Hawaiian judge nukes it???
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 3:42:07 PM EST
[#12]
Hmmmmm,
ironic timing? Coincidence? I think not. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:01:58 PM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. Sadly, many supporters of one will never recognize the validity of the other's opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:04:27 PM EST
[#14]
NVM
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:04:34 PM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Y'think? Sadly, many supporters of one will never recognize the validity of the other's opinion. And.............................go. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:10:31 PM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Y'think? Sadly, many supporters of one will never recognize the validity of the other's opinion. 2A might support early therapeutic abortions but not say broadly it's just between a woman and her doctor Abortion activists might agree you should be able to own firearms, just not the actual military weapons mentioned in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:14:19 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think it happens this way. 2A might support early therapeutic abortions but not say broadly it's just between a woman and her doctor Abortion activists might agree you should be able to own firearms, just not the actual military weapons mentioned in the 2nd. Because abortion "activists" are fucking progressive and want to kill a lot more than babies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:15:48 PM EST
[#18]
Robert's was just one of Bush's bad decisions .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:32:57 PM EST
[#19]
California Supreme Court response to this article
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:35:50 PM EST
[#20]
Their lips to gods ears.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:39:11 PM EST
[#21]
Fuck that estrogen foundry.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 4:40:49 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:00:21 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:20:04 PM EST
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm pro life, but I'll give it a go. Private property rights. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:25:12 PM EST
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:27:14 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can we still own people?! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. If you don't own yourself, there's no real basis for private property rights. This argument of course ignores morality. But legally, Rothbard argued a fetus is akin to a parasite or a non paying tenant, and can be evicted at the owner's discretion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:28:03 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: While that would be fucking awesome it would probably be short lived. Too many people too stupid to secure them when theyre not around and add in a million ghetto grandmas doing straw purchases. How about no pre 86 post 86 bullshit and streamline the process. How is that any different than now? Are we suddenly going to see a spike in Chicago gangbanger murders because previously NFA items are POOF! over the counter? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:34:02 PM EST
[#28]
Good.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:43:04 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yay social conservatives Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. If you’re pro gun, you’re a social conservative. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:54:52 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Roe is not contrary to life and liberty. Both are about freedom of choice. Nobody is making you get an abortion. Taking away the option is actually less freedom. Until we're in agreement on when life begins, we aren't going to agree on the abortion debate. I doubt that the nation will ever agree on that, given the various religions/lack of religious beliefs out there. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: Contradicting philosophies shouldn't join forces. Roe is contrary to the pursuit of life and liberty, while the 2A protects life and liberty. Both are about freedom of choice. Nobody is making you get an abortion. Taking away the option is actually less freedom. Until we're in agreement on when life begins, we aren't going to agree on the abortion debate. I doubt that the nation will ever agree on that, given the various religions/lack of religious beliefs out there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 5:57:26 PM EST
[#31]
Thomas is by far my favorite SC justice. The fact that the left hates him with a passion is a bonus. To them he's a cooning Uncle Tom. He hates liberals. He isn't going anywhere until he puts his name on 2A legislation.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 6:20:53 PM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thomas is by far my favorite SC justice. The fact that the left hates him with a passion is a bonus. To them he's a cooning Uncle Tom. He hates liberals. He isn't going anywhere until he puts his name on 2A legislation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 6:31:29 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And still, the ARFcom NeverTrump contingent moans_on and on about how terrible it is that President Trump was elected.  Heck I seem to remember people posting they were not going to vote becuase Meliania had some modeling pics floating around and that's was not First Lady like. Seems retarded from the outside looking in and the battles you guys are facing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 6:34:25 PM EST
[#34]
He will be the next one to die at a remote hunting camp and not have an autopsy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 7:34:49 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Huffinglue post can eat a bag of dicks. I hope we get all the freedom back that we've lost since the Strict scrutiny is the first step IMHO. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 8:08:58 PM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. Because abortion "activists" are fucking progressive and want to kill a lot more than babies. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 9:31:16 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Contradicting philosophies shouldn't join forces. Roe is contrary to the pursuit of life and liberty, while the 2A protects life and liberty. Just depends on who's life you're talking about. It's splitting hairs, but thou shall not kill splits a lot of hairs for those that stick their hands in the air. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 9:36:17 PM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You own yourself. If you don't own yourself, there's no real basis for private property rights. This argument of course ignores morality. But legally, Rothbard argued a fetus is akin to a parasite or a non paying tenant, and can be evicted at the owner's discretion. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. If you don't own yourself, there's no real basis for private property rights. This argument of course ignores morality. But legally, Rothbard argued a fetus is akin to a parasite or a non paying tenant, and can be evicted at the owner's discretion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 9:38:31 PM EST
[#39]
Trump will get a third Sup. Ct. nomination, that will trigger an avalanche of changes.
Greatest President evar..... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 9:40:35 PM EST
[#40]
One way to look at the issue of the A word is that right now you have 2 choices. One choice is that Ds are the maojority (spelling intended) and the A word is legal. The other choice is that Rs are the majority and the A word is legal. There are currently no other choices. Choose wisely.
I'm just the messenger. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 10:13:14 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, your landlord can come and kill you, to get you out of their property? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. If you don't own yourself, there's no real basis for private property rights. This argument of course ignores morality. But legally, Rothbard argued a fetus is akin to a parasite or a non paying tenant, and can be evicted at the owner's discretion. But I'm just arguing this issue for sake of devil's advocate. From a private property argument, you enter an agreement with the landlord. As savage as it may seem, (legally and philosophically speaking) an unborn child is offering nothing while taking resources. The unborn child is killed due to a decision to no longer provide those nutrients, and physical burdens for free. I do not advocate that position. But the counter argument might be interpreted as a requirement for people to provide for others they do not wish to care for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 10:45:41 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Again, I'm pro life. But I'm just arguing this issue for sake of devil's advocate. From a private property argument, you enter an agreement with the landlord. As savage as it may seem, (legally and philosophically speaking) an unborn child is offering nothing while taking resources. The unborn child is killed due to a decision to no longer provide those nutrients, and physical burdens for free. I do not advocate that position. But the counter argument might be interpreted as a requirement for people to provide for others they do not wish to care for. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: You are going to have to convince me that killing unwanted children is not only moral, but constitutionally protected. And.............................go. Private property rights. If you don't own yourself, there's no real basis for private property rights. This argument of course ignores morality. But legally, Rothbard argued a fetus is akin to a parasite or a non paying tenant, and can be evicted at the owner's discretion. But I'm just arguing this issue for sake of devil's advocate. From a private property argument, you enter an agreement with the landlord. As savage as it may seem, (legally and philosophically speaking) an unborn child is offering nothing while taking resources. The unborn child is killed due to a decision to no longer provide those nutrients, and physical burdens for free. I do not advocate that position. But the counter argument might be interpreted as a requirement for people to provide for others they do not wish to care for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 10:52:40 PM EST
[#43]
Excellent.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 10:57:09 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yup. This is one area Mitch is going to fuck around on. If you haven't noticed, Mitch is pissed Harry Reid changed the rules in the senate. So he fucked them two ways: 1) he used The Biden Rule to fuck the democrats of Garland 2) he used Reid's new rule to fuck them on Gorsuch Mitch is actually good for SCOTUS nominees. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:12:38 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Again, I'm pro life. But I'm just arguing this issue for sake of devil's advocate. From a private property argument, you enter an agreement with the landlord. As savage as it may seem, (legally and philosophically speaking) an unborn child is offering nothing while taking resources. The unborn child is killed due to a decision to no longer provide those nutrients, and physical burdens for free. I do not advocate that position. But the counter argument might be interpreted as a requirement for people to provide for others they do not wish to care for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:26:46 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Man, America hit it out of the motherfucking park when Clarence Thomas was selected for the bench!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:31:43 PM EST
[#47]
Quote History . You remind me of
EXP somebody |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:35:53 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He has more faith in losing gun control than I do. The same as the Dem's are saying good bye Roe V Wade and others. I look any day now for the Dems to say "There goes Brown V Board of Education". Trump just vetoed the 13th Amendment!!! In other liberal news ... The Sky is Falling!!! The Sky is Falling!!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:37:43 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/28/2018 11:41:18 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If only Roe V. Wade and 2nd Amendment supporters joined forces. Seems like it would be a fairly large group, maybe a huge majority. But alas. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
