User Panel
We should go back to the days where employers chained the doors shut so employees couldnt leave.
Where there is a ying, there is a yang. Right now the union employees are captain. Employers of the early 1900’s fucked things up, change my mind. |
|
fauw
fgm ever since they screwed the bond holders and gave it to the uaw what's the fucking point fail fail fail |
|
GM should furlough everybody for 6 months...go from n vacation, lock the doors, turn off the lights, and not even speak to the UAW.
Just walk. You don’t negotiate with people holding you hostage. |
|
Quoted:
Well, not exactly. The legacy UAW membership is making top wages and benefits for the work they do. Wages/benefits aren't free, somebody got to pay for them, that's I don't care one way or another, I vowed to never buy another G/Ford/FCA vehicle and I meant it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So we're cheering for American manufacturing employees to have worse lives at the expense of a shitty corporation simply because they collectively bargain instead of individually and everyone voluntarily did this? Cool, got it. I don't care one way or another, I vowed to never buy another G/Ford/FCA vehicle and I meant it. Its no different being non-union...they don't pay me as much and someone else will...I leave. There are people who have worked longer than myself and get more even if they don't produce as much output...this is much more or a large corporation characteristic than union vs non-union based on what I can observe and have experienced. |
|
Quoted:
Pretty much. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). |
|
Quoted:
No. No they didn't. The stock deal was a ruse from the beginning. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I’m no fan of the UAW, but GM paid back its loan ahead of schedule. The .gov gambled and lost, that’s on the .gov. GM has completely fulfilled their end of the deal. |
|
Quoted:
Can you point out the forced part to me please. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: What are the parameters in which a company is forced to hire union workers? Quoted:
Explain to me how a company is forced to employ union workers. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES Sec. 8. [§ 158.] (a) [Unfair labor practices by employer] It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer-- (1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7 [section 157 of this title]; (2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it: Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made and published by the Board pursuant to section 6 [section 156 of this title], an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with him during working hours without loss of time or pay; —————————————— Apparently striking is covered under " other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection", so firing them en masse is considered "unfair labor practices" under section 8. Also under section 8, if the employees vote to unionize, then they get to unionize and tough shit if the employer doesn't like it. Your only other option at that point is to close up shop. but you probably knew all this already. |
|
Quoted:
I was thinking about this earlier, and have a theory on how this whole deal could play out. GM makes quite a few of their vehicles outside of the US, and since those plants are unaffected, they should have a pretty decent cash flow. If they hold out until mortgages start coming due, the paycheck to paycheck workers will be begging to come back, and will sign whatever GM offers them. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
UAW can last for 22.7 weeks, assuming GM's publicly disclosed insurance costs are accurate and taking into account the $250 per member per week strike pay. How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). |
|
Quoted:
Then I guess GM should have invested into hiring and filling all those jobs on their own. They still can but it would stop production and take time/money. With that said, the union has stopped production and it is costing GM time/money. GM is in a position to give the union a few options: 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
UAW can last for 22.7 weeks, assuming GM's publicly disclosed insurance costs are accurate and taking into account the $250 per member per week strike pay. How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). |
|
|
Quoted:
From the union members I know, they're usually full of debt. Motorcycles, RV's, homes, credit cards and other stuff. Most will be in dire shape in about 2 months like you said. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). Then offer the UAW 40% of what they had in their last contract. |
|
Quoted:
Yep. Pretty soon, it's rank and file will run out of money. Most people live paycheck to paycheck. As weeks go by, people will need to cross the picket line and go back to work. GM might offer a little bonus or pay raise for those that do so. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). |
|
Quoted:
In that case, GM should stretch this out until the new year. Then offer the UAW 40% of what they had in their last contract. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). Then offer the UAW 40% of what they had in their last contract. |
|
Quoted:
Unions pick option A, every time. That's what they are doing right now. They are hurting every American that has money invested in GM (which the entire fucking country had to come together to bail out), every American depending on parts or vehicles to be delivered, every truck driver that delivers the vehicles, every associated business that produces supplies, components, or provides infrastructure for GM. They are holding billions of dollars of commerce hostage and threatening the livelihoods of millions of others..... and they are PROUD OF IT. I'm guessing, based on your location and some of your posts, that you have friends or family that are union workers (maybe not UAW). Those jobs are far less common down here, but when unions strike it hurts every other part of the economic ecosystem. Aside from their strong political and financial support of those that tend to oppose the rights of the members on this site, there are very real economic reasons why many have no love of unions. Union labor is to the entrepreneurial and non-union labor force as management is perceived by union labor. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? Would you: A) Lock every thread, lock every user account, and prevent the site from operating until you got what you wanted or B) Approach the Brownells and the Avilas to discuss your proposal That's what they are doing right now. They are hurting every American that has money invested in GM (which the entire fucking country had to come together to bail out), every American depending on parts or vehicles to be delivered, every truck driver that delivers the vehicles, every associated business that produces supplies, components, or provides infrastructure for GM. They are holding billions of dollars of commerce hostage and threatening the livelihoods of millions of others..... and they are PROUD OF IT. I'm guessing, based on your location and some of your posts, that you have friends or family that are union workers (maybe not UAW). Those jobs are far less common down here, but when unions strike it hurts every other part of the economic ecosystem. Aside from their strong political and financial support of those that tend to oppose the rights of the members on this site, there are very real economic reasons why many have no love of unions. Union labor is to the entrepreneurial and non-union labor force as management is perceived by union labor. You have a large plant that plans on opening in the near future and employing 10,000 people. Project managers and HR managers estimate it will cost $1,750,000 dollars to advertise, interview, and process all the applicants to get to an acceptable staffing level. Then add on another $175,000 a year for employee loss and new hires and $500,000,000 for wages/benefits per year. A union comes to the company and offers its services to provide employees who are already familiar with that companies industry at $450,000,000 a year to do all the work/costs previously mentioned. The company runs the numbers the union presented and sees that it will save them approx $50,000,000 dollars a year. Any company would seriously take that option and consider it since companies are in the business of saving/making money. Now you get the govt involved to some extent because once you get to the point of having 10,000 workers employed they govt wants to ensure, as best as they can, the stability of that economy. I think the intention is to prevent a economic catastrophe where all 10,000 workers lose their jobs turning that 10-15 year built up area into a 3rd world shit hole with 10,000 unemployed and a company that has a major effect on the economy unable to produce goods and damaging the market. |
|
Worked for the UAW in the late 90's right out of high school. Not even adjusting for inflation, the most money I have made vs calories burned. Paid good money to sit on my butt and go crazy. Tried getting other stuff done in my down time and got reprimanded. This was for CTS corp, a manufacturer of throttle position sensors, not even an auto manufacturer. Screw them, just driving costs up.
Got invited to go to a union hall to get my pins. Asked my dad what goes on there. His response was "that is where they decide what windows to knock out and tires to slash". |
|
Quoted:
Explain to me how a company is forced to employ union workers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? |
|
@40xb
I have a serious question for you, and I hope this doesn't get passed over too quickly, considering how fast the thread is moving. Do you truly support modern unions and all that they stand for (including all of the bad things, such as Democratic donations, bribery, theft, embezzlement, threats, violence, vandalism, assault, etc...), or do you support the idea of unions as they once were, as seen through nostalgia-tinted glasses? You have been very staunch in your support of unions, but I've noticed an interesting similarity in your support of unions when compared to SWIRE's unwavering support from the NRA. In both examples, it seems to me that the idea of a union (or the NRA, in SWIRE's example) somehow means more to you than what the union actually accomplishes. More importantly, this nostalgic idea of what unions mean is somehow able to completely overshadow all of the horrible things they have done in recent history, things that are blatantly obvious to those not blinded by nostalgia. Just as WLP's rampant abuse of NRA funding was often overlooked, ignored, or even excused by the most staunch NRA supporters, the UAW's blatant history of wrongdoing by management (embezzlement, theft, fraud, etc...) never seems to get addressed by you. I understand completely if you truly support the idea of unions, and the ideals that they were intended to represent, but how can you in good conscience support the current UAW, given it's extensive and well-documented history of crooked union bosses, scams, and schemes? How do you justify supporting what is now essentially a criminal organization, and one that goes against our very constitutional rights? To me, the cancer at the top of the UAW is almost identical to the cancer that has consumed the NRA. How anyone can continue to support these organizations while they are rotten to the core is completely beyond me. I support the idea behind both, but only if they are completely purged of the rot and the filth that now consumes them, and then rebuilt to their once proud ideals. Even if the original cause was just, how can one continue to support an organization that is now ran almost entirely by criminals? |
|
Quoted:
Tough shit. I pay about $150 monthly plus a $6000 out of pocket max for my health care. Welcome to Obamacare motherfuckers! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Tell that to air traffic controllers and emergency services. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What is wrong with contract negotiations? Do you honestly consider this a fair example of "contract negotiations"? |
|
Quoted:
So you don’t actually know if GM could hire non-union replacements? But you speak with such authority.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Geez, the average UAW GM worker doesn’t even know the details of GM’s last offer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I was thinking about this earlier, and have a theory on how this whole deal could play out. GM makes quite a few of their vehicles outside of the US, and since those plants are unaffected, they should have a pretty decent cash flow. If they hold out until mortgages start coming due, the paycheck to paycheck workers will be begging to come back, and will sign whatever GM offers them. |
|
|
Quoted:
Look at it from a logistical standpoint. You have a large plant that plans on opening in the near future and employing 10,000 people. Project managers and HR managers estimate it will cost $1,750,000 dollars to advertise, interview, and process all the applicants to get to an acceptable staffing level. Then add on another $175,000 a year for employee loss and new hires and $500,000,000 for wages/benefits per year. A union comes to the company and offers its services to provide employees who are already familiar with that companies industry at $450,000,000 a year to do all the work/costs previously mentioned. The company runs the numbers the union presented and sees that it will save them approx $50,000,000 dollars a year. Any company would seriously take that option and consider it since companies are in the business of saving/making money. Now you get the govt involved to some extent because once you get to the point of having 10,000 workers employed they govt wants to ensure, as best as they can, the stability of that economy. I think the intention is to prevent a economic catastrophe where all 10,000 workers lose their jobs turning that 10-15 year built up area into a 3rd world shit hole with 10,000 unemployed and a company that has a major effect on the economy unable to produce goods and damaging the market. View Quote It's more like you spend the $500,000,000, then a union comes in and convinces your employees to unionize, they then 'bargain' a rate of $750,000,000 but produce only 40% of the previous productivity levels. And now you can't get rid of them, or the union, because the US government will stop you from doing so. All the while, a significant part of that extra $250,000,000 you are paying is going to politicians that hate your business and want to see you fail, but also want to see you pay $1,250,000,000 for labor while you fail. |
|
Quoted:
UAW can last for 22.7 weeks, assuming GM's publicly disclosed insurance costs are accurate and taking into account the $250 per member per week strike pay. How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. |
|
Quoted:
Sec. 7. [§ 157.] Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all of such activities except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment as authorized in section 8(a)(3) [section 158(a)(3) of this title]. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES Sec. 8. [§ 158.] (a) [Unfair labor practices by employer] It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer-- (1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7 [section 157 of this title]; (2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it: Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made and published by the Board pursuant to section 6 [section 156 of this title], an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with him during working hours without loss of time or pay; —————————————— Apparently striking is covered under " other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection", so firing them en masse is considered "unfair labor practices" under section 8. Also under section 8, if the employees vote to unionize, then they get to unionize and tough shit if the employer doesn't like it. Your only other option at that point is to close up shop. but you probably knew all this already. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: What are the parameters in which a company is forced to hire union workers? Quoted:
Explain to me how a company is forced to employ union workers. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES Sec. 8. [§ 158.] (a) [Unfair labor practices by employer] It shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer-- (1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7 [section 157 of this title]; (2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it: Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made and published by the Board pursuant to section 6 [section 156 of this title], an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with him during working hours without loss of time or pay; —————————————— Apparently striking is covered under " other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection", so firing them en masse is considered "unfair labor practices" under section 8. Also under section 8, if the employees vote to unionize, then they get to unionize and tough shit if the employer doesn't like it. Your only other option at that point is to close up shop. but you probably knew all this already. |
|
Quoted: I don't buy their vehicles, but from an objective perspective the Union is trying to maximize benefit to the workers, make as much as they can while not drying up the work completely due to costs and on the other end the business is trying to reduce costs, maximize productivity and not drive the workers away due to reductions in compensation. Its no different being non-union...they don't pay me as much and someone else will...I leave. There are people who have worked longer than myself and get more even if they don't produce as much output...this is much more or a large corporation characteristic than union vs non-union based on what I can observe and have experienced. View Quote |
|
"A GM plant in Lansing, Mich., that builds the Cadillac ATS and CTS and Chevrolet Camaro is running at just 33 percent capacity, while the GM Orion Township, Mich., facility that builds the Chevrolet Bolt electric car and the Chevrolet Sonic subcompact runs at 34 percent capacity. A Bowling Green, Ky., plant that builds the Chevrolet Corvette works at just 27 percent of its potential output, according to LMC data.
"Until GM gets more flexibility in its platforms, it will continue to have to play whack-a-mole with its plants as the market transitions — and it will happen again," said LMC analyst Bill Rinna. In all, the four GM car plants that will remain open have a combined capacity of more than 800,000 vehicles a year, but are expected to produce only 360,000 cars this year, according to LMC. Industry analysts have said the general break-even point for running an assembly plant profitably is around 80 percent. Barra said on Monday GM's North American plants are running at 70 percent capacity — including light-truck plants that are working overtime." https://www.autonews.com/article/20181128/OEM01/181129725/gm-s-plan-only-partly-solves-gap-between-capacity-and-sedan-demand |
|
Quoted:
We should go back to the days where employers chained the doors shut so employees couldnt leave. Where there is a ying, there is a yang. Right now the union employees are captain. Employers of the early 1900's fucked things up, change my mind. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Doesn’t the strike fund cover GM, Ford, and FCA? If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. Then they'll just increase the dues to make it all back. |
|
Quoted:
Explain to me how a company is forced to employ union workers. View Quote 2. They agree to allow the union to operate as long as they supply a reliable work force. 3. Ask caterpillar union clowns what happens if you f around too much. They are not forced to play ball with the unions but they can’t stop employees from joining a union. IMO they should show UAW workers the door. They can go work somewhere else. Oh wait, making cars is pretty specialized, not sure there is much out there along those lines for them. Seems to me it would be in everybody’s interest to ditch the union/commie scammers and build the best product possible. JMO though |
|
Quoted: I know nothing about whats going on. From my no info point of view I see nothing funny of mocking men fighting for a better work environment and wage. should they just shut up taking less? Everything you dont like is a socialist right? The rights socalist is the lefts nazis. Shits old. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Doesn’t the strike fund cover GM, Ford, and FCA? If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. |
|
|
Quoted:
Sure they can.... Then they'll just increase the dues to make it all back. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. Then they'll just increase the dues to make it all back. Hopefully that would be enough to get a decent number of members to jump ship, but I’m not gonna hold my breath. |
|
Quoted:
See NLRB regulations, or a whitewashed erosion on their website: https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/rights/employer-union-rights-and-obligations View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The contract is up isn't it. GM is not forced to do anything. https://www.nlrb.gov/rights-we-protect/rights/employer-union-rights-and-obligations It is an unfair labor practice for either party to refuse to bargain collectively with the other, but parties are not compelled to reach agreement or make concessions.
If after sufficient good faith efforts, no agreement can be reached, the employer may declare impasse, and then implement the last offer presented to the union. However, the union may disagree that true impasse has been reached and file a charge of an unfair labor practice for failure to bargain in good faith. The NLRB will determine whether true impasse was reached based on the history of negotiations and the understandings of both parties. If the Agency finds that impasse was not reached, the employer will be asked to return to the bargaining table. In an extreme case, the NLRB may seek a federal court order to force the employer to bargain. The parties' obligations do not end when the contract expires. They must bargain in good faith for a successor contract, or for the termination of the agreement, while terms of the expired contract continue. A party wishing to end the contract must notify the other party in writing 60 days before the expiration date, or 60 days before the proposed termination. The party must offer to meet and confer with the other party and notify the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service of the existence of a dispute if no agreement has been reached by that time. Declared an impasse if they cannot agree Company has to pay and the workers have to work during negotiations. Sounds like that isn't happening on either side of GM/Union. |
|
Quoted:
Aren't Ford and FCA on indefinite contracts now? (Not being snarky. I don't know the answer 100%.) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. Ford, Fiat-Chrysler workers call for all-out strike alongside GM workers Do it!! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? |
|
Quoted: Yep. Pretty soon, it's rank and file will run out of money. Most people live paycheck to paycheck. As weeks go by, people will need to cross the picket line and go back to work. GM might offer a little bonus or pay raise for those that chose to do so early. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Lol at the big capital ball gagglers in herehttps://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/304912/1DFC3DE8-70AE-40EC-B643-C627A1BBBC8B_jpeg-1093795.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Aren't Ford and FCA on indefinite contracts now? (Not being snarky. I don't know the answer 100%.) View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So people shouldn't be able to associate with other people or groups freely? 1. Accept the terms we are giving 2. Counter with terms that are acceptable to GM 3. Pack your bags we will hire outside of the union. It's probably too early to know what either side is planning to do. Strikes can and have last(ed) days, months, or years. Yes, the UAW, has enough $$ to carry out a strike for the near term. Probably not for months or years though. And GM has just taken the first of its contigency planning steps - by pulling the UAWs healthcare funding. My money is on GM to win this one, but who knows? How long the UAW members can survive on $250 per week (which they will owe taxes on!) is another story. I'd be surprised if the UAW could make it more than 7 weeks (which would be two mortgage payments for most members). If so, they can’t burn it all on GM. |
|
Y'all can banter about the pros and cons of the UAW and unions ad infinitum.
In my mind it comes down to the simple fact that I never needed anyone to negotiate my remuneration for me, nor was I willing to tie my potential for advancement - and earnings potential - to people with less motivation, skills, drive, and potential than me. Be a lazy dumbass if you want...just don't limit me with your bullshit. In other words, I'm not willing to sacrifice my potential and be satisfied with earning what the lowest common denominator working for a company earns. Wages should reflect production, not longevity. Why should I have to do my job and pick up the slack for some schmoe while he earns the same 'scale' as me? Why should I work hard if I can ghost and make the same 'scale'? Anyone who thinks that shit is rational or fair is a socialist. |
|
Quoted:
Lol, what is their average pay now anyway? View Quote Attached File |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.