User Panel
|
Quoted: A very Drunken & Completely Incompetent Sloth ... https://c.tenor.com/5j_-5ynIiFsAAAAM/sloth-beer.gif BIGGER_HAMMER View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This war is going to go down in history as the greatest war time blunder in the history of war time blunders. That is what's pissing Putin off. He expected Blitzkrieg and got the military equivalent of a sloth. A very Drunken & Completely Incompetent Sloth ... https://c.tenor.com/5j_-5ynIiFsAAAAM/sloth-beer.gif BIGGER_HAMMER Just wait untilo they send their A-Sloth. Silly Westerner, sinking of flag ship part of plan, achieves more egalitairian navy. |
|
With the fog of war and high quality Russian maintenance, it would not surprise me to eventually learn that there was a malfunction and one of those big P-1000 Vulcan missiles blew up in the tube.
|
|
For what it's worth Dutch mainstream media reporting has sunk But Russia says it's being towed.
Wonder what the casuatly numbers are with a Missle hit -> Magazine explosion -> On its side -> Sleeping with the fishes. All in at night in shtty cold water. |
|
This is from Russian Defence Ministry. Don't know how much I would trust it.
Russian Ministry of Defense: ?? The source of fire on the cruiser "Moskva" is localized. There is no open fire. Explosions of ammunition have been stopped. ?? Cruiser "Moskva" keeps buoyancy. The main missile armament was not damaged. ?? The crew was evacuated to the ships of the Black Sea Fleet in the area. ?? Arrangements are being made to tow the cruiser to port. ?? The cause of the fire is under investigation |
|
Reuters was unable to verify either side's statements.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-flagship-black-sea-fleet-badly-damaged-by-blast-2022-04-14/ |
|
Quoted: This is from Russian Defence Ministry. Don't know how much I would trust it. Russian Ministry of Defense: ?? The source of fire on the cruiser "Moskva" is localized. There is no open fire. Explosions of ammunition have been stopped. ?? Cruiser "Moskva" keeps buoyancy. The main missile armament was not damaged. ?? The crew was evacuated to the ships of the Black Sea Fleet in the area. ?? Arrangements are being made to tow the cruiser to port. ?? The cause of the fire is under investigation View Quote If it gets a tow we will definitely see the damage and will likely be able to determine if a missile was involved or not. |
|
Quoted: This is from Russian Defence Ministry. Don't know how much I would trust it. Russian Ministry of Defense: ?? The source of fire on the cruiser "Moskva" is localized. There is no open fire. Explosions of ammunition have been stopped. ?? Cruiser "Moskva" keeps buoyancy. The main missile armament was not damaged. ?? The crew was evacuated to the ships of the Black Sea Fleet in the area. ?? Arrangements are being made to tow the cruiser to port. ?? The cause of the fire is under investigation View Quote Hit it again. |
|
Quoted: So what would this Russian ship be classified as ? I'll admit I'm not that studied up on ships or Navy issues. View Quote The Slava is similar to our Ticonderoga class cruisers in purpose. The Ticos are primarily air defense, the Slava does air defense and surface warfare. It's a major asset, they don't have carriers so this one is way up on the list, I think they only have a couple Kirovs in service. |
|
Gonna be dark in a few hours over there. We must have pics of this smoking Russian cruiser before sundown. Come on internet, make it happen!
|
|
Quoted: For what it's worth Dutch mainstream media reporting has sunk But Russia says it's being towed. Wonder what the casuatly numbers are with a Missle hit -> Magazine explosion -> On its side -> Sleeping with the fishes. All in at night in shtty cold water. View Quote We will see. I don’t think Russia wants to let anyone know it sunk for as long as they can. “Towed away to unknown port for repair”. |
|
Quoted: Isn't that what I said ? Of course its a legitimate target. Doesn't mean it won't piss Putin off and bring retaliation though for the hit to his ego and Russian pride. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The ship was a completely legitimate target, and reasonable action for Ukraine. But that said I also was concerned about the reaction from Russia when I saw this. I get his point. I'm not even saying they shouldn't have done it, but it might have consequences. That is all I think you can assume from his post. Then again if they are trying to play it off as an accidental fire and not an attack from missiles maybe they'll shrug it off to avoid the embarrassment of admitting what happened. Isn't that what I said ? Of course its a legitimate target. Doesn't mean it won't piss Putin off and bring retaliation though for the hit to his ego and Russian pride. It could be bad. The Russians could start indiscriminately shelling cities, killing civilians, and raping the population. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: It could be bad. The Russians could start indiscriminately shelling cities, killing civilians, and raping the population. Are they not doing that now ??? Check the calibration on your sarcasm detector, that is exactly his point I believe. Hit it again if its still floating. |
|
Hmfph. I've got pics of a Slava class when she visited NOB back... in... the day. 89? I'll have to dig them out. Do the hull nos. change?
|
|
|
Pentagon official claimed it was still afloat and moving east...so I'd be inclined to say it hasn't actually sunk. Yet.
|
|
|
Quoted: There is a robot joint, an awacs, and there was a global hawk broadcasting on ads-B not long ago. The global hawk was right over top the general area of the sinking over the sea, but it went dark maybe a few minutes ago View Quote I think those assets are the most important thing NATO is doing for Ukraine. Doesn't matter what weapons you have if you can't target them. |
|
|
|
Quoted: There are 2 rivets up right now. I've not seen that before. One just on the coast of Romania and one looking at kaliningrad. E-3s up too. I think those assets are the most important thing NATO is doing for Ukraine. Doesn't matter what weapons you have if you can't target them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: There is a robot joint, an awacs, and there was a global hawk broadcasting on ads-B not long ago. The global hawk was right over top the general area of the sinking over the sea, but it went dark maybe a few minutes ago I think those assets are the most important thing NATO is doing for Ukraine. Doesn't matter what weapons you have if you can't target them. Why no pictures? Someone should be able and willing to confirm definitively whether it has sunk or not. |
|
Quoted: Serious question: how would an Iowa class hold up to a hit from a modern anti-ship missile? View Quote That would depend on the missile warhead size and type, and the attack profile, and where exactly it hit. Modern ASMs aren't built to hit 18 inch hardened cemented armor such as the conning tower of an Iowa class and still function. Similar story for the belt and face of the turrets. Superstructure, anywhere not in the armored citidel, and to a lesser degree the decks, tops and sides of turrets are more vulnerable, and things like optics, antennas are still fragile. Short answer is an Iowa is probably the most resistant exisitng hull against ASMs but I still wouldn't volunteer to get hit by one. Still could get a mobility kill, firepower kill, or mission kill on it. They could probably shrug off an Exocet, but a Shipwreck might be another kettle of fish. |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: This is from Russian Defence Ministry. Don't know how much I would trust it. Russian Ministry of Defense: The source of fire on the cruiser "Moskva" is localized. There is no open fire. Explosions of ammunition have been stopped. Cruiser "Moskva" keeps buoyancy. The main missile armament was not damaged. The crew was evacuated to the ships of the Black Sea Fleet in the area. Arrangements are being made to tow the cruiser to port. The cause of the fire is under investigation Hit it again. Die Hard - Hans Gruber Hit It Again |
|
|
Quoted: It is the flagship of the Black Sea fleet. The literal definition of a capital warship. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Belgrano (ex-Pheonix) was a cruiser. Cruisers are not "capital warships": this term is usually reserved for battleships, battlecruisers, and aircraft carriers. No. "Flagship" =/= "capital ship". Definition of flagship 1: the ship that carries the commander of a fleet or subdivision of a fleet and flies the commander's flag That can literally be a garbage scow. Being a flagship does not confer "capital ship" status. Definition of capital ship : a warship of the first rank in size and armament : a major surface ship (as a battleship, cruiser, aircraft carrier) Please note - the Merriam Webster definition includes "cruiser", but in this sense they are referring to vessels such as the Kirov class battlecruisers or the Alaska class ... substantially larger and more important vessels than the Moskva. |
|
Quoted: Hmfph. I've got pics of a Slava class when she visited NOB back... in... the day. 89? I'll have to dig them out. Do the hull nos. change? View Quote That was the Marshall Ustinov. I took the tour, traded some sweet swag, conversed a little via my rudimentary German that a few of them also understood. Ended up with one of those big round dress uniform hats, with the ship name on a ribbon and the big hammersickle pin, some packs of their horrible smokes, a wierd lighter, and a set of ribbons with a medal of some sort. They got a zippo lighter and 2 packs of Camel lights, along with a few loosies. |
|
Quoted: It's one of the largest class of surface combatant in the Russian navy, the only thing larger is the Kirov. The kirov is a big ole boat with a lot of hurt on tap. The Slava is similar to our Ticonderoga class cruisers in purpose. The Ticos are primarily air defense, the Slava does air defense and surface warfare. It's a major asset, they don't have carriers so this one is way up on the list, I think they only have a couple Kirovs in service. View Quote They have a carrier - it just isn't feeling well right now. |
|
Quoted: There are 2 rivets up right now. I've not seen that before. One just on the coast of Romania and one looking at kaliningrad. E-3s up too. I think those assets are the most important thing NATO is doing for Ukraine. Doesn't matter what weapons you have if you can't target them. View Quote Plus there is an E=8C from time to time. What is not so usual is that there is a Boeing WC-135 Constant Phoenix airborne over the UK now. |
|
Quoted: The Russians and the North Koreans have a fixation on large missiles https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQTuTFuXMAIaQu9?format=jpg&name=small https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQ5KU4XwAIH4qR?format=jpg&name=small View Quote In Soviet Russia, big missiles burn big ships |
|
Quoted: Neptune missile damage on a practice ship https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQViamX0AMUUuO?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQVianWYAMferq?format=jpg&name=medium View Quote Damn, I seriously want to see pics of the aftermath. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Damn, I seriously want to see pics of the aftermath. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Neptune missile damage on a practice ship https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQViamX0AMUUuO?format=jpg&name=medium https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQQVianWYAMferq?format=jpg&name=medium Damn, I seriously want to see pics of the aftermath. Not from a Neptune test. That is the HMS Boxer in 2004. Sunk as a target ship. That damage is from a harpoon, which has a 50% larger warhead than a Neptune. |
|
|
Anyone have a map of the current Russian fleet in the Black Sea? Would be interesting to see other ship available as reefs. For the time being, I would think that anything that can fire missiles to the shore would be an immediate target. Troop carriers and assault ships not as important at this point.
|
|
Moskva Cruiser: What You Need To Know |
|
Quoted: Pentagon official claimed it was still afloat and moving east...so I'd be inclined to say it hasn't actually sunk. Yet. View Quote That's unfortunate. Let's hope that info is incorrect. If it is still afloat, maybe we will get lucky and it will sink under tow or just be a total loss. |
|
|
|
New info is that it has “major” damage and is heading back to port.
Pentagon says it’s under its own power. Official Russian MOD says it’s being towed. I guess the Russian mod is more pessimistic? Lol |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.