Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 13
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:21:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

~snip~

Saber rattle enough times and Kim gets ousted in a coup.
If he tries to go to war, he will either die from us and/or he will get ousted in a coup.
Do nothing while DPRK internal economy, agriculture, industry grind to a halt, he will get ousted with a coup.
Surrender his nukes he will be ousted in a coup.
View Quote
Concur 100%, as would any rational/knowledgeable person.
Do you think Lil Kim falls into this category?

No matter what he does, he's screwed.   We know that.
So why does he keep upping the ante?


Serious question, and probably one that no one can answer.  I'm just thinking out loud.
Personally, I don't believe he's playing with a full deck

Edit:  see my post below
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:23:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It has to have landed somewhere by now? Perhaps I missed it?
View Quote
Seven hundred some miles off the coast of Japan, after going across Japan at the skinny part.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:24:47 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:26:24 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It has to have landed somewhere by now? Perhaps I missed it?
View Quote
Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:27:57 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
Oh no! It's Hans Blix!
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:29:28 PM EDT
[#6]
Fire and fury.

Or nothing. One of those.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:29:59 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Agreed...but it sounds like your factoring in Kim being rational.  If he was rational he'd probably would have turned over his slave-like population over to China's manufacturers and become the richest man on Earth a decade ago
View Quote
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:30:19 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
View Quote
Not a bad course of action.

Yeah the UN can go fuck a goat, but Trump not going to them and taking action would have the media creaming in their shorts.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:30:37 PM EDT
[#9]
Yea, Hans Blix will straighten out Nork...
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:32:29 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not a bad course of action.

Yeah the UN can go fuck a goat, but Trump not going to them and taking action would have the media creaming in their shorts.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not a bad course of action.

Yeah the UN can go fuck a goat, but Trump not going to them and taking action would have the media creaming in their shorts.
Eh, UN might boot N.K. from the meeting boardroom entirely. It'd actually be a bit of a big deal for N.K.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:35:02 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire walls to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
View Quote
Thank you for that, it makes a lot of sense.
But it still comes with a lot of risk based on assumptions that I'm really, really uncomfortable with.

I'd never cut it as a diplomat or politician.  I wouldn't have the patience for all this crap
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:35:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Time to.......
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:36:16 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Thank you for that, it makes a lot of sense.
But it still comes with a lot of risk based on assumptions that I'm really, really uncomfortable with.

I'd never cut it as a politician.  I wouldn't have the patience for all this crap
View Quote
Neither could I.

I could never tell a lie to save my life.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:36:25 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Shoot a missile right over the capital Pyongyang for starters, right over NK, so lil Kim can soil his pants.
View Quote
I like this idea, do it in a similar fashion to what NK just did.

Unfortunately I think it is a very unlikely thing to happen, the geography just does not allow it. Shoot from the Yellow Sea and you are shooting towards Russia. Shoot from the Yellow Sea and you are shooting a ballistic missile VERY close to mainland China. Shoot from the Sea of Japan and you shoot towards mainland China. This theoretical is starting to get in the territory where mistakes are globe ending. Sure you could do it with cruise missiles but send on NK may just shoot it down, send 60 and they make think it is war.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:39:31 PM EDT
[#15]
Get Goldar and Silvar ready!!
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:42:06 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
What type of lotion do you make people put on to keep their skin moisturized there?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm going to the basement...I have pretzels and pringles and caprisun down there

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jxsIW-4drxk/TKNgoZU4I8I/AAAAAAAAAGs/zc2Tpb6hfjE/s1600/Ellies+Basement.JPG
What type of lotion do you make people put on to keep their skin moisturized there?
Serial Killer IN THE HOUSE!
Buffalo Bill (Silence of the Lambs)
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:43:08 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Farse Frag
View Quote
I raffed.

J-
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:45:54 PM EDT
[#18]
Time to Japan to conquer and enslave Korea......again.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:47:44 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Time to Japan to conquer and enslave Korea......again.
View Quote
"Oh, Korea, you want more Japanese DNA?"
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 9:55:19 PM EDT
[#20]
so moar of the same..
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 10:00:22 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


"Oh, Korea, you want more Japanese DNA?"
View Quote
It might be the Koreans that take comfort women this time around.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 10:30:26 PM EDT
[#22]
B2's dropping leaflet bombs over Pyongyang full of little Kim memes....what does this mean? where did they come from?
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 10:31:46 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed...but it sounds like your factoring in Kim being rational.  If he was rational he'd probably would have turned over his slave-like population over to China's manufacturers and become the richest man on Earth a decade ago
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
Thanks for the education
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 10:39:03 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


STOP that shit.
You're advocating for the murder of an American by an enemy of the United States.


I can't stand her either, but your inuendo is beyond messed up
View Quote
I don't consider her American......
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 10:40:09 PM EDT
[#25]
start flooding those Norkie tunnels
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:02:35 PM EDT
[#26]
You want to really punish NK? 
Get the UN Security Council to require Obamacare to be implemented in NK.  They'll surrender within a few months. 
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:10:37 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Concur 100%, as would any rational/knowledgeable person.
Do you think Lil Kim falls into this category?

No matter what he does, he's screwed.   We know that.
So why does he keep upping the ante?


Serious question, and probably one that no one can answer.  I'm just thinking out loud.
Personally, I don't believe he's playing with a full deck

Edit:  see my post below
View Quote
Saber rattling buys him time. He doesn't need to commit. But everytime he backs down he loses more credibility. But eventually the costly ramifications of the sanctions embargos will catch up...

But if he can scare us, and others into deescalating to avoid war then China might try to back out of sanctions and embargos, claiming its making the situation more dangerous.

Kim could be batshit nuts but his faction is pulling his strings. That faction wants nukes to prevent war, not start one. While its possible shit could spiral out of control its unlikely.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:14:34 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Thank you for that, it makes a lot of sense.
But it still comes with a lot of risk based on assumptions that I'm really, really uncomfortable with.

I'd never cut it as a diplomat or politician.  I wouldn't have the patience for all this crap
View Quote
Loads of risk and lots of stress. But pull it off and we win without firing a shot and risking a very damaging war, physically and politically. Bannon was right, there is no real military option for NK, its diplomatic. But its the best option and as of right now its actually working out well.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:16:50 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well what the hell do you call a bunch of long tube shaped objects in a wet high pressure environment spitting out projectiles?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This seems serious.
If Trump doesn't respond, then it might tell the world we are spineless and don't mean what we say. (Again)
If Trump does respond it could put us in a very costly war.

Either way, this isn't good. We can't have enemy countries doing ICBM flyovers of sovereign allied territory.
One way or another, we're way past the point of the North Korea situation having a happy ending.
Well what the hell do you call a bunch of long tube shaped objects in a wet high pressure environment spitting out projectiles?
Destroying North Korea is the easy part. Taking care of our allies in the area would be the part that complicates everything.

But yeah, a few SLBMs enroute to that fat dweeb would make me very happy.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:25:08 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Neither could I.

I could never tell a lie to save my life.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Thank you for that, it makes a lot of sense.
But it still comes with a lot of risk based on assumptions that I'm really, really uncomfortable with.

I'd never cut it as a politician.  I wouldn't have the patience for all this crap
Neither could I.

I could never tell a lie to save my life.
That's why you need actors to play parts.

Like Kim, his job is to look like his grandfather, talk like his father, and act utterly ruthless. He was chosen because of all his brothers he had less negative stigma associated. He only gained office with the support of a faction that was loyal to his father,  and that faction now controls NK (and likely Kim too).

Trump is a great actor,  he's been perfecting his persona for decades now. And he likes drama, he likes acting,  see his WWE roles as the heel, fighting Vince McMahon and the loser gets his head shaved. See Trump on reality tv. He likes playing a role, he likes acting.

So of Kim vs Trump, the former is worse at playing unstable/unpredictable than the latter.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:26:09 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Thanks for the education
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed...but it sounds like your factoring in Kim being rational.  If he was rational he'd probably would have turned over his slave-like population over to China's manufacturers and become the richest man on Earth a decade ago
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
Thanks for the education
No problem, i live to educate.
Link Posted: 8/28/2017 11:38:16 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No problem, i live to educate.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed...but it sounds like your factoring in Kim being rational.  If he was rational he'd probably would have turned over his slave-like population over to China's manufacturers and become the richest man on Earth a decade ago
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
Thanks for the education
No problem, i live to educate.
In your opinion, at what point do you think NK would go hot?

 It seems if he's facing an impending coup, a dice role on a limited strike may have merits?  The great enemy idea and hope the world is restrained enough to leave him breathing.  
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:01:29 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If China actually followed through, it would be a huge deal.

China cut North Korean coal exports to zero, which accounting for like 75% of the North Korean economy, then BAM, trade with North Korea INCREASED 40%.

China is faking it while sneakingly supporting Kim Jong Un even more.
View Quote
And that is based on what source? Sanctions on exports only started weeks ago.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:06:21 AM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
In your opinion, at what point do you think NK would go hot?

 It seems if he's facing an impending coup, a dice role on a limited strike may have merits?  The great enemy idea and hope the world is restrained enough to leave him breathing.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Agreed...but it sounds like your factoring in Kim being rational.  If he was rational he'd probably would have turned over his slave-like population over to China's manufacturers and become the richest man on Earth a decade ago
He is already rich enough to have ANYTHING his heart could desire. He cut ties with China and murdered his own uncle, the chief minister that was pushing the NK-China alliance, because he wanted more independence for NK than China wanted.

He is rational. Everything you see is an act. He's a private school raised third son of a dictator that barely knew any of his sons. He wasn't raised to be a leader, he wasn't groomed very long by his father when he was selected, especially since Kim Jung Il was pretty sick at the end. All Kim Jung Un's power comes from the backing of the OGD faction of the NK power elite, who exist to ensure the Kim family remains in power and does what they promised to do. Save NK from the threat of a US attack by creating a nuclear deterrent capable of back off the US forever.

So at its core, everything happening right now on both sides is being done extremely delicately and with lots of rational thinking. Had it not, it would have already spin out of control and military attacks would already have started. However, nobody believes a threat if the person giving it isn't a little bit crazy, which is why both Kim Jung Un and Donald J. Trump both are up'ing the "I'm batshit crazy and will nuke you in a heartbeat" routine. Because its gambling, and that requires acting.

The rest of us are simply spectators, as if we're watching a hand of poker being played at the Texas Hold Em World Championship. We might know a few cards the players have, but we're really just along for the ride, for the entertainment factor.

None need get worried. What we're seeing right now is classic brinksmanship negotiation. Its what the fucking State Dept is supposed to be doing all day, every day, playing hard ball. Stress comes from the irregular nature of all this. We're used to seeing previous presidents either too big of pussies to contemplate this aggressive approach (Clinton and Obama), or they couldn't because they were too tied up in quagmire wars to pull off a credible threat to legitimately attack NK (GWB). And none of our previous administrations had the outright giant set of balls to threaten China with trade sanctions just to get their help on NK. That shit was brilliant, and I still think it was Mattis' idea, he told Trump early on how he would like to deal with various enemies through a joint political military approach. Because NK was on the verge of nuclear tipped missiles, they get priority over Iran, which is SURELY in Mattis' sights. Upon hearing Mattis' plan, no doubt Trump loved it, and being the Reality TV WWE entertainer/actor we know him to be, he delightfully plays the part assigned to him since NK as a legit nuclear power is pretty bad for the long term. Hell, Trump is playing bad cop to Mattis as good cop of all people, which makes sense, considering he isn't fond of his Mad Dog nickname, he sees himself as calm, collected, highly educated, urbane, a master of war and strategy, possibly the deadliest man alive to have as an enemy. And I'd agree.
Thanks for the education
No problem, i live to educate.
In your opinion, at what point do you think NK would go hot?

 It seems if he's facing an impending coup, a dice role on a limited strike may have merits?  The great enemy idea and hope the world is restrained enough to leave him breathing.  
I think if Kim is pressured enough he might crack, and his faction might foolishly and out of total desperstion, attempt some last "show of force" more aggressive than any before it, possibly even a limited attack. It call snowball especially if we FO totally instead of a limited response.

A coup doesnt necessitate Kim even being replaced. "The loyalist factions rescues Kim from traitor ministers who attempted a coup. The traitors were swiftly dealt with and now Kim is once again safe!"

One faction of advisers kill off the other but keep to the same puppet the other side used to be their puppet too. Kim is the puppet, and the faction that needs to go down is the OGD, which now essentially runs NK. THEY are the puppeteers, current Kim is only in power through their support, wouldn't even have been chosen as heir if not for him.

Think of Kim like Hirohito of Japan. Undisputed God Emperor of Japan, but proved he was a puppet as he would NEVER challenge his ministers, until they got nuked twice and.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:19:12 AM EDT
[#35]
China and Russia are not suicidal. If we went all in by means of a massive first strike against North Korea, they would bitch and moan and do nothing of substance.

It would, however, open up a similar course of action against Iran being considered a viable and likely course. We might not be able to save North Korean (or the North Koreans), but we might be able to leverage an attack on them to compel a lasting peace in the middle east.

If those that respect action and strength see that we will fucking kill them if they cross us, we can finally negotiate terms for their surrender (or at least terms under which they are forced into absolute and unwavering compliance with whatever restrictions we choose to place upon them).

If you scream "Stop or I'll shoot", the other party may wonder if you are serious. If they know you have no fucks to give and will kill everyone they have ever known and irradiate every place they have ever been, they are far more likely to stop and consider what you might demand of them next.

North Korea is the best hope for peace we've had in generations.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:32:08 AM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Saber rattling buys him time. He doesn't need to commit. But everytime he backs down he loses more credibility. But eventually the costly ramifications of the sanctions embargos will catch up...

But if he can scare us, and others into deescalating to avoid war then China might try to back out of sanctions and embargos, claiming its making the situation more dangerous.

Kim could be batshit nuts but his faction is pulling his strings. That faction wants nukes to prevent war, not start one. While its possible shit could spiral out of control its unlikely.
View Quote
Saber rattling costs Kim as much time as it buys him. Launching a ballistic missle isn't cheap, even for a dictator. NK may have received some money from Iran but they can't sustain that funding forever.  The way I see it, the longer this drags out the more likely the NK government fails.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:37:20 AM EDT
[#37]
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:52:53 AM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Does NK have a huge hardon for Japan ?

Maybe a stupid question but IDK ?
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 12:55:08 AM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Does NK have a huge hardon for Japan ?

Maybe a stupid question but IDK ?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Does NK have a huge hardon for Japan ?

Maybe a stupid question but IDK ?
You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 1:27:26 AM EDT
[#40]
Don't believe the Chinese, they are playing a shell game.

They are perhaps the biggest threat to the US and they are leveraging NK against a domestically weakened president.

Best hand Trump has is to build upon a solid alliance and game plan with SK and Japan to counter China and it's puppet NK.  
Pressuring China to reign in NK will never happen.  They'll make symbolic gestures but strategically they are bent on having NK survive.  

It's not NK refugees pouring through, it's the thought of losing the regional hegemony over their smaller neighbors.  They are bent on marginalizing the US in Asia while presenting a dominant influence over their smaller neighbors using their economic dominance over the region.  THAAD in SK?  China then says fuck you SK, we're banning your products and services in China and we'll ban travelers to your country.  They are a complete bully and evil when it comes to dealing with their neighbors yet scream of injustice when US is looking to impose tariffs on their crap and punish Chinese companies stealing our industrial secrets.  

China will not let NK fall, they fought a war over that chunk of land and whether NK fails by an uprising, or via war with the US, China will get militarily involved.  

Hmm...   4 Navy vessels crashing in the Pacific, coincidence?  I think not.  China is involved.  

I don't have much faith in Trump as those of you who think he's playing some 4D chess, hopefully he has good advisers who will get him a good game plan to deal with the underlying China threat.    

Don't underestimate the Chinese threat.   They are not our friends and they never will be.   Best we have is to solidify favorable economic/military/social relationship with other Asian countries to counter China.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 2:07:40 AM EDT
[#41]
Tag for later...
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 3:33:26 AM EDT
[#42]
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 3:47:17 AM EDT
[#43]
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 8:35:49 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does NK have a huge hardon for Japan ?

Maybe a stupid question but IDK ?
You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
Why don't you try answering the question instead of giving a snarky reply?
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 8:39:19 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why don't you try answering the question instead of giving a snarky reply?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does NK have a huge hardon for Japan ?

Maybe a stupid question but IDK ?
You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
Why don't you try answering the question instead of giving a snarky reply?
No kidding, the guy asked because he said he doesnt know much about those countries' relatiionship, esp during early days.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 8:51:10 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why don't you try answering the question instead of giving a snarky reply?
View Quote
Japan invaded unified Korea 1910 and utterly destroyed it. At the end of WWII the US controlled SK USSR controlled NK. The goal was unification, then a with alleged support of the USSR NK invaded a nearly unarmed SK.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 9:34:50 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Japan invaded unified Korea 1910 and utterly destroyed it. At the end of WWII the US controlled SK USSR controlled NK. The goal was unification, then a with alleged support of the USSR NK invaded a nearly unarmed SK.
View Quote
And to add onto this. Japan has several US military bases that we would use as ground forces staging areas and to launch air strikes against the norks.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 9:42:58 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
View Quote
Not much for that theatre, no.
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 9:47:21 AM EDT
[#49]
A couple thoughts...


This is the first time I've read reports that anyone was racing to find wreckage....I think someone shot it down and they want intel from the wreckage.


Secondly, I keep seeing reports of multiple rockets going over Japan.  Was it one or more than one?
Link Posted: 8/29/2017 9:55:54 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not much for that theatre, no.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


You're not much into WWII or pre WWII history, are you?
Not much for that theatre, no.
It goes back farther than that as well. Japanese pirates were raiding Korean villages in the 16th century. Cutting off ears and noses to display at home.
Page / 13
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top