User Panel
Quoted:
Me too. That exact one, pretty much. It's still too big but it's the closest thing to what I really want. My first vehicle was an '82 toyota pickup. If it weren't for body rust it would still be on the road. Make that with a crew cab in a 4x4 and I'd buy one in a heartbeat. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/300897/download__1___2__jpeg-1286327.JPG I want one in the worst way... |
|
The 2020 Frontier is getting a class leading 300 HP engine that is 10% better on mileage than the current gen, but that's not saying much. It's also getting an 8 speed transmission I believe. The body gets redesigned for 2021, but there will be no 4 cylinder option and no manual transmission.
|
|
Small truck huge prices. Thats the main problem. I can routinely buy a 4dr short bed full size truck for the same money or cheaper than a tacaoma.
The manufacturers aren't listening to consumers when it comes to smaller trucks. If they would produce today's equivalent of the 80s Isuzu pup for a reasonable price they would make a killing. |
|
Honda Ridgeline? Chevy killed the Avalanche. Dodge Dakota was a joke, unreliable and horrible mileage.
|
|
For the price, small trucks aren’t capable of enough to justify their existence.
|
|
I want another Chevy LUV truck. 4cyl., 4 speed, no air, no carpet, manual window cranks, had a radio swiped from another truck screwed to the dash. That truck went anywhere, it even sorta floated when we flooded. Bare bones transportation & half ton hauling.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
It wouldn't surprise me to find out that changes in the emissions standards created a set of rules for small trucks that made them uneconomical or untenable to manufacture and sell. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no “small” truck sold in the US anymore. The dimensions of the current smaller trucks are pretty much what 1/2 tons were 20 years ago. Small trucks were popular when they had small prices. By the time the Tacoma was created, the price was already matching 1/2 tons. It was a hard sell, and so they became 1/2 tons. All those airbags, crumple zones and tech take up space and add weight. I have an 80s Toyota pickup and a 2010 Tacoma. Looking at the two of them parked side by side you can really see all the bulk that government creates. That bulk may very well save your life in a bad crash but it is there nonetheless. |
|
Quoted:
For the price, small trucks aren’t capable of enough to justify their existence. View Quote Small trucks have their place. Being small, they fit in places a whole lot better (trails, parking spaces, garages etc). I don't tow nor do I haul traditional "truck stuff" that everybody uses as a benchmark (dirt/gravel/construction materials) so a "small" truck fits my needs perfectly. |
|
Quoted:
I liked the older Dakota I rented a while back. That little V-8 moved that truck right along. Too bad the Dakota was such an unreliable, poorly built POS overall. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/300897/download__1___2__jpeg-1286327.JPG I want one in the worst way... View Quote |
|
A rural mail carrier friend of mine drives nothing but extended cab 4x4 S10 trucks. He's had 4 over the years, put 400 to 500k on them. First one was bought new in 03, second bought used cause no longer made. Was totalled out. Bought a mint 3rd that he hates to use on his backwoods route. Bought a 4th so he didn't have to use the nice one.
Currently looking for a 4 door S10 blazer that's not shot. My personal carrier uses the old rangers. This two vehicles are just right ride height for mail boxes |
|
3 Colorado’s and a canyon on the first floor of my parking garage
|
|
I've put 5K miles on a Ford Ranger this year.
They're miserable little things and I don't see any appeal to them at all. |
|
Quoted:
I saw a regular cab short bed truck a few days ago. Looked like a toy. OTOH I parked my 09 GMC 2500 HD CC LB next to a new, lifted Ford Super Duty 2500.....what a monster. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/1818/78C6DA46-2182-46D9-B9A0-9D4411CDDDAC_jpe-1286384.JPG View Quote While yes it will have to be a utility driven truck, I have a soft spot for single cab short bed trucks. I loathed the day when the Chads and Kyles decided to shape the truck market into what it is now. CCSB bajillion ton brodozer monstrosities are the bane of my existence. It's like a rolling Monster Energy drink Tapout White Oakley fucktardery billboard of virtue signaling. Attached File |
|
Quoted: Not quite, if you shop around that is. https://www.brandonford.com/vehicle-details/new-2019-ford-ranger-xl-tampa-fl-id-33547571 View Quote |
|
I see new Colorado’s everywhere. Not so much with the Ranger.
|
|
Honestly I think the thing that most people miss about the minitruck era was the ability to access the bed without having to climb in it.
For people who actually used their truck for hauling (general light homeowner stuff), a simple bed height and width where you can reach in and grab what you need is great to have. No, it won't tow your gooseneck trailer, nor be appropriate for deep swamp bogging, nor be able to haul rail road ties well, nor add inches to your dick... but for the average diy home improvement/garden guy an easily accessible bed is great to have. With my ever-increasing crummy knees, I don't want to climb and rappel like a damn 20 year old ninja to get a bag of compost. Ymmv of course. |
|
Quoted:
Id like to see a picture of the two side by side. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
These damn threads.
No, today's midsize trucks aren't "pretty much" the size of any half ton truck made in the last ~60 years. The only overlap is ride height. Don't believe me? Let's think about this... Since the 1960s or so, half ton trucks have been wide enough that (non Walmart sized) adults could sit three wide on one bench with reasonable comfort. The transmission tunnel or floor mounted shifters might have been a problem, but hip room and shoulder room were not. Try that in a modern midsizer like the Tacoma or Ranger and let us know how that works out. Maybe we should also consider that, before the introduction of the 10th gen F-150 and the Super Duty, 1/2 tons, 3/4 tons, and 1 tons all had the same body. Frames, suspension, drivetrains, and other components were different, but the bodies were not. Those engine bays were big enough to accommodate large inline 6s, big block V8s, and diesels with room to spare. In some cases, mechanics could sit on the fender with their legs in the engine bay. Midsize trucks? Not even close. Bed space isn't remotely comparable, either. The reality is, there was enough white space between half ton trucks and the old compact trucks for there to be an opportunity for midsize trucks. The midsize truck segment took over, and the market abandoned the compact segment. Outside of cheap little FWD pickups for use by delivery fleets, I don't think there's a market for compact trucks anymore. Consumers are migrating by the million from traditional passenger sedans to taller, more spacious CUVs. How many people really want to roll around on America's interstates at 70+ MPH in a beer can with a bed while surrounded by the aforementioned CUVs? |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Honestly I think the thing that most people miss about the minitruck era was the ability to access the bed without having to climb in it. For people who actually used their truck for hauling (general light homeowner stuff), a simple bed height and width where you can reach in and grab what you need is great to have. No, it won't tow your gooseneck trailer, nor be appropriate for deep swamp bogging, nor be able to haul rail road ties well, nor add inches to your dick... but for the average diy home improvement/garden guy an easily accessible bed is great to have. With my ever-increasing crummy knees, I don't want to climb and rappel like a damn 20 year old ninja to get a bag of compost. Ymmv of course. View Quote During the heyday of the minitruck era, most manufacturers produced two distinct models of the same truck. The 2wd versions often had different chassis with a lower ride height and smaller wheels then their 4x4 counterparts. The last company that still did that was Toyota and they stopped in 2016 when they revamped the Tacoma. Now they are all 4x4 ride height. |
|
Quoted:
These damn threads. No, today's midsize trucks aren't "pretty much" the size of any half ton truck made in the last ~60 years. The only overlap is ride height. Don't believe me? Let's think about this... Since the 1960s or so, half ton trucks have been wide enough that (non Walmart sized) adults could sit three wide on one bench with reasonable comfort. The transmission tunnel or floor mounted shifters might have been a problem, but hip room and shoulder room were not. Try that in a modern midsizer like the Tacoma or Ranger and let us know how that works out. Maybe we should also consider that, before the introduction of the 10th gen F-150 and the Super Duty, 1/2 tons, 3/4 tons, and 1 tons all had the same body. Frames, suspension, drivetrains, and other components were different, but the bodies were not. Those engine bays were big enough to accommodate large inline 6s, big block V8s, and diesels with room to spare. In some cases, mechanics could sit on the fender with their legs in the engine bay. Midsize trucks? Not even close. Bed space isn't remotely comparable, either. The reality is, there was enough white space between half ton trucks and the old compact trucks for there to be an opportunity for midsize trucks. The midsize truck segment took over, and the market abandoned the compact segment. Outside of cheap little FWD pickups for use by delivery fleets, I don't think there's a market for compact trucks anymore. Consumers are migrating by the million from traditional passenger sedans to taller, more spacious CUVs. How many people really want to roll around on America's interstates at 70+ MPH in a beer can with a bed while surrounded by the aforementioned CUVs? View Quote |
|
Full sized F150 gets near 20mpg. Tell me why I'd want a smaller truck.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Trucks are too danm big I want a truck the size of a danm forte, but no All I need or want is a 5 foot bed, 2 doors and a 2L engine View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Y'all need to talk to Smyth Performance. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/60883/https___api_thedrive_com_wp-content_uplo-1286546.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Honestly I think the thing that most people miss about the minitruck era was the ability to access the bed without having to climb in it. For people who actually used their truck for hauling (general light homeowner stuff), a simple bed height and width where you can reach in and grab what you need is great to have. No, it won't tow your gooseneck trailer, nor be appropriate for deep swamp bogging, nor be able to haul rail road ties well, nor add inches to your dick... but for the average diy home improvement/garden guy an easily accessible bed is great to have. With my ever-increasing crummy knees, I don't want to climb and rappel like a damn 20 year old ninja to get a bag of compost. Ymmv of course. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/300897/download__1___2__jpeg-1286327.JPG I want one in the worst way... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/300897/download__1___2__jpeg-1286327.JPG I want one in the worst way... View Quote But yeah, small trucks don’t exist any more. My 2000 Dodge Dakota was the same size as my parents 1978 Ram. |
|
Quoted:
Make a small body on frame truck the size of a subcompact with subcompact pricing (13-15k) from a manufacturer that doesn't have a large truck market share to worry about and it will sell. If Hyundai Motor group had any sense, they would have pushed one instead of the Honda Ridgeline ripoff. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
These damn threads. No, today's midsize trucks aren't "pretty much" the size of any half ton truck made in the last ~60 years. The only overlap is ride height. Don't believe me? Let's think about this... Since the 1960s or so, half ton trucks have been wide enough that (non Walmart sized) adults could sit three wide on one bench with reasonable comfort. The transmission tunnel or floor mounted shifters might have been a problem, but hip room and shoulder room were not. Try that in a modern midsizer like the Tacoma or Ranger and let us know how that works out. Maybe we should also consider that, before the introduction of the 10th gen F-150 and the Super Duty, 1/2 tons, 3/4 tons, and 1 tons all had the same body. Frames, suspension, drivetrains, and other components were different, but the bodies were not. Those engine bays were big enough to accommodate large inline 6s, big block V8s, and diesels with room to spare. In some cases, mechanics could sit on the fender with their legs in the engine bay. Midsize trucks? Not even close. Bed space isn't remotely comparable, either. The reality is, there was enough white space between half ton trucks and the old compact trucks for there to be an opportunity for midsize trucks. The midsize truck segment took over, and the market abandoned the compact segment. Outside of cheap little FWD pickups for use by delivery fleets, I don't think there's a market for compact trucks anymore. Consumers are migrating by the million from traditional passenger sedans to taller, more spacious CUVs. How many people really want to roll around on America's interstates at 70+ MPH in a beer can with a bed while surrounded by the aforementioned CUVs? Developing, tooling, and starting up production for a new platform costs millions and millions of dollars, and few people would actually buy that. Look for the cheapest new Nissan Frontier you can find. That’s a really basic vehicle that has had all of the startup costs paid off since the Bush Administration. That’s the floor. Any new BOF vehicle, no matter how small or basic, will cost at least that much. |
|
Quoted:
These damn threads. No, today's midsize trucks aren't "pretty much" the size of any half ton truck made in the last ~60 years. The only overlap is ride height. Don't believe me? Let's think about this... Since the 1960s or so, half ton trucks have been wide enough that (non Walmart sized) adults could sit three wide on one bench with reasonable comfort. The transmission tunnel or floor mounted shifters might have been a problem, but hip room and shoulder room were not. Try that in a modern midsizer like the Tacoma or Ranger and let us know how that works out. Maybe we should also consider that, before the introduction of the 10th gen F-150 and the Super Duty, 1/2 tons, 3/4 tons, and 1 tons all had the same body. Frames, suspension, drivetrains, and other components were different, but the bodies were not. Those engine bays were big enough to accommodate large inline 6s, big block V8s, and diesels with room to spare. In some cases, mechanics could sit on the fender with their legs in the engine bay. Midsize trucks? Not even close. Bed space isn't remotely comparable, either. The reality is, there was enough white space between half ton trucks and the old compact trucks for there to be an opportunity for midsize trucks. The midsize truck segment took over, and the market abandoned the compact segment. Outside of cheap little FWD pickups for use by delivery fleets, I don't think there's a market for compact trucks anymore. Consumers are migrating by the million from traditional passenger sedans to taller, more spacious CUVs. How many people really want to roll around on America's interstates at 70+ MPH in a beer can with a bed while surrounded by the aforementioned CUVs? View Quote 1995 f150 222 L x 79 W x 75 H. 3,925 to 4,307 lbs Seems pretty close to me. |
|
Quoted:
Just saw a commercial for the Ranger. It was advertised at $43-$45 thousand. FUCK THAT. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Oh look another GD I wish we could buy a genuine hilux micro pickup thread.
|
|
Quoted:
And at that size, weight, gas mileage, and price point, you might as well get a half ton. Kharn View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I've put 5K miles on a Ford Ranger this year. They're miserable little things and I don't see any appeal to them at all. View Quote I owned a 1991 F150 until about a year ago. It was about the same size as a new Ranger (other posts on this thread back up that claim with data.) Even though it's not as big as a new F150, I would NOT call my 1991 "little" Unless you are some giant fat-ass, the interior volume of a 1991 F-150 (or a new Ranger) isn't tiny. |
|
|
Quoted:
I saw a regular cab short bed truck a few days ago. Looked like a toy. OTOH I parked my 09 GMC 2500 HD CC LB next to a new, lifted Ford Super Duty 2500.....what a monster. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/1818/78C6DA46-2182-46D9-B9A0-9D4411CDDDAC_jpe-1286384.JPG View Quote Someone built that. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Current Hilux is roughly the same size as our Tacoma. As far as older 'luxes, I am covered. Got 3 sitting here (the USDM "truck" from the 80s is basically the same) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh look another GD I wish we could buy a genuine hilux micro pickup thread. As far as older 'luxes, I am covered. Got 3 sitting here (the USDM "truck" from the 80s is basically the same) I see 'em all the time. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
I miss both of these trucks. small enough to fit in the garage, affordable, big enough for deer hunting. 94 nissan, 93 ranger https://media.ed.edmunds-media.com/nissan/truck/1994/oem/1994_nissan_truck_extended-cab-pickup_se-v6_fq_oem_1_500.jpg https://consumerguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/93114071990215.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Y'all need to talk to Smyth Performance. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/60883/https___api_thedrive_com_wp-content_uplo-1286546.jpg View Quote Is it FWD or built on the R32 platform |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.