User Panel
Quoted:
View Quote Winning. |
|
Quoted:
This may come as a suprise to you-most,if not all of our intelligence agencies deal with classified material.They can only share such information with persons,other agencies that are properly cleared and have a need to know. If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You may be certain that I'm not affording your biased opinion any more weight than I give to the opinions of the other Obama/Clinton lackeys, regardless of where or when they serve your masters. I note that the "intelligence" community never produced a shred of evidence to support that If you have watched Congressional public hearings certain government agency witnesses , will often say that they cannot answer a specific question(s)in that public setting because of the sensitive/classified material the answer may require. It is clear,based on your response ,that you have never had a government agency security clearance. When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them.Your opinion on the other hand is worthless and not needed by me.The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. You guys still have trouble getting the number of agencies who "agree" correct, one of you was claiming within the last couple of months that it was 17. Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain. |
|
Quoted:
Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
...When heads of our intel agencies,or even former heads of such agencies,say it is clear that Russia interfered with our election,I believe them... View Quote A person would have to be fucktarded to believe that lot of ne'r-do-wells. |
|
Quoted:
It's also clear, based on your posts, that neither have you or any of the other Dim lackeys here. Most of whom have pretended to be a part of the inner circle in Washington or have inside information, information which has invariably turned out to be wrong time and again. It's pathetic. You guys still have trouble getting the number of agencies who "agree" correct, one of you was claiming within the last couple of months that it was 17. Additionally, any honest person would look at those claims skeptically, because the DNC flat refused to turn the server over to any federal agency. "We never examined it but the DNC and Crowdstrike told us, and they're honest and above reproach". That, like many of the NeverTrump tards here, is viewed as a joke by anyone with a brain. View Quote Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking heads tell you to say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak. |
|
Quoted:
Where in my post did I refer to 17 intel agencies?I stated "major intel agencies"Also-I don;t know who "you guys" are? Pay attention to the MAJOR intel agencies-the ones that the Pentagon follows and listens to. Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking heads tell you to say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak. View Quote On top of that, the content is indicative of brain damage. |
|
Quoted:
Where in my post did I refer to 17 intel agencies?I stated "major intel agencies"Also-I don;t know who "you guys" are? Pay attention to the MAJOR intel agencies-the ones that the Pentagon follows and listens to. Could care less about the "DNC Server"-why do "you guys" always live in the past?You guys are a broken record, Whatever the talking heads tell you to say-pitiful -Is that all your cult has in rebuttal?Seems weak. View Quote I guess this is ok'd by the confirmation bias of a community that steadfastly maintains their faith in gov't agencies that have lied to the public and used their power to undermine and bully American citizens. |
|
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-08/icahn-subpoenaed-by-u-s-over-biofuel-policy-while-trump-adviser
Federal investigators have issued subpoenas for information on Carl Icahn’s efforts to change biofuel policy while he served as an adviser to President Donald Trump, according to regulatory filings.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York is “seeking production of information” pertaining to Icahn’s activities regarding the Renewable Fuel Standard, according to a Form 10-Q that Icahn Enterprises LP filed on Friday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. View Quote If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them. The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more. The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often. Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them. The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more. The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often. Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them. The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more. The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often. Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone. |
|
Quoted:
If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them. The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more. The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often. Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The fact that you haven't seen "a shred" of supporting evidence means nothing. If the government wants people (other than the hopelessly gullible and the terminally naive ) to believe its claims, it must prove them. The old "It's classified!" ploy doesn't work any more. The government's agents have been caught using it far too many times to cover their asses and have been caught lying much too often. Their credibility, like yours and your comrades' here, is gone. |
|
Fusion GPS co-founder cuts deal to talk about Trump dossier |
|
Quoted:
Watching these people follow the party line laid down by such intellectual luminaries as Juan Williams and Maxine Waters is harmless entertainment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Any case in which my best hope of winning was to bamboozle the finder of fact. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
You left out that he got that email within 24hrs of being fired. I’m sure he had other things on his mind than an email from a campaign volunteer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote Trump's done this time! |
|
Quoted:
Well he said that in the video link, so sorry the tweet wasn't sufficient. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
|
|
Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
Quoted:
Then maybe you shouldn't get your news from random shitbag's tweets and spewing them here as fact View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/7DF23558-949A-41E1-AFAF-E2C183B546C5-357590.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/4E11A351-6A42-410D-986D-FCA65C323D40-357591.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/1F5F82BB-DAE5-4ED7-9EE2-9E6E743F24A1-357593.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/327183/8C1B66EB-B4E3-4FD8-8CA6-91EAAC615D3D-357597.JPG View Quote ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those appear to be civil cases. ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon. ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case. These cases are between two other parties. |
|
Quoted:
Those appear to be civil cases. ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Those appear to be civil cases. ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon. George Webb Sweigart who has been investigating Hillary the DNC and was the one that broke open the Awans case. |
|
There is a lot of speculation that the sealed indictments are a way to put a gag on George Webb’s lawsuits around Awan Contra and Uranium 1.
|
|
|
Quoted:
"That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works..." View Quote I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you. ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432. |
|
Quoted:
Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls. I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you. ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432. View Quote |
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Now the profile picture, the quote and your signature are all trolls. I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you. ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
"That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works..." I'm fairly confident you're going to lose your account and we'll be done with you. ETA: I'm 3 for 3 in predicting that for NeverTrumps. So no matter what happens, it's better than the NeverTrump record of 0 for 2390842309432. Care to explain to the class how a "sealed indictment" (that we haven't established exists yet) would work as a "gag order" on some random guy that's part of a completely unrelated civil suit? |
|
Quoted:
Alright. Care to explain to the class how a "sealed indictment" (that we haven't established exists yet) would work as a "gag order" on some random guy that's part of a completely unrelated civil suit? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
"That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works..." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There is a lot of speculation that the sealed indictments are a way to put a gag on George Webb’s lawsuits around Awan Contra and Uranium 1. This seems to be "this posters" response to everything |
|
Quoted:
I can read. ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case. These cases are between two other parties. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Riiiiiight.... And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? View Quote No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts. |
|
Quoted:
I can read. ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case. These cases are between two other parties. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those appear to be civil cases. ETA: Civil cases filed by some #Pizzagate loon. ETA: A federal criminal case would list the United States first. The same as if the government was the plaintiff in a civil case. These cases are between two other parties. Is Kihn's explanation above correct about Sweigert? |
|
Quoted:
I want to believe, but outside of Trump winning the election, everything else has been one letdown after another. I will not have hope again until something good actually happens. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
This. Many of them, even one here a couple of months back, was repeating the "All 87 Of Our Security Agencies agree!" BS talking point, never mind the fact that's demonstrably false, and that the agencies in question never even laid a hand on the Dim server because they wouldn't turn it over, instead they were fed information from a third party. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
What exactly is "training in clearance" please elaborate and explain.Also please tell about your attending a "training in clearance" program-where and when. No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Riiiiiight.... And all those leaks of classified material and not a single shred of factual hard evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. We were getting leaks every day, sometimes multiple times per day....for over a year, and nothing at all. Even during the campaign, the dems and GOPe couldn't come up with a single damaging factual piece. LULZ. Have you held a clearance, of any sort? Any training in clearance? Hillary school of clearance, maybe? Anything at all? No response-you don't know what the f--- you are talking about.Sorry none of your cohorts have the balls to call you out on your bullshit,lack of credibility posts. |
|
Quoted:
An accurate and truthful post-"everything else has been one letdown after another"-that sums up the problem and current state of the union. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I want to believe, but outside of Trump winning the election, everything else has been one letdown after another. I will not have hope again until something good actually happens. |
|
|
Quoted:
Anyone that has been part of the intel community would never talk about "all 87 of our security agencies"-anyone who makes such a claim has outed themselves in showing they have never served in an intel/counter intel capacity.Re flag-no credibility. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.