Boom headshot.
"You never looked at the two of them to compare?"

ok i think we have at least a shadow of a doubt on anything this guy submitted anyway

It is why the one they showed was slowed down in most of the playback and why the video has not been allowed to be shown in entirety, in real time.
Who thing went down in under 3 minutes from pedo chasing him to Kyle running away from the one armed bandit towards the cops.

Prosecution wants to make it look like Kyle was just waltzing around shooting peaceful protestors for the lulz.

Fair - Interpolation can change what is perceived, however, smart resize ABSOLUTELY can add RANDOM pixels as determined by AI and Deep Learning without mathematical consideration.

wtf not all cases do you "add pixels" when expanding - it all depends on the resolution of the base picture compared to the resolution of the display device.
wtf is wrong, they should be able to get this idiot tossed immediately for missing this glaring detail

This is terrible for the state to have at the end of the day with a tired jury after all the technical stuff earlier

Yep, pretty basic shit.

I've been using Photoshop since it came on a single floppy disk.

He is the true villain in all of this

That's bullshit! The resolution from your average phone camera is larger than a 5"x7" you dumb sack of shit!

it's good cause the computer program salesmen told us it was good...

Just got home and starting to watch the Hernandez testimony.

it is amazing a court would even entertain an "expert" who has answered "i dont know" about everything.

Even if he had, WI law is pretty clear (although I am not a lawyer):  

939.48(2)(a) A person who engages in unlawful conduct of a type likely to provoke others to attack him or her and thereby does provoke an attack is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense against such attack, except when the attack which ensues is of a type causing the person engaging in the unlawful conduct to reasonably believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. In such a case, the person engaging in the unlawful conduct is privileged to act in self-defense, but the person is not privileged to resort to the use of force intended or likely to cause death to the person's assailant unless the person reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant.

939.48(2)(b) The privilege lost by provocation may be regained if the actor in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.

So even if Kyle was the provoker, under 939.48(2)(a), he still has the right to defend himself against death or great bodily harm.    And even if he didn't retain that right under 939.48(2)(a), 939.48(2)(b) explicitly states that if he bails on the fight and gives notice to his assailant that he is withdrawing from the fight (which he 100% did), he regains his entire privileged of self defense without any of the caveats specified in part (a).


I really think this entire case hinges on the legal interpretation of 939.48(2)(c) which reads "A person who provokes an attack, whether by lawful or unlawful conduct, with intent to use such an attack as an excuse to cause death or great bodily harm to his or her assailant is not entitled to claim the privilege of self-defense."

If (a), (b), and (c) are all simultaneously applicable, then there is still nothing to try here, because Kyle retains his right to self defense under the law.   But if (c) is interpreted as excluding (a) and (b), then if the prosecution can prove beyond reasonable doubt that Kyle had intent to provoke an attack wherein he could use his rifle, then he has lost his privilege of self defense in the eyes of the law and can not/could not regain it.    Intent in this case would be (in my view) super-hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.  However, many leftists believe that simply having the gun shows intent.  

Full text for context:
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/statutes/939.48

"Your honor, I'm just a monkey with a computer.  I'm just going to come up with an image that makes my boss happiest."

They have been talking about fucking pixels for two days now. The defense has nothing to go on, just running down the clock it seems.

@Stoop

"20 hrs " of Enhance.

you cannot create detail. You can expose detail, but you cannot create detail. the AI is still making a best guess effort, using the available data. It is only as good as the initial data it has to work with.

State tech guy: common interpolating algorithm and it is used industry-wide. Common. Pinch and zoom! I have 20 hrs of training on it.

Funny how the lynchpin witnesses to something like this have been exempted from testifying.
Because they motherfucking glow I bet....

that is a different kind of interpolation for time stretching video. discussion is about image enlargement

Might be. Might not. Depends on the resolution of the print.

Did Kyle suddenly become left handed when he allegedly pointed the rifle at them by the truck?

Glowie as fuck. I bet if we got the full drone footage we'd see a strobe on the prick.

What the fuck is this? You admitted shitty screen shots with pixelation from hell?

All that for this??? With no explanation, I think this is a fart in the wind for the state

the images are from drone video

Yeah but he billed the prosecution for 40 hours.

Looks like someone sorting out a cheap sling to me.

I wasn't sure if that was a sly dig by the judge at the Prosecution, or not, apparently Fatlock took it that way, lol.

Oh, well in that case, let’s all chimp out. That will definitely help.

This is total insanity.

Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)
Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)
Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)
Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)
Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)
Enhance (BEEP BEEP BEEP)

Attached File

Additional charges - political trial

Literally garbage in those two, "enhancements"

Starting to see a whole lot of evidence that point towards our feeb friends lurking about ALL FUCKING OVER this case.
Uncalled witnesses, "lost" drone footage, a line of prosecution that doesn't gel with the case as known

Attached File

ERHMAHGUURRD1!!

IDZ OHGRE!! DEY GODDEM!11!!

Monday! Monday! Monday!


state will submit additional charges.

He used M$Paint with the spray paint tool to enhance.

it's best guess can add detail that is not there.

weather that would ever be interpreted as anything other than an artifact is doubtful

Yep, inter frame processing that may or may not have been carried out on the video before they got it can create all kinds of artefacts as well. Video guy clearly doesn't understand that or how his choice of algorithm might interact with that.

What is the prosecution stating about the charges?

Find the video, it's in the thread. It doesn't show fucking shit. The lazy ass detective lap dog for the prosecution said he saw Kyle raise a gun at ziminsky on that shitty video on his phone.
It's 100% fabricated bullshit that he saw that. This is the same piece of shit that got a warrant for Kyle's arrest before doing much investigating, and seeing hardly any evidence. Sk8ter boy's backpack and skateboard disappeared, and lefty's phone was not searched by order of the da, even though the cops had a warrant.
I know and worked with shitbags like that, and it was one of the main reasons I quit le. There is not a speck of morals or honesty in this trial from the prosecution, and it makes me sick.

But, it's "Smart," smarter than us.  Why won't we just let it tell us what to believe?  SMART RESIZE.  It's just common sense that it's got to be good.

Addition charges from state wanted.

State want 2hr plus 1/2 rebuttal.