Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 214
Link Posted: 11/8/2017 11:14:04 PM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
ffuuuu.......

Winning.
Link Posted: 11/8/2017 11:16:47 PM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all  of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They  can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know.

If you have watched  Congressional public hearings certain government  agency witnesses  , will often say that they cannot answer  a  specific question(s)in that  public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require.

It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government  agency security clearance.

When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred"

of supporting evidence means nothing.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters.
I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that assessment claim. Of course, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all  of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They  can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know.

If you have watched  Congressional public hearings certain government  agency witnesses  , will often say that they cannot answer  a  specific question(s)in that  public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require.

It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government  agency security clearance.

When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred"

of supporting evidence means nothing.
It's also clear, based on your posts, that neither have you or any of the other Dim lackeys here. Most of whom have pretended to be a part of the inner circle in Washington or have inside information, information which has invariably turned out to be wrong time and again. It's pathetic.

You guys still have trouble getting the number of agencies who "agree" correct, one of you was claiming within the last couple of months that it was 17.

Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain.
Link Posted: 11/8/2017 11:20:16 PM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain.
View Quote
That's key for me. They aren't simply NeverTrumps. If you follow their postings in various threads, they're AlwaysSwamp moreso than NeverTrump.
Link Posted: 11/8/2017 11:21:32 PM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
...When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them...
View Quote
No offense intended, as you are no doubt a brilliant and clever fellow, but you seem to have forgetten when the Director of National Intelligence literally lied under oath on television.


A person would have to be fucktarded to believe that lot of ne'r-do-wells.
Link Posted: 11/8/2017 11:58:54 PM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


It's also clear, based on your posts, that neither have you or any of the other Dim lackeys here. Most of whom have pretended to be a part of the inner circle in Washington or have inside information, information which has invariably turned out to be wrong time and again. It's pathetic.

You guys still have trouble getting the number of agencies who "agree" correct, one of you was claiming within the last couple of months that it was 17.

Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain.
View Quote
Where in my post did I refer to 17 intel agencies?I stated "major intel agencies"Also-I don;t know who "you guys" are? Pay attention to the MAJOR intel agencies-the ones that the Pentagon follows and listens  to.

Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking  heads tell you to  say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:11:19 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Where in my post did I refer to 17 intel agencies?I stated "major intel agencies"Also-I don;t know who "you guys" are? Pay attention to the MAJOR intel agencies-the ones that the Pentagon follows and listens  to.

Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking  heads tell you to  say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak.
View Quote
Are you feeling okay? Your writing has the feel of someone who's about to have a stroke.

On top of that, the content is indicative of brain damage.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 5:59:16 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Where in my post did I refer to 17 intel agencies?I stated "major intel agencies"Also-I don;t know who "you guys" are? Pay attention to the MAJOR intel agencies-the ones that the Pentagon follows and listens  to.

Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking  heads tell you to  say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak.
View Quote
So we should ignore crimes in the past that have ample evidence, but pursue others? Some of the Manafort stuff predates the dnc server and hillary email email scandals. 

I guess this is ok'd by the confirmation bias of a community that steadfastly maintains their faith in gov't agencies that have lied to the public and used their power to undermine and bully American citizens.   
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:05:10 AM EST
[#8]
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-08/icahn-subpoenaed-by-u-s-over-biofuel-policy-while-trump-adviser

Federal investigators have issued subpoenas for information on Carl Icahn’s efforts to change biofuel policy while he served as an adviser to President Donald Trump, according to regulatory filings.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York is “seeking production of information” pertaining to Icahn’s activities regarding the Renewable Fuel Standard, according to a Form 10-Q that Icahn Enterprises LP filed on Friday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
View Quote
ETA: Probably unrelated. Kinda swampy though.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:07:25 AM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
WHAT RHE FUCK IS GOING ON IN THIS THREAD???!?
View Quote
Some people are still crybabying over this:

Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:15:55 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The fact that you haven't seen "a shred"

of supporting evidence means nothing.
View Quote

If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them.
The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more.

The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often.
Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:21:52 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
WHAT RHE FUCK IS GOING ON IN THIS THREAD???!?
View Quote
Statists vs MAGA
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:23:41 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense...

View Quote
Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:25:42 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them.
The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more.

The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often.
Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The fact that you haven't seen "a shred"

of supporting evidence means nothing.

If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them.
The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more.

The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often.
Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone.
You're wrong.   I would tell you how and why you are wrong but you don't have the clearance so you are just going to have to take my word for it.

















Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:27:45 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them.
The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more.

The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often.
Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The fact that you haven't seen "a shred"

of supporting evidence means nothing.

If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them.
The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more.

The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often.
Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone.
What type of case would you want atlaturne on one of your juries?

Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:34:26 AM EST
[#15]
Fusion GPS co-founder cuts deal to talk about Trump dossier
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:36:32 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense...

Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment.
What you said there aught to resonate in their bottom of their empty heads.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:37:45 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What type of case would you want atlaturne on one of your juries?

View Quote
Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:38:11 AM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What you said there aught to resonate in their bottom of their empty heads.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I can't believe folks are so stupid as to CONTINUOUSLY engage these Swamp Trolls' Nonsense...

Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment.
What you said there aught to resonate in their bottom of their empty heads.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:40:32 AM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
What type of case would you want atlaturne on one of your juries?

Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:40:42 AM EST
[#20]
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:42:47 AM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
What type of case would you want atlaturne on one of your juries?

Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:44:40 AM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired.  I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 7:49:00 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired.  I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired.  I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer.
Well he said that in the video link, so sorry the tweet wasn't sufficient.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:15:11 AM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote


Trump's done this time!

Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:15:46 AM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well he said that in the video link, so sorry the tweet wasn't sufficient.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired.  I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer.
Well he said that in the video link, so sorry the tweet wasn't sufficient.
Then maybe you shouldn't get your news from random shitbag's tweets and spewing them here as fact
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:17:23 AM EST
[#26]
Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:19:43 AM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Then maybe you shouldn't get your news from random shitbag's tweets and spewing them here as fact
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired.  I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer.
Well he said that in the video link, so sorry the tweet wasn't sufficient.
Then maybe you shouldn't get your news from random shitbag's tweets and spewing them here as fact
Sorry clicking on links is hard. TL;DR in full effect.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:23:54 AM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/7DF23558-949A-41E1-AFAF-E2C183B546C5-357590.JPG

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/4E11A351-6A42-410D-986D-FCA65C323D40-357591.JPG

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/1F5F82BB-DAE5-4ED7-9EE2-9E6E743F24A1-357593.JPG

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/8C1B66EB-B4E3-4FD8-8CA6-91EAAC615D3D-357597.JPG
View Quote
Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:37:03 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.
View Quote
What is your evidence for that?
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:38:27 AM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What is your evidence for that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.
What is your evidence for that?
I can read.

ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case.  These cases are between two other parties.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 8:48:09 AM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.


George Webb Sweigart who has been investigating Hillary the DNC and was the one that broke open the Awans case.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 9:10:09 AM EST
[#32]
There is a lot of speculation that the sealed indictments are a way to put a gag on George Webb’s lawsuits around Awan Contra and Uranium 1.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 9:12:25 AM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
There is a lot of speculation that the sealed indictments are a way to put a gag on George Webb’s lawsuits around Awan Contra and Uranium 1.
View Quote
"That's not how this works.  That's not how any of this works..."
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 11:13:32 AM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


"That's not how this works.  That's not how any of this works..."
View Quote
Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls.

I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you.

ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 11:24:43 AM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls.

I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you.

ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432.
View Quote
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 11:26:38 AM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
It's been a few minutes since I posted it, so I'm sure that number is significantly higher by now.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 11:27:46 AM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's been a few minutes since I posted it, so I'm sure that number is significantly higher by now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's been a few minutes since I posted it, so I'm sure that number is significantly higher by now.
Oh MY GOD!!!
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 11:45:17 AM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Interesting. 
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:11:29 PM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls.

I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you.

ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


"That's not how this works.  That's not how any of this works..."
Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls.

I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you.

ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432.
Alright.  

Care to explain to the class how a "sealed indictment" (that we haven't established exists yet) would work as a "gag order" on some random guy that's part of a completely unrelated civil suit?
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:14:44 PM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Alright.  

Care to explain to the class how a "sealed indictment" (that we haven't established exists yet) would work as a "gag order" on some random guy that's part of a completely unrelated civil suit?
View Quote
I'm talking directly to you. I'm not engaging you for the behavior that you're likely getting paid for. I'm simply pointing out that you are going down the same path that the other former posters did. You will not likely be around here much longer on that trajectory.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:15:25 PM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
"That's not how this works.  That's not how any of this works..."
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is a lot of speculation that the sealed indictments are a way to put a gag on George Webb’s lawsuits around Awan Contra and Uranium 1.
"That's not how this works.  That's not how any of this works..."
The algorithms must be malfunctioning.
This seems to be "this posters" response to everything
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:41:59 PM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I can read.

ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case.  These cases are between two other parties.
View Quote
Do you ever get the sense that you are dealing with a bunch of fourth or  fifth graders,with some of the theories that they continually rely on and expound on?Its painfully obvious.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:47:46 PM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Riiiiiight....

And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia.  We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all.  Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece.  LULZ.

Have you held a clearance, of any sort?  Any training in clearance?  Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all?  
View Quote
What exactly is "training in clearance" please elaborate and explain.Also please tell about your attending a "training in clearance" program-where and when.

No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:49:43 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I can read.

ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case.  These cases are between two other parties.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Those appear to be civil cases.

ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon.
What is your evidence for that?
I can read.

ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case.  These cases are between two other parties.
Do you know who "Sweigert" is?

Is Kihn's explanation above correct about Sweigert?
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:50:07 PM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I want to believe, but outside of Trump winning the election, everything else has been one letdown after another.  I will not have hope again until something good actually happens.
View Quote
An accurate and truthful post-"everything else has been one letdown after another"-that sums up the problem and current state of the union.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:54:51 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


This.

Many of them, even one here a couple of months back, was repeating the "All 87 Of Our Security Agencies agree!" BS talking point, never mind the fact that's demonstrably false, and that the agencies in question never even laid a hand on the Dim server because they wouldn't turn it over, instead they were fed information from a third party.
View Quote
Anyone that has been part of the intel community would never talk about "all 87 of our security agencies"-anyone who makes such a claim has outed themselves in showing they have never served in an intel/counter intel capacity.Red  flag-no credibility.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 12:58:34 PM EST
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What exactly is "training in clearance" please elaborate and explain.Also please tell about your attending a "training in clearance" program-where and when.

No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Riiiiiight....

And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia.  We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all.  Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece.  LULZ.

Have you held a clearance, of any sort?  Any training in clearance?  Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all?  
What exactly is "training in clearance" please elaborate and explain.Also please tell about your attending a "training in clearance" program-where and when.

No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts.
It's a bunch of fun JKO courses.  I laughed, I cried.
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 1:01:15 PM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
An accurate and truthful post-"everything else has been one letdown after another"-that sums up the problem and current state of the union.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


I want to believe, but outside of Trump winning the election, everything else has been one letdown after another.  I will not have hope again until something good actually happens.
An accurate and truthful post-"everything else has been one letdown after another"-that sums up the problem and current state of the union.
Which high level Director of our intelligence agencies during the Obama years was credible???
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 1:01:30 PM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment.



View Quote
But, I'm afraid they'll make Guam tip over into the ocean...
Link Posted: 11/9/2017 1:01:55 PM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Anyone that has been part of the intel community would never talk about "all 87 of our security agencies"-anyone who makes such a claim has outed themselves in showing they have never served in an intel/counter intel capacity.Re flag-no credibility.
View Quote
Would you also say someone who continues to make predictions and is never correct would have no credibility? You know, like all the NeverTrumps?
Page / 214
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top